witness on al-jazeera. iraq matters and in doha the top stories on twelve boys and their football coach have been found after ten days missing in a flooded cave in thailand parents cheered as their agonizing wait for news came to an end the operation will now turn to working out how to pull the group from the underground complex. to live around the mountain is not rising with the seal team has found them they have to take care of them inside the mansion first we won't take any risks but it seems cool because it's their job to bring the mess what we have to do here is to make sure the n.h.l. does not rise up mexico's president elect says he's offered to help reduce a u.s. bound migration in exchange for president donald trump support and there is money well look doris spoke to trump on the phone after his electoral wind on sunday the u.n. says more than a quarter of a million syrians have now been were displaced by the government's offensive to retake that our province jordan is said to hold talks with syria

to make a decision is a major flaw in the witness identification system and the next witness here in this experiment is proof of how this can happen. i think at the. bottom of the closeness and i'm not confident at that's really him. that's the guy that we think is the person to. accuse the costs he's the closest so you can see the witness starting to change their identification decision because of some subtle pressure absolutely. in dallas the eyewitness identification procedure used in christopher scott's case was a powerful tool for the prosecution despite its many flaws they took me straight to my more you know he told me say look. this is capital murder ok when he's dead he saved the life and death is what you mean he's exactly what i see they can be the key to you i give you a life sentence and with no forensic evidence to lean on the prosecution put all of its weight behind the testimony of its star witness i can believe she was seeing where she was seen because. it is like a play is like a movie when you see the prosecutor doing his team with his witnesses lead her into all o

one hundred people responded that same day offering to testify as witnesses. hunted around us was in germany when he saw the appeal he had heard good things about the syrian human rights lawyer albert he was known for his courage in defending countless political detainees at trials in syria. never liked less. i was surprised actually. here i had an opportunity to bring criminal charges. despite not being german. yeah exactly and chance for me so as i said it was an opportunity as. soon as i saw the appeal. i talked to and we are right away. in twenty fifteen and his wife were able to escape and come to germany where they were recognized towns political refugees they had taken part in the mass protests against assad in twenty eleven was peaceful activists plus they were on the syrian intelligence agencies wanted list at the end of twenty eleven i had been arrested by military intelligence in damascus and taken to the newtonians branch to one find they are now to give evidence to the german attorney general all the karpin strip in this present they were like tot

key witness, former fbi deputy assistant director peter strzok. he told a joint house panel this morning that his work was never tainted by politics. the joint hearing of the house judiciary and government oversight and reform committee expected to reconvene at about 2:00 p.m. eastern. members heading to the house chamber for votes and we will continue with our live coverage at that time. by the way, you can watch the entire hearing tonight starting at 8:00 eastern on c-span, online at c-span.org and with the free c-span radio app. right now we're going to go back to the beginning of this hearing which began with opening remarks from judiciary chair bob goodlatte. >> the chair recognizes himself for the purposes of opening statement. i wish this hearing were not necessary. many children grow up wanting to become fbi agents to catch bad guys and protect the american people. i have little doubt that our witness today has done that very thing during his many years serving as an fbi special agent. a special agent's mission is a vitally important busin

fact if the witness is believed. and, you know, body language, being examined and how their story stands up against other witnesses, that is all critical. the trump campaign and rudy giuliani, they're not denying that donald trump knew. they're just saying that michael cohen is a liar. i think what we see in the coming days from donald trump jr. and paul manafort's team and jared kushner's team, whether they deny it or try and discredit cohen, that will be very telling as to whether this really, truly occurred. but the circumstantial evidence here is so important. remember, lawrence, just days before the trump tower meeting occurred and after it was set up, donald trump had said that new information was coming out on hillary clinton. >> yeah. there is so many elements here that have to be pulled together. and i'd also like to talk to you about the way committees arrive at findings of fact like this as well as courtrooms. when you add all of these things, all of these elements in together, it turns out that it is rare

the witness before us today, mr. strzok, testified not under confidentiality, but not under confidentiality rules, but in private for 11 hours. there is nothing that prevents the majority from releasing that transcript. selective questions of that transcript have been leaked by members of the majority. misleading portions and taken out of context. and i don't know if demand is the right word, but that transcript be released in full so people can see it and see the testimony today and can make better judgment. and i ask the chairman now to order the release of that transcript. orde will the chairman do so? >> rnot today. >> will the chairman ever do so? >> you can direct your questions to the witness, that's your time to do that, not to discuss this. >> i will observe that the chairman will not answer the question and that this is part of the continuing invasion and attempt -- >> yield. >> no, not at the moment. i will in a moment, when i finish this sentence. because we know the pattern. and the pattern is, we're not

witness tampering, i don't know if it rises to that level legally, but certainly witness commingling is something the president has been engaged in since the beginning. >> most legal experts would say that you should not talk about an investigation if you're under investigation, especially if you're under investigation for obstruction. so here he is looking at obstruction investigation and he continues to talk about it and talk about the derogatory -- against the investigation, against people like comey. even last week taking this action where he was trying to take the security clearance away from these former national security officials, two of them comey and mccabe, are witnesses in the investigation. to the average person, i see where they may look at this and say, no big deal. this is the president just being the president. but when it comes to mueller, i'm not sure he'll have such a favorable view. >> do you think this story, when they process it -- my read is that the president will read this and want to be interviewed even more, and that the lawyers will read this and want him

chairman, this is harassment of the witness. >> you need your medication?ntleman controls the time. >> i ask the witness be permitted to response. >> he will be permitted to respond. >> have you ever talked to hillary clinton during your investigation besides the one questioning you mentioned before that or after that to this day? >> point of order, mr. chairman. point of order, mr. chairman. the gentleman will state his point of order. >> it is, i think, against the rules of the house for a member of the committee to be impugning the character of a witness. >> it's not. >> he should ask questions -- the purpose of this hearing is to elicit information. should not be impugning the character of the witness. >> the gentleman is advised of the rules of the house. they're only directed to the members and the president of the united states. >> it's okay to impugn the character of witnesses in any way whatsoever? >> listen, i've heard many members on your side of the aisle impugn the character of somebody that is covered by the rules of the house. the gentleman -

>> the witness will answer the question. >> the witness will be afforded an opportunity to answer the question. if there is a question he wants to answer after mr. gowdy's time. >> my recollection was a short meeting, somewhere between 15 to 30 minutes, probably around 15 minutes. >> and your testimony is, bob mueller did not kick you off, because of the content of your text. he kicked you off because of some appearance that he was worried about. >> my testimony, what you asked and what i responded to, was that he kicked me off because of my bias. i am stating to you, it is not my understanding that he kicked me off because of any bias. that it was done based on the appearance. if you want to represent what you said accurately, i'm happy to answer that question. but i don't appreciate what was originally said being changed. >> i don't give a damn what you appreciate, agent strzok. i don't appreciate having an fbi agent with an unprecedented level of an miss working on two major investigations during 2016. >> the chair recognizes the gentleman from maryland, mr. cummings. >> point of o

chairman, this is intolerable harassment of the witness. >> do you need your medication? >> the gentleman controls the time. >> i ask that the witness be permitted to respond. >> that's despicable. >> did you ever talk to hillary clinton during your investigation besides the one questioning you mentioned before that or after that to this day? >> point of order, mr. chairman. point of order, mr. chairman. >> the gentleman will state his point of order. >> it is, i think, against the rules of the house for a member of the committee to be impugning the character of a witness. >> it is not. >> he should ask questions to elicit -- the purpose of this hearing is to elicit information. he should ask questions to elicit information. he should not be impugning the character of the witness. >> the gentleman is advised the rules of the house only are directed to members of the house and the president of the united states. >> in other words, it is okay to impugn the character of witnesses in any way whatsoever? >> listen, i've heard many members on your side of the aisle impugn the c

so now what find me a witness. comes into play as. police return to the crime scene and found a neighbor who lived across from. henry hanley henry lived in this house told me he lived in the base. investigative reporter joaquin. series about prosecutorial misconduct that took a look at thirty cases in new york city including tyrone johnson's family agreed to testify in exchange for lighter treatment for his own role in the crime he said he was helping sort of arrange this murder and that he had a walkie talkie when leroy arrived he was going to radio them to tell him that he was the first on the scene. and we have he was in my life was when he took the stand he said he knew me for two years he said that you guys knew each other yet and you were part of a robbery plot together like i know he was for. me as something like that was coming out and that's not true no and. the case was going to be chiefly based on henry hamleys testimony according to the prosecutor a guy named claude stewart who was by then a veteran que

can we not be decent to our witnesses, mr. chairman? must republicans descend to the president's level even in his defense? i know the majority wants a public fight with mr. strzok today. i expect that they will ask him questions about the special counsel's investigation that you know the fbi will not permit him to answer. as you did more than 200 times in our last meeting with mr. strzok so that his decision not to answer in instructions by the fbi not to answer can be played out on cable news again and again. i expect that mr. strzok walked into this room knowing that republicans may soon call for him to be held in contempt for following the long-standing policy of the department of justice. fbi agents like mr. strzok should not comment on or even acknowledge the existence of an ongoing criminal investigation. a single decision not to -- i'm sorry. a single decision to deviate from that protocol can cause lasting damage to our republic, as anyone who has read the inspector general's report and his conclusions about mr mr. comey's devi

can we not be decent to our witnesses, mr. chairman? must republicans descend to the president's level even in his defense? i know the majority wants a public fight with mr. strzok today. i expect that they will ask him questions about the special counsel's investigation that you know the fbi will not permit him to answer. as you did more than 200 times in our last meeting with mr. strzok so that his decision not to answer in instructions by the fbi not to answer can be played out on cable news again and again. i expect that mr. strzok walked into this room knowing that republicans may soon call for him to be held in contempt for following the long-standing policy of the department of justice. fbi agents like mr. strzok should not comment on or even acknowledge the existence of an ongoing criminal investigation. a single decision not to -- i'm sorry. a single decision to deviate from that protocol can cause lasting damage to our republic, as anyone who has read the inspector general's report and his conclusions about mr mr. comey's devi

now it's time for witness. hello. welcome to witness with me, razia iqbal.at the british library to guide you through five more extraordinary moments from recent history. we'll meet a woman who was caught up in the violent struggle for a jewish state in british—controlled palestine. we'll hear how the iconic sydney opera house was built. we'll meet the man behind a deaf revolution in the us. and a nurse who witnessed the creation of britain's treasured national health service in 1948. but we begin with an event which still haunts iranian—us relations. in 1988, a us warship, the vincennes, shot down an iranian passengerjet over the persian gulf, killing all 290 people on board. first—hand accounts of the incident are rare, but the witness spoke are rare, but witness spoke to rudy pahoyo, a us navy combat cameraman who happened to be filming on the vincennes that day. it was a tragedy. we did shoot down an airliner. one of those things, i'm still in disbelief that it could have happened. the mood in the gulf was very intense. the mood in the gulf was very tens

witness something coming our. national community. i do apologise for interrupting you do finish your thought. yeah just i want to say is that in the muslim community not interested in gaza they wanted to support the. little humanitarian assistance but the weird thing is that this is. the best that we said because there always been that but i. appreciate you coming on r.t. my guest political analyst from order. into the news now just as the dust itself to settle on the trump putin service in the finnish capitol hill sinking the white house announced its inviting the russian president to washington in the autumn and then interview donald trump or since confirmed his intention to meet again with putin second meeting potentially with was what i mean. is that in the works is it planned has it been you know i would say it's in the works look we had a tremendous discussion on many things but fact is we got along very well i think i have a good relationship with you so far the russian side has neither accepted not declined the invitation the

potential witnesses in the criminal probe. in public, they are holding emergency hearings issuing unilateral subpoenas and threatening content and impeachment even demanding that the top justice enforcement law enforcement officers, in charge nishhis investigation, "fi it the heck up." what a change. what a change. butdid our chairman promise then suddenly launched this investigative attack against our special counsel. there has been one obvious development, the special counsel pleas being five guilty and indicted 18 others including, some of president trump's closest advisers. these are individuals who are already admitting their guilt. michael flynn. president transnational security advisor. he pleaded guilty to lying about his communications with the russians. making false statements to the fbi. impeding the investigations while he worked at the white house last year. underscore, these are not allegations. these are admissions. president trump's national security advisor admitted that he committed these crimes. he is now co

before recognizing our first witness, let me note that our time is limited to the witnesses and the members. please limit your testimony to five minutes and questions to five minutes. numbers, -- members, i hope we can do here to the five-minute -- adhere to the five-minute role as possible. mr. gebbers were recognized for five minutes. >> turn on your microphone please. thanks. >> thank you for the opportunity to testify before the subcommittee today on the effect that these tariffs, in particular those that have been imposed on agriculture products like cherries, apples, and pears. in retaliation for the u.s. trade policy that are unrelated to agriculture and the effect it is having on growers such as myself and my family and really all those families of small farmers that we represent. i am president of gebbers farms . gebbers farms is located in a rural community of washington state. in brewster. three of my siblings and i are the fourth generation with 15 of my kids, nieces, and nephews from the fifth generation working around us every day. only one or two years separate the fifth from

could that be seen as witness tampering?of those individuals can be called as witnesses. >> it could be in terms of using the social media as a vehicle to intimidate. there is a relationship saying do not speak at a grand jury hearing. because you have this go around working and it has been a consistent pattern i expect him to say what are you trying to accomplish by talking to the media or social media? are you trying to undermine their ability to speak? if you are then that goes to the support the claim of mental state of intentionally trying to undermine the investigation. >> kind of a hard case to make because you have to piece it together like a mosaic and just say that he was trying to intimidate a witness publically maybe. >> that is the wb wiproblem wit intent based claims. you have circumstantial evidence or smoking gun of a confession. the underlying claims intent is only part of the element. he could have that to support it. the other things that show there was no other basis for doing so is a bit of an easier cas

now on bbc news — witness. hello, welcome to witness.t the british library to guide you through five more extraordinary moments from recent history. we will meet a woman who was caught up in the violent struggle for a jewish state in reddish controlled palestine. we will hear how the iconic sydney opera house was ill. we will meet the man behind a death revolution in the us and a nurse who witnessed the creation of britain's treasured national health service in 1948. but we begin with an event which still wants iranian, us relations. in 1988, a us warship shutdown and uranium passengerjet over the persian gulf, killing all 290 people on board. first—hand accou nts 290 people on board. first—hand a ccou nts of 290 people on board. first—hand accounts of the incident are rare, but the witness spoke to a us navy combat cameraman who happened to be cooling that they. —— that day. combat cameraman who happened to be cooling that they. —— that daym was a tragedy. we did shoot down an airliner. one of those things, i am still in disbelief that

that is what this witness is asserting. attorney/client privilege, and he has been advised not to answer the question. >> suspend. gentlemen has not raised the attorney/client privilege. he has said that he has been instructed by the fbi not to answer the question. now. >> by lawyers. >> he knows -- he knows the advice i have just given him. if he would like, i'll restate it. but knowing this, will you answer the committee's question as directed, or do you refuse to answer the committee's question? >> point of parliamentary inquiry. >> point of parliamentary inquiry, mr. chairman. >> the gentleman from south carolina has the time, parliamentary inquiry is not in order during the gentleman's time. chair is instructing the witness to answer the question, and the question to you is. >> mr. chairman. >> will you answer the commit te's question or do you refuse to answer? >> mr. kmarm i move to adjourn. >> second. >> you're not recognized for in a purpose. >> mr. chairman, i think you have no choice but to recognize such a motio

i'm nicolle wallace. >>> a star witness.ald trump's lawyer, the friend he honored with praise now looms as the state witness against him. michael cohen says that donald trump, the man sitting in the oval office knew beforehand about his son and son-in-law and paul manafort's meeting in trump tower to obtain from the russians on hillary clinton. repeat. michael cohen says trump knew ahead of time.

there and what will happen in the next hour shall we witness another when you wore a similar to the war of two thousand put in there also if. you are attacking some position and sides in gaza strip my back something really and so it is very dangerous the situation we are awaiting. hamas and is i'd still be clashes between them since because the civilian always base up ice. with the dust not even settled on the summit in helsinki the us president has stirred it all up again announcing he's inviting his russian counterpart to washington later in the year second meeting potentially with putin. is that in the works is it planned has it been you know i would say it's in the works we had a tremendous discussion on many things but fact is we got along very well i think i have a good relationship with you. all right so far the kremlin has accepted nor rejected the invitation the decision to invite putin has once again sparked outrage in the media. man that even president trump now says interfered in u.s. democracy invited to the white house and now the president has apparently doubled down they

witness has spoken to i.audet university in washington dc. it's important to know that i am totally deaf, i can't hear a jet engine, i can't hear anything. right now, i'm working with a sign language interpreter — sarah, who's sitting in front of me, next to the camera. so, instead of hearing your questions, i'm seeing sarah sign. gallaudet college has been the centre of deaf education in america since 18117. in 1987, the president at that time stepped down. right away, there was a push for the board to recognise that the next president should be a deaf individual. so they narrowed it down to three finalists. two of us were deaf and one was hearing. i have a lot to bring to the university, but i also have a lot to learn from it, and that process must start right away. the board of trustees decided to name elisabeth spencer the seventh president of gallaudet. dr spencer had a lot of experience, but she didn't know anything about deafness, and i guess that's when i guess you could say the protests started. some

so he'll be a very valuable witness.ee why the president would be so troubled potentially by this development. and by the way, he said a few months ago that this would be a red line for him. >> stay away from the trump organization. >> jeffrey, go ahead. >> remember, when we talk about, you know, a financial investigation. yes, it's important that michael cohen is interviewed. yes, it's important that mr. wes'llberg is interviewed. but even more important than that are the financial records themselves. because they never have a bad memory. they never disappear. you're talking about bank records that always can be subpoenaed. and that is the way you do a criminal investigation even more than a -- than through the testimony of witnesses because in an investigation like this if any case is going to be made it's going to be made with records. and that's what the prosecutors will certainly be looking at. >> i'm curious, jeffrey. there's the mueller investigation, the federal probe. there's also the separate southern district

and there's only one witness, and that witness was selling crack cocaine at the time he observed theder? what would happen if that witness was called to testify, he would be asked, sir, what would you doing at the time you observed the murder and he would have to truthfully have to testify i was selling crack cocaine. the prosecutors could turn around, use that statement against the witness and bring a charge of distributing illegal narcotics. that's why prosecutors will secure grants of immunity for witnesses. so they can feel comfortable testifying truthfully, even if it includes crimes they may have committed. that use immunity guarantees that the statements a witness makes at that trial cannot be used against him. >> not that they could keep their identity secret, especially if you have someone who went to jail because he was charged with witness tampering. you don't necessarily want these folks to be known or even harassed, right in a situation where you have such a high profile trial? >> exactly, chris. there's another thing, because bob mueller has sought grants of immunity fo

>> there were all the transcript is only of testimony by witnesses. we don't have the argument or opening statements or closing arguments. we have all of the testimony of every witness. you make that was preserved by whom? the next family of the defendant inherently it was passed down through the generations. >> literally he was sitting there with his pen doing his own form of shorthand and transcriptions were new. so the transcriber it is a fascinating character in the book he transcribed the lincoln douglas debates. in fact in one of the lincoln douglas debates lincoln would start said they would not fit into where he was supposed to be sitting because he recognized that to get my message out douglas was better known than lincoln during the campaign lincoln wanted to make sure that this debate was being seen around the country so he would not start until robert was sitting right there adjusted to the family you should hire this guy to transcribe the trial which really wasn't done very often typically the judge would write up a summary of the case an

i want to welcome our witnesses. on behalf of the committee democrats, we look forward to hearing from you. i read your testimonies about the impacts of the administration's tariffs on your communities. make no mistake about it, we are in a slippery slope. we don't know where it's going to end. and we don't really know all the consequences. it's a chaotic policy. so we've been asking this committee to hold more regular sub committee hearings. so our meeting today is welcome. but i have to say we are deeply disappointed that the committee republicans did not call an administration witness to this hearing to explain the president's erratic trade actions. we get them in private meetings. in private consultations. nothing in public before any part of this committee. that is unacceptable. this is not transparent si. this is delusion. last week committee democrats sent chairman brady a letter requesting a full ways and means committee hearing with an administration witness so we could demand answers. the american people de

>> reporter: no one knows the exact number of witness trees here.hey're often identified by photos, sketches, and burial maps. some reveal themselves after they fall. >> hidden away under years of growth is a bullet that could have taken someone's life or did take someone's life. these are little windows into the past. >> reporter: this black walnut tree stood in the middle of pickett's charge, which historians consider the war's most pivotal moment. across the field, a mile-long column of rebels began that charge from under these trees, which still stand today. >> they would have watched these men take their steps across the farm fields, not knowing whether or not they were going to survive. >> reporter: period photographs confirm more witness trees on other civil war battlefields. at fredericksburg, virginia, a union doctor wrote about this. a grand old oak gave shelter to nearly 50 men. the brompton oak still stands today. at antietam in maryland, the most iconic witness tree of all is this sycamore. it still stands next to the burnside bridge, a

he is a firsthand witness.tors look for those people when they're prosecuting the mafia or anyone else. that's the first thing. second thing is, he has a ton of credibility because he is a firsthand witness, despite what rudy guiliani says. a week or two before the tape came out and cohen started to publicly say the president knew about this meeting and that meeting and the russian meeting, called him truthful and honorable. now he is a pathological liar. one thing i thought when i watched it on tv, said takes one to know one. corroboration is a big issue in regard to credibility with the government with mueller. we have to see. >> i expect democrats think it is a huge deal. i would think republicans don't. >> right. look, cohen had a tape before, that was explosive news last week, showed there was a difference between the public story and what was on the tape. >> you could hear the president's voice. >> you could hear the voice. this is different. there is no tape of him talking to michael cohen about any meet

there are no witnesses. it's the nine most important judges in the country and it's supposed to be our finest lawyers arguing law. there is no personal information, no witnesses. and the only two arguments i've ever heard the supreme court justices as to why it will not allow a a cam in the courtrooms they don't want to be recognized on the street. sorry, it's too bad you are a supreme court justice. live with it. they are concerned the media will take the arguments out of context. again, why should they be immune from the thing that i do it else that has to deal with speedy you can do that by going through the transcript and pulling out of the transcript. >> exactly. and it happens when the "washington post" or the "new york times" covers the supreme court case, they are picking clips. i am completely unpersuaded by anything i've ever heard about why there should not be cameras in the supreme court. but the bottom what is, it is completely up to the justices. there is no groundswell of public opinion demand

30 other witnesses that wound up being interviewed? >> i would have to check the case file, but i'll take your representation. >> if she had said something incriminating in your interview that took place months later of her, would she have won 100 million to zero then. >> likely not. >> why wouldn't you wait until the investigation was over before you have her the nominee and winning the general election against an opponent that hadn't even been named yet. a hundred million to zero, agent strzok? that's how bad she should win. >> mr. gowdy, those personal expressions of my observing the political process of the presidential primaries had no bearing on my actions of any investigation to include the investigation of secretary clinton, her or anybody else. >> you couldn't think of a single person that would not vote for hillary clinton for president. >> the committee will reconvene and the chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. issa for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. strzok, you were part of the hillary clinton

>> you can direct your questions to the witness. that's your time to do that and not to discuss this. >> i will observe that the chairman will not answer the question and this is part of the continuing evasion. and attempt at obfuscation. >> will the gentleman yield? >> not at the moment. when i finish the sentence. because we know the pattern. and the pattern is, we're not releasing transcripts except parts of them that may create -- that may convey the impression, false or true, that we want to create, convey. there's no legal reason why this transcript should not be released. there's no -- only a partisan reason why this transcript should not be released. there's no valid reason why it shad not be released. if there was a purpose to our inquiries, to our spending 11 hours, there's prr no reason they shouldn't be released. i'll yield now. >> i thank the gentleman for yielding and i would say it is very customary in investigations to keep transcripts of private interviews until the conclusion of the investigation. this investigatio

they're all witnesses. betsy woodruff and manically jane fox, we're so grateful to have both of you. after the break, donald trump's no good very bad july went from the helsinki debacle to the cohen tapes. we'll show you how the president has hunkered down for the storm. with two times more geographic detail... ...ancestrydna can pinpoint where your ancestors are from... ...and the paths they took, to a new home. could their journey inspire yours? order your kit at ancestrydna.com. it's a high-tech sleep revolution. the sleep number 360 smart bed intelligently senses your movement and automatically adjusts. so you wake up ready to run the world. the new sleep number 360 smart bed, from $999. and back pain made it hard to sleep and get up on time. then i found aleve pm. the only one to combine a safe sleep aid, plus the 12 hour pain relieving strength of aleve. i'm back. aleve pm for a better am. >>> thank you all very much. appreciate it. thank you. thank you. thank you very much. thank you. thank you. than

. >> this witness is under oath and a former agent of the fbi. there is no evidence of lies. >> he's not a member of congress. >> gentleman from rhode island is suspend. >> now the disgrace -- and what this man have done. >> the gentleman from texas will suspend for a moment. >> there is a disgrace and it we don't want be captured any time soon because of the damages that you have done. i have talked to fbi around the country, you have embarrassed them and yourself and i can't help but wonder when i see you looking there with a little smirk, how many times did you look so innocent in to your woo wife's eyes and lied to her. >> mr. chairman, it is outrageous. >> shame on you. >> mr. chairman, please. >> mr. chairman, this is intolerable harassment of the witness. >> what's wrong with that? do you need your medication. >> i ask the witness be permitted to respond. >> he'll be permitted. >> did you ever talk to hillary clinton during your investigation besides the one questioning you mentioned before that or after that to this day. >> point of order

witnesses say they heard 20 to 30 gunshots. a spokesperson for the police department says it is too soon to tell if the shooting is related to terrorism. >>> bullets tore through this berkeley living room. the shooting happened at 1:30 am on delaware street. two people were inside sleeping at the time but were not hus su their legs from flying glass. neighbors say the gunfire woke up the whole neighborhood. >> i heard really loud gunshots. i counted them right afterwards. i think it was about six or seven. >> the shooting is under investigation. no suspect information has been released. >>> we have more on the breaking news in oakland where two have reportedly been the stabbed in the macarthur b.a.r.t. station. ktvu's rob malcolm is speaking now with b.a.r.t. 's public information officer. >> reporter: we have jim allen standing by. this is still an active investigation. b.a.r.t. police are continuing to interview witnesses. the station is shut down. trains are bypassing the macarthur station. let's bring in jim. 120-year-old g

witnesses could change the case. now for the rings. (♪) i'm a four-year-old ring bearer with a bad habit of swallowing stuff. still won't eat my broccoli, though. and if you don't have the right overage, you could be paying for that pricey love band yourself. so get an allstate agent, and be better protected from mayhem. like me. can a ring bearer get a snack around here? wmust have cost a lot. a fancy hotel. actually, i got a great deal. priceline saves you up to 60% on hotels, but that's something the hotels don't really want other guests to know. i saved about 120 dollars a night! did you say you saved 120 dollars a night on a room? 120 a night on a hotel room... that's a lot of savings! i saved even more on my flight. save up to 60% on hotels with priceline. when did you see the sign? when i needed to create a better visitor experience. improve our workflow. attract new customers. that's when fastsigns recommended fleet graphics. yeah! now business is rolling in. get started at fastsigns.com. >>> we are back with

over.s not you and other witnesses are on notice that. answers are expected promptly and with that this hearing is adjourned. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2018] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] chatter]cernible >> president trump has arrived in helsinki, where he is scheduled to meet with vladimir putin tomorrow. their meeting was the topic on sunday shows this morning. about then talked meeting pass agenda on abc's "this week," and senator mark warner voiced his concerns about the meeting on nbc's "meet the press."

chairman, i'm done with this witness, and i yield back. >> mr. chairman, if i can respond. >> briefly. >> sir, there are several questions, i'll answer them all briefly. >> there were several statements. i only heard one question. >> fair enough. i understand why might think these things because of the media. i'm glad to hear people are calling for the release of my private interview so people can judge for themselves, who i am, what i said, and the facts. not something that's been spun or misrepresented and some 10:00 talk show or other place. so absolutely i can understand that, and i'm glad the facts are coming out. second, sir, to your earlier point about -- i never, and i'm unaware of any case being opened that represented some violation of civil liberties or a removal of due process rights. i have never done any activity, opened any case, with regard to that. when you look in the context of what had occurred, sir, during the time that director comey has been fired, the president said initially that had occurred because of a memorandum writt