alamo square park, historic third baptist church, and it will create a problem of the egress and ingress of people on that block. so, please do the right thing and say that there are some things worth holding on to. we do have antiques that are worth millions of dollars and you have antiques on that block. and even that building, that has a certain character that should not be changed. >> president wolfram: thank you. any other member of the public wish to speak to this matter, if so, please come forward. you'll have 30 -- three minutes with the buzzer at 30 seconds before your time is up. >> thank you, good afternoon. virginia marshall. vice president of the san francisco alliance of black school educators and a friend of third baptist church. many people think i'm a member there because i'm there so often. i'm here to support reverend brown and the third baptist membership that you do not change that this historical landmark and keeping the parking the way it is. parking is a dire need in san francisco as you well know, and also affordable housing. i don't think not one of those units

which we signed on with the building department, sprinklers are required for that new unit and that the egressh out to the public way. >> supervisor safai: but not for the entire building. >> not for the entire building. again, with our fs 05, i welcome anybody on-line watching this to go look up fs 05, and it outlines the requirements to what extent you sprinkler a whole building. >> supervisor safai: well, if you had to springler the whole building, you'd be talking about displacing residents, while you do the whole building. you have decks and the cantilevered portion of a property. in that instance, you have to have two forms of egress if you just have -- i'm sorry. >> what we're seeing, and again, this is prescribed in the code, i'd like to make a quite point here. earlier, i was sitting here and taking this all in with -- we're amending the planning code, and you have that authority to do that as this board, this body. the fire code, the state code, and so does the building code. and as the local jurisdiction, we do not have the authority to waive state requirements on building and fire

special community events, weekly events that happen, and we believe that this structure would impair the egress, the coming and going of our members, of our seniors, many of our members are mobility-impaired. we believe this will decrease the amount of space they have to come back and forth. we believe that this will limit the amount of parking for our guests and our community. i implore upon you to please take our comments into consideration and not approve this certificate of appropriateness. thank you. >> president wolfram: thank you. >> chairperson, members of the board. my name is audrey lewis, assistant to dr. amos brown, third baptist church. i've been a member of third baptist around 40 years, and i have been blessed to work for the city and county of san francisco for some 39 years in the health department and real estate department. my concern, being a member of third baptist for many years, and i worked in that area over the years, and the area, and it is extremely compacted and difficult right now. i'm not one who is opposed to change, but if a change is made wherein there's no cons

. >> we're looking forward to have secured parking to minimize the egress of you know visiting and the members of the public but really to minimize the investigators remaining remains from our advancing and so the facility. >> we have a new visitors area we're building that is a little bit more friendly to families. >> one thing you may notice in the room no windows there is no natural light not good for most autopsy but in the new facility at new hall we made that an objective they want to insure we were able to look up in the middle of exam and see the sky and see natural lights. >> that's one of the things the architect did to draw in as much light as possible. >> we have staff here onsite we insure the design of the new design enables the investigators and other investigators skiefksz to consider to house on site this meant we needed to design and plan for locker room facilities and shower rooms the ability to sleep. >> third of the construction going into the building has been by contributions of small businesses. >> part of the project is also inclusive to the sidewalk have all n

we need it open for fire access, the egress. thank you. okay. we will now hear from the permit holder. you have 12 minutes, mr. albright. >> good evening, president fung, commissioners, lazarus, wilson and honda. we're the under dog tonight. i've got my colleague, melanie sangupta to help me out this evening. you're here tonight to look at these findings and see if you can uphold the findings and deny this facility. as we said in our materials, we don't think there is evidence to support the finding, so is what the evidence? the testimony? the photographs we just saw? it's our photo simulations and the plans, and we think that there is no evidence to meet the findings that you have to make that was either presented tonight or previously presented. the department of public health, department of public works, and planning department concur in their brief, department of public works does not believe there's evidence to make the findings tonight. and so what are those findings? if you look at findings seven and eight, it's whether this is a planning

in the under served area, the food truck would increase pedestrian congestion on the sidewalk and obstruct emergency egress from the on -- affronting if a ilt is, the truck would obstruct the view of the physician -- physical storefront. following that, on february 26, 2018, the owner modified the location with d.p.w. order 187-470 to operate at 281 geary street, on -- on geary street approximately 80 linear feet east of powell street, operating friday and saturday from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. and sunday from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. [inaudible] >> -- and reduce the hours of operation on saturdays and sundays to after 6:00 p.m. to avoid conflict with the loading zone. based on the information presented at the time of the application and the public works hearing, the department believes it appropriately modified and conditioned the approval of permit 17-mff-001 for san francisco's hometown creamery. to discuss a few of the comments which were also discussed in the brief, the -- i'll just say that each mobile food facility permit is at different locations, has different challenges and different and different

we have to find a weight that separates the truest silence egress from those who are trying to get intode that people from this country. >> when the president was going after the fbi leadership, a couple of agents that were texting him and saying they wanted him to stop being elected, there were a couple that said he's attacking law enforcement. now leaders in your party like dick durbin are saying that i.c.e. agents are incompetent, that's a word he used. i don't see you defending law enforcement in that case, these are people trying to break up games. they are trying to break up child sex trafficking rings. and yet democratic leaders are attacking these i.c.e. agents and calling them incompetent. >> let's be clear, no one in the mainstream leadership is saying, we should abolish i.c.e. >> ed: hold on, pardon me once decadent. dick durbin said they were incompetent. >> and i said nobody in mainstream democratic leadership is saying we should abolish i.c.e. i'm saying we should not increase the budget, it's being used to continue family separations and not reunite kids. we cannot increa

the p.u.c. parcel provides parking, landscaping, inaggress andand egress and emergency vehe access to the shorebreezertments. and as you all know there is a shortage of affordable housing in the bay area and in response to this shortage the city of mountain view decided in 2014 to rehabilitate and expand the shorebreeze apartments. in january of this year the city of mountain view amended its precise plan to add 15 net new affordable housing units at the shorebreeze apartments. and this is an artist rendering of what that redevelopment will look like. the private and public funding partners have broad support of the development. and it includes the county of santa clara housing authority and the city of mountain view and the housing trust silicon valley, and the state of california. so the existing lease doesn't expire until march 2031, so one might ask why we're entering into a new lease today. that's because midpin housing funding partners require a 60-year term with pre-determined ground lease rent to meet regulatory requirements for tax credits and local funding. because the existing lease has on

the table is leer clear may not be used for additional light or egress or emergencyies are cue emergency rescue. in his new plan, he changed the wording and now his reasoning is to improve livability of the unit. in reality, he doesn't live in subject property and all he wants is city views and profit. another condition that is not met is actually attachment b, the declaration of use limitation. this is signed by mr. syad and notarized. the opening of his building no longer complyies with the san francisco building code then the opening shall be closed off and protected by a wall, not a window. that is ab9 condition 7. at the moment i am building a roof deck and in the future i may build a third floor. >> clerk: sir, your time is up. we have already had the full appeal hearing and it three minutes each. >> clerk: is there any public comment on this item? yes? if there are other people please come up so we don't have to pate. wait. you are a representative of a so you can't speak. please approach and identify yourself. >> my name is indiscernible i think i had opportunity to speak at the

along golden gate, which is our main access to the site, you can see the space provided here, which is emergency access space, egress space, that needs to be kept clear in case there's a fire or an accident within the building. the other areas that have been designated that are happened out here, we -- mapped out here, we need to have power coordinated to the project via pg&e, and this area has been designated to be the power feed for construction, which is where one of the three trees is currently located. that location and pad has been designated, again by pg&e as far as what their limits and parameters are for us. the second tree also conflicted currently with the access to the hoist, so this ramp and sloping of the ramp to the hoist is due to providing the proper slope in accordance with a.d.a. requirements. and then, the third tree access is our only means of provide any off haul or waste control or management on the project site. >> clerk: thank you. your time is up. thank you. >> president fong: you'll have three minutes in rebuttal. >> no problem. thank you. >> clerk: we will now hear from the department. >>

think from talking to the building, planning, and fire department there are serious impediments to adus in general. for adding additional unit do you have to have two forms of egress, do you have to have sprinklers through the whole building? these are more impediments than asking for a street tree to be planted, so although i would like to see it be required still first that you plant a tree, i am okay with this ultimate compromise because i think in the end even if folks dosym do supervisor fewer, pay the fee, the city will come back and have the money to plant that tree in the same spot. in the end i think we will get street trees out of this which i think is important. >> thank you. supervisor fewer, you wanted to sever item 66? you want a role call vote? okay, for item 66 let's do a role call vote. [roll call] eight ayes and three noes. >> can we resend the vote. >> motion made by supervisor norman yee. could you call the role for item 66. is there anything supervisor yee that you want to discuss? >> no. i was in the wrong thing. [roll call] there are 7ayes an and two noes. >> passes on the first reading. what is the next item. >> new business. >> submit. >>

there are workarounds for all of that for the munimobile buses that will be utilizing that particular ingress and egress. labor statistics, as a note in my previous report, there were no recordable's and no lost time. we are almost at 5.4 million draft hours on the project. so with that, i will turn it over to the -- to run for the rest. i appreciate your interest and thanks for all your attention for all these updates. >> i have one question. it has been my perception, but i may be wrong, that a.c. transit is not assuming that the best storage facility will be fully operational on the 14th when we begin service. but, looking at your slide, it looks like it just may be. is there a disconnect sterically. >> i see there is no reason -- the admin building will be ready as soon as the permanent power is in place, which we anticipate will come next week and then a week after that. by the end of july, the admin building will be ready for occupation. and then after the striping that will happen between july 25th and 27th, then that essentially completes everything that i see for a.c. transit's movement. >> ok.

so the smoke issue and some other issues shouldn't really apply and that's what's supposed to trigger high-rise is smoke control and emergency egress. >> i guess it's more -- to commissioner walker's point, what is the make up of this team we would put together, make our case why we are a unique build here. what is the make-up of that committee. it doesn't look like this has happened before. i don't think we have had to deal with this level before. >> it doesn't look like this has happened before, but just from my experience since i came from the fire department i spent time working with city agencies, pardon the pun, to put out fires. i've worked with erin coming up with solutions when it comes to issues similar to this. so i believe, if we have the state fire marshal's office at the table, with our fire marshal chief cossio saying we need flexibility. and bringing erin and bringing in maybe some of our state representatives, i would be happy to reach out to them and ask them to sit at the table and try to hammer out some kind of compromise. so it's just about getting the right people to the table and making sense of why they made

the house. trish: back, art, your own pets? >> my own pets, yes. deer, emus, they ma -- macheted them. we went to disneyland. my driveway is couple miles long. there was no access and egressat all. they came back twice more. i had to have guards 24/7 around the house, armed guards. you can't have guns in california. armed guards around the house at that time. reagan was kind send sending me secret service see the schools. we have six children. we had two little kids going to kindergarten, to see if they would be safe, not kidnapped. >> my gosh. >> it was very serious event. that i have not talked about this in public every. trish: so sorry to here about your kids worrying about them at school, for them to done something to your own animals this is horrible. what you're telling me what we're seeing, in terms of the horrors and upset me greatly, it is not necessarily anything new? >> it is not new. i got rid of my column that i was writing in "the l.a. times." i got, i was doing kcla every day. i had a show on that. i did the national public radio news, little news clip there. i just got rid of all that. if anyone is that serious, i'm sorry i'm not going to fight that battl

because the bouyancy of the life jacket holds them against the roof and makes it even more difficult for them to get to some point of ingress or egress. these are not open vehicles. when they're in the water it's almost like an enclosed bus. it's almost like, imagine if you're on an airplane in the water or on a bus in the water. it is not a boat. it's a vehicle. and so the ntsb recommendations were pretty straightforward. unfortunately nothing happened as a result of those recommendations. i'm in the early stages of drafting legislation with input from the ntsb and the coast guard to require that the design issues with these passenger vessels be addressed and that the boats that are not compliant be taken out of service until they can be compliant. we think that their past recommendations are reasonable and common sense. we really think that the biggest problem that has to be addressed is this reserved bouyancy that has been pointed out in the past at part of the significant problem. and if they can't do the bouyancy in a really timely basis at a minimum remove the canopies if they are going on the water. so there's an opportunity f

who may know winter hill, the television masts up there, the ground is really steep and there are lots of valleys and ditches. access and egress resolve it as quickly as we can. our correspondent this morning was saying that it was possibly the worst he has seen for some time. what is your analysis? both incidents that saddleworth and thamesside, and the winter hill fire, bolton and lancashire, they are similar sorts of incidents. the geology is very similar. they are just difficult to get on top of. the wind changes direction, the fire changes direction. it is a difficult and challenging incident. do you have any idea of fun it will be under control? very difficult to put a timeframe on that. i anticipate us being there all this week. we could do with a bit of help from the weather, i never thought i would say that, but a bit of rain would be really good. we are just going to carry on working as hard as we can with the support of our partner agencies and the military, to try to resolve this as quickly as we can. you are clearly busy, and we appreciate your time this morning. thank you. time to get the news, travel and weather

market for the bond market fall, a significantly, at all meaning there is no, no expectation for inflation any only question moving forward a lot of economists posit great did heo egressionn from big businesspeople to small are worried about the potential impact including inflationary on their business, so the job number we know is good, what is going to be the impact of the tariff war? at least according to the president's words starts today in terms of trade war that is moving forward now that number is out the number is good. dagen: steve forbes markets are looking at this number, right now, and you see, the futures turning around 24 pointed gain on dow futures, what are you looking at in in this report this is a lot of good news. >> there is a lot of good news it shows the economy is going in the right direction if we don't get a full-scale trade war, going to be a real boom for this economy, you will see the stock market go up several thousand points if we get that cloud out of the way. but that is a cloud over there. and we have to remember, tariffs are sales taxes the household surveys another thing to look at in this jobs' report didn't go up that much small busi