a lot of people don't call it eugenics anymore. we tend to think of these issues of reproduction and genetic technology is about individual choice, rather than a fake, controlled vision of eugenics we saw the first half of the 20th century. i would argue that the questions that eugenicists were asking in 1910 are some of the same questions we are using to talk about things like clothing and designer babies and new genetic technologies that crisper. those kinds of questions are still being mobilized in our modern conversations the ideas don't go away even if we use different names to talk about them. >> and sounds from your last answer it is going to get more complicated because of technology. do you see that these questions and the ethical considerations around them are going to get bigger and bigger for our society? >> i think so, i think it is going to get more complicated because there are still a large portion of our society to think about things and genetic terms. talk about certain ideas in our dna. we often see ideas -- artic

>> there's a lot of different definitions, but some included the science of human improvement through better breeding. others defined it as the self-direction of human ev at at its core, it's really about a set of beliefs and practices about improving the quality of individuals and populations for their collective future. >> is it always controversial? >> it has been, yes. >> need it be? >> it's a tough call, because there are a lot of questions of when do we sort of go wrong with a lot a lot of the historical actors i look at in my work really believed there was a right way to do eugenics and there was a wrong way to do eugenics. nowadays i think it's a bit more controversial because of the types of associations we have with the term. but the questions never really go away. so this idea that we can improve people on a biological level is something that is really still inflected in a lot of medical and scientific practice. >> so as your pursue your ph.d. you have a particular area of inte could could you explain what you're really delving into and what your thesis is? >> so it's still

why shouldn't we be tested a lot more? why shouldn't you find out that your blood or some of your vital signs has a little something just to check out when you have sort of a latent, you know, you got the computer in your pocket right now, why don't you do more of that and have the big data i can come from feeding that into these analytical models and your artificial intelligence systems helping on this and mining the information that is coming in. i'm very excited about, particularly the health and also the personal security. the social networking and connecting, it's also a fantastic revolution that's taking place but it's also hard to figure out. that environment is controversial today are good reasons but it's also very popular for good reasons. it's changing our lives in ways that we want to pay attention to and we have to be smart. every challenge to history that sad -- every advanced through histories have these challenges, but if you look at what some economists call the great enrichment, the economic historians plo

why shouldn't we be tested a lot more? why should we find out that your blood or vital signs have a little something to check out when you have sort of a late -- you've got the computer in your pocket right now. what i can do a little bit more of that and had the big data that comes from feeding into the analytical models and we've got the artificial intelligence system mining the information coming in. i'm very excited about particularly the personal security. it is a fantastic revolution taking place, but it's also hard to figure out that environment is controversial to date for good reasons, but it's also very popular for good reason and is changing our lives in ways that we want to pay attention to and we have to be smart in every challenge through history has had advancement in these challenges. you look at what some economists commend your drummer koski calls the great enrichment, economic historians point out the graph do we really took off the 1700s, 1800s with the industrial revolution all this comes than in our in

and and also i have a child and so i i kind of and around a lot of a lot of people who are who are from all over the world and they also have issues where they worry about chinese people taking pictures of them and so on so i'm not saying that there is no racism issue but i also think that there are whether it's whether it's unfamiliarity there are people in china who have never seen a black person before they also never seen a blonde woman or blond man before redhead except so there's a lot of there are some people who are just having tourism experiences for the first time and if you are around the area. this is what you will experience and i think there are more challenging issues in regard to race in. china or the case that you're in or even the u.s. of course there's daily issues but. what's also important is also the questions around government policy the questions around how do people do business how do people. and africans definitely have a more challenging time around the world as well with it. if you will people are experiencing is definitely something that they feel placid in

only recently, there's been a lot more scrutiny of the law. host: when you say lax enforcement, does that mean they have used this law a dozen times, a hundred times? guest: a lot of people were not necessarily filing on-time. we've seen a lot of attractive filing. -- as retroactive filing lot of retroactive filing. a lot of it went undisclosed for years. host: what is the danger of that? guest: people don't know who is spending and who is behind influencing their opinions and the policies that affect their lives. trish, callingto in from new york on the democratic line. good morning, trish. caller: good morning. say i just don't think any foreign government should have any influence over a political party, whether it's republican or democrat. what it basically boils down to andhe system is so corrupt it's because we've gone so far away from god and his laws and now it is coming to an end. that's why everyone should go to truth.net to find out the real truth about what is going on. thank you. have we seen any movement in congress to tighten up

for my work i did a lot of work with, and what of interviews. my background is on data and the data driven approach. so i built a database of approaches to the defectors and i wanted to think carefully about what our the reasons young people are either attracted to this type of propaganda and what are things that really sort of makes somebody get up and either buy ama ticket or join online to support their ecosystem. she had come back recently and i was asking her very early on in the interview gives me a one-word identification when you think of isis and in my head i'm ready to take notes and i thougha bit ofa one-word answere horrendouswh or horrific or murderers. very dark and accurate ways to describe the hateful rhetoric and their hateful sort of approach. she started listing off her one-word answers and they were identity, belonging, trust. i did some of those things where i did a double take and wanted tobl make sure i was speaking to her in arabic and i wanted to make sure this is what she was saying. and it struck me because i said how d

you have a lot of contentious points along the way. people elected from all over the country and have different constituencies, a republican from alabama is not the same as a republican from california. how do you expect them to come together and say this is all of our priorities as one. that's a very difficult thing. people talk about the kitchen .able analogy americans need to sit down at their kitchen tables and work out a budget so congress should do that as well. we know from divorce rates in this country and just from our natural trying to do a budget at home, it's difficult to sit down with two people and do a budget at home. expect congress to get it done we are expecting a lot. where are we for folks who have been watching the floor? how many spending bills have been approved? which one still need to be approved? this month the senate is laborg done defense and health and education. right now. they've gotten ahead of the house i believe at this point. labor rates still need to be done in the house. and it's all going to come do

a lot of this is still a notion. a lot of americans are in agreement that a lot of our trade deals have not been beneficial for americans and so they willing to give the president some legroom, or some running room to negotiate and try to make those deals better. so we have a lot of work to do. and i am not saying, i am not sure that we can change the public opinion on nafta or tariffs but you know, the industry is united and we do intend to have more public facing activities to try and educate folks and highlight the economic risks that increased tariffs would have on our industry and economy. >> may ask when will pre-k maybe describe what's going on on capitol hill? what is the political dynamic on this issue, what are the coalitions among some lawmakers from the car making region and can describe the nature?>> sure. i would say that concern is growing on capitol hill. specifically, republican party has been the party of free trade. so this is a little unusual. they're finding themselves in an unusual position to h

they have a lot of reasons. [laughter] there is not really one consensus explanation at least when i was talking to them. quite a few people i spoke to focused on the campaign itself. this is not necessarily one simple way. some people said well, the campaign was running a sophisticated modern campaign, but just not very well. they sort of compared it to the tightly scripted obama campaign from 2008 and 2012 in saying the clinton folks just didn't have a quite down. one voluntary spoke with an iowa -- one volunteer i spoke with in iowa said by the beginning of october you should not be talking to anyone who's in favor of the opposing candidates. at their campaign organization ent. some what incompet some people were saying it was sophisticated but they were too reliant on the data. i heard this from quite a few people. a person in south carolina told me that clinton had a lot of people on her campaign who thought they knew everything and were not listening to people on the ground. i heard this from quite a few pe

i see a lot of excellent journalism being done. is is a golden age of journalism in a lot of ways "the new york times," "the wall street journal." there is some great journalism being done right now. there is a lot of really excellent journalism being done. often seever, too journalists running into a defensive crouch when president trump calls us the enemy of the course, isch, of ridiculous, acting as if that is the most important story in america. it is not. it is indecent, it should be condemned, but we are not the story. -- often i see journalists twitter is a problem with that, and i am not blameless with this -- when it comes to reacting emotionally and instantaneously. i do not think that helps our cause. i do not think that helps with journalism is supposed to stand for. we make mistakes. we are human beings, but when we make mistakes, we need to acknowledge and correct them. think journalists need to do today is rise to the moment and not i recently wrote a novel and i think some of you have a copy of it. it takes place in

tesla, there is a lot of question about where that stock is going to go. also forget that tencent has a u.s. investment arm that is very strategic. they have -- here in the bay area, they look at a lot of early-stage startups and looking at the data, they have been relatively active. they have not come with any issues in terms of those areas. those are really focused on the early stages of frontier tech investment. it will be interesting to see how those play out. selina: that was been harbored of msa capitals. coming up, they are friends on the basketball court, but rival investors off of it. we hear from golden state warriors' star andre iguodala on his tech investment rivalry with his teammate. and bloomberg technology is livestreaming on twitter. check us out at @technology and be sure to follow our mobile breaking news network at tictoc on twitter. this is bloomberg. ♪ selina: welcome back to "the best of bloomberg technology." i am selina wang. andre iguodala may have three nba titles to his name, but he also has a host of hot tech investments, inclu

lehman brothers ten years on a story of ambition. mania. lots with a full of investment bankers who talk to car sales which never stop of a system that spun out of control. over. the crash the investment bank lehman brothers start september thirteenth on g.w. . which football is a simple game not really not really now you know why zero zero see it quick germany the you know what the nations leak it is we will give you the answers at least. football is a simple game it's a mystery magical. what a great world cup this was well not for everyone and for those germans but you can look as broken as science and yes presented this new form a.

care a lot of putting a thought out there. you can compute in no need to listen because i want to are all in the loving to place in mind for planted america at the now motown that is will show here where by now without all that i thought oh yeah marley carlin contra . when you look at me think it's a guy by i love you not for consequential i don't for a year she know this who conducted. see the dial there to what. what is happening. is a simple only quote that i want to say that we're sorry and we simply cede percocet current when i was in all your put ok worn i sincerely radio today was he not. they'll have presario for you i'll be the comment that i went this week in infinite justice or homicide is in the field of no problemo so you know landy cannot again come upon the most evil man alive henty i can't help thinking and i'm not alone that if this crisis is not resolved quickly politically nicaragua could end up being embroiled in yet another civil war and all appearances he known going to filter go you more the head but isn

well, you've also done a lot right. got two kids who are following in your footsteps. you've got a sister who's with you all the time. seems like, when the dust all settles, you have a very tight, loving family. i do. very fortunate. that must feel really good, after the ups and the downs that it just seems like it's a very... - very solid, yeah. - ...loving family. yeah. that's part of the success of life, isn't it? hopefully, yeah. that's more than you could ask for. - you owed a lot of money to the irs. - 32 million. that must've been a tough period for you. bee spears said, "well, i think they should be the ones who should be worried. to let a guitar player from abbott, texas, get into them for 32 million, they're not that ( bleep ) smart." get into them for 32 million, your digestive system has billions of bacteria but life can throw them off balance. re-align yourself with align probiotic. and try new align gummies with prebiotics and probiotics to help support digestive health. tell me a little bit about why you r

overwhelming amount of material so i needed to focus on the region and one of the regions i found a lot of material from cure of funding was a little bit difficult to come by it's not necessarily the most sexy topic you say no to sex a topic but i think it's a very counter-intuitive topic on many levels how did the idea pop into your well there's a difference actually how i came to them like constitution and stalin seem like two things that shouldn't go check out there so i wanted to see what this was about how serious a project this was whether it was really just a propaganda exercise as it had been described or if there was something a little bit more substantive now the stalin era is one of the most extensively researched areas of the soviet history and it's also the one that comes with a lot of accept the conventions. this was strictly to tallaght terror and state where everything was decided top bottom line here you. are coming out of the book suggesting the stuff and actually tried to encourage what he saw at least as genuine political participation why would he need something lik

i like that idea a lot. infrastructure for the future and there was a political situation after the subprime. we had 10% unemployment. the economy was really in horrible shape. and it was spreading around the world. after an early 2009 i think fiscal stimulus of about $780 million. and congress changed over. they were not going to allow another dime of additional spending in terms of fiscal policy. they almost had no choice but to start creating a big money supply. there was no physical capability at this point. and on the one hand people were really worried that i was gonna be hyper inflationary. others believed that as narrow first of all. a lot of that money in the $4 trillion to make its way into the economy it was basically sitting on banks balance sheet. fiscal wasn't really an option. it would be the more traditional way to structure it. how policy wise when that even happen. now they're trying to reverse the quantitative easing. how could a program commence whereby the banks are somehow forced into t

there is a lot of outrage on the streets. iranian president is sitting in this tough middle ground. he has been traditionally a moderate. he dresses in the traditional clerical garb, but by historical accounts, he is a moderate, especially compared to the regime that preceded him. he is getting pressure from the conservative clerics who did not like this deal, and getting a lot of heat from pro-western moderates on the left who think he wasted the window they had by not being more aggressive and pushing through economic reforms. carol: $175 billion will be spent to lift citizens out of poverty in china. jason: some of the would-be beneficiaries of this program are questioning be strategy. carol: we got more from our editor. christina: this year alone, the government will spend $170 billion on poverty reduction. jason: this story takes us to a specific place where there has been a transfer of people from rural settings to gleaming, urban settings. that has come with a lot of complications. christina: this little village of abou

the reality is a lot of what is being read, and a lot of what they are seeing on social media, a lot of things out in the marketplace are not necessarily applicable to their particular fact or circumstances, so we spend a lot of time trying to this and how we absorb this new tax act and we are dealing with calls and questions that come from clients based on a very uninformed and uneducated perspective. again, it has presented real .hallenges to the profession i would also say, and you may or may not have an interest in what is happening from a tax reform standpoint, but there is a link to a website here that there is a tremendous amount of resources on tax reform if you have any interest on following and learning and getting tools that can help you in this area. i would encourage you to make a note of that and go to that link. there's a tremendous amount of resources there. and the tax area, i would say probably be bigger issue, the bigger trend we see happening is the fact that tax as a service a becoming more and more commodity and what we're seeing is that the marketplace is deman

there's a lot of it about this week in the movies. f local taxi driverfor the rich, the ladies who lunch in this area of asuncion, and she suddenly discovers a freedom when she gets behind the wheel of a car, a late—flowering romance with another woman called angie, who she finds rather sensual and striking, played by ana ivanova. the woman, chela, won the best actress at the berlin film festival earlier this year for her performance. it's her first screen performance ever. that's how rare cinema is in paraguay. she's been a stage actress all her life and this is her first ever screen appearance. you'd never know. she's brilliant. i hope there is more from paraguay. and a really impressive debut. probably the film of the week. 0k. jason, best out at the moment? the best film out at the moment, i know there is mamma mia and mission impossible, but if you are looking for a sort of small british success, there is a film called apostasy, which is out at the moment. again, a rare glimpse into a society i'd never seen on camera before. it's

a lot of this is happening inside the environment of a bank's mobile app.k a place where i am doing that kind of commerce? that may differ from customer to customer. jason: next, the founder of tmz wants to find the next celebrity president. taylor: and what amazon is doing about its youtube envy. jason: this is "bloomberg businessweek." taylor: welcome back. i am taylor riggs. jason: i'm jason kelly. you can listen to us on radio on sirius xm channel 119, and on am 1130 in new york, 106.1 in boston, 99.1 fm in washington, d.c. and am 960 in the bay area. taylor: and in london on dab digital. we go over to the features section. we are starting with tmz, they are plotting their second revival in the age of trump. jason: they are going from hollywood to washington, d.c., planting their flag in politics. taylor: here is our reporter. >> in the early 2000's, when time warner and aol were famously trying to make something work between these companies, one of the ideas for synergy, they came up with an idea. maybe we will use aol technology and warner brothers' l

a lot of jobs. d cleveland cliffs announced a beautiful new $700 million plant in toledo, and that is just a few of them. that is just a few of them. one of the things we have done in addition to the biggest tax cuts as we have eliminated the largest number of job-killing regulations of any president, even if they are there for four 8 years, almost 16 years. we set the record already. we have a lot to go. we are going to have a lot to do. clean water,rystal beautiful, clean air to breathe. cleaner than ever before. you will not have to go to 12 different locations when you can get it at one location. to build a highway, it would 18, 20, 21 years to appropriate we got it down to about two years,, and i want to get it down to one. and you may be rejected him but at least you will be rejected quickly come up quickly. one of the things i'm very proud of it the congressmen here know this very well, and then ultimately, we got approval from rob in the senate to give critically ill patients access to like i

market is going to feel a lot of pain. the leaders in beijing have a really important decision to make coming up. do they let their currency drop further in value which is going to drive investment out of china which is a bad thing for them? do they try to prop up their currency which would exhaust their foreign reserves which is well over at $1 billion or do they actually make the reforms that they have been promising to make for the last few years? that's certainly what i hope the outcome is there. you have seen this kind of escalation between the u.s. and china and i'll be happy to get to a little of that in the q&a but you can see the specific demands from the u.s. government made of china about what they expect to do. they want the trade deficit removed. they want to and predatory intellectual property tactics. they were program called made in china 2025. any country can be allowed but if the economic planning is exclusionary and discriminates against foreign firms it's right for us to have a problem in asrary are it.

>> not a lot of running room. i think that -- let me put it this way, stock prices three, four years from now will be where they are today. lots of ups and downs but i don't think we'll make a lot of progress. i'm not calling for the end of the bull market but i think the best days of the bull market are behind us. neil: all right, you base that on -- there are a lot of people who look at the value of this market and say, you know, historically it's not all that rich, you could make a good run since more than half of the american people are invested in the market, more might be intrigued to do so following this. what do you think? >> three things. one, we can debate valuation, but it's on the high side of fair value. maybe slightly overvalued. it's not like it was in the late 1990s for sure, or 2,000, it's on the high side of fair value. second, the federal reserve is going to be raising rates. the unemployment rate is heading lower because of the fiscal stimulus and the fed is going to have to raise rates. that's

we will break a lot of this tomorrow. g a little teaser here.ng in one year, 2009, alone, they say in the book that james comey was paid $6.1 million just for working for them and this was on new important spy information. i'm not suggesting anything necessarily is nefarious but it's never been disclosed and that robert mueller was at the fbi and signed off on that 6.1 -- in that one year, there's five other years, i don't know how much he got paid. also got $6 million of a hedge fund. that's an awful lot of money it seems to me. >> these guys were leveraging their government positions, according to the book, to enrich themselves and the company and the private sector they were working for. it's very much the same arguments i make in my book of how they were leveraging their relationship with each other for a long period of time, which is why this is a conflict of interest. for mueller to be investigating the president on a case in which his longtime friend, ally, and partner, james comey, is a key witness against the pres

what does that really mean is canada included are we expecting to see canada step in soon i think a lot of people are because really canada has to step in this is a system that has worked a certain way for many many years and that system is that all three countries are reliant on each other for parts and putting cars together and crossing the border with parts each and every day so that we have the automobiles that we drive it's a big issue there as well as the other issue that middle raised with the forty to forty five percent of workers being paid a minimum salary of sixteen dollars and that is a good thing for the states especially seeing that that so many jobs are going south of the border because the labor is cheaper so this is interesting you know the way it's being done and it really looks like donald trump is spearheading it but at the same time there were concessions made in the whole of sunlight or the sun down cause where we were talking about the possibility of the agreement coming to an end when. when it's just basically zero at the end of this cause we're looking now at a

lot, a lot, a lot. but it was one of those things. all right, now behold. you know what that is? >> what is that? >> cookies and cream. >> oh, they are beautiful. >> yes, so we got to get --. >> all right, all right. we treat the cookies like wine tasting. i don't ever want anybody to bite into a cookie and not get what they want to get. we're training staff because they can look at the cookie and tell if it's wrong. >> oh, here we go. >> you smell it and then you taste it, clean the plat palate with the milk. >> i could be a professional painter because i know how to do this. >> i can tell that it's a really nice shell, that nice crunch. >> but inside. >> oh, my god. so you are going to -- cheat a little bit. i had to give you a heads up on that. >> what's happening tomorrow? these cookies, there's a lot of love in these cookies. i don't know how else to say it. it really just makes me so happy. man, you bake a mean cookie, anthony. >> i know. people really know if they are getting something made with

there is a lot of people, a lot of paperwork and a lot of intrinsic values. you get more money if you have more responsibility so you don't want to get a piece of the pie. >> the changes that we made were supposed to solve all this stuff after 9/11. we're supposed to have agencies that communicated with the actual bandwidth with electronic communications, what happened? >> easier said than done. the dod was was have a lot of stuff in there was $40000 and a hammer. but these are aircraft carriers. if you think you're going to move those things in three minutes in a new direction, it's not going to happen. they are enormous, unwieldy beast. not saying changes won't happening but it's long. >> martin is in the washington, d.c. area, hello. >> a morning -- good morning. i just finish the fall and recently and went through all of the series. they are in all your books but especially deckers there some elements in it, martin, what is that scene you remember from the book,. >> that is a great question. for me, i have to make these characters feel like they are real

a lot of information is not written down. that is something i have learned. it is just a way for people to see how unique the institution is. and also just the personal, stories that the women give that make things a little bit easier to understand, maybe more interesting. and again just the information, you wouldn't find anyplace else. >> yeah, i agree on all of those points and i would add that going into it, i thought that people might reflect more on individual pieces of legislation. and they do through the interviews, but the theme that emerged with the women was how important it was to grow the number of women in congress. there was a woman's voice at every table, whether it is leadership, committees, how important that was and that was a striking thing at every one of these interviews. >> thank you very much. >> our eight week series of interviews with former congresswomen continues this weekend with the barbara can only. who served in the u.s. house of representatives from 1982-1999. she was the first woman in to the house intelligence committee and se

a lot of challenges ahead. : we spoke with a reporter and really got some insight into the starwood sends and why they are not so keen on their program at marriott. patrick: marriott, which is an older company, they were sort of at the beginning of the hotel expansion in the u.s., whose loyalty program was really based on some variation on buy two get one free. you state a certain amount of nights, and you are going to get a free night. taylor: more of a value proposition there. patrick: what they call rewards, or what loyalty wonks call rewards. starwood didn't come around until the 1990's. marriott was always sort of known for a company that was good at executing on the business plan. starwood was always known as a creative company. julie: the integration of these programs two years after the acquisition is finally about to happen. marriott has already made some concessions like the late checkout. you have an anecdote at the end of your story involving an spger who books a lot of travel over the course of the

a lot of information is written down. that's something i learned from oral histories we have done here. it's a way for people to see how unique the institution is, and also just the personal stories that the women give that make things a little easier to understand. maybe a little more interesting, and then again just that information you wouldn't find any place else. >> yeah, agree on all those points. i would add that going into it, i thought that people might reflect more on individual pieces of legislation and they do hear the interviews, but the theme that emerged with a lot of these women was how important it was to grow the number of women in congress so that there was a woman's voice at every table. whether it was leadership or committees and how important that was. and that is a striking almost every one of the interviews touches on. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. >>> in a moment, their oral interview with former congresswoman, susan molinari, a republican from new york who gave the keynote speech at the 19

i remember getting a lot of hate mail from the bush folks at the time. ttle earlier today from fox business, which if you don't get, you really should demand. it has been here since the whole bull market. nasdaq, former nasdaq head roberts with me, he was talking about things they could get in the way of this. jonathan, i want you to react to this because he was talking about political developers they could get in the way of this. >> it's annoying, the outside noise that could materialize. palmetto ford, and possibly others. that is under certain future. what you think? >> i think that the markets, at the end of the day, are going to focus on earnings. it will be the drivers of the market. i am not sure about a 50 year bull market, at the end of the day it was a record bull market or not, what matters are earnings growing. are corporations doing better? i think the prognosis of that, certainly in the next 12 months is quite strong. >> neil: what he is saying, if the president survives the scandal, whatever you want to call it, everything will be just fine

a lot of resilience and a lot of the termination in terms of the community and that would be been doing for the past twelve years. according to the red cross blood services division every two seconds in the united states someone needs a blood transfusion that means thirty six thousand red blood cells seven thousand units of platelets and ten thousand units of plasma needed each day that this week a new discovery by researchers at the university of british columbia presented at the american chemical society could change everything while only type o. blood is universal meaning it can be given to any blood type a and b. type blood contains sugar molecules called. up until now the challenge has been finding a way to remove those antigens well it turns out the answer was in our guts all along that's right it seems there's an enzyme in our stomach that can break down those sugars and when applied to blood cells removes the antigens even thirty percent better than any other enzyme what this means is that donated blood could be converted into a universal blood type for any patient by using some

it's a lot of work. and so the data that i really like to use for describing trade relationships, it's out there, it is really easily accessible, it is this data. it is called the trade by five digit end use code. that's what you want to google to get this data. it has annual data on imports and exports. it has it by country and by product. and it's comprehendable. the one thing i like about this data is it is really complete. it gives you the total picture of trade between two countries or between the u.s. and the world. so it gives you when you go to these pages on five digit -- you can go to a page. there's links at the end of my presentation. i can assume you can share the presentation with people. there's links at the end that show you where to find this. you can search country by country so you pull up a page that looks like this. u.s. exports to canada. by five digit end use code. it tells you exactly how much -- it's for the calendar year. it is annual data. it tells you exactly how much wheat th

we have got a lot. of a place to work together through some of these issues, some of the really tricky issues with rates and fees, and we have had heated and interesting debates about rates and fees, but we are working toward cooperation. we cannot have unreasonable rates and fees, or it is hard deployment. something, to attack tax something that is causing problems for society -- alcohol, tobacco, this is creating a good for society. it is helping with culture and education. why would we not want to encourage that? it is something we feel strongly about. peter: jonathan adelstein, who sets the rates and fees? mr. adelstein: it is really the localities that have the power over the rights. we control the rights of way along the streets, where they are traditionally able to charge certain amounts. they might end up trying to use that, because they have a monopoly over that. they are the only ones who can control that. in some cases, it may go too high, and members may say we are just not going to go there.

the most extensively researched areas of the soviet history and it's also the one that comes with a lot of accept the conventions. this was strictly to tally terror in state where everything was decided top bottom line here you are coming out with a book suggesting that stalin actually tried to encourage what he saw at least as genuine political participation why would he need something like well russia is very very big and at the time it had incredibly poor infrastructure and very few members of the communist party in rural areas to govern it so governing desirous empire of the soviet union and modern russia has always been difficult simply because of the expanse and the fact that the population is not densely settled russia has a very peculiar relationship between people in power and it's usually assumed the leadership suppresses the people's demands for rides but i take it from your book that in the case of the nineteen thirty six constitution it was actually the other way around that stalin was actually more liberal and progressive society could take yeah i was quite surprised when

nature means a lot to me. i came here because of nature's beauty because of the ocean and you know i'll be there to come and live. to be out here in nature is just inspiring. every looks with the most beautiful locations full hollywood and goes along to the shoots. jurassic park was filmed here as well as king kong and many others. it is. well known in hollywood circles he lives here on kawai and a typical wooden house. he's modest and discreet when it comes to celebrities. but he knows many and gets to know some of them well during filming. i spent two weeks every day with robert redford you know and. he was different then a few and if you meet harrison ford who is very private he did every day he'd show up at six am six sandwiches coffee and we would play tennis together. but nature is more important to me than any big name. the jungle the mountains the solitary beaches. the clients feel that you are connected to everything the ocean. earth the mountains and sky. if we've learned anything from our travels ar

another thing is a lot of the debts are owed by corporations and banks. the imf is geared toward lending to sovereigns. they would have to come up with a mechanism where they lend to the sovereigns, the sovereign lends to the corporate's. it is not with the imf is designed to do. taylor: we talked with a lot of em investors and they would like to see a $600,000 basis point rate hike to stem the high inflation and they are not. how concerned should we be the independent is from erdogan? peter: it is not independent. something has got to give and we are wondering what it his going to be. orthodoxy,e economic raise rates -- which will cause recession, by the way, which is a bad thing but it is the lesser of two evils possibly. jason: recession versus the financial crisis? peter: yeah, and another is capital controls where you can't put -- take your money out. jason: which erdogan has been to date very reluctant to -- peter: right, because it is an admission of defeat. jason: we talked a lot about turkey so far, but i would love to get a sense of how investors

it's an exceptional book, something a lot of people need to read, "fight like a girl." there's a lot to go over and just to set the stage for people who may not have any familiarity with the military at all could you give us an overview of recruit training, male or female, and what it's all about and why it's important? >> guest: actually. i just am missing them the rinks the only service that separates man and women at the entry-level in boot camp. they've maintained that stand for the own reasons but boot camp for men and women is 13 weeks. now said to be a little bit longer because they've added a week at the end but its 13 week along and the men and women are allegedly supposed to be doing the same exact training at every single minute of every single day. i get it set for women. most of the training for women at least when i was in paris island takes place on an isolated compound completely separate from the male recruits. important because it's the foundational level of training and it's what you earn the title of marine. it's important that the training be rigoro

emily: they certainly make a lot of money. mark bergen, ben brody, kate mitchell, great to have you back. sticking with google, at least 13 ngos have signed an open letter asking google to not provide china with a censored search engine. the letter said if it does go ahead with the plan, that "there is a high risk the company will be directly contributing to or complicit in human rights violations. google has a responsibility to respect and fulfill its own human rights publication." last week, facebook, google, and twitter took down iranian government backed accounts influencing global affairs. . the company to have to thank for that is fireeye. our conversation with the ceo is next. if you like bloomberg news, check us out on the radio, listen on the bloomberg cap, bloomberg.com, and, in the u.s., sirius xm. this is bloomberg. ♪ bloomberg. ♪ emily: it's began last week with the news that facebook shut down 652 iranian and russian backed accounts tried to spread global misinformation. it was then twitter and google's turn takin

we have had a lot of dollars coming back to the u.s. they are finding a place to park their money that is keeping funding pressure at the banking level low. as we go forward, the next iteration of the em crisis will be the funding aspect. not just spreads widening. jonathan: are we starting to see that already, though? the united states exporting volatility on several fronts? i have been saying it all week, it is our deficit, your problem, our currency, your problem. our monetary policy, your problem. when does it become a problem for the united states? >> there will be feedback at some point. i do agree that it is more of a 2019 story, but we are getting episodes of body blows to the market. you got it with the vix, italy -- anything that is kind of a spread in the risk contract tree is getting hurt. em is now in the focus, but we take that will have more. but it will not be the linear price action. jonathan: i keep hearing about this, and a lot of people are describing it as rolling bear markets. is that how you would describe it? em e

a group of patients like women who have not been studied and included in research and so they have a lot of unexplained symptoms appeared and i think this has created a mutually reinforcing problem or because of this gap, women do have more unexplained symptoms, whether their symptoms are unrecognized by the fact it's from a drug benefit that studied studied in women at all are from an autoimmune disease that the system is just not good at recognizing and diagnosing. this sort of the more doctors women be for the symptoms, the more dark risk it the impression that their offices are filled with these women who have symptoms they can't explain and it must be all in their head. so i think the knowledge gap is kind of created this stereotype that is really impacting women. and i think in some ways the way these two dynamics play out has made this problem. deeply entrenched so that it's perpetuated, even despite the best intentions of most health care providers very much want to be treating their patients the same and sometimes they think actually don't even know that they're not because this

this requires a lot of powerpoint slides, a lot of words. very complicated. takes a really long time, and the judge, it seems, grows not impatient, but he wants to make sure that the trial stays on track. he actually told the mueller team this morning, let's move it along. >> dana: all right, peter, thank you for that. let's bring in shelby holiday. she -- what else have we learned today? >> i think that they are sort of saying that he willingly broke the law because they are showing documents when they had his bookkeeper, she said it looks like the document, but it is totally different. they are starting to produce evidence that shows there was intent. they are climbing the financial mountain. it is very dense, and i have been hearing from court reporters that the government is trying to make this quick but also entertaining for the jurors. they want everyone to pay attention. they have demonstrated his wealth, they have demonstrated his greed, they have showed that he was in big financial trouble and 2016. but the big question here, and it won't be touched

and at the same time, there was a lot of talk of, will he let this company go? is it going to become a company that became under john scully and other past ceo's who replaced steve jobs originally? the answer was a resounding no. this is that a market cap that was three times what it was when steve jobs passed away, and that is just a number, but the number is still representative of this historical marker, which represents so many new products over the years, smaller products, the apple watch, etc. emily: apple isn't the first company to hit the trillion dollar market cap. it was actually petrochina, which fell as oil prices fell. caroline, you are digging into some of the other historical markers here, and having the highest market cap isn't necessarily a recipe for success. caroline: certainly not. casting my mind back to microsoft, a key tech player, who back in 1999 hit that half a trillion dollar mark, and then it had four successive years of downward trajectory, it languished at the number 300 in terms of market capitalization. it does not always spell thi

but it gets a lot more interesting when you slice and dice by generation. the silente generation, the oldest folks, and green. the boomers, gen x, and millennials. you see a pattern. across successive generations, you see that americans now by generation are less likely to say it would be best for the country to take an active part in world affairs. -- i wanturing 2014 to say that was just 50% of millennials -- so barely. this is the interesting starting point of our conversation, which what is causing this kind of spread? and what does it mean? hill, it is on the important to sort of address one question right up front. what about partisanship? you might have heard of millennials are more liberal than other generations. it is not just millennials. it is actually each generation from the silent generation onward, more liberal than the one before it. one question is is this just a partisan effect? the answer is no it is not. among republicans, this is boomers -- 72% of them think it is best to take an active part, but only 55% of gen x republicans, 53% of mil

we talk a lot. we talked a lot about this deal. and i would like to congratulate you and the mexican people. >> thank you very much mr. president. i'm glad you recognize this, especially the point of understanding we are now reaching on this deal. and i really hope, i wish, that parts of canada will be materializing in a very concrete fashion. that we can have an agreement from this negotiating process. but today i celebrate with the united states and mexico, because we are reaching a final point of understanding, and i hope that in the following days we can -- and the formalization of this agreement. i hope -- something additional, mr. president. and with a full participation of the administration and the president-elect of mexico. as you know, we are now going through a period of transition. and it's possible to create a highly unified front between the negotiating team of this administration, the people appointed by the president-elect of mexico. the observers participate in this agreement in this understanding, to reach the poi

do you have a lot of that? car: we have wonderful customers who have a high degree of self-importance. [laughter] david: what percentage of luggage is lost? [laughter] david: by the industry generally. i'm sure yours are better. oscar: by complaint, per 1000, i think it is 3 per 1000. david: the best way to avoid having your luggage lost is do what? just carry it on? or -- oscar: your predicate -- we don't lose that much luggage. if we do, we get it right to you. in fact, we instituted a policy last year. it used to be kind of onerous, where indeed if something got lost and we could not find it, we needed receipts for everything in your bag, including things -- i mean, who keeps receipts for underwear and your toothbrush? but we instituted a thing that was, look, you trusted us with your bag. we lost it. here is $1200. it is important for us to build trust. we don't lose it that often. we need you to trust us. and when we do, we have to act on it very quickly. days, inw, in the old the old, old days, people were