in germany i mean not only do we have the fact that this is a crime allegedly perpetrated by margaret margaret who was here some two years after his asylum was was rejected someone who apparently may have had some other brushes with the law since coming here i mean how how broken is this policy well the thing is we can see this as an isolated case as a big scandal now here in germany regarding the office for migration of refugees a so-called bomb it has been alleged that one of the branches of bomb in the city of bremen misappropriate the old mishandled one thousand two hundred applications in other words they accepted one thousand two hundred applications without the legal and the proper care and that has obviously been a very big debate here in germany now this element of this fourteen year old girl adds to this big scandal and reflects a concern that many. well in germany i have about germany's migration policy all right let's take a look at the folks who are sort of pushing this one step further which is to say the n.t. migrant far right part of e f d they are calling for demonstrations un

margaret brennan joins us now. margaret, it has been a long and fascinating road up until this point. what are you watching out for now that the summit is back on? >> reporter: well, it was interesting today to hear the y esident try to set expectations lower by calling this a "process." he's saying it's going to take tre than one meeting to actually get to an agreement. he bought himself some juplomatic wiggle room there to justify what he said he was going to do, which is hold off on new sanctions. the type of significant gestures that would keep this process going would be getting north korea to do something irreversible, like ship out or destroy some of its missiles and ultimately agree to let in weapons inspectors to verify just how extensive kim jong-un's arsenal actually is. the president also said today, you know, it might be possible an end the state of war on the korean peninsula. to north korea, that sounds a lot like a concession or a hint that he might be considering drawing down u.s. troops there. ys that not on the table at this point. jeff. li glor: that certainly sounded like an enormous statement when it happened. talking logistics here inside that room, who-- who is going to be there in singapore? >> reporter: you've got an entire white house team negotiating this right now. and right-- right now, the person with the most experience negotiating with north korea is the secretary of state. he's the one with the relationship, mike pompeo. but he says he does not yet know if he's going to be in the room and for how long with kim jong- un. so, they've got to come up with a game plan quickly out at camp david this weekend. >> glor: and, of course, the translator, as well. all right, margaretnnan, thanks very much. gi will be broadcasting from singapore beginning sunday, june gi, and the "cbs evening news" 11ll originate from there monday and tuesday, june 11 and june 12. now, an already troubling mystery in new england took a dark turn today. police in springfield, massachusetts first arrested a man for kidnapping. now, they say that three bodies have been found inside the house where the man had been living. ndnight, it is a major crime scene, and anna werner is there. >> reporter: investigators found the three bodies in and around tois small bungalow and today raed ground-penetrating radar to look for more evidence. authorities said it's the residence of 40-year-old stewart a ldon. a police report shows weldon war asase and the discovery of a female passenger who said she'd been kidnapped and physically abused. an officer wrote that her injuries were "grotesque and o olent," and included stab pounds to her abdomen and a o ssible fractured jaw. before being transported t

. >> glor: all right, margaret brennan joining us from d.c. brnight. margaret, thanks. tew york state today filed suit against president trump, his three oldest children, and the unump foundation. the suit alleges a pattern of illegal conduct by the foundation. the president calls the suit itdiculous. here's anna werner. >> reporter: the lawsuit filed today says mr. trump ran the daundation according to his whim, rather than the law. it describes the foundation as little more than an empty shell anth a board that hasn't met in 19 years. the complaint cites a series of transactions that new york attorney general barbara underwood says benefited mr. trump's own interests, an illegal practice known as "self- dealing." there was the $100,000 payment to fisher house foundation to settle legal claims against mr. rump's mar-a-lago resort. and the $10,000 of trump saundation money the suit says mr. trump used to buy a painting of himself. >> everybody's going to get a bot of money. >> reporter: and the a.g. pointed to this campaign event in iowa, in january 2016. candidate trum

first national guest. >> thanks, margaret. >> thank you very much, governor kasich. >> so pleased. >> welcome to "firing line." take care. ♪ >> "firing line with margaretver" is made possible by... corporate funding is provided by... ♪ ♪ ♪ >> you're watching pbs. ♪ >>> welcome to "amanpour" on pbs. tonight, two women making waves. dr. mona hanna-attisha, the american pediatrician who blew the lid off the flint, michigan, poison water crisis, joins me with her new book, and its devastating account. and jennifer egan, the pulitzer prize-winning novelist, whose latest work "manhattan beach" shines a light on the thousands of women who heroically manned the naval shipyard during world war ii. >>> good evening, everyone, and

first national guest. >> thanks, margaret. >> thank you very much, governor kasich. >> so pleased. >> welcome to "firing line." take care. ♪ >> "firing line with margaretver" is made possible by... corporate funding is provided by... ♪ ♪ ♪ >> you're watching pbs. ♪ [ wind rushing ] macdonald: do you remember when you were a kid, the day before your birthday, you couldn't sleep because you knew something special was coming? it's a little bit like that, crossed with the thought that maybe, you know, tomorrow there'll be a hurricane, you know, the weather's going to change, and things are going to get really serious. because you just know that life's going to change when the goshawk arrives. ♪♪ 10 years ago, my father died suddenly. ♪♪ stricken with grief, i fled from humanity. i ran towards things of death and difficulty -- spooky, pale-eyed feathered ghosts that lived and killed in woodland thickets.

margaret for the first time. hello, margaret, how are you? you're looking gorgeous. no more gorgeous than you, my dear. this is maren. hi, pleased to meet you. margaretsat down and put my feet up on my recliner. put a blanket over my legs, and i'm looking forward to the next day, because that was when i had family coming, good friday. i watched the programme. i laughed and i cried. i cried with you! and then at the end of the programme, it flashed up, now, ladies, go check your breasts. and i thought, well, i will perhaps do that. but when i woke up in the morning, this flashed across my mind. i read it there in front of me, check your breasts. so when i had my shower, i stood in front of the full—length mirror, and there it was. that one was much shorter than that one. this is the bad one. the nipple had gone right up half inside. i thought, ooh. i started to feel around my nipple and their was this craggy feeling lump. total disbelief. you said you had found you had an inverted nipple and your breast had gone flat. and that's when you had the alarm bells ringing, like i did. i've always had an inverted nipple, but it was slightly more inverted than

margaret blair is elizabeth's sister. >> he said "um margaret, there's been an accident. liz fell down the stairs and died." "what are you saying?" i just totally went numb. i mean, my sister. he's saying she died. she's young. she's got two beautiful little children. babies, really. >> reporter: those baby girls? they are martha and margarettook custody of the girls after the accident in germany. and then michael, along with his first wife patty, and then later with kathleen, raised them as his own. >> patty was saying that our birth mother was like a sister to her. she was her closest friend in the whole world. and it was said in our mother's will that we would go to mike and patty when they passed away. and, so, dad saw it as his responsibility and took us in. and stay -- we stayed with him for our whole lives. >> reporter: you didn't think, "that's strange, the petersons? who are these people? >> well actually, you know, i can understand how that could happen. this was her world now. liz must love these people and trusted them to the nth degree. >> reporter: elizabeth ratliff's body was flown to texas for burial. at the funeral, margaret was desperate to hear further details from michael peterson about her sister's passing. but to her surprise -- >> michael was very aloof and very strange. >> reporter: did he speak? >>

the scope for oil price will fall margaret david: -- will fall margaret david: donald trump -- will fall more. david: that is what he cares about more. marty: oil prices were at $50 a barrel when he was elected. it has been a nonfactor in the election cycle. it is interesting, that gasoline prices in the u.s. have risen. no one is talking about it. they are talking about immigration, not oil. stephanie: we're kind to work at how we can get trump's tweets into our economic models. he is in the residuals somewhere. alix: that is a blowout. david: i'm not your if that is a good idea. .second-story europe . pmi's. a chart shows, maybe mario draghi is right. they went up, came down, way over here on the right, pmi, coming back up. is there growth returning to europe? stephanie: we still looking at slower growth than last year. when we were hoping for, things were optimistic at the start. pmi's, average, still a bit lower than at the start of the year. we are not euphoric. for the some support european central bank approach. i got to hang out with mario draghi this week. david: that can all wi

margaret hoover! ♪ ♪ ( applause ) >> stephen: hi, margaret, how are you. >> wow! >> stephen: nice to see you again. >> great to see you. >> stephen: congratulations onlet relaunch and rebit, of "firing line." i was a big fan of "firing line," even when i was a kid. >> really, yeah? >> stephen: because i loved the way william f. buckley, who created "firing line," the longest host on television. >> so few people point that out. >> stephen: cvs hoe passionate about his argument of srveatism, and the way he thought the world should be. he was actually the father of the modern conservative movement. my first question to you is, young lady, now that you are taking over "firing line," when he created "the national review," his mission station was, "it stands afford history yelling stop at a time when no one is inclined to do so or to have much patience with those who so urge it." margaret> to the wonder and enjoyment of many, i will not be william f. buckley. i am not trying to be william f. buckley. and that legacy is such a heralded legacy. he is important to so many people and i approach this with a real respect for his legacy and what he brought to the table but i am not him and will not try to be him. >> stephen: it was a conservative show with conservative arguing with all sorts of people-- political, cultural. do you consider yourself a conservative? >> i consider myself a conservative to a certain extent. i moonlight as an l.g.b.t. advocate. i run an l.g.b.t. advocacy organization that works with republicans. ( applause ) we work with republicans and we make the case that freedom means freedom for everyone, and where that really lends itself at this moment in time is to securing full civil rights protections to l.g.b.t. americans because there are still 28 states where you can be fired for being gay, and it's things republicans don't know. it's mostly in red st

awe we're going to move to margaret brennan senior foreign affairs correspondent and moderator of face the nation, our cbs news senior security contributor. margaretwhat happens now? >> well, the president gave himself a lot of wiggle room today. he said i may stand up here and in six months say, i was wrong. so he has given himself some room there. he also gave the north koreans room to maneuver as well. next up, secretary of state mike pompeo has to become a salesman. he is going to south korea to try to explain what was agreed upon in the room. that wasn't on that written statement. that was released to all of us. then goes to china they have leverage over north korea sfeek to leadership about making north korea follow through on what they at least say are said to have agreed upon in the room. diplomats say there is still a lot of detail yet to be determined. mike pompeo and john bolton will meet with the koreans next week to hammer out details. >> michael, what did the president achieve at this summit? >> jeff, this was a diplomatic win for the united states. but we are far from a strategic win. it was a diplomatic win because the it was the b

margaret jones moore. you don't hear a will the about her. you hear about amelia boynton billings robertson on the bridge, down on the bridge on bloody sunday. margaret moore was on that ground too. amelia boynton billups robertson had on a bhite coat. margaretones moore had on a white coat as well. both of them were down on the ground. having fallen an then having been beaten on that bridge. margaret jones moore was a stalwart of the movement. she was a teacher. at my high school. she taught me english in the 11th grade. and she was always even at that time when we were not at the church and out of school, she would talk about the freedoms that we needed to enjoy. and she would talk to her students about what special people they were and never to let anybody diminish you. that you were a strong person. you were a great person. and just because you were african-american did not mean that you were any less than anyone else in this world. we really understood what the purpose was and we understood intimately what our mission was. and what the outcome was. that we were working toward. we knew especially after bloody sunday that we were making history. it's unfortunate that bloody sunday had to happen but we did know prior to bloodyi sunday when

margaret brennan, our senior foreign affairs correspondent and moderator of "face the antion." also michael morrell, former deputy c.i.a. director and now our cbs news senior security rintributor. margaret, what happens now? he reporter: well, the president gave himself a lot of wiggle room today. he said, "i may stand up here in six months and say, 'hey, i was ."ong'." so he's given himself some room there. he also gave the north koreans room to maneuver as well. next up, secretary of state mike pompeo has to become a salesman. k is going to south korea to try to explain what was in the in the room that wasn't on the written statement that was released to all of us. d en he goes to china and, of course, they have the most leverage over north korea and he will speak to their leadership about making north korea follow through on what they at least say are-- said to have agreed upon in the room. but diplomats say there is still a lot of detail yet to be determined. secretary of state mike pompeo and national security adviser john bolton will meet again with the north koreans next week to hammer out those details. >> glor: michael, in your estimation, what did the president achieve at this summit? >> jeff, this was a diplomatic win for the united states, but we are far from a strategic win. it was a diplomatic win because po was the best possible outcome of the summit. shared objectives to denuclearize, and an agreement to continue the negotiations. we're far from a strategic win because there are immetails to . and there was nothing-- to drive home that point, jeff, there was tg that the north koreans sreed to in singapore that they have not agreed to before, including in the early 1990s, and those talks over specifics ultimately broke down. >> glor: margaret, the president dropped out of the nuclear agreement with iran because he said it wasn't strong enough. that took two years to work on. so i think one of the questions here is what will the benchmarks be now? >> reporter: denuclearizes north korea is more complicated. not only because they have nuclear weapons, which iran didn't have, it took iran and the u.s. and their partners about two years to negotiate that agreement to ship out about 97% of their enriched material and to freeze their nuclear development. north korea already has usable nuclear material. they have the delivery mechanisms. they have the ballistic missiles and they claim to have tested a n sted a hydrogen bomb more powerful than the one that was used in hiroshima. so, there's a big unknown for u.s. intelligence here which is still, while they believe they heaneae they actually successfully aunch a weapon? and that's why inspectors need to get on the ground. >> glor: okay, some great analysis tonight with margaret bre

margaret hoover. what is next for the #me too movement, the resurrection of the equal rights amendment, and even new rules for miss america? today on "firing line." ♪ >> "firing line with margaret hoover" is made possible by... corporate funding is provided by... >> women's voices are being heard today like never before. women are standing up against workplace harassment and have turned to my guest for inspiration. gretchen carlson is a journalist and a former fox news anchor whose sexual-harassment lawsuit against her boss helped ignite a brushfire across the country. no longer friends with fox, gretchen's impact has spread across the internet, amplifying the already burgeoning #me too movement. much like that hashtag which remains forever present on social media, gretchen, too, continues to trend. she has taken her harrowing experiences with workplace harassment -- at least we presume they were harrowing, though her settlement terms prohibit her from discussing it, and turn them into legislative goals with the introduction of the bipartisan bill ending forced arbitration of sexual harassment act. surely the laws cannot change our underlying culture overnight, but since "firing line" has no gag order, she will discuss how her bill in congress can help. >> [ chuckles ] >> she is a new york times best-selling author, one of time 100's most influential people, a former miss america representing the great state of minnesota, and now chair of the board of trustees of the miss america organization, which she just announced has dropped the lifestyle and fitness portion of the pageant, formerly known as the swimsuit competition, and she has transformed it into a contest that rewards talent and accomplishment. gretchen carlson, welcome to "firing line." >> i've known you for forever. we should make sure your viewers know that. >> we have known each other for about a decade, and we knew each other even during that time that you were on fox, and that's exactly where i want to begin, because what you did at fox news by beginning a lawsuit and going through a process that actually ended up fairly favorably for you. i know you can't talk about the details, but what we can say is, through that process, you identified a problem with the system. you identified that there is a larger set of forces that were forcing women into silence, and instead of going quietly into the night with a paycheck, you've devoted your time since then as an activist to fix the system. >> i'm thinking about so many emotions, like the courage it takes to come forward by yourself before there's a #me too movement, before there's a time's up pin, before there's anything -- just me taking on one of the most powerful men in the world. so courage, first of all, is not something that you just switch on like a light switch. it takes years and years, and why is that, especially with this issue? because women are so maligned when they do come forward. so as much as you say that things worked out okay for me, not really at the beginning when i had no idea what was going to happen from moment to moment. >> well, and part of the reason it took so much courage is because you were forced into silence. >> right. so, this is the way that society has deemed to settle sexual-harassment situations... until now -- either settlements, which is what happened to me. >> uh-huh. >> then i can never tell you any of the details of my case, although my lawyers had a strategy in which to make my case public. so you can go online and you can read everything that you want to read about it, but i can't say, for example, on july 6, 2010, here's what he said to me -- something like that. but the other way in which we've chosen to solve these issues is through arbitration, and usually when i say that to big groups of people, there's this glaze factor. because nobody knows what "arbitration" means, although 60 million americans have arbitration clauses in their employment contract, so they should. >> arbitration in and of itself on its face isn't something so terrible, right? i mean, the idea of arbitration on its face is to unclutter the court systems, unclutter civil courts, create a more streamlined process for both sides, both parties to come together and resolve disputes. >> right, and so it was originally intended when the supreme court ruled on it 20-plus years ago to do just that -- to unclog the courts and to settle small-business disputes that really didn't need to go through the whole jury process. but what's happened in the workplace is since the anita hill hearings, a lot of companies figured out to use arbitration in a way of keeping their dirty laundry private. >> mm-hmm. >> because one of the stipulations of arbitration is that it's a secret chamber. >> right. >> now, they'll say to you, "it's a really good option for you because it's cheaper for you." well, not really, because it's not cheap. you have to pay these people about $1,000 an hour just to sit there and hear your case, and, also, they'll say, "well, maybe you don't want the whole world to know what's happening to you." well, i think what we've seen over the last two years is that the world has been taken advantage of, and that's why i think the movement has continued so vociferously is because people were angry when they found out that there had been this big secret. >> well, the issue isn't arbitration of itself, it's forced arbitration, and you say 60 million americans are involved in forced arbitration. oftentimes, they agree to it without really understanding or knowing because it's in all sorts of contracts that have nothing to do -- it's really pervasive. >> it's everywhere, and so for a cellphone contract, maybe we don't think that's that big of a deal, but when it's your employment, and it's a reason that you have to sign on the dotted line or you don't work there, that is not correct. >> uh-huh. >> there are a lot of really, really smart people out there who don't realize they have these clauses in their contracts until they get to a situation, hypothetically, like mine, and then they're like, "oh, my gosh. i have no recourse." >> so, is your dispute with forced arbitration generally or forced arbitration in the specific cases of sexual harassment? >> so my bill in front of congress, bipartisan, as you mentioned, which is a huge accomplishment in the house and the senate, is very narrow in scope because i want it to pass. >> mm-hmm. >> and in this hyper-partisan time that we live in, not much passes in a bipartisan fashion. so it's only for sexual harassment. >> so that's the pragmatic, but just on a philosophical level before we get to the details of your bill, do you have a problem with forced arbitration generally? >> so i generally do have a problem with it for almost every argument because i've learned so much from the process of being involved so intimately in these discussions and learning more about these laws. so i don't really feel that it's fair to force anybody into those situations because, in many cases, there are tons of people who don't have the resources that i had or the national platform to make my story public. >> right. >> so there are probably thousands of stories out there of people who have not been given their just due because they've been forced into the secret chamber. >> so your bill, ending forced arbitration of sexual harassment act, which, in this case, you have republicans and democrats in the senate and the house who have dropped a bill specifically to address this issue. >> mm-hmm. >> and i know for a fact, because i know you, that this didn't happen by itself. this is what you did. you went and found the sponsors, both democrats and republicans, for this bill. this is gretchen carlson's bill. >> well, thank you, margaretyes, it was a tremendous amount of work. what i've learned now, though, is that i have so much work to do to actually get it passed. so, i mean, i spent about 18 months walking the hallways of congress and meeting -- >> are you registered as a federal lobbyist? >> not yet, but here's what i would say to the members of congress. do you want to be on the right side of history or the wrong side of history? and do you have daughters? and do you have any woman in your life that matters anything to you at all? and they would all -- mainly the men would start telling me stories about their wives who had faced harassment, their daughters, their nieces, and so, then i would say to them, well, then don't you want to be a part of fixing this? because this issue is truly apolitical. let's take it out of the shadows. you know, let's deal with it. because when you do that, you empower more women to know that they're not by themselves. >> and what's important is that the sponsors of your bill are not

we are going to go to margaret, calling from arizona on a democratic line. good morning, margaret. good morning. host: we can hear you, go ahead. caller: yes. your previous guest, andrew from u.s. world report? i wanted to mention some things that weren't mentioned. one is when the mexicans do get here, they are given jobs. they are not taken the jobs from american workers. what they are being hired by is illegal employers who are star to do exactly what they want to do, -- scot-free to do exactly what they want to do, and a cheat the country out of taxes and the taxpayers as well. it is dances around and not said like it is. mexicans do not go around putting in applications. when they get here, they know where to go to go to work. they know who is hiring them and they make a practice of it. it is not mentioned and it is a big factor as to why illegals are working on these construction jobs. so somebody should address that angle of it. thank you. host: caffe from st. louis, missouri, republican line. good morning. caller: good morning. yes, i want to make a comment on unions. union

margaret chase smith moment for somebody. maybe it's for bob corker, maybe it's for flake, maybe it's for senator collins, senator murkowski. margaret chase smith stood up before anybody else and said joe mccarthy was bad for america. and it took the men four years to catch up. somebody needs to be senator smith here. >> harry litman, what is the case you would make from your vantage point to a republican with a conscience, a republican who still believes in the rule of law, republican who didn't like what they say maybe yesterday on the muslim ban being upheld by this supreme court, what's the case that you would make to that kind of republican that john meacham is talking about? >> well, it would depend, of course, a lot on the nominee. i think what jennifer said kind of hits home. you want, you want for the future, you want for any party as america an institutionalist. someone who even more than her or his specific views on individual provisions of the constitution, respects the role of the court, understands the need to check. that is more clear in this president than it has ever been. >>> now, there is a possibility that he wil

margaret hoover. she is bringing back the expectation show "firing line" hosted for over three decades. now it's margaret's turn to fire the questions. show her at work with house speaker paul ryan. >> something that's plagued republicans for decades now, right? when you hear the term work requirement there are some americans who hear a dog whistle. there are some americans who in their mind go back to 1980 and hear ronald reagan campaigning against welfare claims. >> it obviously shouldn't be. this is just as big a problem in rural white america as it is in any other part of the country so this is not that. >> big guest right there for margaretthis show was something special to so many for such a long time. big shoes to fill. >> big shoes to fill. i am not william f. buckley jr. some will breathe a sigh of relief. but, look, he did an extraordinary thing for our television tradition which is bring this rigorous contest of ideas to television for 33 years, longest running television host in history. nobody gives him credit for that. it's extraordinary and that's the tradition we're trying to do. bring back a really respectful exchange of ideas, so few places on television do you get to just be with one person for 30 minutes and do a deep dive on a single topic. >> you'll stick with a real long discussion in depth. >> in our media climate which is so fractured, a lot of people end up going to podcasts or other places for a deep dive on a single idea and that's what we'll return to television. thanks to william f. buckley jr. >> he was a legend as i said, conservative legend. you also come i guess from republican royalty. the g

margaret, lexington, kentucky, democrat. caller: yes, when i wanted to discuss was concerning the polling. as long as the sample is a random sample, they will be pretty accurate. host: margaretu are going in and out, but i think we got your point. gilbert from birmingham, alabama, on the line for independents. caller: today, the topic of concern has really been in mind to the american public. as a former united steelworkers employee, i remember in the carter administration where he brought forth a thing called the trade readjustment act, if you can remember. paid for having to suffer. now, when chuck schumer come together with donald trump on anything, it has got to be something pertinent about it. in yesterday's new york times, they said even chuck schumer said that china was our bigge economic enemy. they said in that same "new york times" article that made in china 2025 plan, that is only about seven years from now, and that we as a nation -- i am an independent -- if we as a nation do not come together now and try to stop china with this 2025 plan, made in china, everybody is going to have garbage and trash. host: how do we stop that? do you think tariffs are a way to do