mr. mihm, i want you to comment on why is it that every time, you are not the only person that is talking about this, the concorde coalition, i do not know if it exists, but they used to talk about these things and you know, there is this a equation in front of us -- we are spending more than we are taking in -- the only solution i ever hear is, we have to cut social security and cut medicare and yada yada. look, the fed has been managing the economy with low interest and thathelp the rich, is why the debt has been manageable. it is all smoke and mirrors. tell me, why don't we talk about putting the maximum tax bracket back up to 90%, like it was i think in the 1950's after world war ii, and squeeze the top 10% in the nation that has profited from all of this "economic growth," and led them pay for this stuff. because i earned my benefits. host: that is the revenue side. guest: i completely understand where the caller is coming from and that is why we have been saying the solution will have to

mr. mihm you to comment on why is it that every time, you are not the only person that is talking about this, the concorde coalition, i do not know if it exists, but they used to talk about these things and you know, there is this a equation in front of us -- we are spending more than we are taking in -- the only solution i ever hear is, we have to cut social security and cut medicare and yada yada. look, the fed has been managing the economy with low interest and thathelp the rich, is why the debt has been manageable. it is all smoke and mirrors. tell me, why don't we talk about putting the maximum tax bracket back up to 90%, like it was i think in the 1950's after world war ii, and squeeze the top 10% in the nation that has profited from all of this "economic growth," and led them pay for this stuff. because i earned my benefits. host: that is the revenue side. guest: i completely understand where the caller is coming from and that is why we have been saying the solution will have to be a mi