again, i note that this is an seqa issue and i would likely appeal this to the board of supervisors.tionent

income is an seqa issue.tem proposes to revise fees that were just adopted in the budget but this is a separate action, the may 1st deadline for the budget has passed. this is separate from the budget approval. it's a stand alone item and this was actually proposed as i understand after the budget was adopted. so the seqa review that was associated with this item was back from february in connection with the over all budget. did not detail out the fees, include the specific set of proposals. i don't think that the prior approval covers this item and i would likely contest this via an appeal to the board of of su the february seqa review was not a blanket approval. jhe agency can chano fees and fares is covered under 15273. the planning department has to conquer in that and actually needs to review the proposed fee changes. so you can, you know, approve this if you want. council can go discuss it with staff. i've already made my points. i would likely contest this unless this is an urgency item. i would s ress

. >> staff is going to want to hear this as well because this is also an seqa issue. do you want me to proceed? >> chairman brinkman: yes, please. >> so is seqa issue here, you already heard from the cac they disagree with the staff recommendation. the issue is this is in any opinion not a minor change to a structure applicable to class one exception. these vehicles are 45 -- are more than 45 years old and the checklist does not so indicate. it marked the other box. the agency just leased space for vintage streetcars to be moved from morin. these are streetcars that could be so moved. i thought that in order to dispof such streetcars that the agency first had to declare them surplus under the administrative code. the calendar item caption doesn't say declaring them surplus. i'm not sure that the action is within the scope of what is described here. i was also assured that any disposal of such cars would be consistent with a vintage car policy that would be preve pres to the cac and i understand has not been. the calendar item does reference something related to vehicl

again, i note that this is an seqa issue and i would likely appeal this to the board of supervisors. i havtionen that the cac disagrs with the staff and, again, i would say unless there's some urgency ar thi i would suggest putting this off and resolving theissues. this is another one wre council and miss jones may need my comments.obly hea >> chairman brinkman: thank you. i think that we'll take your recommendation and delay this one, put it off to -- no, we'll wait to hear -- >> madame chair, maybe move on the regular calendar and allow staff to discuss and come back. >> chairman brinkman: we'll move on to the regular calendar and have staff thence t discuss this. >> item 11, committing to start procuring zero owe mission battery buses. >> chairman brinkman: excellent. i see mr. haley approaching. mhaley, welcome. >> good afternoon. mad dam -- madame chair, board members. i'm here to is you to adopt a resolution that memorializes your leadership in a very important topic and is the topic of zero emissions. i would remind theoard t under your vision and leadership we currently opera

eir is required by seqa. it's at the heard of our decision making process in san francisco and we ask that you continue this matter for about six month. we would love to see how far we can get in six months and possibly be back in front of you that quickly. we do ask that you will continue the manner and process the application in accord dance with the code. >> you are asking for continuance on this? >> in addition to asking you to process the application as required bylaw. it could be six months, nine months, however much time you think to finish the eir. [bell ringing] >> normally we take it in a little bit more truncated way and we do a project, so i would like to take up the matter

eir is required by seqa. it's at the heard of our decision making process in san francisco and we ask that you continue this matter for about six month. we would love to see how far we can get in six months and possibly be back in front of you that quickly. we do ask that you will continue the manner and process the application in accord dance with the code. >> you are asking for continuance on this? >> in addition to asking you to process the application as required bylaw. it could be six months, nine months, however much time you think to finish the eir. [bell ringing] >> normally we take it in a little bit more truncated way and we do a project, so i would like to take up the matter of continuance and kind of limit debate on the project if that is the case and then we can do that. if you want one minute to say something. >> we had two minutes of -- >> he says fine. >> president hillis, that is about the only decision that you can make today. >> president hillis: or disapprove. >> we don't know what to do b