goes back even before john marshal. >> chief, thank you so much. >> thank you. [applause] >> appreciate it. thanks very much. [applause] >> c-span where history unfolds daily. in 1979 c-span was created as publish service by america's television public company and today we continue to bring unfiltered coverage of congress, the white house, the supreme court and public policy events in washington, d.c. and around the country, c-span is brought to you by your cable or satellite provider. >> next hearing on war powers granted by the constitution and whether or not a new authorization for the use of military force is needed for current u.s. military engagements, senate of homeland security and subcommittee heard from attorneys and legal experts from across political spectrum. this is about 90 minutes. >> had never really been authorized by congress, after attacks by 9/11 president bush did constitutional duty and asked congress, if you read

that was supposed to be something that would last forever john marshall said. it's quite curious where we wind up >> this question ask about the japanese and germans during world war ii. we talked about it. i guess you want to ewill be e-- elaborate about lasting lessons that we can take from either the history of habeas from the world war ii era and issues that we talked about percolating today. what should we take away and where would you like to see the court go in the future when it looks at these issues? >> that's a great question. i think we can learn a lot from that historical episode. there are lot of lessons that come out of it that are timely today. the first is -- if you look at speeches that lot of japanese-americans have given in the wake of their internment, they often quote charles evans hughes in the speech he gave. he talk about the constitution. he used a similar phraseology. for a different end result. he said the constitution, you may think it's your protection. it's only scrap of paper. he uses the phrase differently. he says, it's only as

later john marshall would also refer to this suspension clause a partial bill of rights. so it was a really important component of the original constitution. >> interesting fact that in your discussion of the constitutional convention that originally, it was located in article 3 instead of article 1 which is the legislative branch. was there any significance for that. what would have happened they left it in article 3? how might that have worked? >> major point of significance with respect to the original placing of the clause it was put next to the jury trial rights. that shows you just how intimately connected the two provisions were. the jury trial right is the right to be judged by your peers through the criminal process. that was completely wrapped up with suspension clause. all the protections that have long been associated with the english habeas corpus act. is so that's what i think significant about that placement. it winds up getting moved in the and reorganization which was not supposed to have any substantive component to it, in article 1 and there it finds a

that was supposed to be something that would last forever, as john marshall said. is quite curious where we have wound up. we have time for one more. >> this question has to do with the japanese internments of world war ii. i guess you want to maybe even elaborate a little bit more about the lessons that we can the from the history of world war ii era in some of the issues we have talked about that are percolating today. what should we take away and where would you like to see the court go in the future when it looks at these issues? >> so that is a great question. i think we can learn a lot from that historical episode. there are a lot of lessons that come out of it that are timely today. the first is, if you look at speeches that a lot of japanese americans have given about their internment, they often quote charles hughes' speech where he talks about the constitution. and he uses similar phraseology for the war department, but for a different end result. he says, you may think the constitution is your protection, but it is only a scrap of paper. but he uses the

he was not wrong, i mean, he's often criticized for insisting, ignoring john marshall's ruling of the supreme court took the supreme court said this is a sovereign nation, the federal government should come to the rescue of the cherokee, pushback on these georgians, sorry. and that jackson said, you know, this famous line he may or may not have said, that's john marshall's opinion let him enforce it. well, that's in direct violation of the constitution, but he had his reasons which was if he did enforce it the whole country could go up in flames and he knew that and he was right, i mean, it was early to think that , but it was definitely smoldering. next question? i hope you still like me. [laughter] we are so nervous up here. >> what can your research explains how john ross rose to this position and especially having read the fictional book, somewhat based on this and i think in that doesn't he can't that he was abandoned and adopted by a cherokee chief or something like that? is that at all part of the truce? >> was true of sam houston. not true of john ross. john ross was not adopt

. >> john marshall. we head ever read every word toh other, it is nice to live with an outstanding editor who does not let politics get in the way. peter: that is why we're talking to you today about your book, "i love you, but i hate your politics." >> well "i love you, but i hate your politics" it more like it. this book has a long prehistory. based on my marriage with rick. at or wedding, william if f bucy was present. person who walked me down the aisle, the first person -- and the friend of ours at the time, politics makes strange bed fellows, that is our history, i have been the mascot for the right for many years. >> you are very liberal. >> yes, i am a liberal democrat. and i think that there is -- we both voted for guliani the first time. we both believe in the death penalty for abuse, but other than that we've -- literally no position in common, none. abortion, assisted suicide, gun control, all of the big hits we're on opposite sides. >> how many years have you been married. >> 37. >> happily?

. >> with him was photographer john marshall picked by johnny cash to take photos.raphs taken by marshall that have never been seen before. >> one significant photo is this rare color print that shows johnny cash at the prison chapel. the pictures are now on display. you can see them at the san francisco art exchange to honor the 50th anniversary of that concert. >> hey i'm in a giants-a's frame of mind. there were thrills in this bay bridge battle for a while. go pablo. first game of a six straight between the two. ( ♪ ) pixar pier has arrived! prepare to be awed. prepare to be moved. prepare to make a mad dash... ( ♪ ) ...because with the incredicoaster, pixar pal-a-round, and a bunch of your favorite pixar characters, it's going to be pretty incredible. pixar pier is now open! only at disney california adventure park. >>> baseball up top. although i would like to talk about other things liz. but if we go with baseball, battle of the bay. not tampa bay. not chesapeake bay, san francisco bay. battle of the royal. let's go ahead and grill out. band and his dog outsi

. >> mostly john marshall. >> and also john marshall. >> but jefferson is opposed to these midnight appointments. they were called midnight because it seemed like they were the last-minute kind of thing, lame-duck appointments. and of course, that was a mistake. abigail just, whoosh! rushes to her husband's defense and writes a very strong, angry letter back. jefferson tries to explain and he must have, at that point, wondered, what have i got myself in for. and he finally -- a couple of exchanges and finally he just stops. and the relationship is not recovered until 1812, through the efforts of benjamin rush, a mutual friend who works two years to bring these two former friends together. >> a great physician. and then john adams enters the fray by telling jefferson, i had nothing to do with these letters, right? >> that's right. >> he says this -- well, he's saying it to abigail -- or he's -- no, actually, he's saying it to us. he knows we're going to be reading this, okay? >> i knew nothing about this exchange at the time and have nothing more to say about it at this time. >> right. >> they, y

you are following a tradition of john marshall. i have to believe that john who enjoyed sitting colors,r along with his i have a feeling that he would approve of everything we do here. >> don't sell the prior cheap short. john jay was one of the -- he was the first circuit justice. he was the first circuit justice assigned to this. >> thank you so much. [applause] >> c-span, where history unfolds daily. c-span was created as a service as -- by america's cable television companies. we continue to bring unfiltered coverage of congress, the supreme court and public policy event in washington dc and around the country. c-span is brought to you by your cable or satellite provider. now a look at the supreme court as most recent term. potentiald about the impact of justice anthony kennedy retiring. this runs an hour and a half. >> although you guys have bios of our speakers on your table, for the people were watching us on c-span, thank you to c-span for covering us, i will do a short introduction. in order of how they have been covering t

. >> with him was photographer john marshall picked by johnny cash to take photos. we got a look at photographs taken by marshall that have never been seen before. >> one significant photo is this rare color print that shows johnny cash at the prison chapel. the pictures are now on display. you can see them at the san francisco art exchange to honor the 50th anniversary of that concert. >> hey i'm in a giants-a's frame of mind. there were thrills in this bay bridge battle for a while. go pablo. first game of a six straight >>> baseball up top. although i would like to talk about other things liz. but if we go with baseball, battle of the bay. not tampa bay. not chesapeake bay, san francisco bay. battle of the royal. let's go ahead and grill out. band and his dog outside of at&t park. giants got a ball to get on if -- on the board. the a's did it well the a's way. tied at one. steven duggard right on through. that scored a couple of runs it was a 5-run inning. giants cruise from there. won the game 7-1. game two tomorrow night. >>> on to tennis. south african kevin a

[applause] -- [laughter] justice wilkinson you are : following a tradition of john marshall. theas the time before fourth circuit judicial conference was established i , have to believe that john madeira enjoyed sipping with you along with i have a your colleagues, and feeling that he would approve of everything we do here. chief justice roberts: don't sell the prior chief short. john jay was one of the -- he was the first circuit justice. he was the first circuit justice assigned to this. judge wilkinson: chief thank you , so much. [applause] chief justice roberts: thank you. i appreciate it. [applause] >> justice anthony kennedy's retirement brings a significant change to the supreme court. follow the story on c-span, from president trump nominating a replacement, the senate confirmation hearings to the swearing-in, all on c-span, c-span.org, or listen on the free c-span radio app. on c-span this week at 8:00 p.m. eastern in prime time, tuesday the weekly standard posts a conversation on the millennial generation. >> what is happening is bad in kansas, and in high schools, p

. >> donald trump can dominate george washington for john marshall and they couldn't get through.his is a nightmare for red state democrats to pose a highly qualified nominee. all four of those people are highly qualified, and know what they're doing, mainstream judges. red state democrats are going to have a very hard decision. >> joining me now is a congressional reporter for the "usa today." nice to see you on sunday. >> good to see you come to two pitch to make a difficult will for democratic leader chuck schumer opposing a supreme court nominee? >> very difficult. this is an election year. a lot of democrats up for reelection. but there is a handful of those in states that trump won by a 42-point. these democrats are really feeling the heat. they need to win that trump voter and they also need the democratic base to show out. that's a hard line to walk. absolutely do not vote to confirm. they really want them to confirm and also republican voters might not love trump, but are supportive of republicans for the supreme court issue. >> some of the democrats to watch. donnelly, h

john marshal didn't, but he was only talking about one amendment, the fifth amendment.er the wobblies? the courts weren't going to do anything for working people any way. i discovered some inscriptions of that. a woman named elizabeth flynn, she would pass out pamphlets talking about, come to these states that are pressing working people to thin the bill of rights. so if the bill of rights maybe wasn't cited as such by that many people of the federalist generation, certainly the american people did. and that's my story and i'm sticking to it. okay. phew. that was about five years' worth right there, don't you think? all right. what i promised you, so this is definitely when we're going for the trees. that's what your programmer said you wanted. i'm going to take an overview of the bill of rights, tell you some things you may already know, some things i hope you don't already know. and again, my emphasis is not on every single right in the bill of rights. that's why you want to buy my book. it's going to be my stories. the important part of our secret sauce is the role t

the john marshall's come up the great chief justice, all the way through so many justices who are revered given to a great extent by the left. they would not in fact countenanced the kind of scare tactics for one thing. this is beyond the pale. but we also care about results. we are here to make what we believed to be the most humane and compassionate that is not what we were here to do -- when i say we i mean the courts and the land. i would much rather be stewards of the law and take the text, meditate on that text but don't just make it up. and that is the great divide that is going to divide the united statesin senate. >> justice kennedy and judge cavanaugh, and let's watch. >> tomorrow i begin meeting with members of the senate, which plays an essential role in this process. i will tell each senator that i revere the constitution i believe that an independent judiciary is the crown jewel of our constitutional republic. if confirmed by the senate i will keep an open mind in every case and i will always strive to preserve the constitution of the united states and the american rule of l

donald trump can dominate george washington or john marshall or -- and they couldn't get through. i've never seen it this dysfunctional. there's nobody that was trump could nominate from a conservative vent that will get many democratic notes, this is a nightmare for red state democrats. >> dana: do you agree with that assessment? >> i do. look at the ten states where democrats who are running for re-election and states that president trump carried, five of them in states are carried by double digits. they're in a quandary here. how do they satisfy the radical leftist base of the democratic party and how do they present themselves in the general election in a way that will allow them to get bipartisan votes. they're on the horns of a dilemma. >> dana: what happens tonight after the president makes his announcement at 9:00 p.m. eastern? what is the next step for the senate judiciary committee? how quickly you think you could have a hearing on this nominee? >> i'm told the average time from nomination to confirmation is seven days. there's a lot of work to be done. we need to go thr

. > donald trump -- george washington, john marshall, they couldn't get through, maybe a democrats will vote for a trump pick because they have to politically. have never seen it this dysfunctional. there is no one that president rump could nominate from a conservative vent that will get many democratic votes, but this state ghtmare for red democrats to oppose a holly qualified nominee and all four these people are highly qualified, been on the court, know what they are doing, judges, so red state democrats will have a very hard decision and i hope every rally behind l these picks because they are all outstanding. > what is the democratic party's strategy in the senate? you can do the math, you know you have 49 democratic senators. first, let me ask you this. united?ybody going to be >> i can't say that until the president announces his nominee. each senator understands this is a historic decision. it will decide the future of generation or a more and so i know they will look carefully at each nominee. predict how all of my 49 or 48 colleagues in the senate on the democratic side will v

donald trump, john marshall - - they couldn't get through. maybe a handful of democrats will vote for trump pics because they have to politically. i've never seen it this dysfunctional. there's nobody that president trump could nominate from a conservative vent that will get many democratic votes but this is a nightmare for red state democrats to oppose a highly qualified nominee and all are highly qualified. been on the court. know what they're doing. mainstream judges. so red state democrats are going to have a hard decision and i hope every republican will rally behind these pics because they are all outstanding. >>dana: senator lindsey graham. thank you for reading my mind say she couldn't hear me. always good to talk to you. >>> what could a conservative replacement for justice kennedy mean for road the way? ilise hogue, president of naral ♪motorcycle revving ♪ motorcycle revving ♪motorcycle revving ♪ motorcycle revving ♪ no matter who rides point, ♪ there are over 10,000 allstate agents riding sweep. ♪♪ and just like tyrone taylor, they

one -- aaron burr he said you must prosecute him and told the chief justice's third cousin john marshall if you do not contact him i will be impeached. he himself arranged for witnesses to come into the white house and deals with them personally to say if you're willing to testify i will give you a pardon. if you are unwilling i will tell my attorney general to go ahead. historically we had a unitary executive the president was in charge of administering justice attorney general is not in the constitution he make himself attorney general. he pointed himself or minister president could appoint himself attorney general secretary of war and then he can do all of these things. that is a terrible system i am totally against it. but it is the constitution. >> and why is that an official act? so let's suppose i have alleges documents they are my documents in my property i am legally entitled two or not the president and i cannot say all at not be the basis but a constitutionally authorized act as a special status you cannot go pro as a special status you cannot go pro? >> why did president obam

john marshall all boy through so many justices who are revered even to a great extent by the left, like louis brandeis and benjamin cardozo. they would not in fact count on the scare tactics. this is beyond the pale. but also the jurisprudential approach that we just care about results. we are here to make what we believe to be the most humane and compassionate public policy. that's what we are here to do. no, that's not what we are here to do. when i say "we," i am talking about the courts of the land. you are to be stewards of the law and take the text, talking about the text, the text is so terribly important. meditate on that text but don't just make it up. that is a great divide that's going to i think divide the united states senate. >> laura: justin, again, former clerk for both justice kennedy and judge kavanaugh. kavanaugh said this, alluding to what judge starr just said about reverence for the constitution. let's watch. >> tomorrow i begin meeting with members of the senate which plays an essential role in this process. i will tell each senator that i revere the constitution.

donald trump could nominate george washington, john marshall , and they could not get through.aybe a handful of democrats will vote for a trump take because i have to politically. i have never seen it this dysfunctional. there is nobody that the president could nominate, from a conservative vent, that will get many democratic votes. this is a nightmare for red state democrats, to oppose a highly qualified nominee. and all four of these people are highly nominee. they have been on the court, know what they are doing, mainstream judges. red state democrats will have a very hard decision. i hope every republican will rally behind these picks, because they are all outstanding. host: from senator lindsey graham. let's go to jim in missouri. good morning. caller: howdy. one thing that stands out in my mind in this whole supreme court deal -- what is the difference between a conservative and a liberal on this up in court? host: thanks for the caller. goes to what ier was trying to talk about earlier, the approach to legal reasoning and legal ruling. by and large, the liberal leaning j

donald trump could nominate george washington or john marshall and they couldn't get through.y be a handful of democrats will vote for a trumpet because they have to politically. i've never seen at this dysfunctional. there's nobody that president trump could nominate from a conservative event that will get many democratic votes. this is a nightmare for red state democrats to oppose a highly qualified nominee and all four of these people are highly qualified, been on the court, know what they are doing, mainstream judges. red state democrats are going to have a very hard decision and i hope every republican will rally behind these picks because they are all outstanding. >> dana: all right, senator graham, thank you for reading my mind since you couldn't hear me and for joining us today. it's always good to talk to you. >> senator graham: thank you. >> dana: up next, what could a conservative replacement for justice kennedy mean for roe v. wade? tlyse hogue, president of naral, pro-choice america, joins us when we come back. etty fast. you just want to get a real price and that

donald trump could nominate george washington or john marshall and they couldn't get through, maybe aandful of democrats will vote for a trump back because they act him politically. i've never seen it this dysfunctional. there is nobody president trump could nominate that would get many democratic votes. this is a nightmare for red state democrats to pose a highly qualified nominee. all four of these people are highly qualified. the have been on the court and know what they are doing. red state democrats are going to have a hard decision. i hope every republican will rally behind these picks. host: those four on the short list, brett kavanaugh, amy coney barrett, thomas hardiman, and raymond kethledge. we are taking your phone calls. who is your ideal supreme court justice? charles from indiana on our line for independents. caller: good morning. i picked the woman by the name of barrett. there should be more women running for office. congress should have more women. the women should be paid as much as the man when they do the same job. host: we will go to richard on the republican lin

thomas jefferson, john marshall, going back a century, thomas jefferson didn't like it that he got subpoenaedocuments, but he obeyed. i'm sure richard nixon didn't enjoy the fact that he was getting a subpoena for the famous and now infamous white house tapes, but he obeyed and that's the rule of law in our country. neil: but it was the threat of subpoena from your office, not the implementation of one, that ultimately got bill clinton to talk to you, right? >> no, we actually subpoenaed him, but then we negotiated the withdrawal of the subpoena. neil: so. >> which was fine, out of respect for the presidency. neil: thank you for clarifying. ken, do you know whether he would argue that -- breath kavanaugh would argue that if a prosecutor wants to talk to the president of the united states, he can force the issue? >> well, we're in a different situation now, neil, as you know, because bob mueller is an officer of the justice department. in those days we were talking about an independent counsel, right, and the independent counsel had his or her own authority. so it's going to be a different set

. >> donald trump, josh washington, john marshal and they couldn't get through.vote for a trump pick because they have to politically. this is nightmare for red state democrats to have to pick a highly qualified nominee. main stream judges and so red state democrats are going to have very hard decision, and hope every republican will rally behind these picks because they're all about standing. >> paul kaine, how little is the vice that red state democrats are in right now in the senate? >> it's particularly tight for joe mansion in west virginia, had i had had i had had i haddy heidi height kchl. this is going to become an issue that's going to be a dividing line and it could rally the conservative base there to come out for his republican opponent marcy. it's a dicy move for three or four of them right now. >> and play that out kind of in the long-term. let's say a couple of democrats do break, what happen tuesday the divide in the democratic party? >> it depends if they provide the margin of victory. right now we're a year a half into the trump administration,

mean, i would suggest anybody who wants to understand how things work, john marshall, the chief justicet save the united states. a great read. constitution if i am not mistaken, is the longest living constitution in the universe, i believe. it has served us well. served us very well. republicrepresentative . if we were a true democracy, it would be like two walls -- two wolves. also, if we had one man, one vote, get rid of the electoral the only way to elect a president would be to take a vote in new york city, take a vote in california, and pick another big city. that is where they began -- that is where they would be campaigning. no. works.stem the gentleman who gave us the constitution and the bill of rights, all of it, they set it up, they want congress to fight. think the house of representatives is supposed to be the hot cup of coffee. the senate is the saucer. and if they can't resolve it, we have a third branch, judiciary. very well thought out, it has served us well. host: thanks. he mentioned the system works. would you agree? guest: i think it has worked for a very long time,

oh i'm joined tonight by john tesh al with the german marshall fund of the united states mr tesco is an author and foreign policy analyst who has worked at the german defense ministry as well as with nato he had a front row seat at the nato summit in brussels mr this hour it's good to have you back on the show maybe you can help us find some clarity truck declared victory today saying that everyone had agreed to his demands for spending four percent of g.d.p. on defense but that is not what we are hearing from other leaders what is the truth . the truth is that of course four percent was not agreed at the summit what we have seen as a classic trump in a sense we have seen a president who has escalated the negotiations and the proceedings really of the summit on that second day today and in order to increase pressure on the other allies and threatening even to basically was draw the united states from the alliance and there was this kind of zero gravity moment today at the summit for all those present that was you know a moment where everybody thought ok you know is this the kind of s

on may 28th, marshall along with general bell had the distinction of escorting general john j. per shingal his staff. marshall was depressed over being left behind.pershingal hi. marshall was depressed over being left behind. he didn't have to wait long before learning that brigadier general elseiber had commanded marshall's services, marshall worked to make the preparations for his departure for france. marshall boarded his transport vessel on june 10, set to work organizing the first division. in the course of his work he learned that many men in the division had only received their rifles after they completed their training and were boarding the trains to their transports. more troubling for marshall was the fact that the division was about 20% of the original. the vest of the regiment had been taken to form new regiments. regarding the situation years later, marshall said 20% of the regiments were recruits and it was quite a messed-up affair when they arrived. they had no knowledge of how to drill, handle their rifles and they were 20% of the strength of the companies. this

john cowles ready the president of the air marshals the c.h.p. to clear the air marshals association believes that missions based on recognized intelligence or in support of ongoing federal investigations is the proper criteria for flight scheduling currently the quiet skies program does not meet the criteria we find acceptable so the t.s.a. is sort of the new kids on the block as far as this goes because they haven't been around as long as like the air marshals and that but every other agency in the inflight is saying no this doesn't work i don't know why you're doing. income inequality in the united states continues to surge a study published by the economic policy institute found that income inequality cross america grew fastest between two thousand and nine and twenty fifteen the latest year with recorded data by the i.r.s. sarah monta oka has more. the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting for at least that's the case across america today the economic policy institute found that rising inequality is not just a problem major cities

john karr's ready the president of the air marshal c.h. to clear the air marshals association believes that missions based on recognized intelligence or in support of ongoing federal investigations is the proper criteria for flight scheduling currently the quiet skies program does not meet the criteria we find acceptable so the t.s.a. is sort of the new kids on the block as far as this goes because they haven't been around as long as like the air marshals and that but every other agency and in the in-flight is saying no this doesn't work i don't know why you're doing. income inequality in the united states continues to surge a study published by the economic policy institute found that income inequality cross america grew fastest between two thousand and nine and twenty fifteen the latest year with recorded data by the i.r.s. sarah montas to oka has more. the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting for at least that's the case across america today the economic policy institute found that rising inequality is not just a problem maj

mcmullin, former chief policy director of the house republican conference and gloria brown marshal associate professor at john j. college of justice and author of "the voting rights war." let's start with this admission we heard from guiliani here. i'm going to go with you. give me a reaction to what he just had to say. >> yeah, well, i think guiliani is -- he's in a terrible position, as is his client. president trump. >> they don't see it that way, though. >> well, i think they do. i think they have decided they're going to fight this battle. it's a political battle. and they understand that eventually this will come down to impeachment. so they're fighting this war in this battle in a political way, not a legal way, as much. i think in the end, this is going to come back to bite them. because right now there is an absence of information from the special counsel. we don't know what they know or not. that's the way it should be. we get drips and drabs of information in the press. but we really don't -- we don't know what the special counsel knows. so in that information void, guiliani and the president can s

on may 29, marshall had the distinction of escorting general john j. pershing and the staff and it should come as no surprise from anyone that he was in the depressed frame of mind over being left behind. fortunately, the war was moving at a fairly rapid pace and he did not have to wait long before hearing that the first commander of the first infantry division have requested marshall posey as an officer. over the next day and a half, he worked quickly to make the necessary preparations for his the partner. marshall boarded the transport vessel on june 10 and set to work organizing the first division. in the course of his work, he learned that many men had only received their rifles after returning from their transports. or shall learned that the transport was 20% of the original. the rest of the regiment had been taken to form new regiments. recalling the situation many years later, marshall said although only 20% of these regiments were recruits and it was a mess of the fair when they arrived, they had no knowledge of how to drill, handle their rifle

maryland man is being held without evening accused of going into a restricted area at bwi marshall airport. police tell us john evening of the fourth of july. that's according to "the baltimore sun" which reports that hill tried to allegedly open a secured doort bwi's international concourse. hill did not have a boarding pass and investigators found a small knife in his waistband. he's facing a number of charges now. "the sun" reports tvs is trying to figure how the how he got through a checkpoint without a ticket and a knife. we it's the video we've been talking about all because it begs the question no harm no fall. a guy in virginia calls 911 after he says he was fouled at an l.a. fitness in sterling. this evening a new view from the body cam of the deputyho had to respond to that call. the deputy handled the call like a pro mediating the dispute between the two ballers. no charges were pressed and the mennt elly returned to the court. >> they are recreating that dispute there, all right. >> a first of itsind is getting ready to open. just a few months from now right here in d.c. starbucks says it's launchi

marshall nicely. not has can achieve the so much more needs to be john and i think people have to be a concrete solutions. and i feel. such. people across the world have been watching the longest lunar eclipse of this century the phenomenon happens when the moon passes through the earth's shadow turning a deep red color known as the blood moon. visible in australia asia africa europe and south america. greek prime minister alexa sit cross has accepted political responsibility for the deadly wildfires that killed at least eighty seven people in the country this.

will marshall has new ideas and we always don't agree on every specific that i'm still liberal in the john stuart mill sense that if you debate ideas you get better ideas and the worst thing liberals can do is adopt a groupthink which is what republicans have done. what it means to be liberal is to believe in robust debate of ideas and you have been committed to that. if i could recognize my two colleagues, john delaney was helpful in crafting the earned income tax credit legislation and the coalition behind that and the real source is your wife who everyone in washington knows and appreciate the friendship. i didn't know you were a rhodes scholar. tim often comes -- the future of work and what it means in a changing economy and understand technology and look forward to continuing to exchange ideas and work together. let me be brief, there is a mckinsey study which i found informative and the mckinsey study had three points. between 2005, and 2015, 80% of american households, 81%. mckenzie looked at this and surveyed, what do you blame for that stagnation and you could have written donald

john dean right here. which we do. >> you know nothing. and their then marshall mcluhan was you know nothing about my work.u got to be a professor of columbia amazes me or something like that. >> anyway, there is a huge difference between michael cohen at this stage and john dean when he became famous. john dean told his story and told how he told the president there was a cancer on the presidency. he admitted that he was part of the watergate cover-up. michael cohen hasn't admitted anything. michael cohen hasn't said what he knows. so we can't really draw a comparison if michael cohen is merely speculating, or his representatives are merely speculating that he may say something damaging until he actually says it. we don't know what michael cohen himself is accused of doing wrong, if anything, and we don't know if he knows anything bad about donald trump. so i think the comparison sort of falls apart right at the very beginning. >> so, john, what is this? is this just some sort of public campaign to either influence the president to a potential pardon? is it a message to prosecutors? how do you see this? >

back off while i was marshall's and what not to do in ireland has actually shown the world what we should be doing to break this down we sent correspondent john a phone doll in ireland and he filed this report. i lend is a magical country full of wonder. and i'm not just saying that because my last name is o'donnell and as an american in i feel utterly disconnected from. and some overcompensating by romanticizing an idealized in a far off land especially relative to the box of corruption that my country has become that's what i'm doing i'm giving credit where credit is due the republic of ireland will become the world's first country to sell off its investments in basel fuel companies after a bill was passed with all party support in the lower house of parliament that's right ireland is the first twenty three in the world poised to divest from fossil fuel that's a big deal because climate change is a real and serious issue. anyway i know it all you news junkies are thinking right now. didn't like norway divest from fossil fuels like last november shun it now. norway's huge one trillion dollars sovereign wealth fund has only partially divested

marshal, who has welcomed new ideas, new vision. we always don't agree on every specific, but i'm still a liberal in the john stewart mills sense, which is if you debate ideas, you get better ideas. the worst thing liberalks do is adopt a group think, which is what republicans have done. what it means to be liberal is to believe in a robust debate of ideas and you have been committed to that. just quickly, if i could recognize my two colleagues. john delaney was helpful in crafting the earned income tax credit and legislation, and h p helped to get a coalition behind that, and the real force, is your wife, who everyone in washington knows. so i appreciate that and appreciate the friendship. and jim, i didn't know you were a rhodes scholar. jim comes on the house floor and we talk about the future of work and what it's going to mean in a changing economy and really understands technology and i look forward to exchanging ideas and working together. let me be grief, there is a mckenzie study, which i found very informative, and they -- the study had basically three points. between 2005 and 2015, 81% of american households have had their

marshals observe up to 50 travelers a day on domestic flights. if no suspicious behavior is discovered, people are removed from the program within 90 days. there is no electronic surveillance, like wiretaps. johnwas the t.s.a. administrator when quiet skies launched. >> so, the whole idea was how can we mitigate risks against known risks and unknown risks, people who might do something but just haven't come up on anybody's radar yet. >> reporter: do you think it's a good use of your man power? >> absolutely not. >> reporter: whistleblower robert maclean is an air marshal. he filed a formal complaint about the program. >> it goes back to what i say over and over: the air marshal's job is to protect the cockpit and the pilots. let somebody else do the intelligence and criminal investigative work. >> reporter: t.s.a. insists the program's goal is to ensure the safety of passengers and flight crews during flight, that it is not intended to surveil ordinary americans. jeff? >> glor: kris van cleave at reagan for us tonight. still ahead on the "cbs evening news," video of a deadly police shooting leads to a controversial decision. lyred... in jellyfish. in clinical trials, prevagen has been shown to

marshall has welcomed new ideas, a new vision. we always don't agree on every specific and i am still a liberal in the john stuart mill says which is to debate ideas, ultimately you get better ideas and i think the worst thing the girls can do is adopt a group which is what republicans have done. what it means to be liberal is to believe in a robust debate of ideas and you have been committed to that quickly, if i could recognize my two colleagues . john delaney was helpful in crafting our tax credit legislation and helped to get a coalition behind. the real force of course is your wife who everyone in washington knows and i appreciate that and appreciate the friendship and jim, i didn't know you were road scholar. now, german, often because on the house floor and we talk about the future of work when it's going to be in a changing economy. and really understands technology and i look forward to continuing to exchange ideas and work together. let me be read here. but the mackenzie study and baines study which i found very informative and the mackenzie study has basically three points. between 2005 and 2015, 81 percent of american h

marshall who has welcomed new ideas, new vision. we always don't agree on every specific, but i'm still a liberal in the john stuart mills sense whichis that if you debate ideas, ultimately you get better ideas. and i think the worst thing liberals can do is to adopt a group think, which is what republicans have done. i think what it means to be liberal is to believe in a robust debate of ideas, and you have really been committed to that. just quickly if i could recognize my two colleagues, john delaney was very helpful in crafting the earned income tax credit legislation and helped to get a coalition behind that, and the real force, of course, is your wife who everyone in washington knows. so i appreciate that and appreciate the friendship. and jim, i didn't know you were a rhodes scholar. [laughter] so now i -- >> [inaudible] [laughter] >> but jim often comes on the house floor, and we talk about the future of work and what it's going to mean in a changing economy and really understands technology, and i look forward to continuing to exchange ideas and work together. let me be brief. there is a mckenzie study and bain study which

marshals observe up to 50 travelers a day on domestic flights. if no suspicious behavior is discovered, people are removed from the program within 90 days. there is no electronic surveillance like wiretaps. john pistole was the tsa administrator when quiet skies launched. >> the whole idea was how can we mitigate risk against known risks and unknown risks, people who might do something but just haven't come up on anybody's radar yet? >> do you think it's a good use of your manpower? >> absolutely not. >> whistle-blower robert maclean is an air marshal. he filed a formal complaint with the program. >> it goes back to what i say over and over. the air marshal's job is to protect the cockpit and the pilots. let somebody else do the intelligence and criminal investigative work. >> reporter: the tsa insists the program's goal is to ensure the safety of passengers and flight crews during flight, that it is not intended to surveil ordinary ♪ ♪ degree motionsense™. ultimate freshness with every move. the more you move, the more it works. degree®, it won't let you down. the more you move, gives skin the moisture it needs and keeps it there longer with lock-in moisture technology skin is petal smooth a

under cover air marshals have documented whether passengers fidget, have a computer, use a jump in their adam's amor a cold penetrating stair among other behaviors according to the records. johnne who flies an awful lot between here and los angeles, i was like what? this is pretty shocking. you report there are a dunz rules for screening passengers. based on this information you were able to get, how does this exactly determine who gets tracked, when does actual surveillance begin? so tell us the story. >> it's actually -- here's what we know. we know that thousands of ordinary americans have been followed by teams of armed air marshals on domestic flights and that these people are not suspected of any crime, they're not on any watch list. and yet there are reports being written of every single thing they do at the airport, on the flight and until they leave the airport. we know that every single person who is an american who leaves a country and flies back is screened for this program. what we don't know, we know right now in a may bulletin that we obtained there were 15 rules related to travel patterns and behavior. it could be because you have traveled through istanbul, th