i do not have a choice if i wanted to pay or not pay, or whether i wanted to join or not join. it is a fee that is mandatory, and in illinois and 22 other states, 5 million public sector workers were in similar positions. ,e have to pay to have our jobs and i did not think that was right. >> what do you do? >> child support specialist, looking at quarters and doing .ccounting type work >> for what kind of children? >> children of all aspects across illinois. i cannot be specific because it is a wide variety. anytime there is a child support order between two parties, we have to look at it and make sure everything is right. >> let's go to the legal side of this. when the liberty justice center took this on, on what legal grounds were you going to argue mr. janus's case? >> forcing people to pay union fees is forcing them to pay for advocacy.group's when a government union bargains on workers behalf, it tells the government things like how much it should pay workers, what kind andenefits it should apply, all of those are political topics. if anybody else talk to the government ab

ajit pai: absolutely. if you don't do that it is a violation pic in addition if it's an ethic of infringement the ftc has brought authority on an fair and deceptive trade practice authority or unfair authority. the new chairman of the ftc has did before congress inhering in which i testified as well that he is willing to determine to do just that. kim hart: do you intend, do you think the sec and ftc will work closely together to try to figure out if the company is transparent with you guys and therefore compliant with the fcc but the ftc may have considered what that means for consumers and competition landscape come you guys work together on. ajit pai: not only will we, but we are. we have a memorandum of understanding with sign that i spoken to chairman simons about the need to share information on a real-time basis. going forward we will work hand in glove to make sure that consumers are protected, we had a competitive marketplace. kim hart: you talked with reports of investment and infrastructure make

want to pay more? my guess is they would want to pay less, especially when in the last five years, the five most successful drug companies in the world made $50 billion in profit. as senator baldwin said, they pay their ceos exorbitant prices. so i would ask you that maybe we should learn something from countries around the world that are negotiating drug prices and lowering prices rather than demanding the countries around the world pay higher prices, which by the way i don't think they would. i don't have a lot of time. let me just ask you another question. during his campaign for president, president trump made a lot of statements to the american people, which turned out to be lies. didn't keep his word on those promises. he told the american people during his campaign that he would allow consumer access to, quote, imported, safe, and dependentable drugs from overseas. this is an issue that has had bipartisan support for a whole lot of issues. you have canada 50 miles away from where i live. we have

pay for the union politics. but what is political and what is not political, they wouldn't give you good breakdown of that. a lot of people are frustrated that they don't get good information about the union and what it is doing with their money. as a result a lot of people think it is going towards things that aren't helpful to them. maybe now, unions will provide better information as partners attracting more it members, which they need to do now in the public sector. caller: good morning. my question is, now that this collectivesed, as a bargaining agreement between management and the employees of the union, if you are saying now that you don't have to join that union, what is going to happen does management now have two different pay scales? because during collective bargaining, the way it stood now is that everyone got the same cache, the same benefits, even if they weren't paying union dues. now that they have passed a law that says you don't have to be part of that, is that going to allow management to se

are we talking about pegging back executive pay or increasing the pay of lower earners?a rs the longest pay squeeze for 200 years right now. people watching this will know that their pay has not been going up while the pay of cheap executives has been soaring. we very much want to see an increase in pay for the average worker, that is absolutely our priority. but i do think we should be looking at the pay of the top bosses and calling for restraint. many people running these businesses will say they risk losing their top—flight executives. it is like the brain drain. they will go somewhere when they don't have to because of this process. the leader of the tuc says many of these high earners willjust shrugged and don't care. is there a risk that that will happen and they will move? we have to think about why people are motivated to do theirjob. most of us go to do the job partly for the pay of course, but also because we wa nt the pay of course, but also because we want to make a success of ourjob and we care about it and we are passionate. those people would want to empl

they take your case and pay $500 before they start paying anything on your doctor bills or medication or anything. then plus you're paying, at least i'm paying $135 a month that comes out of my social security check for medicare. what happened to that money. my husband didn't draw his. when i asked the lady when i retired what happened to his she said nothing. she let me know i couldn't draw any of his because i had my own. >> thanks for the question. this is a very important set of questions the caller has asked because, i think, oftentimes people are under the misimpression that their own personal contributions to social security are being saved in an account somewhere under their name and somehow there's money of theirs that is not -- that they are just drawing back their own money after they contribute. that's not how it works. it's more closely analogous to an insurance fund. you're being insured against living a long life. what happens a lot of people who do live a long time draw a lot more benefits out of the system than they ever put in. people who die earlier put in a lot mor

we pay too much and they pay too little. i don't know it will work. we might end up paying more. >> you have thought about it. you are not sure if it would work to ascompanies to treat the u.s. the same way they treat u.k. citizens. how about a pilot project? gleevec andu take five cancedrugs and try it. when we take a couple of drugs and try it? get a best price contract and let's test whether it works or not and help a lot of americans who are suffing through high drug costs. >> could you please answer that in writing? >> senator burr? >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. secretary, welcome. would you agree with the statement that the policy challenge that we have in this committee and country is how to balance competition price with innovation killers? -- cures? >> i would agree. >> we have on committee numerous fasttrack initiative so we could introduce drugs into the marketplace quicker. do you agree that the length of patent life divided by the cost &d is the starting point to determine price? >> the short ofhe pent life the higher t pill end up ing

ajit pai: i think that's right. another example, rocket fiber, folks in detroit who were dissatisfied with some of the services the incumbent were providing some of those incumbents were not serving parts of detroit that a been written off for decades. they decide we want to do something about it and they run into roadblocks here nuts and -- roadblocks. nuts and bolts stuff like axis to utility poles or pipes. these are the companies necessary to provide a more competitive marketplace in detroit and provide access in some of these parts of the city. it's emblematic of the problem. we want to have a light touch approach because, in terms of access and competition. kim hart: you have said you think rolling back the net neutrality rules will be better , faster, cheaper internet access and help the competition. how will the fcc determined that? is it anecdotal? you have a lot of ways of tracking data and extensive reports on the state competition. how do you think the fcc should continue to track that? is there a need f

paying anything on your doctors bills or medicationio or anything. then i'm paying $135 a month that comes out of my social security checks for medicare and i'm retired from the state. i would like to know what happens to the money. when i asked what would happen to his, i was told nothing. she lets me know i couldn't draw any of his because i had my own. >> host: thanks for the question. >> guest: this is an important set of questions because often times people are under the misimpression their own personal contributions to social security are being saved in an account somewhere and that somehow there is money of theirs that they are drawing back their own after they contribute. it's much more analogous to something like an insurance fund where basicallyns you are being insured against the prospect of living a long life. so what happens is a lot of people that do this a longtime e draw more benefits out of the system but people who died earlier put a lot more into the system than they ever get out and so that basically what's happening is if someone

him hush money. >> sure. >> could even have a rational argument for paying him hush money by paying his legal fees if they so desired because of that business relationship, and yet they're choosing not to when his potential cooperation posesuch a risk to the president. >> you are speaking like a rational actor here, but the president has done nhing in like he has michael cohen's feel back, and that has been a problem. you forget that the president went on fox news and basically said i barely know the guy. very, very small boy. percentage of my legal work. >> right. >> and then his attorney, rudy giuliani, has gone on television repeatedly making this harder for michael cohen. and the reaction for michael cohen, from everything i know from my reporting has been these guys don't have my back. and from the first time i interviewed him last august, the way that michael cohen spoke about the president was like you were talking about his father, his boss, his hero in life. he could barely walk by trump tower. he would get teary-eyed because he missed him being there so much, to now a man

you can't pay your employees on time. the employees are having to pay for fish themselves. driving a bmw may not be a deal breaker as it relates to their finances, but it's a deal breaker as it relates to sending a message and leading by example. it just isn't right. do you have a profit-and-loss statement for the business? larissa: oh, yeah. right here. lemonis: so, $1.8 million in total business? and the business, on paper, made $148,000. gary: on paper. lemonis: and so, what it doesn't account for is any money that left the business to pay debt. from what i can see, swansons has a lot of business, and they actually make a decent profit, but between paying their mounting credit-card debt and sticking their hand in the till, that paper profit is really a cash loss of hundreds of thousands. this is a 40-year-old family business. it's a long time. it's a lot of history. it's a lot a fish. it's a lot of customers. it's a lot of memories. and those are to be taken very seriously. the struggle that i have is, the numbers are fuzzy to me. and with the numbers being as fuzzy as t

el gobierno dice que se paga sÓlo entran ilegalmente al paÍs..nte a pedir asilo, tambiÉn por separados. enrique: informaciÓn en univisiÓnnoticias.com. funcionarios de la -- el presidente trump insiste en que el tema es polÍtico y que los demÓcratas son los responsables de esta situaciÓn. todo esto en el marco de dos iniciativas en materia migratoria con las que la casa blanca y los republicanos buscan imponer condiciones en el debate legislativo. pablo: lo odio. por ver la separaciÓn de padres y sus hijos, dice. pero sorprendiÓ cuando culpÓ a los demócratas de esa separaciÓn. "es una ley demÓcrata", aÑadió. pero los demÓcratas pidieron que sÓlo hay un responsable y donald trump que fue Él el que ordenÓ esa separación familiar. >> recuerdo los tiempos cuando yo vine aquÍ. es muy difÍcil y no sÉ cÓmo mÁs pueden decirle a este dictador que tenemos de presidente que esto no es modo de tratar a un niÑo. pablo: la administraciÓn de separar a padres e hijos es desanimar a que otras familias vengan. "no somos hostiles hacia la inmigraciÓn. sólo contra la

is the gender pay gap narrowing?m will recruit more women pilots. is the gender pay gap narrowing?can help women get to the top jobs they will then get the necessary pgy- they will then get the necessary pay. it is not help women. it is helping business. and what isn't needsis helping business. and what isn't needs is the top talent. and people point in their own image. someone who looks just like them. the skill is to ask what we need tomorrow, what needs to be in the pipeline was to mark and many talented women are coming through. weight you think in asia, new zealand and the philippines, are doing well? —— why do you think? gender parity with a 12.5% to the gdp. we need women. here in singapore we have a female president and a female minister for manpower. their own new summits being conquered and we need to make a comprehensive in asia and around the world. a quick look now at the markets. flat or lower in early monday trade. this is after the war of words between the us and its g7 allies. with president trump accusing justin trudeau of engaging in bad faith politics. the top s

ashley: you cannot force someone to pay money into something they do not want to pay into.ndment right. liz: right. stuart: by the way, i don't think this had a direct impact on the stock market. it may be given it a little lift because when we got the news literally after 10:00 o'clock eastern time the dow was up 200 points, 190, now we are up 230 points. maybe give it a little help not sure about that. but we certainly have a rally in progress. we are up about 1%. now most of this rally is because we've got a softer ruling on trade. this morning it was announced from the white house that esntlly t flow of m into american technology companies from china would in future be controlled by a committee, no new special emergency regulations but a mmittee, the committee is in place and it is called the committee on foreign investment in the united states. that was a softer approach to trade. the market approves of it. now we are up 200 points. am i right in that that did help the market jack hough? >> i think so. businesses are flexible. they don't like tariffs but they can deal

and then you have to pay 500 before theyy pay anything then you pay $135 per month that comes out of my social security check for medicare and i'm retired from the state. so what happens to that money? when i asked when i retired and he told me nothing. so hee let me know i couldn't draw on his because i had my ow own. >> this is an important set of questions because often times people are under the impression that their own personal contributions are saved is the account somewhere that they just throw back their own money it is much more analogous like insurance fund where basically you are insured against the prospect to live a long life. so they draw a lot more benefits from people who die earlier they get put in more than they get out. if somebody passes awayea earlier they did not reap the benefit of that insurance value but somebody else in the system did. certainly there are issues with medicare advantage and the reason that medicare advantage payments were higher than previous projections. but it is no means limited to medicare advantage present not only with the trust fund b

and what do you think now, given what an issue equal pay still is always yea rs issue equal pay still much changed, because there are still people still struggling, are, especially women. the only ones i know who have got equal pay is the tennis players. what will you be doing there today? a lot of you have come from pale wood and you are meeting with other women at dagenham. what will you be doing this afternoon?” women at dagenham. what will you be doing this afternoon? i believe both mayors are going to speak to us and they want us to answer some questions, obviously. yeah. amazing to be there 50 years after the strike to began. very nice to talk to you. have a good afternoon. ok, thank you very much. finally, this is how not to drive even if you are fed up of sitting in a trafficjam. traffic cameras in the us state of 0hio captured this vehicle reversing out of the queue of cars after getting into trouble. it is thought the driver continued to drive backwards more than a mile, narrowly missing traffic coming on the slipway. police believe the driver had problems with their automat

government pays your medical care on their behalf however there are they do set prices for m.r.i. zur or various procedures that you might get medicare is for the elderly right so medicaid is. provided by the government to taxpayers to folks that can afford health care and i pay taxes and the tax revenue that i pay helps of fund the government's many kade cost but because the government would like to take the money i pay in taxes and bomb people defenseless people overseas and spend trillions of dollars they then come back and they tax me again something called obamacare they tax me again. to provide the health services that they say they're providing for people who can afford health care now here's my one simple question sense the tens of thousands of dollars a year we pay to offset the government's in a fit inability to fulfill their requirement. why can't i write that off as a charitable donation on my taxes it is a charitable donation i'm donating twenty two thousand dollars a year of charity to people who can't afford health care that's the way it's set up why can't i write t

the people trying to side between accommodation and paying for these fees, there is and paying for theser these fees, there is a family that is still paying back the £7,000 that they borrowed. a family that is still paying back the £7,000 that they borrowedm a family that is still paying back the £7,000 that they borrowed. it is per person. it is incredibly expensive and this idea of creating a hostile environment has spilt over into many areas of immigration and this is essentially creating an expensive environment where of course, a banker from expensive environment where of course, a bankerfrom new york who has come to work for one of the largest country —— companies in the world can afford it at for an asylum seeker this is unaffordable. this has been brought up because of the windrush scandal and lots of those fees are being waived for those affected by that. but we saw from the scandal that it wasjust people from the caribbean who had been a fa ct from the caribbean who had been a fact that, it was from across the commonwealth. looking at the daily telegraph. the we are. it is tiny

right now, i think most people watchign this will realise their pay hasn't been going up, while the pay for the average worker. that's absolutely our priority. but i do think we should be looking at the pay of those top bosses and we should be calling for a restraint. many people running these businesses are saying, "we are going to risk losing our top—flight executives here". because it's a bit like the brain drain — they're going to go somewhere where they don't have to go, through this process. like i think the leader of the tuc, and a lot of these high—earners shrug and don't really care. is there a risk that that's going to happen and they'll leave? well, i think they have to think about why people are motivated to do theirjob. most of us go to to do ourjob of course partly for the pay, but also because we want to make a success of ourjob. we care about it, we're passionate about it. and i think most people would want to employ somebody who is motivated by those kind of reasons rather than whether their pay packet is, you know, slightly bigger than the next boss next door. labour t

los lideres polÍticos dijeron que aran todo para frenar la expulsiÓn de este paÍs.za. muchos residentes insisten en recuperar los cuerpos de sus seres queridos . la cifra oficial de muertos es de 109 y 197 personas continÚan desaparecidas. erika: el volcÁn de fuego volviÓ a registrar una impactante erupciÓn amenazando a la poblaciÓn de escuintla, pero a los sobrevivientes y damnificados no les importan las nuevas amenazas, desean recuperar los cuerpos de sus seres queridos. >> exigimos mÁs bÚsqueda, porque aunque sean los huesos de mis hijos yo los quiero. unos hijos tan buenos, estudiantes! mi niÑa, yo la necesito. erika: norma siente la muerte en vida y al ver que los equipos de socorro no realizan ninguna labor de rescate, decidiÓ adentrarse en la montaÑa para ir a buscar con sus propias manos a sus familiares. carlos es un rescatista que llegÓ a guatemala con sÓlo un deseo, ayudar a los damnificados. carlos: usted sabe que estÁn ahÍ adentro y haría lo posible por ir por ellos. no tengo familiares, pero me duele en el corazÓn ver gente sufrir asÍ. erika: -- tambi

. >> y el paÍs por primera vez sabe cÓmo es la migra.en jaulas. pablo: son casi 200 los indocumentados muertos en los centros de detenciÓn de ice. el acceso de la prensa a los centros de detenciÓn es extremadamente limitado. estas crÍticas podrían ayudar a entender el por quÉ. enrique: con la firma de la orden ejecutiva que detiene la separaciÓn familiar se ha detenido parte de la polÍtica cero tolerancia con la que se presentaban cargos criminales a todos los inmigrantes llegaban a la frontera sin documentos. muchas familias estÁn siendo liberadas bajo ciertas condiciones mientras se procesan sus casos. pedro rojas nos cuenta de estos casos en la frontera. pedro: a toda marcha se ha reanudado la liberaciÓn de familias indocumentadas luego de que el presidente trump por decreto suspendida la separaciÓn de familias. jorge ramos es uno de los padres que saliÓ junto a su hijo de seis aÑos. >> mucha gente. pedro: ¿ a quÉ ciudad va? >> a florida. pedro: entre los cientos de liberados encontramos a hermÁlez y su pequ conocimos el miÉrcoles. su

6.5% pay rise over three years.ree yea rs is less unanimous decision. 6.5% over three years is less than projected inflation, which again gives people a lowering of their standard of living. these people work long hours and saw the nhs through the winter crisis on their regard this as an insult. what is your take on why there was such a gulf between the view of your members on this offer and the views of the members of the unions who voted for it, in that case overwhelmingly, to accept the pay deal? i can't answer for the other unions, i am pay deal? i can't answer for the other unions, iam here pay deal? i can't answer for the other unions, i am here to represent gmb members. but do you have a take on why there was such a gulf in the opinion? no. we heard earlier from the lead negotiator for the unions that those who voted for this deal felt it was the best that could be achieved through negotiations. so what is next for the gmb? is it further negotiations or some further action like a strike? our next steps are do

they're willing to pay more to strengthen it. but the problem, as congressman rice pointed out, is it's really difficult because it means people are either paying more or getting less. everyone is willing to always put that choice off until tomorrow. so we've put that choice off into another tomorrow and another tomorrow and another tomorrow. i'm also not optist mystic thmi this year is going to be the year or even this administration is going to be the administration, with one news story breaking every hour. it doesn't give us the space to have the reasonable and constructive discussions that we're having here and educating the populous, as you said, that's so important in order to really get people to buy into a solution. of course, the bipartisanship that will absolutely be necessary doesn't seem very plausible in this moment. >> can i justed a, i have one other thing that's important. congressman larson mentioned this. framing is very important also in how you sell this. if you do surveys, you ask people, are you willing to p

significant co-pay. but in a few years from there came along the affordable care act. and it changed everything with how i was insured for my health care needs moving forward, both insurance access -- both insuring accession and treatment with financial protections. needless to say i slept better that night. i joined the washington state health care exchange, called apple health. we grow apples. my insurance premiums were cut in half while maintaining the exact same level of care and i was able to maintain and keep my xisting treatment team which i cannot even begin to tell you how huge that is. with the recent rumblings here in washington, d.c. torques abolish the a.c.a., me, along with 16 million other cancer patients alone, are extremely concerned about maintaining our access to quality health care coverage. especially when it comes to pre-existing conditions which we will all have. health care is the number one cause of bankruptcy in the united states. that probably doesn't come as a surprise to too

you know i'm not saying that at all i'm saying that germany cannot afford to pay for the eurozone but what germany has a duty to do to itself as well does to europe is to help but he designed the architecture of the euro so that the german treasury does not have to pay for it let me give you a very simple example as we speak up to three trillion euros is sitting idly in bank accounts of the continent not being invested in productive activity so it is not a question of whether germany should pay it's a question of whether we as europeans together and he designed the rules of the eurozone game in such a way as to enable money which is already there savings that have not been invested excess savings to be invested in order to produce think i'm struggling europe that will pay for that recovery which we need in order to be able to avoid situations like with that which we have now we need really well human to human to these these savings. to see that from a german perspective many much of this savings are german savings and the view from germany is we've given so much money to the greek the

a niÑos sobre los enjaulados de una manera que no es lo que representamos en este paÍs.ienesemanas despuÉs de que se le previene la entrada a un senador a uno de los centro generando preguntas sobre si el gobierno trata de ocultar algo. hoy aquÍ se vieron protestas en contra de esta polÍtica de cero tolencia. curiosamente antes de que llegaran los legisladores al Área, la patrulla fronteriza realizo una conferencia de prensa aclarando que nos separa a bebÉs de sus padres. >> no estamos con la capacidad de poder enjuiciada 100% de los que son elegibles para ser deportados. yo en esta Área, no estamos enjuiando a nadie que venga con niÑos de cuatro aÑos o menor. cavia: la patrulla fronteriza nos invitoa hacer un tour pero no pudimos grabar. mientras yo estaba caminando un grupo de madres me empezÓ a gritar, me empezaron a preguntar dÓnde estÁn mis hijos, dÓnde estÁn mis hijos?era una detrÁs de la otra. yo les preguntÉ con diseÑo tenÍan y me dijeron cinco aÑos, 13 aÑos, de verdad son unas escenas desgarradoras. regresÓ con ustedes a los estudios. fÉlix: mientras esto ocurrÍ

it. >> i pay it because i wrote a column about this. >> i believe you pay it but in general nobody pays it people would buy a $3,000 television and 8% is a big deal. so if you're best buy who i think is most advantaged by this, because they sell big ticket items and they sell against online all the time. so if you're them, you have been fighting this 8 percentage point battle against big ticket items that people will change buying habits over all the time. >> so it helps best buy. >> but in general this is a bad thing if you're a small online only retailer. this isn't going to hurt amazon. in 2017 they finally started paying sales tax on the last state but for third party players on amazon they still don't collect the sales tax. >> it's more complicated for them because they're not big enough to develop the software that it takes to come one the 10,000 jurisdictions and different rules and levies that take place. >> yes but you know who is amazon, so what are they going to do? sell the service to the small player the technology exists. the software is all there. amazon does this every d

how are we going to pay for this? are you part of theion e we paying through revenue's tax or general fund, you heard estimated price tag is $1.9 billion. >>ke we haveeen thinking through different models about how to pay for this. a lot of exercises the city is going throug fundamentally here you have a large infrastructure component typically the city would seek au to borrow foro stretch over the life of the asset and then there is another component of the cost that is likely to be going annual operating expense, where we couldn't borrow money and would want to have a pay as you go source available. >.as linda has noted, there is a number of unknowns that are intended to become clear through the procurement process. >>speaker: is that the$44 on og ker:ea yes, $44 million operating cost will become clearer as the process prosodass based on estimated work. the other is what is buildout cost going to be like. that is nottiest the result o na hard, and that is a tgn financial unknown regarding what we are looking at. us

oddly we could move to a world where they pay even less than they're paying with and we get stuck paying more for patient access. i'm happy to talk with you about that and think of solutions there. >> the operative word is could. the opposite is true, this all could work really well for the united states. so guess the point is, why don't we give it a real world trial instead of talking theoretical and liste t the academicsnd the bureaucrats in the department talk about the theoretically possible, take one or two and see in the real world works and doesn't work? >> happy to talk with you aut that. the issue if we were to try something there does it create a problem for patients here in the united states in terms of access or create a precedent that in the international community we would be hung over our head. >> of course if it does we can stop it and say it didn't work. i know a lot o times we're reluctant to admit we're wrong, but we could stop it, right? >> if it hasn't done irreparable harm. that's one of the issues i want to work with you on. >> senator murray talking about companie

rit now hhs just pays the bill. that's it. and while attempting to develop drugs that fit into part d. rather than part we are going to look at ways to merge and create competition with the savings can be obtained, leverage the options but to ensure that patients remain at the center. third, we need a more competitive marketplace. thanks to the reforms that passed in the 1980s america has the strongest generic market of any country in the world. but there is still too many ways in which the drug companies are blocking competition. since the rollout of the administration blueprint, they'll be publicizedhe names of companies that may be using safety programs to block competition and we issued new guidance as to lessen the effect of the actions they have on the genetic approvals. this follows many of the accomplishments under the commissioner including record-setting drug approvals an 2012017 and measures to build on the congress is work t was workd a genuine competitive market for the similar finally, we need to bring down the o

la vÍctima mÁs reciente y mÁs inocente de la crisis de hambre y escasez que vive este paÍs.ebÍa pesar siete. francisco:hace tres aÑos lucÍa fuerte y activa. roberta no estarÁ más, perdiÓ su batalla contra el hambre y rindiÓ su vida. el zoológico permaneciÓ cerrado este martes. su cuerpo estaba siendo na aut. >>ahora van a decir que estaba vieja, que tenÍa 80 aÑos, que no le funcionaban los riÑones, tenÍa problemas estomacales y digeivos... cualquier cosa, pero todo eso se locasionóntacÓ. francico: no hay que ir muy lejos para encontrar la causa de su muerte. hubo ofrecimientos para trasladarla a zoolÓgicos extranjeros y las autoridades del parque lo rechazaron. francisco: los animales del zoolÓgico con el Ís,siguen esta trÁgica muerte. nadie en el gobierno de nicolÁs maduro se hace responsable. ilia: lastimosamente, todos los dÍas recibimos poes que nos muestran, y que le muestran al mundo la crisis que vive venezuela.. jorge: el tema de la escasez de la que hablamos hace semanas, y cÓmo ha afectado la desnutriciÓn infantil.. s mueren de hambre. ahora este caso en el zoolÓgi

el presidente reitero que un pais sin fronteras un pais, ademas que los estadounidenses claman por la seguridad.. el dia de hoy el tema de la frontera fue abordado tanto por jeff sessions, fiscal general, kristine ielsen, secretaria de seguridad nacional y el mandatario... y precisamente por este panorama, "tornillo", la ciudad en texas, pasara de ser una pequeqa comunidad silenciosa con un poco mas de mil quinientos habitantes, al foco de la controversial politica de "tolerancia cero"...alli hasta el viernes el refugio tenia 400 camas preparadas para recibir menores separados de sus padres en la frontera, pero el representante federal republicano, will hurd, quien ha visitado varios de estos lugares se mostro decepcionado por la falta de informacion de la administracion trump... ademas, se evalua si se aumenta la rapidamente con juan carlos gonzalez, quien nos amplia esta informacion desde tornillo, una ciudad en medio de desierto... el comentario lo hizo hoy ante la conferencia nacional de alguaciles en nueva orleans. ante todo esto.. la primera dama de ante todo esto.. la nueva orl

lemonis: why would the business pay for that?ler: i mean, there's so many personal expenses in here. lemonis: your personal expenses? skyler: matt's personal expenses. matthew: he's talking about mine. 'cause i wasn't paying myself salary, so a lot of things did probably get grouped in here that probably shouldn't be. lemonis: does it bother you that his personal expenses are in the business? charlotte: only because it's, like, not quantifiable. like, we have no idea how much you've been, like, "paid." you know what i mean? matthew: because i wasn't paying myself a salary. so, if i pay myself a salary, it would've been fine. so, that's what we decided to do, marcus. so, i am now officially on payroll. so, i didn't pay myself for the 2 years before that. i still didn't want to take a salary to any capacity, so i charged, literally, what i had to. lemonis: let's go through the p&l. "revenue of $1,798,000. gross profit of 1,102,000. total expenses of $1,129,000. $27,000 loss." add depreciation in -- $66,000 -- it's a $93,000 loss. s

congress is refusing to pay for the wall. president trump started jailing babies and toddlers and children of all ages in april and did it without legislation from congress, he did it without an executive order. he just did it through a memo issued by the attorney general to federal prosecutors on our southwest border states entitled zero tolerance, and that memo to prosecutors was a change in the policy of how these children were handled. it was a change in the way the trump administration was handling these children right up through march of this year. the president to do that just needed to tell jeff sessions to tell his prosecutors to do that. now all the president would have to do is tell his prosecutors to stop doing that. to stop prosecuting every family who crosses the border without the proper documentation. today the president issued an executive order. an executive order that helps none of the babies and children who are in custody tonight. it seems the president will continue to per sue a zero tolerance policy and

in saying the country must meet its challenges challenges the middle class hope they won't have to pay for how middleburg d.c. al jazeera. still ahead on the bulletin evonne supreme leader says his country for not being bullied and issued a warning to western nations challenging head ons for the stickiness alcohol plan where we're actually physically being targeted by a president and government fighting for palau going to what's being called a pink wave of cat. for us midterm election. i. mean the weather sponsored by cateye always however costs a lot of hot and dry weather across the middle east now so no more service is pretty much been received we have still got those showers coming out of the black sea for the caspian sea some lovely downpours still a possibility he said positive he could see some showers long spells of frame for a time for most despondent try syria lebanon jordan all the way down is israel will warm sunshine twenty seven celsius there for beirut it's hot sunshine for baghdad at around forty three degrees celsius was enough in kabul and also into karate getting wel

so at the very least you can look at the data, we love data, right, on paper, pay women what you're paying the men. seems pretty simple. >> you can watch this and other programs online at booktv.org. >> here is a look at upcoming book fairs an festivals coming around the country. on june 16, presidential library museum holds the roosevelt tenure. also later this month in new orleans, it's the american library association's annual conference with keynote speaker michelle obama. annual conference, freedom fest in las vegas. for more information about upcoming book fairs and festivals and watch our previous festival coverage, click the book fair's tab on our website, book tv. now, final author talk from the day. a conversation about syria between middle east politics professor wendy and quran lina. today's program will be broadcast live on c-span's 2 book tv. this time at tend for q&a session, we ask microphone to the side so home-viewing audience can hear your question. before we begin today's program we ask that you silence your cell phones and turn off your camera flashes. please welcome l

marchly on the issue of executive pay. he's brought that same commitment to public good during his time at the s.e.c. and he is here to discuss important research and the sent to which corporate insiders are personally benefitting from buy bask. we're so grateful he could join us and start off the discussion. >> well, thank you so much for that very kind introduction. i've so long admired all that do you to promote an economic agenda and i share your commitment to making sure our markets are safe and efficient and fair for all americans. i want to thank my good friend who in addition to being director of economic policy has been a critical source for wisdom for me. and a close friend and counsellor to our days together in the obama treasury in 2009. before i begin, let me stay views i am about to express are my own and don't reflect views of the commission, my fellow commissioners or the s.e.c. staff. and let me say my own standard caveat. i hope to show my colleagues that i am completely correct in everything i say and do

government pays your medical care on their behalf however there are they do set prices for m.r.i. zur or various procedures that you might get medicare is for the elderly right so medicaid is. is provided by the government to taxpayers to folks that can afford health care and i pay taxes and the tax revenue that i pay helps of fund the government's met it cost but because the government would like to take the money i pay in taxes and bomb people defenseless people overseas and spend trillions of dollars they then come back and they tax me again something called obamacare they tax me again. to provide the health services that they say they're providing for people who can afford health care now here's my one simple question sense of thousands of dollars a year we pay to offset the government's in a fit inability to fulfill their requirement why can't i write that off as a charitable donation on my taxes it is a charitable donation i'm donating twenty two thousand dollars a year of charity to people who can't afford health care that's the way it's set up why can't i write that off we

so how do you pay for this? simple doing what actuaries would do if you take a look to realize you have not made an adjustment since 1983, we need to make an adjustment to make everybody contribute an additional 1% both the employer and employee. but that contribution even at 1% represents a lot of money so that is phased in over 25 years to come out .05% or, to make it easier to understand if you make $50000 a year, it would cost 50 cents a week to fix social security. that is where starbucks comes in i was in broward county and said how much do you think the starbucks latte cost? every senior new is $4.50. or nine weeks of social security payments. we can enhance a program to lift the caps on people of incomes over $400,000. so even at $400,000 what we are proposing for social security, it cost you more per week to buy starbucks latte fan to fix social security program with all enhanced benefits that we just laid out. why is that important? especially here you know because we don't increase the national debt.

el Último mundial en el paÍs se realizÓ en 1994.> en los 80 juegos que realizaran un periodo de cuatro dÍas 60 se llevarÁn a cabo la uniÓn americana y la gran expectativa es si houston serÁ una de las ciudades anfitrionas. especialmente por el gran impacto econÓmico que representarÍa para lciudad. >> es un impacto muy grande para la ciudad de houston y laÁ juegos. mÁs o menos un promedio de 350 a $400,000,000. >> aunque houston se perfilan de la ciudades favoritas para organizar un evento de esta magnitud, por su experiencia con la copa centenario, el juego de las estrellas, y la copa de no es of desde ya mucho se hace la idea de que en unos aÑos podrÁn vivir esta gran experiencia. >> para mÍ creo que las decisiones asÍ. una comunidad, la de houston con tantos latinos y tantos internacionales. es increÍble. es una comunidad increÍble para juego de fÚtbol aquÍ. >> feliz porque ahora ya no tendrÉ que soÑar a viajar, este mundial. tenÍa ganas de ir este mundial pues muy largo, saber que podemos gastar mÁs. estando locales serÍa mucho m

son cifras que dio un aumento de 75% de la tasa de homicidios en el paÍs en los Últimos tres aÑos. obviamente tenemos que saber quÉ pasa. ivÁn: este es el momento en que candidato fernando fue asesinado un tiro en la cabeza, justo despuÉs de un debate en mÉxico. el asesino espero el momento justo para cometer el crimen y despuÉs huyo. >> entendimos el dolor y el daÑo que la violencia le genera a nuestro paÍs. ivÁn: donde tambiÉn se libra una guerra contra el narcotrÁfico , en otros estados de la naciÓn, el candidato josÉ fue igualmente abatido en plena campaÑa. >> nadie sabe mi dolor que yo siento ahora. mi hijo era un guerrero, un muchacho decente. mi hijo luchÓ desde chiquito. >> es una cobardÍa lo que estÁn haciendo. ivÁn: la ola de asesinatos que se apoderÓ del paÍs ha cobrado la vida de decenas de candidatos sin que hasta el momento las autoridades hayan podido hacer nada por detenerla. >> algunos de estos incidentes no tienen que ver con informaciÓn con lo que contamos, con que haya perdido la vida por su carÁcter de precandidato o candidatos sino que tiene que ver con incide

don't pay it. a class action. so it's going to be very interesting to see how many people fall into category "a," which is they have the money and aren't paying, or "b," as eric was saying, they simply can't pay. by the way, in the lawsuit, the notice gives them 60 days after the 40 days. when you get a revocation notice, it says you have 60 days to clear it up. in my experience, day to day, you can go to a court, cite hardship, make arguments, et cetera. >> shannon: you're talking 100 days total from the time of the judgment, or the license is gone for good if you haven't made any reparations. when i put this case out to social media, and our viewers who are the jury in these cases, there was a lot of tough love out there. people saying, if you can't handle this, don't drive a car, don't break the law, don't break the fines, or use public transportation. eric, how do you respond? >> shannon, this is not necessarily someone who is a drunk driving, these are speeding violations. a lot of people simp

. >> y terminamos con (nombre en inglés) que protegió la ventaja en su visita a la capital del pais paísks quiere cerrar más de 150 locales en el país, donde las rentas son altas, además abrirán en otras tiendas, dicen que las ventas en staburcks, son más bajas . >> muchos lo hacen con el propósito de encontrar a su media naranja, se van a redes sociales y sitios de encuentro. >> pero hay que tener cuidado porque los estafadores crean un perfil falso para una relación y engañar a su víctima a la que después terminan pidiéndole dinero, aquí nos dicen cómo funciona el fraude y cómo debe protegerse (música) (música) es fácil, un hombre conoce a una mujer por internet, ella se enamora, y él le corresponde, o al menos es lo que cree hasta que es estafada y la historia de amor no tiene un final feliz. >> era el hombre perfecto, pero era un buen acto. >> cecilia se enamoró de un hombre que conoció en (información en pantalla) pero le costó 10 mil dólares . >> era una ilusión nada más . >> cecilia cayó en la trampa de la estafa de romance, las víctimas son personas mayores las que han enviudado,

i do know the veterans straon pays the lowest in the country for prescription drugs and medicare pays a lot more so why did the president go back? >> the veterans administration is a unique stem 74of veterans have supplemental drug coverage it requires looking at that balance it is a unique system not applicable to senior seniors. >> thank you. thank you senator sanders. senator murray due have closin comments? >> i recognize you need to go but thank you for being here today. i do have to say again i am disappointed president trump abandoned the campaign promise to negotiate lower prices through medicare. that would haveeen a real impact for drug prices for patients i will keep pushing it and many others will but has to bring drug prices lower for patients families and now i know you are seeking comments from stakeholders am terested to hear what they have to say but it is time for action we know the problems that higis prices no negotiating authority and part d and now solely trying to build this legalores around products is competition over decades democrats are at the table we take

watch website, pay watch .org.that is an astounding 361 times the median production and nonsupervisory workers pay in the united states. working people do not have the freedom to negotiate a fair return on their labor and labor unions are in decline in this country and that is why you have this growing disconnect between productivity growth in our economy and working people's wages. >> , too followp two things. the incredible amount of inequality that the economy seems to be driving. those at the very top do very well and that inequality is appearing to occur in the corporate sector where declines in competition declines in antitrust enforcement also appear to be constrained power among larger companies that are emerging and one of the reasons why companies may buybacks is they are reduced member shares that have been put out to enforce the mma and any thoughts on this larger question of concentration of power in inequality and the negative feedback that appears to have been created. >> a lot of the reason why plea

you pay 12.4% of everything. talk about numbers and going forward, how do we continue these benefits when people reach their retirement age. for some people this is their sole income. i appreciate it if you can, there's an article i would like to submit for the record. >> this is in the trustees it's a marvelous read for people just to look at just to get a more realistic understanding of what social security is out works, who funds it, going forward how does that work? i think were going that economy fast now. it's happening at a fast pace a net revenues going to come in to help pay these benefits. i yield back this regards, i have looked at your report. i look at it is good news. the part about the survivor benefit is not unexpected. statistics jested by year. the disability is better than we thought. we thought it was going to expire. >> in 2028. >> a few years ago we are expected -- >> the recent change of former years of disability wasn't at the result of legislation,. >> it's just the experience were seen i