before he left the white housei stopped at the border. that would violate the constitutional rights guaranteed even to non-citizens who are seeking asylum. >> they have a right to be treated fairly and humanely and given a chance to fully present their cases. >> late they are hour, mr. trump will speak at a campaign rally in south carolina for that state's republican governor. >>> presidential politics hitting the local level. three long time local politicians say they are quilting the republican party. they are making that announcement at a joint news conference this afternoon at city hall in san jose. they called the separation of children at the border a tipping point and put the blame on one person. >> the president who has really made good on all of his terrible campaign promises. this was just the last straw. >> i hope that this decision today helps the party understand that they need to change. otherwise, there's going to be even more exodus. >> all three say they will register under the no party preference. >>> keep california's g

housey, in 1988, the ethics committee opened an investigation into speaker wr ight receiving gives in exchange for speaking gain -- engagements and questions about his wife's employment. he became a publican. in exchange, he did speaking engagements and there were congressional limits on the amount he could be paid for those speaking engagements. in addition to that, he was also for the purchase of large quantities of the book at these engagements. that did not really look good. it is for others to look at all of the evidence and judge on that. charges what one of the was against him. they were also questioning the job his wife had and how much she was getting paid for it versus how much she was working. he addresses that in his response to the charges. was this just a job on paper, or was she actually working and receiving compensation for this? there were other questions related to speaking publicly and .ongressional honorariums a lot of these skirted the line of the ethics of congressman. so the house ethics committee conducted an investigation. they spoke to speaker wright and he

paul: what about junk insurance, somehow this is going to be housey insurance and not going to coverat you really need, is there any truth to that? >> i mean, no, some plans may decide to tailor benefits, that doesn't mean they will decline to offer coverage like maternity because of the reasons i have been describing, a lot of people who work for companies want to have, companies want to provide it to retain the talent. now necessarily it's not necessarily bad if plans are taylor today what -- tailored to what beneficiaries might want. some people may want higher deductible coverage that's less expensive. paul: allyisa, how optimistic are you, do you think it's expansive enough to allow more of the plans? >> do i, a lot of it will depend if it's upheld by the court. new york and california have indicated their intent to sue. paul: why would they do that? >> well, they can actually already basically outlaw the plan in their states, i think one they wanting to after trump as political issue, two, may may be worried that it could -- some people would leave exchanges. i think that's ove

paul: what about junk insurance, somehow this is going to be housey insurance and not going to covereally need, is there any truth to that? >> i mean, no, some plans may decide to tailor benefits, that doesn't mean they will decline to offer coverage like maternity because of the reasons i have been describing, a lot of people who work for companies want to have, companies want to provide it to retain the talent. now necessarily it's not necessarily bad if plans are taylor today what -- tailored to what beneficiaries might want. some people may want higher deductible coverage that's less expensive. paul: allyisa, how optimistic are you, do you think it's expansive enough to allow more of the plans? >> do i, a lot of it will depend if it's upheld by the court. new york and california have indicated their intent to sue. paul: why would they do that? >> well, they can actually already basically outlaw the plan in their states, i think one they wanting to after trump as political issue, two, may may be worried that it could -- some people would leave exchanges. i think that's overestimat

the white houseied i at the time. it was obvious the storyed 180 degrees. i'm surprised tha sarah sanders did not have more to say yesterday. she obviously is ham strung as well from the legal point of view. >> let's get to that. it is not a crime to lie to reporters. it is not a crime to lie torepo. yesterday, when confronte with the stories. the president's lawyers told the special counsel this. sanders could have said i got it wrong. instead. >> he didn't dictate, but, you know, like i said, he weighed in and offered l any father would do. >> this is a reference with a letter back to the outside counsel. this is pertaining to a letter from the president's outside counsel. >> what is your basis for saying it? >> i would not get into a back and forth. i would encourage you to reach out to the outside counsel. >> i think we need to be clear. rudyi may be out there and say these people made mistakes. sarah sanders did not say that. she did not address why she made the initial comment shed. have . as you pointed out, there were many things she could have said

now they have kicked out all the houseis intelligence committee members, so the only ones that are goingo provide documents to, in the whole entire house of representatives, only two republicans. paul ryan, the speaker, and myself. this is totally acceptable. it's a classic case of obstruction of a congressional investigation.re at the problem we have here is, who's going to investigate the investigators? >> sean: let me ask you about a staffer, kash patel. is he the one or one of the people who got kicked out of the room? i really want to know, when you threaten and intimidate, to use the power of that office, being the deputy attorney general, isn't that itself a form of obstruction, and does that raised the question of impeaching rod rosenstein? >>tell ywould rather not g into the names of thetaff. it's more than one. for the particular incident, there were three staff in the room but there's been many others that he felt threatened at different levels by the department of justice. they have not been intimidated. our members have not been intimidated. but what they have done now, how

as we saw, yet again, this weekend with white housey ress secret sarah huckabee sanders. >> white house secretary sarah sands says she was out for dinner last night in virginia when she was refused service at a restaurant because she works for the trump administration. >> here's what the press secretary for president t.ump tweeted she writes, quote, "last night i was told by the owner of red hen in lexington, virginia, to leave use i work for president trump. and i politely left. her actions say far more about tor than about me. i always do my besreat people, including those i disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so." >> seth: that's right. sarah sanders says she always tries to treat people respectfully. les see that respect in action. >> i'm not gonna comment on the attorney's specific comments that i haven'teen. >> you just said it's in the bible to follow the law. ou that's not what i said, and i know it's hard foro understand, even short sentences, i guess. [ auence oohs ] >> seth: he? he can't understand short sentences? the guy you workmeor can't er anything unless

the search of the houseis reassure them. the search of the house is continuing.rned of a brexit meltdown — in a secret recording made at a private dinner. a 90—year—old woman is seriously ill in hospital after being attacked in her own bed in north west london. more than 1 million nhs workers in england will receive a three—year pay deal worth 6.5% after union members voted to accept the deal. time for a look at the sport now. fa announced a winter break... from the 2019—2020 season — and that is happening in debris. they will stagger it so that premier league matches are on both weekends of the fortnight break they are planning. the efl have decided they will not change their calendar, despite the fact that they were consulted beforehand. the fa cup fifth round will now move to a midweek time and replays will be scrapped. the premier league will have a winter break. much anticipated. plans have been put in place for it to happen from the 2019-2020 place for it to happen from the 2019—2020 season. 0ne place for it to happen from the 2019—2020 season. one of the r