has to stand up for its for our values actually as europeans and trigger article.rticle seven allows the european union to initiate a procedure against a member state it can even lose its voting rights for the first time in the e.u.'s history the european commission triggered article seven in july against poland despite a similar case against it hungary has so far a marriage to unscathed the reasons for this are mainly political according to green m.e.p. . she examined the legal situation in hungary on behalf of the european parliament and she also sees clear breaches of the e.u.'s fundamental values. the political party is member of the european people's party and they have friends in commission and in parliament and hungary viktor orban still has a majority behind him in the european parliament though it could look very different. well for more let's cross over now to the e.u. parliament in strasbourg where our correspondent max off one is standing by hello to you max so how likely is it that enough lawmakers will in fact vote in support of those political sancti

oriented articles. and we've also found that the manner in which news media report about bullying and cyber-bullying is different. cyber-bullying is more likely to be covered using fear-based approaches, anxiety, anger based words. and so our goal would be to be able to have some findings to bring back to you and to have some new ideas about bringing another group into our prevention sphere and thinking about new initiatives towards preventing cyber-bullying and bullying, partnering with this group that we know does so much in shaping the dialogue that our parents and teens experience. thank you so much. >> very good. we have powerpoint. let's give them a moment. a few moments. there we go. good morning, everyone. and thank you so much to my co-panelists. great work. and thank you for being here this morning. my name is melissa mercado. i'm a behavioral scientist at the cdc in atlanta and i would like to start the presentation by moving the slides, if potential. let's just continue. i want to acknowledg

this article. i quickly want to go to kaitlan collin at the white house. we got reaction from the president himself to this extraordinary article. >> reporter: that's right, wolf. we had not heard from administration officials but the president himself as we were talking about the president 30 minutes late to this event leading to some speculation he had had time to read this op-ed. why he was so late to that event with those sheriffs but you saw the president walk in there and he had a piece of paper in his hand that he pulled out and he went over after this announcement denouncing "the new york times" for publishing this op-ed which is written by an anonymous top official in the trump administration, anonymous to you and i, wolf. not the "the new york times" editors saying they know who it is, the identity of the person writing the op-ed and the president touched a nerve with. this calling it gutless. going after "the new york times" for publishing something with an anonymous source and then list

has to stand up for its for our values actually as europeans and trigger article seven article seven allows the european union to initiate a real procedure against a member state it could even lose its military rights for the first time in the us history the european commission sugared octal seven in july against poland despite a similar case against it hungary has so far a marriage unscathed the reasons for this are mainly political according to green n.e.p. in teenie she. the legal situation in hungary on behalf of the european parliament and clear breaches of the e.u.'s fundamental values. the political party its member of the european people's party and they have friends in commission and in parliament and hungary viktor orban still has a majority behind him in the european parliament though it could look very different. needs a two thirds majority. in the chamber. well he his party the foetus party is a member of the biggest political group in the european parliament the so-called european peoples party so you'd be forgiven to think that it's most likely not going to be a two th

european trigger article. article seven of the european union to initiate.a member state it could even lose its rights for the first time in the us history the european commission checkered article seven in july against poland despite a similar case against it hungary has so far a marriage unscathed the reasons for this are mainly political according to green m.e.p. . she examined the legal situation in hungary on behalf of the european parliament and clear breaches of the e.u. is fundamental. the political party is member of the european people's party and they have friends in commission and in parliament and hungary viktor orban still has a majority behind him in the european parliament though it could look very different. which way is tomorrow's vote likely to go. it really depends if the e.p. the european people's party which is a part of the. party makes its members stick to a certain party line in this. article seven but it's going to be hard to get the. two thirds majority now we don't expect that to happen actually just a reminder p.p. is kingmaker h

the book and now this article.n, the author of this op ed in "the new york times" also writes this. given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th amendment which would start a complex process for removing the president but no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis so we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until one way or another it's over. as you know -- >> for those at home. >> -- who don't know, there's the impeachment process, but there's also the 25th amendment. >> which has never been invoked. it is a provision basically designed for when the president gets too sick to serve in office where the cabinet begins a process that also eventually includes congress that says this president can no longer serve. and it involves at least initially a vote of the cabinet. it is certainly not something that a single cabinet member has suggested is remotely possible, but given, you know, the lunacy described in this piece

or at least they could have been if the article was not dropped we contacted the i.d.f. but they refused to comment but a spokesperson for the syrian rebel group previously confirmed israel says quote to the wall street journal israel stood by our side in a heroic way we wouldn't have survived with our newsrooms assistance however the israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu has vehemently rejected these reports he says that is also assistance has been purely humanitarian we do not interfere in this terribly bloody conflict we do however provide humanitarian aid to young boys and girls it is expensive but we will continue to invest of course the syrian government has been accusing israel of providing weapons to the rebels will some time back in may syrian state t.v. before said that the militants handed over hundreds of israeli made weapons israel vehemently denies these reports but some of the findings have elsewhere and on numerous occasions we reached out to the twosome post who told us they were forced to move by the army citing security reasons. investigative journ

i said that in the georgetown article as you know. i said that actually in the phh case most recently. the statute you're talking about, the independent counsel statute was a different regime that congress itself decided not to reauthorize in 1999. i think senator durbin said it was unrestrained, unaccountable, unconstitutional str unconstitutional statute. >> i'm interested in your views, judge. you said it was a constitutional travesty, what did you mean? >> i think i meant what justice kagan said when she said at stanford a few years ago that justice scalia's dissent was one of the greatest dissents ever written and got better every year. identifying justice scalia's dissent is one of the greatest dissents ever written. justice kagan seemed to be saying this is the only reading of it, the morrison v. olson decision was wrong. >> i'll actually strongly disagree. you offered that quote, that cite of justice kagan when we met. i was struck. perhaps i should call justice kagan and say she is one of your judicial heroes. i think that cr

i said that in the georgetown article as you know. i said that actually in the phh case most recently. the statute you're talking about, the independent counsel statute was a different regime that congress itself decided not to reauthorize in 1999. i think senator durbin said it was unrestrained, unaccountable, unconstitutional str unconstitutional statute. >> i'm interested in your views, judge. you said it was a constitutional travesty, what did you mean? >> i think i meant what justice kagan said when she said at stanford a few years ago that justice scalia's dissent was one of the greatest dissents ever written and got better every year. identifying justice scalia's dissent is one of the greatest dissents ever written. justice kagan seemed to be saying this is the only reading of it, the morrison v. olson decision was wrong. >> i'll actually strongly disagree. you offered that quote, that cite of justice kagan when we met. i was struck. perhaps i should call justice kagan and say she is one of your judicial heroes. i think that cr

senior officials have been lining up to deny they wrote the article. white house says the author should name themselves and resign. our washington correspondent nick bryant reports. this american stately home is now the scene of a washington whodunnit. which administration official was in the new york times with an article stabbing the president in the back? the anonymous editorial claims some trump appointees are working diligently to frustrate parts of his agenda, that he is impetuous, adversarial, petty, ineffective, anti—democratic, that his presidency is defined by amorality. god bless you and thank you, mr president. the article struck washington like a lightning bolt and, shortly afterwards, at a meeting with american sheriffs, the president delivered his unsmiling response. if the failing new york times has an anonymous editorial — can you believe it? anonymous, meaning gutless, a gutless editorial, we're doing a greatjob. the poll numbers are through the roof, our poll numbers are great, and guess what? nobody is going to come close to beating

was not run as a piece to exonerate him or to somehow miss ingate the nature of his behavior the article that got broom of fired was written by asian ghomeshi is a canadian radio host whose career was destroyed when he was accused of sexual assault back in two thousand and sixteen now all the charges against him in twenty sixteen were dismissed in court due to lack of evidence however since then twenty different women have come forward and accused him now those accusations have not yet gone to court but jian ghomeshi never got his job back there are a lot of guys more hated than me now but i was the guy everyone hated first during the first two weeks i was suicidal i contemplated the methods by which i could kill myself i was terrified of being weak and terrified of falling asleep after the article was published there was a firestorm both in the media and on the internet pretty soon bruno was no longer the editor now the new york review of books even one as far as to publish an apology for what they thought was a poor editorial decision while mr gomes has an absolute free speech right to

link tax and it's article levon explain what that is and why people are so concerned ok article eleven let's say google news and all the other like a similar sites to google news if they use as they do using now someone story part of the story all of the story they link it up on their site or they take from it that is a copyright infringement and now they're going to have to pay for that story the question which is open ended is how would they get a pay. before it is it could be based on how many words they use how big a part of the story how many stories there's a lot of unknown but this is going to possibly limit what they actually give to the consumer and people like you and me who go to these sites like google news to get our news individuals will not be that affected especially if this is for teaching or for research but if you're an individual with a website and you use the same story is google news they're going to leave you alone however if you're an individual you have a huge following and you buy the ties your website then you might be subject to the same copyright rules so y

core values and that is why any piece of voted to start article seven but what it may also there's a reminder and a wakeup call to some of those nations who also find themselves not exactly whiter than white that they could well be next peter all of r.t. . about carrying government denounced the voters fraud and called it the revenge of pro migrant politicians journalists luger of a told us that certain political forces believe it's their last chance to stop populism advancing in europe the left is furious it's really a crisis to an incredible point as well as the liberals the globalists because they know it is their last chance to obtain that populist sop punished somehow the list grows longer you have the austrians you have the italians it didn't work it won't work and all day do is for. demised old bon bon will be reelected certainly one time comes with a big majority because he's a victim of europe the worst that europe can produce we heard yesterday and today today it was less important vote happened and that was it but the report produced by mrs sargent teenie was a green party

law used to sign and an article in the second article of the treaty of lisbon and they cover a wide ranch of values which are human dignity the human rights the rule of law and when you look at the order it was written by this dodge lawmaker you there was interview you can see that there are actually quite a bunch of those values that have been breached at one point or another by the hungry in government and so but the main problem being that those that are using their white and white on this find it's also pretty hard to know exactly pinpoint where the issues are so it's mostly a question i think of political willingness rather than strictly like a strategic issue approach ok so martin on the contrary viktor orban says that actually he is the offending european values and i'm going to quote him here he says that this is the first case in the history of europe where a community can then it's own border guards so what what does he mean by that of course i'm looking from the polish perspective and yet to really think how you define european values there are four different perfect there are

we should be talking about how a bill becomes a law and what the job of article 2 is and article 3 is. let's try just a little bit. how do we get here and how can we fix it? i want to make four brief points. number one, in our system the legislative branch is supposed to be the center of our politics. number two, it's not. why not? because for the last century an increasing by the decade, more and more legislative authority is delegated to the executive branch every year. both parties do it. the legislature is impotent. the legislature is weak. and most people here want their jobs more than they want to do legislative work. so they punt most of the work to the next branch. third consequence is that this transfer of power means the people yearn for a place where politics can actually be done. when we don't do a lot of big, actual political debating here, we transfer it to the supreme court. and that's why the supreme court is increasingly a substitute political battleground in america. it is not healthy, but it is what happens. and it's something that our founders wouldn't be able to m

2 or article 3.do we get to a place where the legislature decided to give away its power? we've been doing it for a long time. over the course of the last century, but especially since the 1930s and then ramping up since the 1960s, a whole lot of the responsibility in this body has been kicked to a bunch of alphabet soup bureaucracies. all the acronyms that people know about their government or don't know about their government are the places where most actual policymaking kind of in a way law making is happening right now. this is not what schoolhouse rock says. there's no verse of schoolhouse rock that says give a whole bunch of power to the alphabet soup agencies and let them decide what the government's decision should be for the people because the people don't have any way to fire the bureaucrats. what we mostly do around this body is not pass laws. what we mostly do is decide to give permission to the secretary or the administrator of bureaucracy x, y, or z to make law-like regulations. that's

if it should provide aid in syria but according to the jerusalem post article its real goal was to keep his fellow fighters and rain and soldiers away from israel's borders and if guys israel over forces be provided aid to no fewer than seven syrian rebel groups included among them out july. with a full hundred strong fighting force you will see some five thousand dollars as the money to put the ports up in circulation for a while but it's also forces so in rebel groups that this is the first time that those with force subpoena tributed to the idea or at least they could have been if the article was not dropped we contacted the i.d.f. but they refused to comment but a spokesperson for the syrian rebel group previously confirmed israel says quote to the wall street journal israel stood by our side in a heroic way we wouldn't have survived without israel's assistance however the israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu has vehemently rejected these reports he says that is also assistance has been purely humanitarian we do not interfere in this terribly bloody conflict we do however provi

the state of journalism and let's talk about the state of the new york times in our their recent article. by now we're going to select this night now the plot to subvert an election unraveling the story the russia story so far just a title it assumes that there was a plot ok ok it's about a ten thousand word article there's one hundred ninety nine paragraphs and paragraphs five we have a president trying to twitter outbursts that this is all a hoax and a witch hunt in the face of a mountain of evidence to the contrary have taken a toll on public comprehension and then we go down to after the reader is tortured for many many paragraphs we go to paragraph one seventy eight mr trump's frustrations with the russian investigation is not surprising he is right that no public evidence has emerged showing that his campaign conspired with russia india election interference or accepted russian money mark interesting what happened in between i don't know evidently it's not very important because paragraph one hundred eighty three i think it was contradicts completely paragraph five and the rest is

it had been subjected to censorship by the israeli military the news provider published an article online saying that israel had admitted giving military support to anti-government forces in syria it was later deleted though the article was summarizing a media briefing which was held by senior officials of the israeli defense forces more details next from our middle east correspondent paula slayer about it. in a groundbreaking revelation published by the two recent post newspaper on tuesday it ran with a headline that these weighty defense forces confirms that israel provided lightweight pens to syrian rebels the article was immediately taken down but not before which was picked up elsewhere on the mate the division's article outlines high israel has been providing syrian rebel groups with money and arms while the i.d.f. maintains that it was not intervening in syria's civil war are minded confirmed that as part of operation good neighbor israel has been regularly supplying syrian rebels near its border with light weapons and ammunition in order to defend themselves from attacks and a sub

i said that in the georgetown article as you know. i said that actually in the phh case most recently. the statute you're talking about, the independent counsel statute was a different regime that congress itself decided not to reauthorize in 1999. i think senator durbin said it was unrestrained, unaccountable, unconstitutional str unconstitutional statute. >> i'm interested in your views, judge. you said it was a constitutional travesty, what did you mean? >> i think i meant what justice kagan said when she said at stanford a few years ago that justice scalia's dissent was one of the greatest dissents ever written and got better every year. identifying justice scalia's dissent is one of the greatest dissents ever written. justice kagan seemed to be saying this is the only reading of it, the morrison v. olson decision was wrong. >> i'll actually strongly disagree. you offered that quote, that cite of justice kagan when we met. i was struck. perhaps i should call justice kagan and say she is one of your judicial heroes. i think that cr

law used to sign and an article in the second article of the treaty of lisbon and they cover a wide ranch of values which are human dignity the human rights the rule of law and when you look at the board that was written by this dodge lawmaker you there was interview you can see that there are actually quite a bunch of those values that have been breached at one point or another by the hungry in government and so but the main problem being that those that are using their white and white on this find it's also pretty hard to know exactly pinpoint where the issues are so it's mostly a question i think of political willingness rather than strictly like a strategic issue approach ok so martin on the contrary viktor orban says that actually he is the offending european values and i'm going to quote him here he says that this is the first case in the history of europe where a community can then it's own border guards so what what does he mean by that of course i'm looking from the polish perspective and yet to really think how you define european values there are four different perfect there ar

the op-ed article says members of the cabinet whispered about the 25th amendment to the u.s. constitution. here's what the constitution says about that. whenever the vice president and the majority of either the principal officers of the executive department transmit to the president of the senate and the speaker of the house their written declaration that the president is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the vice president shall assume the powers and duties as acting president. here's what that means. if the vice president and majority of the cabinet think the president can't do the job, then congress can vote to remove the president. this is different than an impeachment process. the 25th amendment would be a last resort, only used in the event of a true constitutional crisis. something former senator and secretary of state john kerry believes is the case right now. >> this is unbelievable. this is a presidency, this is a genuine constitutional crisis. the crisis is heightened by the fact that my former colleagues, the united states senate on the rep

the article described as being primarily about trigger warnings he may the article so much better.the team at the atlantic. it is a great title. we hate it, but it's a great title. the hook became that it was that trigger warning. just one piece. trigger warnings never became a big thing. safe spaces, did not have a lot of safe spaces. what i've been big as a whole idea of micro- aggression. my question to you -- okay. yeah. there's not much to hang it on. we talked about them because this is one piece of a new conception. where did you go to college? you went to princeton. >> did you have the sense, when you were there, that you could be called out for saying something insensitive. you have to watch yourself or how you spoke in class? >> sure. i think it was. not in a way to get you in trouble, but of everyone learning. my view of offensive speech, for example, you know, you may have the right under our constitution to say offensive things, but you do not have the right people to have social repercussions to respond to that. >> that makes a lot of sense for each individual person.

your article helped me make sense of a lot of things. another thing that happened is a lot of international students i went to the program with often complained about how difficult it was to speak openly in class and so forth. the american phenomenon do you have any idea why this particularly american and a canadian. >> i teach at nyu i found this conversation from china, singapore. i was expecting to find a free-speech environment and then much more greater than it was in china or singapore. >> they are horrified, too. john stuart mills was not about restrictions on speech when the government here and it was all about the social effect and that's what we're experiencing. >> did you say what country? so in 2015 we thought it was american universities through 26th of a lot of the same things happen and written in canada and 2017 in australia and new zealand. it's not on the continent. the political correctness on the continent is not this idea that you'll be damaged. we have a couple things in common. one thing we in the u.k. do this on t

law used to sign and an article in the second article of the treaty of lisbon and they cover a wide ranch of values which are human dignity the human rights the rule of law and when you look at the board that was written by this dodge lawmaker you there was interview you can see that there are actually quite a bunch of those values that have been breached at one point or another by the hungry in government and so but the main problem being that those that are using their white and white on this find it's also pretty hard to know exactly pinpoint where the issues are so it's mostly a question i think of political willingness rather than strictly like a strategic issue approach ok so martin on the contrary viktor orban says that actually he is the offending european values and i'm going to quote him here he says that this is the first case in the history of europe where a community can then it's own border guards so what what does he mean by that of course i'm looking from the polish perspective and yet to really think how you define european values there are four different perfect there ar

here to talk was about that article is contributor and author of the book shep melnick. good morning, professor melnick. guest: good morning. host: can you tell us the history of title ix and why we're focusing on this now? guest: sure. aboutone way is to talk contemporary controversies and then to walk back of it. the obama administration issued ix, oneelines on title on sexual harassment, sexual assault, on public schools to crack down on sexual misconduct on campus in public schools. the other were a set of regulations on transgender, that a studentg can choose which facilities use come, bathrooms, locker rooms, and the like. that was all based on this 1972 law, title ix, which simply said anyone who receives federal funding cannot discriminate on the basis of sex. that was noncontroversial what was passed. president nixon find it without any statement about the importance of it. " did notyork times even cover it when it was passed in 1972. there was white agreement that institutional policy that prevented women from entering various schools, programs, departments wer

a fierce criticism of this writer of the article saying this writer of the article saying this was ae have seen this sentiment a lot. here is stephen bush for the new statesman magazine in the uk saying... and i confess anthony i had a similar thought. it doesn't seem to add up as a move. it's not exactly a profile in courage to do this anonymously. and a lot of what the writer in this piece says is already out there and has been echoed on the record and off the record accounts that have appeared in newspapers practically since the beginning of donald trump's presidency. 0n the rosa was a senior administration official and she has written an entire book that has similar sentiments. —— 0marosa to say that this is big news is a stretch. although there was something suggested that there was a conversation possibly talking about removing donald trump because he is not capable of being president any more. that is a startling revelation. i also want to ask you about the repeated claims by trump supporters in recent months that there is a deep state operation trying to undermine the preside

is doing the same thing there's a way the gist of the article he says we do is to say as a former cia officials who has been working for thirty years as a chief of the entire russian operations so again cheney is courting him the yes absolutely carried out election influence and they're called we keep doing it and of called so one course you see no evidence that supports this is very core of america's sense of exceptionalism of course meddling in a lead in someone else's election is wrong but when we do it when the u.s. does it it is because of virtuous reasons. and of course the serbs see it the sprit ludes the star wars yes yes there's a popular me i'm. telling the young darth vader attic and don't dare attack i have the high ground that every time i hear us a virtual say this we have the moral high ground don't you dare. you we're going to go to a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion and some real live stay with our. same wrong but old rules just don't hold. any. get to shape out just because the adjective and engagement equals betrayal. when so many

it is the article says, because it isa what it is the article says, because it is a consistent picture house, and it is said we have these increasingly credible sources making the case, and that is why i think it is having such an impact across town now, and why we see this parade of officials, starting with the vice president who felt compelled to say, it is not me. the article in the new york times said that the president likes to align himself with the dictators, the big men around the world, if you were looking for endorsements today why would you send out a tweet like this... ? that is some endorsement to put out! and we know the president has spoken favourably about strongmen across the world. including president vladimir putin. and has made some officials that work for him have been uncomfortable about that from the beginning, talk of a two track administration, the president speaks one way but administration officials speak another when it comes to countries like north korea. thank you very much for coming in, in a very slow news week here in washington(!) it may slow down soon

what evidence is there about the article?ng stuff from the president's desk and you could see that as a disruption, taking things away from him which they don't want him to decide upon at that moment in time. that could be the kind of disruption, but also you get a sense in the article especially the foreign policy aspect where it talks about a second track of behaviour inside the white house, looking at national security issues, where they plan a furrow which is much more considered to america's allies, and that might be an area where the diplomats and people, when it comes to national security issues, when they are in contact with other governments, they are saying slightly different things to the president, but that is just speculation. that is the line that the article is taking, though. gary, thanks forjoining us. it was a colonial—era law — for 157 years gay sex was categorised as an "unnatural offence" in india, until today. now in a hugely historic decision the country's supreme court has ruled that being gay is no lo

when they published an article in the atlantic. with discussing mostly trigger warnings as a phenomenon in education. the book takes that goes with it and far-reaching from cognitive behavioral therapy in american parenting, and yes, playground design. conceptions of justice, societal -- and what the mission of higher education is. so deeply can compassionate, sometimes distressing and banner raising vision of our common humanity. it holds it up for consideration in a beautiful way, be in the case study in the careful reasoning that it seeks commits an achievement we are proud to welcome them to politics and prose. thank you. [applause] >> thank you. thank you for having me. it's funny how age affects your impression of space and time. when i was in a school in america tell people that i went to school in washington, d.c. i now live on capitol hill and i thought we were like in canada. it took forever to get up here. it's delightful to be here. politics and prose lives large in my memory of living appear. excited to talk about the

the article very much worth the read.snuck onto the front page of the telegraph. italy blames fake news as prosecco sales go flat. the telegraph. italy blames fake news as prosecco sales go flatlj love that. it is a great headline. i love that. it is a great headline. i love that. i think they have fallen for a number of reasons, they are asking why. i am doing my bit to keep sales up. i have been in a number of british vineyards in the past few months, the quality of british lions is absolutely fantastic. i was in the chilterns north of london, not many weeks ago... north of london, not many weeks ago. . . that north of london, not many weeks ago... that is near me. i had a red wine that was as good as anything in the world. one reason is that once, the world. one reason is that once, the other is that the pound has fallen in value. that makes imports more expensive. the economy has been sluggish. people clearly don't feel like they got enough to celebrate when it comes to printing prosecco. not fake news, economic reali

for critics of the president, this article offers proof of a white house in chaos.hat what he calls the "deep state" is trying to subvert his presidency. nick bryant, bbc news, washington. the government has abandoned plans to cut taxes for three million self—employed workers. the treasury had announced two years ago that it would scrap some national insurance contributions. our political correspondent, alex forsyth, is in westminster. so, why do you turn? this was a tax cut first announcement just by george osborne but it was delayed and now it has been scrapped altogether. this was because the plan to abolish a class of national insurance contributions which would have seen 3 million workers pay £150 a year less, that by abolishing that class, it would have pushed some of the lowest earners into a higher class meaning they would have had to pay more. the treasury could not find a way to make that fair and so it has ditched the plan. this is not the first time the chancellor has had to go back on a proposed change to the tax system for the self—employed, he did so

i'm quoting this article. if there's an allegation of president chat wrong doing, a congressional inquiry should take precedence over the investigation. this american spectator article was striking to me, this one in which you said it was constitutionally dubious for a criminal prosecutor to investigate a president. you suggested not just the president should not be criminally investigated as during his term but even his associates shouldn't be held accountable during the criminal justice system. you mentioned you might make an exception for violent crime. last question for you, if i might. what if a presidential aide commits an assault? an act of domestic violence? >> i never said anything like that. >> i will let you answer that. then we'll do on. >> i'd like to conclude. >> i've not said anything approaching what your broad description is. there's always been a question based on the justice department's own position for the last 45 years. the justice department's own position assumes that the proper thing t

this is a georgetown article. i have the quotes. i just want to walk through it. you agree you did say this. you said, the constitutionality seems to dictate -- you're expressing a view on the constitutionality. in the "washington post" you wrote, the constitution appears to preclude -- >> that was in the georgetown law journal in 1998 and as it's been reported, i advised my advice to independent counsel starr was not to seek -- >> in the minnesota law review article you said that the constitution establishes a clear mechanism, talking about what the constitution establishes, yes? >> let's be very clear. can i get 30 seconds? >> of course. >> so the constitution obviously sets out a mechanism for removal. >> yes. >> the question of criminal indictment is simply a question of timing and the question is does it have to be after or may it also be before the justice department for 45 years has said it must be after. >> i guess you see what i'm getting at here. you've talked about this issue quite a bit. people were asked to raise their hand, how many people believe as

i was one of the mps who voted against triggering in article 50 last year.s that position that i was right to do so. the government had no plan for brexit then and has no realistic brexit plan now. and triggering article 50 when the prime minister did begin the countdown to the biggest changes our country has faced in peace time. it was an incredibly serious decision and one that should not have been taken lightly. what the prime minister's letter meets president tusk's desk in brussels, it strictly limited the time for negotiations to two years and one that clock is ticking down and feel like its taking down ever faster by the moment. but if the government wants to be transparent and open about this, they should very clearly state whether in their view article 50 is or is not revocable. as far as i'm aware, the position they've adopted so far is, "the question isn't being posed, therefore, we are not going to answer it." actually, they should. they should put it on the record. i absolutely agree with that. we're discussing all the options available to us at

this is borisjohnson, never known saying in this article. boris johnson, never known for underplaying a colourful phrase and we get more on that sort of language, talking about theresa may chequers proposal which he resigned from the cabinet over, he called it a humiliation and said it would make the uk look like a weakling. that is the uk look like a weakling. that is the standard language you would expect to get an borisjohnson but it's whether or not he went a metaphor too far, that's when he was talking about the government's commitment to keeping frictionless trade along the irish border. he decided to employ this metaphor of eight suicide vest saint theresa may would be wrapping a suicide vest around the british constitution and handing the detonator to the eu. as you mentioned that has seen some vocal backlash from conservative mps, siralan duncan vocal backlash from conservative mps, sir alan duncan worked with borisjohnson at mps, sir alan duncan worked with boris johnson at the mps, sir alan duncan worked with borisjohnson at the f

he simply made the decision to publish the article. i have absolutely no doubt that the me too movement is a necessary corrective or male behavior but like all well intentioned doing good things there can be undesirable consequences now there's no question that need to is giving victims a voice that is much needed but getting people fired for giving a voice to people whose guilt has not yet been proven is that what me too is supposed to bring about mop and r. t. new york we spoke with criminal defense attorney emily company who says the media is there to give more voices on a subject not fewer there is a backlash effect occurring within journalism these days which essentially it's the professional death sentence upon a mistake like that and the duty of the media the duty of this of this paper was to provide information it's to give an outlet to all of those voices in general journalists and editors i believe have a heightened sense of duty to not only act as stewards of the me to movement but that includes publishing and giving weight

the article. they did not condemn the author of the article, and they did not condemn "the new york times." now, viewers who were with us last night know that i worked through an elaborate process of elimination and analysis of the text of the article to end up with dan coats as my educated guess. and it was only a guess as the most likely author of the piece. dan coats denial today reduces my confident in that guess only slightly. dan coats is the only person who issued a denial that was actually a two-person denial. it was person saying speculation that "the new york times" op-ed was written by me or my principal deputy is also. we have insisted that the entire intelligence community remain focussed on our mission to provide the president and policymakers with the best intelligence possible. well okay. but i, for one, never mentioned your principal deputy. i don't know if someone else did. but okay. tonight with all these denials pouring in, the most interesting silence in the trump administrati

berlin it wasn't me senior trump officials are lining up to deny that they wrote that a new york times article even the u.s. vice president mike pence is forced to issue a public denial as the hunt for the anonymous author intensifies the bombshell article talks of insiders efforts to support the president's agenda trump has called it treason also coming up germany and turkey turn the page and put their recent tensions behind them turkey's foreign minister talks of the historic friendship between the two nations as they hit the reset button. i'm burnt off it's good to have you with us tonight a whodunit inside the white house senior members of the trumpet ministration are coming forward to say that they are not behind yesterday's new york times article in an op ed piece someone said to be a senior official claims that aides are working to frustrate parts of trump's agenda from inside his administration trump has lashed out calling the peace treaty and he says whoever wrote it is gutless for hiding his or her identity. i am part of the resistance inside the trumpet ministration the headline pro

articles about libya for example a few days ago you reposed an article by the a.p. and the a.p. describes the causes of the conflict in a very curious way let me quote it for you libya's lead into the cares after the two thousand and eleven uprising that overthrew a long ruling dictator moammar gadhafi and led to his death that there's not a single mention of the nature intervention and i couldn't find it in none of the western articles on the subject what do you think explains that propensity to gloss over the role of western powers in the disintegration of that country. before i answer your question i mean. libya today's in a profound crisis and i'm not necessarily i don't necessarily think that dwelling too much on the mistakes of twenty eleven or how the intervention is framed today whether you know we had that this was an overstepping or not actually insurance is any more action i don't know whether it was just there being a north east. by the time of the war in twenty eleven i was in working with crisis group and i wrote a very strong article. following the death of gadhaf