i'm jamie undone with somcan. there are other issues that are raised. first central soma creates a second financial district at the expense of familiarses , youths and seniors the development is not conducive to a healthy neighbor. this e.i.r. must be studied against the healthy development measurement tools, developed with the department of public health and community organizations during the eastern neighborhoods rezoning. adequate infrastructure with ride-hailing companies are not fully considered. the transportation infrastructure adjacent to the plan area of central soma, lags behind the needs of past and current growth. it's negligent with ride-hailing and transportation network services like uber and lyft. the impact can in no way be equated with bicycles in terms of traffic or environment impact. next, central soma disregards soma special use district. we demand that projects when the soma youth and family district are required to undergo approval by resident groups and community organizations before they're considered by the planning department

my name is t.j.bosell with somcan. and continuing our points in our eir appeal. the uses in central soma is inadequate. the eir indicates that it is removing protective zoning for p.d.r. but there's no complete timeline of how much eir has been lost and which in part is to stop the loss of eir. and having incentives to protect the eir uses is problematic. and it will quickly not be incentives tomorrow. depending on the land use, financial and macroconditions driving the development market at any particular time. more consideration of the continued pdr use is required in the eir. the eir does not address the lack of affordability of housing and inventicized for the plan and the social and economic makeup of the new residents that will result. the plan does not provide any studies or figures that support that the new development will drive down the housing costs. as the eir states on page v-10, what effects the development on the housing affordability is a matter of controversy and that the influx of real estate investment and higher income residents may increase t