has always been a good person and a true friend. thank you. >> my name is more a fitzgerald, i've known brett kavanaugh since high school. in college briefly and i've been friends with him ever since. i want to make something clear, very clear. political, me not being here, my being here has nothing to do with politics. and the talk about a man i have known for over 35 years. allegation against brett is inconsistent with everything i've known about him as a person. in both public and private, brett treated me and everyone i know with respect. he has always been kind and good-natured. he has always been caring and concerned. -- writingin college that she could imagine the hurt i was feeling. brettas very typical of read openly and unabashedly exhibiting care and compassion. friend male or female who wrote to me after that terrible time. my family summers .ould rent a beach house it was a full house. brett was always welcome. he was polite and considerate. to my siblings and to the parents. he would express his visit he would expresse

both as a close personal friend and a white house colleague. brett is one of the most decent, honorable and goodhearted people i know. he is a man of high integrity and character. i have seen -- i have never seen him be anything but a true gentleman in all aspects of his life. i first met brett in when we 1997 were young lawyers and d.c.. we socialized and some of the same circles. -- in d.c.. we socialized and some of the same circles. he was single at the time. i saw him mentor young lawyers in the counselor's office and empower white house staffers. after 9/11 when tensions ran -- in the weeks and months after 9/11 when tensions ran high, brett had a natural ability to navigate choppy waters to find consensus without ever losing his cool. he was the guy who stood up for the staffer. he quietly explained to him or her how to avoid the mistake. -- the mistake the next time. he often interacted with the most senior and sometimes the most junior staffers. he treated everyone with the same level of respect, decor-- . him, and professionalism. tod

this is a high quality person. and i certainly hope -- i certainly hope -- it would be a horrible insult to our country if this doesn't happen. it will be a horrible, horrible thing for future political paint ball, judges, anything you want, it will be a horrible thing. it cannot be allowed to happen. and the democrats are playing a con game, c-o-n. they know it's a congame. they know he's high quality. they wink at each other. they are winking. they know it's a con game. >> is the second accuser be a allowed to testify on thursday, would you welcome that? president trump: the second accuser doesn't even know if she thinks maybe it could have been him. maybe not. she admits she was drunk. she admits time lapses. there are time lapses. this is a person and this is a series of statements that's going to take one of the most talented, one of the greatest intel lects from a judicial standpoint in our country -- intellects from the judicial standpoint in our country -- i said something this morning. he has a chance to be

persons annexed ordinary -- is annexed ordinary person, but also a real person, and neighborhood barbecues, and he likes to coach basketball. he goes to church. he does all the things we do, including working to set a good example for his children, his family, and his community. honestly, he does those things better than most of us. with more dedication and more humility. this is the person that i know. this is the person who is an honorable husband and father, and dedicated public servant. the nomination process should be deal with those not qualified or suited to serve, , it seems anyone can launch an allegation without corporation or evidence and dismantle a person's career and life and the lights of their family members. this is wrong. i stand before you today as someone who spends most of my time working with women to help them succeed and build careers. i am so proud that brett has worked to foster an environment in his office that empowers and supports young women lawyers as they embark on their careers. maybe he does this because he is the father of two young daughters. but more li

but just that i would use it as a personal reference. unfortunately some of these things make me sound like dana carving -- carvey. i tried to do it religiously. the would be a gap. i would do it by dictating and subsequently it was transcribed quite a bit later. brian: when you read it, was it on microfilm or was it the actual diary itself? dr. engel: at that point the audiotapes have been lost from the 1970's. 1970's wererom the transcripts that had been done. the system is really important. transcripts were done of audiotapes by people back in houston in his office, sometimes a year or two after bush had recorded them in china. remember, bush does not speak chinese and he had had a few drinks. he is trying to describe chinese people he met and have it be transcribed by people who did not speak chinese, trying to imagine what he might have been trying to say. the most fascinating and difficult part of the diary was trying to figure out, who was bush talking about? i think we got most of it. i will tell you a really interesting and impor

ford as a real person, not as a political pawn. and it would let the democratic operatives who have now been hard to dig up dirt out of the mix. i want to say that chairman grassley throughout all this has been exceedingly generous toward dr. ford, as we all want him to be. even when his patience has been tested or under want to commend him once again because he has had a very difficult job, trying to run the judiciary committee, trying to be fair to the nominee and the accuser alike, when this wrench thrown into the spokes of the committee operation has created more of a circus like atmosphere than it has a sort of deliberative process insert fore the truth and testing the background of a nominee, which is something all nominees deserve. no n nominee deserves to be dragged through the mud like this. chairman grassley has been patient because he knows how important this is, how much is on the line not only for the supreme court but also for women across this country who see a little bit of themselves and dre her voice, like theirs,

is that a person? the clues pointed so many different directions it was a total mystery. >> the case, the murder of a former model and flight attendant. >> when she got dolled up, oh my god, gorgeous. >> did she write these letters? was this a hint to who killed her? >> you got this message saying this was my killer. >> it's like you would see in a movie. >> and the ending, that was just like a movie too. >> i can't believe what people do to each other. >> hello and welcome to date line. r.o.c. those letters would tell a story all their own. the letters in blood above her body seemed like a beacon that could lead detectives to a killer, but what exactly did they need? and what other crucial clues were hiding in plain sight? it would take a dogged forensic specialist with a keen eye to unravel the mystery. here's dennis murphy. once the one time model and flight attendance got flight in her shoes, she never looked back. >> she loved the beach, diving, bo boating. >> catherine worked the counter at americ

that section very clearly says that when a person is in canada, regardless of how they got here, if they are in canada and make a claim for asylum, there is an obligation on the part of canada to give them a fair hearing and determine their status. are they or are they not in need of canada's protection? if they are found not to need canada's protection, in other words, it is not a legitimate claim for asylum. this person is not a refugee. then they become inadmissible to canada and they need to be removed from canada. the law provides for that. if they do sustain their claim and convince the immigration and refugee board through the due process of law, that their claim is legitimate, then, under the law, how they entered the country becomes irrelevant and non-actionable. that is the law, as it stands now. as it has stood all through the periods since the mid-1970s. >> does the charter carry relevance? >> the charter embodies the principles of due process and fairness and natural justice and ensuring that people are treated in a humane and compassionate way. >> thank you. mister blair, i

and it's a shame that you can do this to a person's life. i tell you, maybe even more important, who's going to want to go before this system to be a supreme court judge or to be a judge or to be even a politician? i can tell you that false accusations and false accusations of all types are made against a lot of people. this is a high quality person, and i certainly hope -- i certainly hope, it would be a horror in itself to our country if this doesn't happen. it will be a horrible, horrible thing for future political people like judges, anything you want, a horrible thing. it cannot be allowed to happen. and the democrats are playing a con game. c-o-n, a con game. they know it's a con game. they know he's high quality. and they wink at each other. they're winking. they know it's a con game. go ahead. >> the second accuser be allowed to testify on thursday, would you welcome that? >> i look at the second accuser, the second accuser has nothing. the second accuser doesn't even know, she thinks maybe it could have been him, maybe not. she admit

principles in our government and our country under our constitution which guarantees the rights of a person accused of a crime. i know the minority leader, my friend from new york, senator schumer has says judge kavanaugh, this is not a court. this is a nomination, which i presume from not he means -- accused of a crime. attempted sexual assault and has testified under oath under penalty of perjury that no such thing happened. so this is a very serious matter and we need to take it seriously and not create a new framework out of thin air which says somehow if somebody make some accusation that cannot be cooperated by anybody else 36 years later that somehow satisfies our notions of due process and protecting the rights of people who are accused of crimes. this is fundamentally about fairness. people accuse of grave misconduct have a right of due process under our constitution. they have a right to know who their accusers are as well as the nature of the charges being brought against the and the evidence presented against them. those are basic constitutional american right consistent with ou

>>. >> she is a great person. we never had sexual interactions by bringing this up you are dragging her to the mud. it is unnecessary. >> thank you mister chairman. you made reference to a sworn statement i believe to the committee. is that correct quick. >> i made reference to what the lawyer sent to the committee quick. >> is that a sworn statement. >> under penalty of penalty. >> but it is signed by his lawyer. and it is six cursory and conclusory sentences. are you saying that is a substitute for an investigation by the fbi? or an interview by the fbi quick. >> under penalty of penalty longfe - - penalty long - - felony that i never would have done something like that. >> you always want best evidence. >> so that is the elk orchestrated political hit with that pent up anger of president trump in the 2016 election that has been unfairly stoked about the judicial record with revenge on behalf of the clintons and millions of dollars with a left-wing opposition groups with the motivation where she sat a short time

my concern that he would be a fifth vote to cut back row be weighed and stop women, stop people from airing. and exercising the right given so with the person they love. cutting back on consumer rights and workers rights and environmental objections. and permitting prejudice. a president who could decide that he believes the law is unconstitutional and therefore should not be in force. meaning that laws protecting millions of americans who suffer from pre-existing conditions like diabetes and heart disease, and pregnancy. would go unprotected. giving the power of that kind of unilateral authority. what we saw yesterday went beyond views on these issues. i would be very. what we saw was a man filled with anger, rage. someone in my view, temperamentally unfit for the united states supreme court. in fact, i fear his partisan which came across so clearly and explicitly to a left-wing set conspiracy. democrat, organized to fight him to destroy his family. in conspiratorial view of the world is notot only actually totally false but also deeply dangerous. on president. anything we ever heard from any nominee or any judicial position as long as i h

there was contention between us and a third person.anscript about him, and you should assess his credibility with that in mind. put yourself in our shoes if you can, i know that is asking you a lot in this setting. but suppose you had gone through a process to select someone had gone through a process to select someone for an incredibly important job in position, you had a lot of qualified candidates, and as you finish the hiring process, you learn ofa finish the hiring process, you learn of a credible allegation that, if true, would be disqualifying. would you either take a step back and conduct a thorough investigation, or move different canada ? conduct a thorough investigation, or move different canada? and why not agree to a one—week pause to allow the fbi to investigate all these allegations, and allow you an opportunity a week from now to have the folks present in front of us for us to assess their credibility, and for us to either clear your name or resolve these allegations by moving toa resolve these allegations by moving to

he is entirely ethical, a very decent person, he has warm, friendly, unassuming, he is the nicest person in the ava. one thing i can tell you that you should be proud of, ashley, you should be proud of this. that you raised a daughter, that would pray for doctor ford, to my republican colleagues, if you vote no, you are legitimizing the most despicable thing i have seen in my time in politics. you want a seat? i hope you never get it. i hope you are on the supreme court. that is exactly where you should be. and, i hope that the american people will see through this charade. and, i wish you well. and, i intend to vote for you, and i hope that everybody who is fair-minded will. >> at that moment from the senate judiciary committee lindsey graham republican of south carolina from south carolina, kavanaugh criticism the most despicable seen -- then he has seen in politics. some other heads -- headlines, kavanaugh denies the ford accusation of psych sexual assault, also from the cincinnati inquirer, the city and community watches christine ford, the story is believable, i did not want it to b

i am not a chair, i am not a person in a chair, iam me. chair, i am not a person in a chair, i am me.e had to scotland to catch a glimpse of some rare flying visitors to 0rkney. catch a glimpse of some rare flying visitors to orkney. we are not entirely sure where the eagles have come from. there is an outside chance they have come direct from norway. first up on this week's programme, we had to ibiza. a bill eric islands known as much for its nightlife as its idyllic sunsets —— baelaric. but what is it like hitting the famous dance clubs they are ina hitting the famous dance clubs they are in a wheelchair? alex taylor agreed to take us for a spin to find out. ibiza, home to a world—famous nightlife scene four decade strong, and a paradise for clubbers worldwide. as someone who lives for clubbing, parties and a good time, it is no wonder i've ended up here. the only difference is, i'm in one of these. i am alex, and i am a bbc journalist. i've got cerebral palsy and have used a wheelchair since i was young. so i need a carer to help me with lots of day—to—day things. i also happen to

it fulfils a cause, not a personal ambition. cessities of the moment. law makes life possible. honour and mobility... forjohn, it was a way of life. john returned to an america divided over its presidency, divided over the war. amidst all of the turmoil and civic unrest, divided over the best way to protect our country and over whether it should be respected for its power, or its ideals. john came back from the war and declared that this was a false choice. america owed it to itself to embrace both strengths and ideals. in decades of condition service, ultimately as chairman to this committee, john was an incompatible exponent —— great exponent of an america strong enough to vindicate its purpose. but john america strong enough to vindicate its purpose. butjohn believed also ina its purpose. butjohn believed also in a compassionate america, guided by core principles for which american foreign policy must always stand. with liberty and justice for all, it is not a name —— it is not an empty sentiment, he argued. it is the formatio

the great guy, a centrist kind of person. but it was leading up before the presidential race and he apparently, now you know it's a male, he apparently fell to pressure, and as we saw on the campaign, both of the presidential candidates did not want to touch it. they didn't want to touch medicare and that's what makes me feel that we may have to move to a crisis situation. but doing it through regular order and as you know, things only happen like this under divided government. no party wants to own changing social security or medicare. the best opportunity was when you were head of the owen b. om the. >> you say candidates want to avoid the issue. and it was fair to say that candidates are probably on one side of this issue. and probably you and i were on the issue. and that's trade. what are your concerns about the current trade course for the u.s.? do you think right now we should be doing differently in the place that were in. >> well, both candidates run against tpp which was a shame. and now, here we are not only with th

in one nine hundred fifty seven son a person was a member of a swedish un but tiny and guarding the armistice line between egypt and israel.

it include a 5-k run. this persones from south of first street down to marshall park. >> all right. rob is here now with a find check on the forecast. we've got a little of everything. you can see the number in the 70s around san francisco. and the temperatures in the 90s from monday tomorrow through thursday. possibly showers. it is so hard to believe. i feel like the holidays are right around the corner. >> thanks for watching, everyone. distance relationship. this is long distance with the best wifi experience, plus the most free shows to stream.less, this is a relationsh with more money to spend on the important things. this is how xfinity makes life... xfinity gives you the best wifi experience to stream the most free movies and shows from anywhere. plus, staying connected on the go is easy with xfinity mobile. switch today and see how you can save. click, call or visit a store today. >>> he had already told me that guys were flying up from florida, the black ops. at that point, it got a little scary. they're her

they say we need a more conservative person to be in this position or a more moderate person. when i want to do with the time left is to talk about a few races in detail that we examined in the book. i will talk about some things that suggest that not only ideology can matter but personal relationships or how you perceive a certain candidate can matter. we don't think these don't matter at all. it is that when you want to explain in general the trends you see with members and how they vote, you need to think beyond personal relationships and ideology. the first one is a 1965 race for minority leader. republican leader in the house of representatives. the incumbent is charlie halleck of indiana and the challenger is gerald ford from miniature -- from michigan. thistle background on why happening. charlie halleck has been the leader of the republicans in the house. he overthrew joe martin who had been the leader. 1964 is a bad year on the publican party perspective -- from the republican party perspective. democrats control the senate, they are passing big progressive pills. repu

there is no such person at the moment there are two schismatic groups each of which is headed by a person equal or person.

in closing, they wrote kavanaugh "has always been a good person." t objection, i put itco in the . senator lee? have been cooperative a every stage of the investigation, both your background investigation and tby investigatiohis committee, is that correct? >> that's correct. >> also correct, you yourself do not control the fbi or when it conducts an investigation. you are a nominee, you are not task with the job of deciding who, when, or how an investigation is conducted? >> that's correct. >> but at any moment when either we or prior to the committee taking jurisdiction over, theas fbi,sked you questions, you have been attentive and rightsive, isn't that >> that's correct, throughout my career. >> t my colleaguay have repeatedly asked for an fbi investigation, and there are some ironies in this, ironies that are at least two levels. the first place, at least one of my colleagues, at least one of them,ad access to this information many, many weeks before anyone else did. had th ability, and i believe the moral duty and obligation, report those facts

section 27-2 of the regulations clearly states and less these regulations provide otherwise, a personseeks to enter canada at a place other than a port of entry must it be without delay for examination at the port of entry that is nearest to that place. the crossing so is not illegal. what is, when you talk about illegality of where there is a contravention is under the customs act. in section 11-one of the customs act as require a designated customs office. although section 160 creates a a general offense for the contravention of section 11 it is very doubtful prosecution against a refugee claimant would or could be pursued without being in breach both the chart and canada's international obligations. it would be a rather odd state of affairs if we are refer to refugee claims made in conformity with the process that out in irpa as illegal only because of a breach of customs regulation. irpa is designed to relate the entry of people while the customs act deals with goods. refugee claims, claim it's entering a place other than the port of entry are doing so in order to make a refugee c

, a very thoughtful person. ct, she's not even a public person. so for her to come forward an tells me a lot about her her sense of obligation in getting these facts out there to the american public. >> something that i heard, i heard a commentator earlier saying it was incumbent upon people like miss ramirez and miss blasey ford, it was that they were obligated to come forward because if they didn't, then they were somehow responsible. they were somehow -- they somehow caused other victims or they needed to come forward to protect other victims. what do you say to that? >> you know, every victim's story is going to be different. and they're not under any obligation to do anything. they are the experts in their own lives. every option has consequences. so if you choose one avenue, you know, there can be benefits but also backlash. you know, these kinds of judgments are another form of victim blaming. and instead of blaming victims what we need to ask is, why, what, are the barriers that keep you know folks who ha

he seemed interested in me as a person. i could tell right away this was going to be a warm boss that would hire me. someone that would be looking to mentor me. >> what struck you about his personality? >> how very kind and generous he was. with his time, and his personality, he took his oath and he had his friends come in, we got to meet his parents. just seeing him being able to engage with people from all walks of life. even kind of fun things that first year, when we were first hired, there was a security process to get your badge and your key. at the beginning, my coworkers and i could not let ourselves into the office on our own. he was always the first one there. he would have to walk down the long hallway, usher us in. you could just get the sense that he's a real person, incredibly humble, willing to be a normal guy. he's a person you would love to have dinner with, grab a beer with. we got to have a lot of casual lunches with him that year. greta: how do you know judge brett kavanaugh? >> i clerked for judge kavana

if a person is stealing a document from his desk and what the president intends is not happening, or if you have orders issued to the secretary of defense, a former general to assassinate people, which obviously is wrong and against the law and he doesn't do it, clearly you have a situation where selectively the president is not the president. and that's a very dangerous situation. that is not constitutional. that is not the way it is supposed to work. but people are protecting it because of the impulsiveness and gap between the president's understanding and reality and the norm. so this is unique. and the senate was designed to be the great check, that's why you have six-year terms, that's why you have this different set of rules from the house. sadly over the years, as i began to see it in the late 1990s, and then onwards, much, some of the -- some of the traits of the house have been transferred to the senate. and i think the senate is diminished by that over the years here. this is a time where senators should be standing up to protect the constitution and protect the institution

the last thing you want is a personal physician who only services you. because that person shows up and do house calls. you want i a dr. who is seen hundreds of sick people so that when you have a problem that dr. has a bunch of data points how could that a personal private physician ever diagnose something. you want a bunch of copayments. that's what happens if you can use a commercial system effectively has a dr. that has a lot of patient teaching. i see a lot of folks taking notes. let's get specific with the air force, how would you recommend fostering innovation with an organization like the air force. i could talk about this a long time. i'm in a give you the short version of this. in large organizations it is about decision-making and one of the problems. >> let me just back up one more piece. what you really want is scale and nimbleness. so if you take the u.s. air force one way to make it nimble is to make it much smaller. but that's a really bad solution. it brings some the advantages. and i see the same thing at amazon. because of our scale we

a personal quest as a favor to me, i'd be grateful to each of you would be respectful of all the juice that up here. my axios defends colleagues have worked hard to make sure we represent a spectrum of views.

become to challenge the commission as well and this last night at kleinman for example used to be a person who was highly involved in the. election campaign for the current president he was actually part of. a leader of the campaign before he became the current chief of about elections commission here's what's coming up for you on this news hour rising from the ashes in brazil but how long will it take to restore what's left of the national museum also the archaeological treasure in iraq that locals say is being treated more like a rubbish dump and sport anthony joshua puts in heavyweight title on the line in london far right here with that at about ten to the hour. now the woman who is accusing donald trump's choice for supreme court judge of sexual assaults is deciding to announce if she will be testifying two u.s. senators break out in a denies assaulting christine blasi forward when they were high school students thirty six years ago are white house correspondent kelly how it has all. after days of surprising restraint u.s. president donald trump turned on christine blasio forward the

he has a great personal story. his mother, his daughters. look at is haircut. a haircut prep year than mine. >> juan: jesse committee of a great personal story. i love your family. you think i want you on the supreme court? >> katie: one of his law student said they really liked his hair. >> juan: the big story here is are we politicizing the supreme court so people no longer feel they can get a heat fair hearing. >> greg: it started with bork and it's been unraveling. republicans are generally very, very deferential. >> dana: are republican seem to be able to count votes better. we are going to go to this hearing. let's hear brett kavanaugh answer questions from senator blumenthal. >> the confidence of the american people on the judiciary and the rule of law in the united states. one key facet of the independence of the judiciary, as i have studied the history of nominees, is not to make commitments on particular cases. i'm >> i'm not asking for a particular commitment and i'm going to take your answer as a "no." it's really a "yes" or "no" question. you will

a very bright person. people at the law firm liked him a lot. he was the kind of person that you just wanted to be around. because he was a delightful person and cared about things. he wasn't as smooth as gil. but he also assured me that he was a very solid person. you do a good job when he got an appointment with the government which is what he was doing and his administration. in your politics in 1981 did you have any. >> in terms of the civil rights issue i had grown up really during the time of the civil rights movement. and very much felt a part of that movement. i've been fortunate to take advantage of living in that era a lot of opportunities were provided for me that weren't provided for my older siblings. i was very much there for what have happened. and wanted to show my support and to work in the area. i guess politically what that would do is make me somewhere on the left politically. i was assured that even though clarence thomas worked at the time for republican senator. my ideas in my work could be valued. i know there were still p

what i have to offer is she is a serious person. she's a family person. is, her statistististatis ti -- statistics. she's careful not to exaggerate thoughts. she's a serious and thoughtful person. i think she wants the process to be fair. yop why it should be a rush. that's just me. i think she wants to avoid situation that is not the right process. >> part of that, she says there should be an fbi investigation. she's not demanding it but she's been very firm that she wants to see that. how critical do you think that is? >> well, i can't imagine why there wouldn't be an fbi investigation. that's how she originally brought the nfginformation forw. she said you're doing a background check. this is information you should have. that's what the fbi is there for to investigate this information. i can't imagine why they would not. she's not asking for anything that's outside of the normal process of vetting a candidate. i yus don't know wjust don't kn wouldn't happen. >> we spoke with someone who said the president's tweet is so explosive there's a scenario that

in the democrat party she's like a conservative person. ontas, elizabeth warren, she's considered like a conservative person. these people, they've gone crazy, they've gone loco. >> warren says she will think about a 2020 bid after the midterms. do you think the president is practicing for what's ahead? >> no. i think it's more of his attack on women. that's what it's about. he couldn't attack dr. ford. they told him, whatever you do, don't do that, she's sympathetic, the people believe her. so first he goes after dianne feinstein. now he goes after elizabeth warren. who is next, melania? who knows where he's going to go? the man has no respect for women. he wants to put -- the president, he wants to put women in jail if they get an abortion. let's be clear what's at stake here but let's not vote for someone who has the wrong temperament for the court. and if conservatives like that temperament, they wouldn't like it if they appeared before him and he didn't agree with them, i'll tell you that. that is wrong. >> former senator barbara boxer

-- a person who works for the administration serves for the president. a person who obviously is living in dishonesty. it doesn't help the president. if you're not interested in helping the president, you shouldn't work for the president as far as i'm concerned. reporter: speaker ryan -- speaker ryan: what were you doing in vegas? reporter: following you. that's a different story. and you popped up. speaker ryan: you popped up. reporter: it is my hometown. more and more members are talking about bringing back earmarks. is that something you think -- modified version. is that something you think should be done? do you think they should vote on it after the elections in conference? speaker ryan: this is something that's always -- we dealt with this in our last organizing conference for this congress. i don't doubt that the next organizing conference, the next congress, will probably wrestle with this issue. the challenge is, when we had it before, it was a corrupt system. duke cunningham went to jail because of earmark abuse. my experience with earmarks wa

business they'd done in the main street up at least thirty but when a black person wanted to open up a business the latest lation in discounted it prohibited for person myself who are never allowed to apply for any specific job because in the at thirty's moment it specifically told you that job is for white people only and you're not even allowed to apply for a procedure and today when the democratically elected government one to affirm black people then you get lots i think a damn mess and people like mr burke adamant that want to stand on the rooftops and want to shout it is unfair but unfortunately for them the partition of the republic of south africa makes provision for the empowerment and for positive discrimination in order to and that is the injustices of the past mr herman i mean in theory if you look at the whole russian are behind the share ownership land bridges tribune it basically says that if companies meets government quotas on black ownership if we can redistribute land to the poor that could boost the economy the same way it did for countries like

>> it did involve a huge financial contribution by a private person in a case that was already pending about when the person was running for the state supreme court. a pending case. a huge financial contribution to a private individual. >> in this case, you have a pending criminal investigation and you have somebody who's done a good deal more than put $3 million towards getting that judge in the seat. he is actually 100 percent that judge in the seat, do you not see that there's any potential relevance between the caperton decision and the decision that judge kavanaugh would face if confirmed? >> i think mister chair, so it's not 100 percent that's what this body is about. the presidents don't put people on the supreme court and if you have any concern whatsoever that any promise of any sort was made to the present or anyone in the white house about this litigation, i would say you should vote no because promises are improper. there is another relevant precedent on judicial recusal and to repeat, when that case comes before the supreme court, where justice kavanaugh is on it, he will

and then as a queer person, being a queer person and there's believing in queer politics and i talk aboutthat in the book quite a bit. trying to decipher between those two things that just because you're black, because you're queer and you're a woman doesn't mean you're radical. doesn't mean you're revolutionary. just because your gender nonconforming doesn't mean you don't play into gender binaries in your actions. i've seen people do it. it's wild. just because you are documented, disabled, transgender, any of those things doesn't mean you're automatically radical . it just doesn't. it takes consciously taking up those commitments and doing things to live out your values in the world cause shout out, i personally love beyoncc and cardi b and they talk about feminism is the belief in equality of women to everybody else but that's a .5 step. everybody doesn't even believe that so you can get to that point, i want to take you farther than that. i want to take you past equality as the goal to justice and transformation. i want to take folks to that place and reconciling all of that every da

. >>> she was a person out of a 40s film noir movie. with life full of mystery to match. >> she was a stunner physically. she was able to say jump and the men would say how high. >> married to a wealthy lawyer. >> he always said she has this hold over me. >> but there was someone she seemed even choserer to. >> they bought matching underwear together. >> they shared everything. >> they're eating together, they're sleeping in the same bed together. she's living at her house. >> did they also share a deadly secret? >> it was a lie triangle, and one of them had to go. >> but was it her idea? >> oh, god, it seemed like a good idea at the time. oh, god. >> or hers? and who would take the fall for evil? >> how deep a hole did you dig? >> the not deep enough, obviously. >> hello and welcome to dateline. attorney larry mcnabney had been living fast and loose, but things were finally slowing down for him. he had a thriving laws practice, a wife he adored and plenty of money. then, a new friend entered the picture and a love triangle took shape.

so i deeply do you care about being a good person and being seen as a good person? most of us on a one to seven skill, not just in brooklyn, most of us if you were on a one to seven skill of a six or seven on this. most of us see ourselves as a good person. derek black and his father and his mother i guarantee you are a six or seven on that skill before and after. so if that's true for people in prison and for white nationalists and for those of us sitting at the brooklyn law school, we've got to wrestle with our humanity. we can't choose between restorative justice and rehabilitation. >> retention. >> redemption, i'm sorry. i don't think we have another option other than humanity. that doesn't mean we don't fight tooth and nail for what's right. >> i have five minutes, okay. let me try to use this wisely. arjun, you tell a story of a young woman who, against the odds perhaps, ran for president at her college, the student union, and she was the only woman of color who was running, and she won. which she took to be a very moment of great opportunity and she was presum

to be a person in public they want to have for making remarks that nobody likes actually . making a head of state and yes and in the end they don't really care about that they want to establish all their things in their population and i think. right now the politics it's not touching so much these events were already used by one going to stir who appeared there who was talking publicly and yes that's it pretty much otherwise many populist party politicians in germany of course call us or counter demonstrations for showing the real society and the real face of germany cynthia i mean this is the daily limit for four and get a merkel the governing coalition knows that it's poor ratings are declining and therefore you can easily detect that they are moving too was the white and this could explain why they are not really being aggressive when it comes to what's happening low income it's. i think that part of what's happening is that you know the governing coalition have to continue to assert german values germany stands for and continue to fight against it and speak out more stro

every time a person comes in to the offense oval office, a president, a king, a queen, a prime minister, they say mr. president congratulations on what you've done with turned it

the "washington post" talks about a person was a border patrol agent.is is at a time where the president is lobbying for stricter voting rights laws. >> thank you. i want to continue this conversation now with michael wild. he is an immigration attorney and author of this book. so good to have you with us. i'm glad to get your expertise and perspective on all things immigrati immigration. there is a lot going on. what we heard is that the passport denials have happened under past administrations. it is complicated. it's nuanced. is what is happening illegal? >> from 1960 to 2008 there were 75 mid wives that were found to have committed fraud. in 2009 the aclu settled a lawsuit because they began to do this under prior administrations. is it illegal for the government to ferret out fraud? no. it has a policy interest in making sure that if there is fraud that they mark it down. but there is certainly an escalation now at the border on those that are more vulnerable. this is an unprecedented power grip compounded with the building of the wall, the muslim

if you were really a moral person, a person of courage, you would stand up, quit, and say these things and put your name next to it. >> and this is where it's dubious to call this a constitutional crisis, but a constitutional crisis is when there's a crisis that the law and constitution cannot resolve. and the president doesn't like people who are not working for him and not implementing his agenda, he can fire them. there's arguably a breakdown of checks and balances if people believe there should be an investigation and there aren't. but there is a constitutional remedy for that. >> that's a fair point. they chose not to use the remedy. >> exactly. it's not that the constitutional system is broken down, it's that some people may not be using tools at their disposal, and voters in the midterm elections can choose. now, they will have to choose starkly. the contrast is between a party that will enable the president's impulses and his agenda and a party that will thwart his impulses and his agenda. there's no third option here, you can't mix and match, which is what this anonymous offic

whole family was and i noticed you shared even now that parkinson's is what your living with and as a person so well known -- social media kind of allows us all to do what celebrities have had to do can which is be known in some way. on other hand it feels like a trap, like i don't necessarily want people to know >> i think there's a stinction to be made between personal and private. i didn't mention to anyone i had parkinson's for three sw half years and i realized that people were going to notice that i had a tremor and when the first story came out about it i wanted to make sure it wasn't a sob story, because one of the problems i think that people who get diagnosed with it have is that there's the tendency on the part of the whole culture to think the world has come can to an end with that diagnoses but it hasn't. and as a matter of fact that fiej, that worry that the world has am can to an end and have to deep a secret even to yourself, you might post pone doing something that can help like an exercise program. and that can hold off worst symptoms for a long time. i wanted to help get r