here's two more examples with dormers. and another with dormers. and another two with dormers. here are many more examples of homes throughout balboa terrace with dormers. here are examples of harold stoner english style homes with dormers. it's clear that dormers are characteristic of balboa terrace and harold stoner homes. our house is to the north of hers. based on the trajectory of the sun, our dormers never come in between her house and the sun. the d.r. requestor claims we didn't notify neighbors or the h.o.a. about our plans throughout the process. they state that we refused to meet with neighbors. over the last two years, our house has gun through numerous neighborhood notification and involved. this includes showing the architectural plans to 100 neighbors individually through our own petition. we have a lot of support for our project. we have gotten 103 signatures from 69 homes. this represents 24% of all the homes in balboa terrace. the d.r. requestor has a fair number of signatures, but we have reason to believe they're not obtained in good faith. we spoke with some

the part that's circled is where the dormer was added for 290 san leandro. the dormer only added 50 to 100 square feet, which included a small bathroom and walk-in closet. in the project sponsor's response, they state their home is in need of repair, various aspects don't meet city code and energy efficiency is low. they stated they don't know the rental value of the property. "i attest that the information is true to the best of my knowledge." it was signed by both nathan and marcia ng. since january, 2017, they have four tenants living in the home. according to their tenants, the rental income per month is $5,000. in addition, the lower level is only about 6 feet high and how an unpermitted bedroom. knowing this is not up to code, they're still renting out the bedroom to a tenant. the project sponsors have never lived in the home. these pictures were taken two years ago. this is a picture of their tenant, peter, that i chat with pretty often. here's a picture of the tenants' cars during the day. a picture of the tenants' cars at night. and a picture of the

90 she said the design guidelines for dormers would still apply. page 18, lines 21-25. 106.8, would a neighbor be allowed to ask for a pre-app meeting? planner responded, only the applicant. that's problematic if neighbors will be involved as part of the process. my comment for a.d.u.s, i know the size thing was removed, but a 1,200 square foot size may not be distinguishable and building projects can bypass zoning, maybe one of the reasons for the removal of a.d.u.s from the new construction. this would occur when legalizing the numbers of a.d.u.s and a summary not differentiating. it was done in the 2016 farrell-peskin legislation. thank you. please submit this into the minutes. >> supervisor tang: thank you i have much. any other members of the public that wish to comment, come on up. seeing none, item is closed. i want to speak to a couple of issues that i heard over and over again and want to be clear. we will have changes at the board of supervisors to correct language in the legislation, specifically as it relates to the built envelope. it s

the fourth component of the legislation is to allow the addition of dormers. if you need a picture, we have it in our handout or planning may want to put it on the overhead. there's a specific definition for dormer windows, but we allow them when a structure or growth is converted to a.d.u. without neighborhood notification even if it extends to the required year yard. so what we're doing today in land use is i would like to clarify the decision for dormers when converting to a.d.u.s would allow such expansion even if the structures are in the required rear yard. and so the definition for dormers is, again, very specific. i think it's, what, 8x8 or something. planning staff can correct me if i'm wrong. and there are other requirements not related to the legislation that they would have to meet. another component of our legislation is that we allow the expansion of a.d.u.s under cantilevered rooms in the rear yard. this was in the original legislation, but what i'm proposing today in land use is a mandatory pre-app meeting. we've heard concerns about eliminatin

so the roofline and no dormers. i just want to make sure that our report is clear. >> no dormers. there is extensive record that was listed by a real estate company. i am sure there are plans that exist prior to him taking over. i don't know how my fellow commissioners feel, you know, we are asking to take the building back and there was unpermitted work prior to him purchasing the building which resulted in some noncode compliant bump ops in the back, you know, to me it means exactly that. i don't want to penalize him. it is what it is. if it is not compliant, the zoning administrator would have to rule on that. they would be required to retain a variance to legalize the replacement of the noncompliant portion of the building which they took down without benefits of permit. >> it is already gone. they did not have a permit to remove the noncompliant portion. they have lost that. >> i would recommend that we, if it is down, it is gone. they are not allowed to restore any noncompliant portions could we also have clarification as to the parking? at the curb cut had and it will be ex

the original requested a gabled hipped roof which could include dormers. and so, the dormers would possibly be able to allow for additional head height for bathrooms and things like that. >> commissioner moore: and that is what mr gladstone obviously told us that doesn't work. because he explained that the usability of the room was a sloped roof and dormers does not create a workable room. and that leaves what is proposed noncompliance because you can't you can only build a three story building. that is basically what they are at odds with. there is no discussion on the size of the family sized dwelling. you have 12 time bags and 12 times as what you can put into this bag. this is what ultimately, our guidelines and adjacency considerations are all about. it is about fit and context. i do support your idea that you are lucky enough to have a home in which you can raise two children which is larger. however, for everybody else next door and up and down the block, in the situation when the homes are smaller, building family sized units was in context. that i

i believe that those actually include windows and depending on their dimension, dormers. but i will defer to planning department staff. >> thank you, supervisors. planning department staff. that is correct. there is a number of features in section 136 which already are exempt from notification. those are the features in sections 136c-1 through c-24 and the features in section 136-c26 as the deputy city attorney just read off. c-25 is the provision related to that rear yard modification that currently today does require notification. >> so, what i would suggest is that we further -- i would make a further amendment, which is to take what deputy city attorney stacey just said on page 41, lines 20 and 21, which is to accept out 136-c one through 24 and 26. >> supervisor tang? >> i think it just speaks to the overall nature of the amendments. you know, we got kind of like a draft word document earlier but i didn't get to see this until just now. so, you know, there are other things in here, for example, from what i understand. the planning department are generally guidelines

the second amendment has to do with the dormers.ure that there is still notification procedures in place if the dormers have to do with historic structures or any building that might contribute to a historic district. a third amendment has to do with it mandating a preapplication meeting for adjacent neighbors if someone is trying to feral under and create an a.d.u. under a cantilevered room or a deck. the next amendment is that originally, we were going to allow more than one unauthorized unit to be permitted if it meets code requirements. we heard concerns about that and so we are going to revert back to what is already allowed. which is one unauthorized unit can be legalized. the next amendment is that -- sorry, i will let supervisor pass can go to that one. and then we are allowing -- we are clearing up a typo that happened in land and use committee about allowing expansion of the a.d.u. within the buildable envelope. you have that language with you in a summary sheet on page 7. we are also limiting the height of an expansion in

they have a roof dormer here. it's very possible, this family may want to someday increase their floor like this. currently, they live only in about this area of their top floor. this area is 3 feet here, 3 feet here. if they really want to have more of a room than they have here, and they want to go here, aren't we really discouraging that by suggesting that our roof come down here? will they be allowed to bring theirs up to that point if our roof comes like this or steeper? that's an issue, and i think you should consider that. in fact, this shows that that same building -- this is our building. note that building next door that they want us to emulate has a peaked roof here, which is only 3.4 feet above our roof here. that was before we created a shaped roof. please keep in mind, the staff report has read to you their wording, which said gabled roof, sloped roof, or some other shaped roof. the "or" is very important here because they didn't say exactly what they want. it's up to you to decide what that means, a

i will be carrying this dormer mattress with me everywhere i go . >> why did you bring this up? one of the pieties of the feminist movement is women never lie and you have to believe all women. that is overly broad. people live for lots of reasons. -- people lie for lots of reasons. justicertment of reports 7% of rape claims are not true. in her case, there is a great area.- is a grey found she had not been raped. she accused was able to --vide facebook messages >> she took this matches everywhere she went? >> she did. that became a cultural meme. some mattresses showed up on other campuses. a man she a key -- the man she accused one his case against columbia. columbia issued an apology. >> why would columbia university allow somebody to carry a mattress into all their classes? >> fashionable, i guess. [laughter] they wanted to be seen as on the right. they are terrified of being accused of not handling these accusations with enough sensitivity. they have a lot of counselors. 49.ard has >> is a 54, i think. >> 54 -- you said 54, i think. >> that is 54 people? >> it is a mess. th

and having dormers on free-standing structures if the property is within an article 10 or 11 district, and adu expansions within the envelope cannot exceed the exiting building height, and, finally, the removal of the cap on the number of units that can be legalized per lot was taken out the ordinance. as a result only one unit per lot continuing to be eligible for the legalization program. with these amendments it passed at first read at the board. and next was the three-tiered program for homeless s.f. that lasts to december 31, 2019. at the meeting supervisor tang announced that she would introduce the new amendment to have a 36-month it or lose it or lose it meant, and the amendment states that entitlements granted by the planning commission for a project would expire after 36 months unless the project sponsor has pulled a building or site. and it passed 11-0. and the aryx mend the legislation passed its first read. and finally the board continued the central soma plan to to december 4th of this year and that's all i have for you today. >> thank you. >> commissioners on behalf of

krar phi -- clarify that dormers on stand-alone structures would be allowed even in rear yard. allow in lieu fee for trees and the same for units undergoing legalization and consider size thresholds and address the eviction loophole and legalization program through amendments to the admin and planning codes. supervisor tang accepted recommendations 1-5. during public comment, provision to allow a.d.u.s in new construction was equally opposed. supervisor safai suggested allowing a.d.u.s on new construction in vacant lots. it was not added as amendment, though. there were concerns in public comment about removing requirements for cantilevered rear yard. they talked about having a notice. that amendment will go to the board next week. they moved to move it to the board. and home-sf 2.0, tiered system that would last until 2019. the commission considered this item at june 28 meeting and vote 6-0. one would allow home-sf projects to receive voting modifications, and those in tier one to set all affordable levels as a maximum and then language to require home-sf products to receive a

but it did have the same style of dormer windows, which he used to basically look out and survey the entire battlefield there, to help decide where he was going to build his defenses and what the british were doing. so when the british decide to launch the ground assault of january 8, they launch a fairly complicated three-pronged assault. the reason this spot was picked by jackson to make the defense is that it's so narrow. it's one of the narrowest chunks of ground between the swamp and the river all the way into the city. which kind of helps jackson concentrate a smaller force in negating some some of the british's superior numbers. he starts by having a rampart, a long wall-like fortification, created along the rodriguez canal. so the canal gets dug out about eight feet wide, 15 feet deep. and the rampart wall is created as well to about 15 feet wide and eight feet tall. which provides kind of a long fortification that the men can stand behind. so this is our recreation of the rampart wall. it is similar in terms of construction. though it is a little bit short. it would have bee

who had been turned off the game fell in love with it again on the back of that and we had nesson dormereague error. there are non-football fans supporting the team and i spoke to scottish viewers and welsh viewers and there is something about this team that is making people fall in love with them. there had been a series of disappointments with the national team, mating in the iceland debacle national team, mating in the iceland d e ba cle two national team, mating in the iceland debacle two years ago. gareth southgate takes credit for this. he we nt southgate takes credit for this. he went in with a clean slate and he said to the staff, we will do things differently before they went out to russia and there was a media day where every player in the squad was available to speak to the press, which hadn't happened for 20 years and the message was, we are open, accessible. it was easy to connect with them. gareth southgate has said so many times that this team can create their own history. how smart has it been for him to keep pushing that, not just do has it been for him to keep pushing t