citizens is more than just a wee bit unconstitutional george washington university law professor jonathan turley told the globe that quote if this was about foreign citizens the government would have considerable power but if it's u.s. citizens u.s. citizens don't lose their rights simply because they're in an airplane at thirty thousand feet. you know it's easy to forget these times of political theater experience again the surveillance state bootlicking but yes we do still have a fundamental right to privacy and due process regardless of what the t.s.a. the cia and any other agencies. like it would have you believe. and this is why we must always be watching the hawks. to. get the. real thing what's. the bottom. like you know what i got. with. the. program on the watch of the harks i am tyrone and i'm to have a for a while and let's just say it's out of the good i think it's jonathan turley the george washington university law professor saying that you're right so go at thirty thousand feet i feel like maybe he hasn't traveled lately yeah because you don't have free speech. you don't ha

citizens is more than just a wee bit unconstitutional george washington university law professor jonathan turley told the globe that quote if this was about foreign citizens the government would have considerable power but if it's u.s. citizens u.s. citizens don't lose their rights simply because they're in an airplane at thirty thousand feet. you know it's easy to forget in these times of political theater tricks peer propaganda and surveillance state bootlicking that yes we do still have a fundamental right to privacy and due process regardless of what the t.s.a. the cia and any other agencies like them would have you believe. and this is why we must always be watching the hawks. to wonder what. it looks like. it's what. the bottom. like you but i got. this. welcome i'm on the watch of the harks i am i wrote them and i'm top of the law and let's just say it's out of the good i think it's jonathan turley the george washington university law professor saying that you're right so go at thirty thousand feet i feel like maybe he hasn't traveled lately yeah because you don't have free speech.

joining me jeffrey rose, a law professor at the george washington university. jeffrey, let me start by playing a bit of tape of the president in big sky country yesterday talking about his pick. let's take a listen. >> as you know, there's now a vacancy on the supreme court. and if you tune in monday at 9:00, i think you will be extremely happy with the selection. right. and they're all great. they're all great. >> appointment viewing monday night at 9:00. jeffrey, you followed the court for a long time. suffice it to say this process is different from what we have seen before right down to the self-imposed deadline of monday night. how is this process different? what are the consequences of that? >> well, it is different because the list is so firm and the deadlines are so strict. it is like -- almost like journalism where it is all about the deadline. the president has said he will pick from these 25. as you said, there seem to be three or more front-runners, but what is so significant -- and this is what we have to focus on now -- there are strong difference

he's a professor at the george washington university law school. >>> i want to keep going with the supreme court conversation. i want to turn to health care. joining us to talk about what the nomination could mean to the future of health care is kathleen asbelias. she's served as the governor of kansas and the insurance commissioner. she's now the president and ceo of her own company. let's talk about this. there are a few strands of information that we have on brett kavanaugh and how he feels about things having to do with health care. some are process oriented. some say justice roberts' opinion on the aca which sayed it, came in part or at least might have been influenced by the type of thinking that kavanaugh had on this. that the congress can't impose an individual mandate or a tax on people to underwrite universal health care. >> well, hi, ali. nice to be with you. sorry about the camera glitch. >> no worries. >> but happy to weigh in. i think that what we have seen in the 12 years that justice kavanaugh has been on the d.c. dou court of appeals is he has had a limited number of opini

admitted to george washington university hospital in the district yesterday. the 79-year-old is resting and being treated wit antibiotic antibiotics.d with congress returns to work monday andpo hkesperson says the congressman is looking forward to being back at work soop. the 4th of july is about celebrating our nation's independence. itay is also a to remember the men and women who fight for our freedom. fisher house is organization that helps military falies nationwide. fisher house dover air force base that delawe was built specifically for loved once that made the ultimate sacrifice. >> we believe in the power of family and bringing mit of military fam.y to ligh >> if they'reed is and they want to cry and hug we' right with them.d we'll cry with them. >> fiber house foundation brings homes they can stay free of charge while loved once in the hospital. >> fireworkse scary forre b pets and those that sufferfrom . man saw when he went to takeia out the trash. >> look refully that is a bear. we'll till you what he thinks attractioned the animal to his house. >

before that, she was director of care in -- at george washington university. is fromt call tallahassee, florida. go ahead with your question or comment. in 2015, i was rear-ended in an automobile accident. and i had terrible pain in my back. nothing worked. except tram at all. is that can -- tramedol. is that considered an opioid, number one? took that as prescribed, and i still have five tablets left from 2015. my question is, why are people taking these pills by the handful? it fore hurting everybody who wants to legitimately take medicine for pain. i am tired of the minority ruling it for the majority of people who need this kind of medication. as i said, i think it is similar to opioids. pain and iood for my think the problem is people that are willing to take four and five of these tablets at a time. host: thank you. dr. wen? guest: you bring up a really important point, and one that i and our entire profession of medicine and public health really struggle with, which is that opioids do good work. there are people who need opioids for all types of reasons

before that, she was director of care in -- at george washington university. is fromt call tallahassee, florida. go ahead with your question or comment. in 2015, i was rear-ended in an automobile accident. and i had terrible pain in my back. nothing worked. except tram at all. is that can -- tramedol. is that considered an opioid, number one? took that as prescribed, and i still have five tablets left from 2015. my question is, why are people taking these pills by the handful? it fore hurting everybody who wants to legitimately take medicine for pain. i am tired of the minority ruling it for the majority of people who need this kind of medication. as i said, i think it is similar to opioids. pain and iood for my think the problem is people that are willing to take four and five of these tablets at a time. host: thank you. dr. wen? guest: you bring up a really important point, and one that i and our entire profession of medicine and public health really struggle with, which is that opioids do good work. there are people who need opioids for all types of reasons

he's being treated at george washington university hospital if you wanted knew mona.oyer is the minority whip. he is 79 years maryland long since 1971. >>> we're learning about the man who tried to climb the statue of liberty she was protesting the separation of families at the u.s. mexico border when she climbed on to the bed stall there. it took three hours to get her down. >>> new video of what d.c. fire ficials was several fighters. this was on randolph place northwest. you should leave the fireworks alone to burn out and then submerge them inwa r. >>> this year's fourth of july parade hored five people killed. sakes wald in,aring the banner and some marchedith them. visitors brought balloons and owers in a moi moral for those killed. >> for me, it makes it sadder. ut the community com together. and everyone will celebrate and honor the victims. >> the deadly shooting happened one week ago today. the suspect is being held in jail without bond. >>> a community is mourning the death of a father who died on outhe y of july. friends of the victim tell news 4 he had tw

henry from george washington university. i was on the nsc staff at the same time that he was and none of regions -- reagan's strategic programs could have been achieved without the economic programs. about inarea to think terms of reagan's legacy, how he turned around the economy. a major revolution in thinking about how to deter war. it is not mutually assured destruction but mutually assured attention. my question is why there was so little follow up on it. he got congress involved in the public involved in trying to understand what he was doing by way of reacting to mutually assured destruction and trying to find a more humane way to determine because he was as the panel suggests, determined to deter. i think he was consistent in reykjavik when he walked out on gorbachev where he wanted to restrict everything to testing in the laboratory. if you remember the press conference afterward, there were very senior people other than reagan who looked very dour about his rejecting met wonderful the tragic trade that was being pro

he studied international affairs and modern european history at george -- georgetown university. before returning to washington dc and that other great bicentennial year when he joined the staff of the george washington university calls first federal congress project. that was another one of our founding fathers's commitments -- to higher education. chuck was one of the editors of the 22 volume documentary history of the federal congress. in 2015 he joined the historical society as chief historian and vice president for education and scholarship. on scholarly interests focus constitutional history and the politics and history of the federalist area -- era. : thank you for enabling me to be part of this. ton john recruited me succeed him as chief historian, he did not say there was a book in the wings already. he brought me to the house for lunch and they lowered they with high caloric foods. they finally got me to see that this was a book that needed to be written. what was my role? i am a political historian. this takes place in the early republic. we needed to tell the underlying story that made it possible

lay out a couple of things, first i want to say hello to jen nolan, who i work with at george washington university. we do a project of placing nuclear follows on capitol hill. then, my friend willie curtis, formally a naval cavity -- academy professor, who is now retired. i went back and looked at a 1979 cement and house armed services committee report on nuclear weapons. this is before the soviets invaded afghanistan. every singular is a single nuclear program was cut. everything from the b-52, the b- 1, and the b2. everything including the de- five, and the ohio class submarine, every single program was cut. then i looked at a 1981, ronald reagan's first press conference. the first question was from the ap reporter and said do you believe in keeping the salt 2 treaty, which as you know have been withdrawn from president carter, after the soviets invaded afghanistan. we were under no legal obligation to abide by it, because we never ratified it. the president said, how can you call that arms control? as you know, it led to a buildup of about 13,000 nuclear warheads. i was sitting in the back of t

i want to say hello to jan nolan at george washington university. we do a project together. and my friend who is now retired, who invited me over a period of six years to lecture at the naval academy on nuclear deterrence. i was extraordinarily honored to do that. i went back and looked at a 1979 house and armed services committee report on nuclear weapons. this is before the soviets invaded afghanistan. every single nuclear weapons program was cut from the budget request, everything from the b-52, the b-1. for mx missile, there was no procurement money, including the deep five and the ohio class submarine. then i looked at 1981. the first question at a press conference was, do you believe in keeping the s.a.l.t. two treaty, which had been withdrawn by president carter. we were under no legal obligation to abide by it. the president said basically how can you call that arms control? because as we all know, it allowed a buildup to about 13,000 nuclear warheads under the treaty. and you -- i was sitting in the back of the room against the wall where they put young people that

. >> i'm from george washington university. i know both of these people so living here it is a bit of a surprise to hear we have optimism. [laughter] so could you address to do the right now of the political volatility in the country what with the bipartisan system for the republican party? in this very difficult. we are seeing increasing polarization but it isn't just political there are number of contributors on we see that we blame our leaders in washington but i will date myself when i was a kid we watched the brinkley reports some people watched walter cronkite but we saw the same shot right or a vietnam war was a common base of information and it was that it one -- vetted because that is what the intermediaries did. now i could go to my aggregator or website cable channel and don't encounter anyone who thinks different now i think they are stupid. that is on both sides of the spectrum not on one side or another and that is reflected our policies in washington. i do know how to get back to the point of the more common base

i'm a professor in the political science department at george washington university. it's okay. my students talk when i talk anyway. [laughter] >> i'm used to it. we're really gratified to have three excellent scholars to talk to us today and to think about the spread of misinformation beginning with the professor at the university of california davis who said to me before we gathered here today i love being in d.c., which made me wonder if

for the government of puerto rico's part, they say they are waiting for a study out of george washington universitye asked for official review and once that is complete they may change the death toll. they say they don't plan to make changes to hurricane maria's death toll. >> we are so glad that you are staying on this and that your investigation and reporting is bringing us the truth about what happened at maria. thank you very much. >>> so this was a fun holiday show. what are you doing for the rest of the day? >> sleeping, fourth of july tradition. >> i'll be grilling out, listening to xs fourth of july. >> the best fourth of july song. >> happy fourth. >> i take your word for it. of the uz the dozens of fourth , it's the best. >>> cnn newsroom with erica hill picks up after this quick break. have a wonderful holiday everyone. >>> good morning on this fourth of july and happy independence day to you. i'm erica hill in today for poppy. this morning a senate committee led by republicans is breaking with the president saying not only did russia in fact meddle in the 2016 election but they specific

. >> and we called uber and shows up at george washington university where we're staying and sees us and said is that a make america great again cap -- >> laura: were you wearing it? >> no, holding it. he couldn't see anything. >> laura: very observant. >> and he's like, is that the hat. >> and we said ya -- yeah and he said i can't do this ride. she was in the car and he was trying to get in and i'm standing to the side and so we're like, this say joke and he's like, i'm serious, i can't do this ride. so last month the same thing happened but the uber was joking so that's why we didn't try to pursue anything. >> laura: adrian, i got to get you on this. this is just wild. >> yes. >> laura: people get into ubers with bare feet. i'd rather have someone with a hat than with some of the clothes i see people wearing on the streets of d.c. as an african american woman and conservative republican, apparently you're not allowed to think certain things, that's what goes through my miennd, otherwise you don't deserve to be in the car. i find it reprehensible. what was going through your mind?

first, i want to say hello to jan nolan who i work with, she's with george washington university. we do project of placing nuclear fellows on capitol hill. and my friend, willie curtis, formerly with the naval academy, professor, who's now retired, who invited me for over six years to lecture at the naval academy on nuclear deterrence. i was extraordinarily honored to do that. willie, thank you for being here. i went back and looked at 1979 senate and house arms committee report on nuclear weapons. this is before the soviets invaded afghanistan. every single nuclear weapon program was cut from the president's budget request, from carter's request, from the b-52 to b-1, rdt&e, there was no procurement money as well as, a said, including the d-5 and ohio class submarine. every single program was cut. and then i went and looked at 1981, ronald reagan's first press conference. first question was from the ap reporter and said, do you believe in keeping the s.a.l.t. 2 treaty, which had been withdrawn by president carter from the senate after soviets invaded afghanistan and we were under

news 4 confirmedoyer is being treated at george washington university hospital for pneumonia. he was admitted tuesday. he is expected to make a full recovery. hoyer is the minority whip second only to nancy pelosi and the house democratic leadership. he is 79 years old and served maryland's fifth congressional district since 1981. >>> now to a story that hasolhe social media world talking about a flight encounter. you probly asked yourself before or been asked to switch seats on a plane. >> but that simple question turned into much more earlier this week. now that story has gone viral. nbc's chanel jones has details. >> reporter: once upon a time on a flight from new yorko dallas -- >> on my flight home, my boyfriend and i asked a woman to switch seats me so we could sit together. >> reporter: he just wanted to sift with his girlfriend on the four hour flight. the woman helen who asked that e not use her last name said yes. but joked she might want to n'itch back if she d approve of her new seat mate. at this point, most people would probably chuckle, thank you and open the in

a professor at george washington university. he has been watching this saga.tyor nonaligned point of view, i would say. so what do you make? i do think you have a pretty nonaligned point of view. i don't even know what your politics are what you make of the most recent developments with lisa page? >> i also heard that she acquitted herself quite well. i think that is much to her credit. the problem is that we haven't seen the hearings that we have had. peter strzok r confused to answr on the insistence of the fbi. most of the material questions, it was quite surprising that anything actually came close to answering the questions that most of us wanted to hear. the fbi was well off the navigational map in terms of privileges. they spoke of all of these equities and having to follow the investigatory privileges. and none of that attracted very well to. me. this is an oversight committee. i thought it was a particularly strange thing to have this, speaking to a government employee and having this mantra, i would love to answer, but the fbi won't let me. i'm hopin

news 4 has confirmed hoyer is being tated at george washington university hospital.reated for. pneumon he was admitted yesterday. expected to make a full recovery, according to his spokeswoman. second only to nancy pelosi in the house democtic leadership. e is 79 years old and serve maryland's fifth congressional district since 1981. >>> in just a mter of moments, the annapolis independence day parade begins. the city is trying to use the holl hallow day to begin ha healing its wounds. in 4's chris gordon is annapolis tonight. he'll join us live from the parade route at 6:30. > there is a hate crime investigation underway tonight in laurel. poce say they started getting complaints two weeks ago about these anti-semitic flyers turning up in neighborhoods. prince george's county bureau chief tracee wilkins spokeo e resident who calls the flier vile. >> there were, like, all these anti-semitic, one thing after another. >> reporter:till shocked by its words, donald showed me the anti-semitic flier he fou outside his rural home. >> it talks about how you shouldn't be asso

. >>> just in, house minority whip steny hoyer has been admitted to george washington university hospitaled with pneumonia. he's resting and plans to get back to work soon. we wish him well. >>> we are also hearing for the first time about an unusual meeting in white house that happened last year where president trump asked his foreign policy team about the possibility of the u.s. invading venezuela. retired lieutenant general mark hurtling joins me live to respond to that idea. (director) cut! nice, candace, but this time bold. did someone say "bold?" (gasping) starkist jalapeo tuna in a pouch! loaded with bold flavor. just tear, eat... mmmmm. and go bold! try all of my bold creations pouches! to me, he's, phil micwell, dad.o golfer. so when his joint pain from psoriatic arthritis got really bad, it scared me. and what could that pain mean? joint pain could mean joint damage. enbrel helps relieve joint pain, helps stop irreversible joint damage, and helps skin get clearer. enbrel may lower your ability to fight infections. serious, sometimes fatal events including infections, tuberculos

she was previously a member of the faculty of the george washington university law school and has been a visiting law professor at harvard, nyu and university of virginia. in 2017, she was visiting senior fellow in the law department of london school of economics. clerked for the second circuit and for justice the supreme court. please join me in welcoming amanda tyler. [applause] amanda, we're here to talk about your new book. and for those in the audience who may not be familiar. maybe we can start off simply. what is this concept of habeas corpus? what does it mean? does it come from? >> the rooting of the privilege of habeas corpus comes from england. as so much of our law does. translated loosely, it is a phrase that references to undergo and receive the body and translate it further still. the rule of habeas corpus is remedy or i should say a writ by which courts takes jurisdiction over the body of a prisoner in classical form and form of habeas corpus by which the book is written, we're talking about executive detention in wartime. we're talking about the king taking a prisoner

we called the uber and he shows up at george washington university where we're staying and he sees us and is like is that a make america great again cap? >> we were holding them just like this. he couldn't see anything. it was -- >> laura: very observant. >> is that the hat? and we're like, yeah, he's like i can't do this ride. so we're kind of look at each other because she was in the car and he was trying to get in and i'm standing to the side. and so, we're like, this is a joke. and he's like, i'm serious, i can't do this ride. i had this happen about -- last month the same thing happened, the uber was joking. >> laura: so, this is just wild. >> yes. >> laura: people get into ubers with bare feet. i mean i would rather have someone with a hat i disagree with. but as an african-american woman, as a conservative republican, apparently you're not allowed to think certain things. that's what goes through my mind or you don't deserve to be in this car. i find that to -- it's funny to joke about it. but it's not funny in another way. what is going through your mind? >> well, i was fright

i'm a professor in the political science department at george washington university. it's okay. my students talk when i talk anyway. [laughter] >> i'm used to it. we're really gratified to have three excellent scholars to talk to us today and to think about the spread of misinformation beginning with the professor at the university of california davis who said to me before we gathered here today i love being in d.c., which made me wonder if perhaps she wasn't well or something was wrong? [laughter] >> last time i was in davis, california, it was about 88 degrees and perfectly sunny and here we are. she's a scholar of political communication. also joined by a political scientist at the london school of economics. he has done a great deal of interesting research about social media and in particular this thing called twitter which you may have heard of, and then finally a research director at harvard's center for the internet and society and robert has been involved in a lot of different research projects but one in particular that i've always found very valuable was a lengthy repo

here now, jonathan turley, constitutional law and attorney and law professor at george washington universityr, thanks for coming on with us tonight. can the president be charged with a crime over his tweet? >> they can be charged but not very convincingly. if you are charged to stitch together tweets for some criminal mosaic then you really are reaching the evidentiary dragons. a subject does not surrender their first amendment rights to speak out in their own defense. the president is frankly someone who seems to play poker with the cards faced outward. that helps in many respects, and he's not just issuing these tweets with regard to special counsel, he's doing it on trade and republican and democratic critics. he is someone who communicates through tweets and it tends to be visceral in his responses. i don't see how you could possibly base a convincing criminal case on that type of social media social media. >> sandra: if this is it the case and we are going off of a report here, and the special counsel is looking at the president's tweets, particularly about sessions and comey, what does

for the government stance, they say they have commission an independent review from george washington universityhey are waiting for those results until they make any changes to the death toll. >> and of course if you are hiding the truth, the question is are the people in need getting help. leyla santiagsantiago, thanks v much. that is it for me. the news continues right now. >>> jim, thank you so much. i'm brooke baldwin. let's start with the 12 young boys found starving, dehydrated but alive along with their coach. this is the incredible moment. we'll play it for you. where the scuba divers emerged to see them stand management darkness wearing just

for the government stance, they say they have commission an independent review from george washington university and they are waiting for those results until they make any changes to the death toll. >> and of course if you are hiding the truth, the question is are the people in need getting help. leyla santiagsantiago, thanks v much. that is it for me. the news continues right now. >>> jim, thank you so much. i'm brooke baldwin. let's start with the 12 young boys found starving, dehydrated but alive along with their coach. this is the incredible moment. we'll play it for you. where the scuba divers emerged to see them stand management darkness wearing just shorts and t-shirts, this nearly ten days after the group went missing. >> how many of you? 13? brilliant. >> that elation was short lived with the reality of two potentially deadly words. monsoon season. the same heavy rains and raising waters that trapped these boys may only get worse and fears are glowing that these kids could be stuck not for weeks, but for months. dive teams including thai, navy s.e.a.l.s and u.s. experts are now figuring

one is susan-- she's a research professor at george washington university school of international affairs. she's also a senior fellow of the international governance innovation. she's written quite extensively on trade policy and on the history of trade policy. our other speaker today was to be al-- he was held up in, i think, the atlanta airport ecause of the weather this morning. so dane will read his comments. he's a research professor emeritus in history at the university of ohio in athens. for nine years in the 1980s, he was a chairman and a member of the international trade ommission. he has a unique perspective on trade policy having been at it in the trenches, as well as academic. he has a unique perspective on he's the author of nine books on economic and international history and has quite a distinguished record as an editor and scholar in this area. so what we're going to do is start with susan and then dane will read out the presentation. after that, we'll open to it questions. thank you. >> are you going to go, chris? >> no, you are. >> hi, everybody. can i just make a sugges

he's also a law professor at george washington university law school and elliott williams, principal at republic policy firm the raven group, previously served as deputy assistant attorney general for legislative affairs at the department of justice during the obama administration. jeff, let's start with you, what are we looking at right now? we've got these four finalists. we believe that to be the case. there are rumors that the president has narrowed it down to two. how do you handicap these four? what should we be thinking about? >> well, handicapping of course is tough, but we know that senator mcconnell has told the president that the easiest confirmations would be kethledge and hardiman because they have less of a paper trail and they might be sort of less contested. amy coney barrett and also brett kavanaugh have strong paper trails and really the strong -- the question -- the million dollar question here is roe and precedent in general and what is the approach of each of these judges. the truth is not all judicial conservatives are the same. it's not easy to tell which would

jonathan turley, constitutional law attorney and constitutional professor at george washington universityhank you for your time today. as we all recall, strzok said i will be there. i will volunteer to testify and answer questions before congress and now they have to subpoena him. what changed? >> i think a lot of people are confused, including myself. i actually agreed with strzok's attorney when he objected that his client have been put through this long closed session and then all these people are describing how he appeared and what he said. i do think that sort of unfair. i've never liked that. so he asked for that transcript to be made public and i agree that we should be the way it's done. in fairness to him. but he also said he wanted to testify publicly and that also made a lot of sense. this doesn't. to suddenly declare that they are not playing by the rules, i'm not so sure what those rules are. they had a closed session. he asked for a public session. they want a public session and now he's saying he won't do it. part of the problem is that he is a public employee. it's true he

i work at the george washington university. lastly, there was a lawsuit filed against columbia government for perpetuating a series of economic development policies over the years that had discriminated against people of color and in privileged white people in an effort to create a class for the district and it meant bringing in a lot of wealthy white and displacing a lot of poor blacks. now, it is better when we have people who want to invest in the district, but my question is, what can be done to take advantage of this kind of desire to invest in the district so we get more equitable development, rather than what some people would like to call revitalization? others: gentrification, and others call it ethnic cleansing. what is the key to more equitable development in the district? >> thank you. the thick one more. >> my name is claudia faris. i think the conversation is about to change. we are moving into an american plutocracy. and there are all kinds of movements underground that are radically changing the structure and re

i am john seitz, a professor at the political science department at george washington university. my students talk when i talk. i am used to it. i am really gratified to have the excellent scholars to talk to us today, and to think about the spread of misinformation, beginning with amber winston, who is a professor at the university of california in davis. he said to me before we gather here today, i love being in dc, which made me wonder if perhaps you were not well, or something was wrong. the last time i was in davis california, it was 80 degrees and perfectly sunny. she is a scholar of media publications. >> finally, rodrick farris who is a research director at harvard client center for the internet and society. robert has been involved in a lot of research projects, but one in particular that i've always felt valuable is a lengthy report about the nature of news coverage in the 2016 elections, indymedia ecosystem that was in some sense created in the context of the election, which you may talk about little bit about today. i want to turn it first to amber for her opening thou

. >> no, i school.g to go to law went to george washington university.dared me to audition for the nyu acting school. and i auditioned, and i got in. and i went, "i'll never be g yoough to try this again." and i said, i'll go and i transferred. and i went to nyu. and i just kept working. i got a job d i kept working. >> jimmy: wow. >> yeah. >> jimmy: you said tha origin -- >> i was in acting class, so i thought it was funny. i said, i said -- why honesty, i said to the guy who ran the program. n?go, "why am i in the class? why did you let me i want to learn to understand myself. why did yolet me into the ting class?" he goes, "you want me to be honest?" i said, "yes." he goes, "you're the only straight guy that applied." [ laughter ] >> jimmy: we need one for casting. >> it's like affirmative action. >> jimmy: we need one for >> yeah. yeah. >> jimmy: you're a fantastic actor. and you're so good in this. we, the theater we ss in, you got like two applause breaks. >> well, you know, i don't want to give it away. there's some great moments in this movie. >>

lara brown, director of the graduate school of polical management at the george washington university. she's also the author of several books on presidents, including "jockeying for the american presidency." and domenico montanaro, the lead political editor for npr. and we welcome all of you back to the newshour.m domenico, ing to start with you upon. we were just sharing with the audience some se theoll numbers. 58% of those polled say they think the president tells the truth some of the time or har ever. how does that breawn among the electorate? who art we talking abre? >> well, and if you add "never" into there, you get to 61 so you have a full 60-somethingt percent american people who think that this president either never, hardly ever, or only some of the time tells the truth. you know and when you look, particularly in the suburbs, where there are going to be all these key s,house raou wind up with seeing that, you know, the-quarters of people o live in the suburbs, including, especially, suburban women who are going to be so key to this election, really not having a lot of fai

my name is john and i am at george washington university. my question is directed to mark. you seem to have a problem with missiles, but not air force. south korea has advanced fighter jets. they have attack systems from germany. north korea should give up its missiles. is someone going to provide them with an air force? who would you suggest do that? mark: the delivery systems for nuclear weapons be a part of the list of things that should be eliminated. if there are missiles in north korea not nuclear capable, we can put them in one quarter going -- in one category. almost all of their scud -- derived -- scud- you get rid of them. you get rid of the other weapons to the peace process tony was talking about. i understand your point. the realistic proposition, united states and south korea are not going to invade north korea. the opposite has been the case. from a north korean perspective, they would say we cannot give up all of our defenses. what are their missiles for? zone, youlearization have to deal with it. >> you had a second question? with had discussion chemical an

i work at the george washington university. lastly, there was a lawsuit filed against columbia government for perpetuating a series of economic development policies over the years that had discriminated against people of color and in privileged white people in an effort to create a class for the district and it meant bringing in a lot of wealthy white displacing a lot of poor. have one in what we the district than not, my question is, what can be done of taking advantage of this kind of desire from the district that we get more equitable growth rather than, what some people would like to call revitalization? what is the key to more equitable redevelopment in the district? >> my name is claudia faris. i think the conversation is about to change. americanving into an plutocracy. they are all kinds of movement's underground that are radically changing the structure and relationships in our society where everybody will be affected by this concentration of wealth. to get beyond,r we have to get ahead of these kind of movements and i

now a senior fellow for the center of homeland security at george washington university as well as holding a variety of other posts and i think it's fair to say he is one of the foremost experts on the issues that we have today and i think he's going to give us an excellent sense of where things have been but also where things are going. client told me in this book he has written there is actually a chapter they did not publish which was an it's a fine fiction looking at how manipulation campaigns might play out in the near term. he himself is subject to attacks on his personal security and his own work in this regard was early at spotting russian efforts to interfere in u.s. democracy and in our campaign and its testified to the senate and their government about russian interference in efforts in the middle east as well. without further ado i introduce you to clint watts to give us the talk and i will join you for a little bit of q&a and opened up to audience questions. we are filming this. c-span is here filming it. let me take q&a were going to line up over here and we will need to ask

with me to discuss all of this is jonathan tu rley, professor of law at george washington university.line for viewers around the world of how critical this appointment is. this is the nomination that everyone on the democratic side, the very concept of a conservative president replacing kennedy who is the swing vote on the court. the legacy of kennedy is immense but also quite fragile. all his major decisions were won by either single vote, his own. there is no selection in the centre of gravity will move to the right with any of these four. chiefjustice roberts would suddenly become the swing vote which is quite unnerving for liberals in the country, their best hope is thatjohn roberts who rarely votes with the left would be the swing vote. of those four people who are conservatives, the american people do not necessarily know where those people stand in key social issues and there seems to be a tradition in the united states that they are not meant to ask where they stand on social issues?|j they are not meant to ask where they stand on social issues? i have been critical of that fo

. >> jim tillich from george washington university. i recognize the funding commitments are really important. but also really important is personal morale, institutional morale and long-term commitment of your own staff. i think this applies both to cdc and also to rotary international. and in terms of how do you maintain the momentum and commitment among your own staff that are involved in this over now decades of this effort and dealing with many of the frustrations where we had some near misses and some retreats and some progress moving forward. >> robert? >> thank you, robert steinglass. echoing what senator mcconnell said about the systems and the patients, i have always found that strong and steady wins the race. it is a challenge to develop health systems in countries, we get distracted a lot by the verticality of the disease approach which has their own sort of momentum and urgency to reduce incidence of disease. health development requires a different sort of mindset in many cases. i think usaid could take a lot more credit fo