keith morrison: oh. that i will not be standing on the side of my children's graves and people aren't going to be patting me on the back and saying, there's nothing you could have done. i did. keith morrison: oakes claimed mark stover shot first. thus, the claim he now made, it was self-defense, even though no evidence ever surfaced to suggest stover was in possession of any firearm at all or that stover had ever arranged any meeting with oakes. and as for the story that he was a hired gun for the opdyckes, just not true, said michiel oakes. a great many people believe that one or both of the opdyckes are involved. were they involved? not at all. keith morrison: but of course, it was all michiel's story about a crazed dog whisperer, threats to his children, all that fear. i mean, who else says that besides you? and what evidence is there that he ever said such a thing? said such a thing as-- that he was threatening your kids. well, keith, it's been the problem. i survived that day in october. i was still

in morrison v. olson, even though the statute passed into history, morrison v. olson as a decision of the supreme court is still good law. in fact, your own circuit said so forcefully tonight. >> i think the humphries executor -- >> i think that is a yes or no question. the d.c. circuit held this year that morrison v. olson is still good law. correct? >> i think they were applying humphries executor, they may have cited more. >> they literally said, morrison remains valid and binding precedent and -- >> and how it applied humphries. >> criticized minority as flying in the face of morrison. >> and again, we're -- we're talking about independent agencies. so the traditional independent agencies on the one hand and the old indpuependent counsel regim that is long gone on the other. it was a serious mistake. senator durbin's words unrestrained and unaccountable, unconstitutional. >> so what i think -- what i'm concerned about, judge, is not so much whether there are members of this committee or other ju

in morrison v. olson even though the independent statute has passed into history, morrison v. olson is still good law? your own circuit said so this year? >> i think the humphries executor -- >> that's yes or no. the d.c. circuit held this year where you wrote a dis-september that morrison v. olson is still good law, correct? >> i think they were a playing humphreys or -- >> they said and i quote "morrison is binding and valid -- >> how it applied humphries -- >> criticized your minority in the face of morrison. >> again, we're talking about independent agencies, so the traditional independent agencies on the one hand and the old independent council that is long gone on the other. the independent counsel regime, this committee and the congress as a whole decided was a serious mistake. senator durbins words, unrestrained, unaccountable, unconstitutional -- >> what i'm concerned about, judge, is not so much whether there's members of this committee or other justices that viewed the independent counsel

in morrison v. olson, even though the statute passed into history, morrison v. olson as a decision of the supreme court is still good law. in fact, your own circuit said so forcefully tonight. >> i think the humphries executor -- >> i think that is a yes or no question. the d.c. circuit held this year that morrison v. olson is still good law. correct? >> i think they were applying humphries executor, they may have cited more. >> they literally said, morrison remains valid and binding precedent and -- >> and how it applied humphries. >> criticized minority as flying in the face of morrison. >> and again, we're -- we're talking about independent agencies. so the traditional independent agencies on the one hand and the old indpuependent counsel regim that is long gone on the other. it was a serious mistake. senator durbin's words unrestrained and unaccountable, unconstitutional. >> so what i think -- what i'm concerned about, judge, is not so much whether there are members of this committee or other ju

in morrison v. olson, even though the statute passed into history, morrison v. olson as a decision of the supreme court is still good law. in fact, your own circuit said so forcefully tonight. >> i think the humphries executor -- >> i think that is a yes or no question. the d.c. circuit held this year that morrison v. olson is still good law. correct? >> i think they were applying humphries executor, they may have cited more. >> they literally said, morrison remains valid and binding precedent and -- >> and how it applied humphries. >> criticized minority as flying in the face of morrison. >> and again, we're -- we're talking about independent agencies. so the traditional independent agencies on the one hand and the old indpuependent counsel regim that is long gone on the other. it was a serious mistake. senator durbin's words unrestrained and unaccountable, unconstitutional. >> so what i think -- what i'm concerned about, judge, is not so much whether there are members of this committee or other ju

justice scully has morrison versus olson sole dissent embraces the so-called unitary executive theory, which grants sweeping powers to the president of the united states. scalia said in a call, we should say here the presidents constitutionally assigned duties have complete control over investigation and prosecution of violationn of law and that the inexorable command article ii is clear and definite. the executive power must be vested in the president of the united states. in this age of president p donad trump, this expansive view of presidential power takes on added significance. earlier thises year the senate judiciary committee reported a bipartisan bill to protect the independence of the special counsel, bob mueller. several republican members who are here today cited coleus dissent to justify their opposition to alele bill protecn the special counsel with one even sane, and i quote, many of us think we are bound by its coleus dissent. at the time i joke instead of those dealing with stare decisis, we are dealing with scully at the faces. mac >> unitary executive. the basis of p

would you vote overturn morrison?> i'm not going to say more than what i said before. >> i think what you said before is clear, your enthusiasm for overturning morrison is unmistakable. >>. >>. [shouting] >>. >>. [shouting] >> i want to make a few things important, one of which is executors for the precedent that stands and i call it an entrenched precedent on independent agency generally and the two is the special counsel system was in the phh decision recently and in the old georgetown law journal which i specifically said that that's the traditional way that criminal investigations proceed when there's a conflict of interest and the usual justice department process is not appropriate. >> that's in federal law for 83 years, right? early on you said you would be able to produce on long settle cases. can you tell me if executor was correctly, long settled precedent, you said that about a number of cases but the key differences whether he will say that something is rightly decided.i'm struck about this and we are conce

olson, it may show morrison v.lson, a, is a bad decision, and b, that the -- and want you to get a constitutional claim out of this, but supervisors are not doing the job in reining him in. it would be if you have lower level official in the department of agriculture running around the country doing things nobody said hey, you can't keep doing that. that's how i tend to look at it. it shows a problem the constitutional and statutory problem with special counsels. >> don't forget, every week, most week nights you can watch me on levin tv, levin tv. i hope you sign up and join us. call 844-levin tv. 844-levin tv. or go to crtv.com/mark. we'll be right back. sleep disturbances keep 1 in 3 adults up at night. only remfresh uses ion-powered melatonin to deliver up to 7 hours of sleep support. number 1 sleep doctor recommended remfresh -- your nightly sleep companion. available in the natural sleep section at walmart. (crash) some debt you plan for, some just... ...happens. putting it all on credit cards just wasn't work

once again, here's keith morrison. >> david jackson was murdered the in 1988 in florida.ch detective donna velasquez could say for certain. but the rest? after more than a year of phone calls and late nights, all velasquez had come up with an increasingly complicated web of stories and relationships. david jackson was married to barbara britton, her father, harry, disliked david. barbara went on to become the fifth wife of a man named michael wolf. they divorced and he later married two more times. >> that we needed to talk. >> but now, finally, one of wolf's ex-wives, a woman named nancy, was sitting with detective velasquez, telling police that she knew everything about what happened to david. >> can you tell me again? >> because i know how he was killed and what they did with him. >> how did she know? according to the ex, michael drank, a lot. >> every night he would almost down a whole bottle of scotch. and i guess he just needed to talk. >> and the story wolf told, according to the ex, implicated more than just himself. here's what happened as nancy heard it. wolf an

the new prime minister, scott morrison, has a task ahead of im. he has assembled a new cabinet and has a big hill to climb. the government has a 10% deficit. against the labor opposition. election isn't due for at least another eight months so there is time to rebuild. that was the last and fairly tumultuous session at the australian parliament. we'll see you next time. >> tonight on c-span. national security advisor john bolton talks about the international criminal court, a panel at the hudson institute looks at military actions the u.s. has taken in the 17 years after the september 11 attacks. and the house homeland security subcommittee hearing on cyber security threats in the aviation sector. >> c-span's "washington journal" live every day with news and policy issues that impact you. coming up tuesday morning, with just over 50 days to go until election day 2018, politico campaign editor steven shepard will preview key house and senate races around rand corporation senior advisor brian jenkins discusses the state of homeland security 17 years

he was replaced by scott morrison, another liberal party member and house of representatives member. >> hello. i'm david speers with a look at the latest association of this toy department and the decision that descended into chaos. ostrow has lost another prime minister not advance of voters but advance of their party colleagues. no australian prime minister has made it through a full three-year parliamentary term now for more than a decade. parties keep replacing them for the get the chance to go to another election. why? because they're not convinced they can actually take them to victory. this time it was the liberal party prime minister malcolm turnbull, a liberal party being the conservative side in australia and it was the right wing conservative faction of the liberal party that moved against him precious been building for weeks and then it finally exploded but it took quite a few days to bring malcolm turnbull down. during that time we saw with the begin with steel still motion. malcolm turnbull survived that by a narrow margin. a number of his own ministers voted against hi

olson, it may show morrison v. bad decision, and b, that the -- and want you to get a constitutional claim out of this, but supervisors are not doing the job in reining him in. it would be if you have lower level official in the department of agriculture running around the country doing things nobody said hey, you can't keep doing that. that's how i tend to look at it. it shows a problem the constitutional and statutory problem with special counsels. >> don't forget, every week, most week nights you can watch me on levin tv, levin tv. i hope you sign up and join us. call 844-levin tv. 844-levin tv. or go to crtv.com/mark. we'll be right back. touch shows how we really feel. but does psoriasis ever get in the way? embrace the chance of 100% clear skin with taltz, the first and only treatment of its kind offering people with moderate to severe psoriasis a chance at 100% clear skin. with taltz, up to 90% of people quickly saw a significant improvement of their psoriasis plaques. don't use if you're allergic to taltz.

once again, here's keith morrison. >> david jackson was murdered the in 1988 in florida.na velasquez could say for certain. but the rest? after more than a year of phone calls and late nights, all velasquez had come up with an increasingly complicated web of stories and relationships. david jackson was married to barbara britton, her father, harry, disliked david. barbara went on to become the fifth wife of a man named michael wolfe. they divorced and he later married two more times. >> that we needed to talk. >> but now, finally, one of wolf's ex-wives, a woman named nancy, was sitting with detective velasquez, telling police that she knew everything about what happened to david. >> can you tell me again? >> because i know how he was killed and what they did with him. >> how did she know? according to the ex, michael drank, a lot. >> every night he would almost down a whole bottle of scotch. and i guess he just needed to talk. >> and the story wolf told, according to the ex, implicated more than just himself. here's what happened as nancy heard it. wolf and harry britton

in the caption, mr morrison praised his colleagues as being "on fire today". in general. the prizes of getting it right, and the pitfalls of getting it wrong. charlotte gallagher has this report. this is the twitter post that got the australian prime minister trending. but for the wrong reasons. while many people tweeted they were cringing, others were offended and scott morrison ended up apologising with another tweet. and, of course, he is not the only world leader to be mocked on social media. the british prime minister dusting off her dancing shoes during a trip to kenya. she was called a baby robot giraffe by one twitter user, but theresa may saw the funny side. but sometimes a social media mistake can work in a politician's favour. take ed balls day. it marks the day when the british politician ed balls sent out this tweet. he was searching for articles about himself and accidentally posted his own name instead. and, yes, he was ridiculed at the time, but it raised his profile and introduced him to a younger audience who probably didn't know who he was.

let's get to paul jarvis on morrison. firmritish like to make names possessive so morrison's.he morrisons results really, they show why this is theof the purest place on strength of u.k. foods retail. the earnings are pretty much in line with expectations but there is -- the results are a treasure trove of good news. lots for the bulls in here. doneirst time they have that, analysts are saying it will not be the last. if you include that with the increased first-half dividend, the dividend has more than doubled. there is increased guidance on new sales, and their guidance sales has wholesale been brought forward. plenty of good news. been reducing their positions and william arson and they are at the lowest level since 2014. the share price performed well and it is likely to be one of the strongest performers in london this morning. matt: thanks for much. what are you take us to the break with banks, and a? anna: we have [indiscernible] in focus and keep an eye on natixis. talking about a special dividend. we will get more of that as we go through the trading day. this is bloo

somehow the only commentary on morrison is from kagan's law review article. she also said this in a magazine stanford lawyer three years ago and it says justice kagan has called justice skalia's dissent one of the greatest ever written and said that every year it gets better. we're in recess.

morrison has nothing to do with that.at dealt with the old statute as you said which is expired in 1999 under overwhelming consensus that statute was inappropriate. secondly, morrison, justice scalia's precedent, does not prevent the supreme court precedent that allows independent agencies to exist. those independent regulatory agencies continue to exist, of course. so both on the independent agency side, those are unaffected. on the special counsel's side, that's unaffected. you mentioned the cfpb case. that -- my decision in that case would have allowed that agency to continue operating and performing its important function for american consumers. the only correction would have been in the structure. it was unlike every other independent agency created previously. as to the concept of prosecutorial discretion in the 2011 case, that is a traditional concept. prosecutorial discretion. that's recognized in the executive branch. the limits of it are uncertain. that's arisen with president bush in the immigration context. th

actually i was going to say one, morrison v. olson. >> that's the independent counsel statute case. >> it's been effectively overruled, but i would put the final nail in. >> hear hear. >> so that's what pete was talking about, that kavanaugh has some views on how much people should be able to look into and investigate the president. >> not based on morrison v. olson. lots of conservatives are not big fans of morrison v. olson, but that's because long ago it held constitutional the independent counsel statute, which is totally different than the special counsel that we have today. the independent counsel statute that was created in a post-nixon era expired many years ago and structurally it was significantly different from the special counsel, which is wholly a creation of the executive branch today. the independent counsel, on the other hand, had real separation of powers controversies. >> is that the distinction? >> that's right. so once you get into the courts, for example, that's another branch of government. and then you hav

. >> was morrison v. olson rightly decided? that was discussion -- >> i associated myself with justice kagan's position. >> i went back and looked at presidential administration, her article where she expressly rejects unitary and you expound in decent. it's exactly the reason that i have concerns, judge. >> i specifically recognize, i understand the point but i specifically called the precedent that we must follow in the independent agency context, precedent of the supreme court that i've referred to as entrenched. the only question in phh was can we go further than that kind of independent agency consistency with article 2 or does it draw the line that sets forth the permissible boundaries under which congress can establish agencies. >> in an exchange with senator feinstein earlier today this was exactly the question that i don't think you answered it. as i understand the decent case, your exact problem with the structure congress created for this independent agency was that the director was not removable at will by the presi

on morrison versus olson. that case did not involve the special counsel system. had written repeatedly that the special counsel system, which we have now, and have had historically is a distinct system pine e appointed by the y general. that dealt with the old independent counsel statute that expired in 1999. secondly, morrison justice scalia's dissent that does not affect humphrey executive. those independent agents continue to exist. on the special counsel side that's unaffected. you mentioned the cfpb case, my decision in that case would have allowed that agency to continue operate and performing important functions for american consumers. the only correction would have been in the structure because it was a novel structure that was unlike every other independent agency that had been created previously. limits of it are uncertain. there's debates about what the women saw. those are not determined. i've made clear in my writings that a court order that requires a president to do something or prohibits a president from doing something under the constitution or l

keith morrison with "crossing the line". >>> hello and welcome to "dateline extra." a dangerous highway was the setting for a deadly crash that left shock and heartbreak in its wake, except they were about to find out that this tragedy was also a mystery and the truth about what happened on that late winter night might be darker than anyone knew. here's keith morrison. >> march 19th, 2009. night fell heavy in montana's flathead valley. something off that night, something wrong. at mary and randy winter's house, anxiety spiked. where was she? >> it just felt like something was not right. >> it's hard to explain that there's something not normal. >> you could set your clock by their daughter, justine. that reliable. but a new driver, too, just 16. on her way home from her boyfriend's house. and though she wasn't very late, the feeling seeped in like a poison. something wrong. >> i called her starting about five after 8:00, no answer. called the house where she was at and they said she had left 15 minutes before that. >> i was thinking she had went off the road between

here's keith morrison. >> we had a homicide. no suspects. so we are dealing basically with zero balance here. >> nancy cooper had been strangled. her barely clothed body found in a storm drain several miles from home. but why? there were no signs of rape or robbery or that any struggle had occurred. >> we start going back to where we started at saying, okay, let's look at everything again. >> there were reports from people who said they saw a woman who looked like nancy running that saturday morning. one man said he watched her for a good 30 seconds, then saw a van make a u-turn to follow her. and there were other reports of mysterious vans. friday night, one sped away from a cul-de-sac with no light pops could any of this be tied to her killer? >> not walk away from anything at this point. everything becomes important. >> like conversations with her husband brad that weekend of the search. brad told detectives he and nancy were up at 4:00 a.m. saturday to calm their crying 2-year-old katie. then 6:00 or so, he made two trips to the grocery

now, with the conclusion to our story, here is keith morrison. >> may, 2011. and women of riverside county, california, filed out of the courtroom, a second jury, to make a life decision about chris hall. did he murder his wife? which of the medical examiners should they believe? whose account of the defendant's character and, perhaps most important, what did lindsay patterson see when she peeked three times into the halls' back yard. >> do you ever have those sort of little dark moments of the soul where you think, i may have misinterpreted, misremembered -- >> it's something i've thought about every day, whether i misinterpreted, whether i think i saw something that wasn't there. i didn't see everything. >> yeah. >> but i saw what i saw. and i know the conclusion of my story. i know it. i know it. right here. i know it. >> of course, chris hall's daughters say they know the truth too, real thing. in their hearts. >> i think that we were the three most critical jurors in that courtroom. believe me, if we had heard anything or had any inkling that our father c

here again with secrets in a small town, is keith morrison. >>> it's a funny thing about secrets. they can only stay hidden for so long. especially in a little place like moundville. and it didn't take very long for sheriff ellis and corporal boyd to stumble onto a secret scott had been keeping. >> while we was out at the crime scene, scott had had a young lady to come pick up the boys. >> it was only later when the fog of grief had lifted that one of teresa's relatives wondered to police, who was that woman hanging around the day teresa died? ellis and boyd tracked her down, and what they discovered? well, that changed everything, or seemed to. the person they were talking to was scott's mistress. >> he was under the impression that scott was not married at that time. >> what did you make of that when you heard it? >> we knew that wasn't correct. >> a love triangle? jealous home wrecker kills wife, claims husband? no. not even close. scott's girlfriend thought his marriage was over, his divorce finalized. >> what was her reaction to getting the real story? she must have been upse

somehow the only commentary on morrison is from kagan's law review article. she also said this in a magazine stanford lawyer three years ago and it says justice kagan has called justice skalia's dissent one of the greatest ever written and said that every year it gets better. we're in recess. >> day three of the brett kavanaugh supreme court hearing just taking a short break at this point. judge kavanaugh in the second day of questioning. senators are getting 20 minutes each during this second round, and the hearing will continue tomorrow as well, 9:30 a.m. eastern time. we'll be hearing from outside legal witnesses, including john dean, and a note if you missed any of the live broadcast, we'll be showing today's session in its entirety again tonight at 8:00 p.m. eastern on c-span2.

anna morrison versus olson, a couple of things at the outset. involve a special counsel system. i have written repeatedly that the traditional special counsel system which we have now and have had historically is a distinct system, appointed by the attorney general. morrison has nothing to do that. that dealt with the old independent counsel. it expired in 1999 under overwhelming consensus of that statute being inappropriate, unrestrained, unaccountable, as he said. secondly, morrison, that has not affected the precedent of the executor. humphrey's executor allows independent agencies, those regulatory agencies continue to exist, of course. so on the independent agency side, those are unaffected. on the special counsel side, that's unaffected. you mentioned the see if pp case. my decision in that case would have allowed that agency to continue operating and performing its important functions for american consumers. the only correction would have been in the structure because it was a novel structure that was unlike any other independent agency t

the middle, the treasurer, scott morrison. representing the center of the party.ltimately he was the winner. earlier in the week, though, he had been also backing malcolm turnbull as a loyal treasurer. somebody who didn't want this change to happen at all. >> thanks, mr. speaker. o the treasurer. >> is the treasurer aware of conflicting reports over the treasurer's loyalty with the treasurer doing the numbers for the prime minister and helms? - himself. >> absolutely, mr. speaker. the prime minister has always enjoyed my support, mr. speaker. i'll tell you why. together as a team, the prime minister and i have assured we have turned the corner on debt. we have brought the budget back into balance and have been -- on economic policy for the single greatest increase in employment, mr. speaker. young people getting the jobs. our infrastructure program hitting the ground. our plan for a stronger economy is getting the results we want it to get. a triple-a-credit rating. we have plans to do even more. plans to do even more, mr. speaker to ensure the australians continu

here's keith morrison. >> 7:00 a.m. november 15th, 2007. dawn in salt lake city, utah. he pulled into the restaurant parking lot, turned off his engine. sky beginning to brighten, sun not quite up. and then there they were. the voices. the terror. the nightmare beginning. >> immediately ducked down in my car after the first shot was fired. i laid there thinking, okay, this is how it's going to end for me. >> you're going to be dead. >> yep. >> 911, what is your emergency? >> somebody just shot a man, laying dead in front of the village inn. >> it stands in stark contrast to the rest of salt lake city. this old chocolate factory. this grand stage for our story. it was converted to loft apartments in the boom years before the bust, and the style of living and location drew a distinct crowd, outliers of a sort, iconoclasts in this famously mormon city. >> i loved this building. >> bianca pearman-brooks, for example, born into privilege in england, raised in ireland and africa, she came here in august 2006 to visit a friend. >> i came on holiday and i met christopher and we

the morrison case, was that about separation of powers? >> that was a separation of powers case. >> okay. it was about a congressional statute and the authority of the executive branch and how they interacted. is that correct? >> that's correct. and a very specific statutory scheme that was unprecedented. had the judiciary involved in appointed the counsel. >> and apparently kagan and scalia agreed. >> yes. >> but kagan agreed with scalia's dissent. >> she's called it one of best ever written. >> i don't want to get into the habit of saying listen to kagan, but i will here because she's a fine person. the situation we have before us about mr. mueller, that's not a separation of powers issue, is it? aren't these different facts? that mr. mueller was appointed through department of justice regulations. >> senator, i don't want to talk specifically about current events, but i will just refer back to what i've written previously about special counsel -- >> i'm not asking you to decide a case. i'm just asking you, do you read the paper? do you

what do you make of his enthusiastic and repeated embrace of scalia's dissent in morrison? >> there's a lot to that question, senator. >> there is. >> i will try to keep it brief. what most concerns me about judge kavanaugh's position is not just that he has embraced the tenets of unitary executive theory, but that he has gone to such lengths to try to create a kind of legal foundation for it in the dc circuit, in cases that had nothing to do with unitary executive theory. there was much discussion during the panel about the case of morrison versus olson, and judge kavanaugh of course has famously said that he would like to put the final nail in that case. but in the phh case, that was being discussed, this was a case that the dc circuit unanimously resolved on purely statutory grounds and judge kavanaugh sought to write an extensive opinion for the panel, on the constitutional issue that later got overturned, but the opinion he issued for the panel pulled out of thin air this completely unmoored theory about why a single-headed independent agency was unconstitutional. it w

david: you said your business at taylor morrison is doing well.e it do better or worse? more well or less well? is the disposable income or how much people are making? sentiment or people saying i would rather spend my money somewhere else than buying a house? sheryl: i do not think so. i think the consumer feelings are good or they feel good about their jobs, they are financially more secure than they have been. about thelk demographic tailwinds and the millennials, if you were to chart this for the last 20 years, 30 years, 40 years, we would see homeownership rates really have moved about a year every few years. we are seeing millennials not purchase homes until probably 32, 33. a life change -- marriage. probably more relevant, children. that is what is enticing them into home ownership. i think the millennial tailwinds will continue to work in our ofor as a large group millennials today are just turning 30 and 31. we are also seeing another interesting trend. that is consumers are buying less than they can afford today. our we look and test ba

. >> now, i've had colleagues who have worried about your view that morrison was wrongly decided. your view, just to be clear is that morrison applies only in a special context no longer relevant here, is that right? >> that's correct. >> what context is that? >> the independent counsel statute which is distinct, it had a lot of features to it, and that statute was viewed by the congress when we consider day in 1999 as being unrestrained, unaccountable, impermissible and the statue was not renewed, the morrison case was about a one-off statute that no longer exists. >> that's what you can talk about it. >> that's why i have talked about it. >> these are the remains of a once existing but no longer -- it's a dinosaur, in legal terms. what about your opinion on phh, it's really limited to independent agencies. >> the federal energy regulatory commission, the securities and exchange commission, a full range of independent agencies, the 1935 president of the supreme court established that those are permissible. traditionally they've been multimember bodies and that was a problem i tho

. >> arizona bed taylor morrison homes is the seventh largest publicly traded home builder by revenue. and the ceo sheryl palmer is the first and only one of her kind in tho ranks, a female ceo. that this wastain an intentional path for me. but it's one that felt right fob ously -- i've been in this industry for 20 years. color blind, i'm depender blind. they might notice i'm the single female at the table. but f mehis is just what i do. all the old jokes about there is no line tohe ladies -- those are all true. but it -- doesn't change me. i always said in business, the day i have to change who i am is the day i'll stop. >> palmer started in home building first at poulty homes then taylor morrison. they she took the company public in 2012. >> you're at the table. >> um-hum. >>he other publicly traded ceos have you you ever felt minimized and if so how. >> for sure. early days i think if i were to share a view i think it almost was gloss over. i had to continue and i knew that -- i knew that my position wsws my v on the business were right. i would sayth tgroup of ceos had to get to k

here again is keith morrison with hometown hero and the homecoming queen.jane laut, now accused murder and dave, now that dave was dead, stories emerged. >> it seemed like she was controlled, in my opinion. >> an across the street neighbor. he's there standing there while she's, you know, pulling weeds, cleaning out gutters, washing his truck and he's not lifting a finger to help her. i was like a scared little rehab it. >> i was always a little leery about what was actually going on in the home. >> she said jane reminded her of another vulnerable creature. >> jane looked like a scared cat. always doing a switch over her shoulder. looking to see if someone is behind her. >> and this from jane's former coworker. >> he was very aggressive. very demanding and when he said jump, she would go how high? >> how strange it was, she thought, that jane always wore long sleeves, even when it was hot outside, but more disturbing. >> there were times she would come in and i noticed on her face it looked swollen. and she would never comment how it happened. >> there were

that's what was upheld in morrison v. olson. . hessian i don't think there is much legal controversy over whether robert mueller has the legal authority to do what he's doing. we can debate about whether he's doing a good job but i don't think there is the same kind of controversy and we're starting so i'll shut up. >> it does look like we are about to gavel in. there you go. senator chuck grassley. let's listen in. >> on the nomination of judge brett kavanaugh -- >> mr. chairman? >> -- to serve as associate justice -- >> mr. chairman, i'd like to be recognized for a question before we proceed? >> regular order, mr. chairman. >> mr. chairman, i'd like to be recognized to ask a question before we proceed. the committee received last night less than 15 hours ago -- >> mr., regular order. >> -- 42,000 pages of documents we have not an opportunity to review or read or analyze. >> you're out of order. i'll proceed. >> we cannot possibly move forward, mr. chairman with this hearing. we have not been given an opportunity to have a meanin

here's keith morrison. >> it was her first time in las vegas, her first look at that famous strip, its outsized kitsch, its gaudy cavernous casinos. with their endless electronic clatter and their darker places where men in black suits hover over the steadied calm of high-rolling wishful thinkers. her name was adrian solomon, and she was here on business. >> i was excited to go, to see what this city was all about. >> adrian came to las vegas to plan a medical conference. meeting planning was her business. a road job. >> i was probably gone 50% of the time. >> and now the job had brought her here, to a vast casino, all alone. exciting of course, but buttoned down compared to her previous more exotic occupation, teaching the flying trapeze. >> i went to work for club med and worked for the vacationers for seven years, living all over the world. >> i can't imagine what it's like to have a job where your responsibility is to teach people how to relax and have fun and do it in a wonderful setting. >> it was the best job. >> in which she learned to embrace moments of fun, new experiences, a

keith morrison: but an ill wind will blow through paradise.d i knew in my heart something terrible had happened. keith morrison: where had the dog trainer gone? a trail of sinister clues. there was three wet blood spots in the hallway.

before you go, i want to get back to this justice kagan's comment on morrison, this is something thatare have discussed a long time. somehow the only commentary on kagan's law review article, presidential administration. she also said this in a magazine, "stanford lawyer" three years ago. it says "justice kagan has called justice scalia's greatest dissent in morrison one of the greatest and gets greater. >> shepard: so you heard it there, a break of 15 minutes. maybe 7 1/2. we'll see. we'll take you back when it begins again. first, a.b. stoddard is with us associate editor from real clear politics. she's getting mic'd up and ready to go. i was listening to a.b. in the moments after the bomb shell op-ed anonymous dropped on "the new york times" on its website and through its alerts on your phones and the rest. it was a.b. that had what i thought were interesting comments at that moment. we'll take a quick commercial break and hear from her after this. . . but does psoriasis ever get in the way? embrace the chance of 100% clear skin with taltz. up to 90% of those with moderate to sever

but it must be banned morrison that i'm on a mass general rhythm and blues love me. live. concerts in forty five minutes on d w. a great yourself with d w's interior design. channel on. terror at the more of a refugee camp there's a terrible suspicion coursing through one of europe's largest refugee camps on the island of less lost a legit i as followers has said to be terrorizing the refugees some say they've created criminal structures we meet witnesses and victims in an exclusive report today in reporter on. africa. hello and welcome to a new edition of art's twenty one. this is its literature i'm intentionally messing with you it's the best german language novel of the year will be announced at the upcoming french first book fair meet the six contenders for the cup of his judgment book protestant.

keith morrison: summertime in miami.. >> reporter: when "blind justice" continues. >>> plane crash in alaska. >> from the day we are born we >> reporter: summertime in miami. pounding heat. unavoidable sun. unavoidable except of course inside. >> all rise, please. >> reporter: six years inside a cell in the county jail had produced a doughy christopher sutton by the time his trial finally began. it was july 2010. the son charged with hiring the hit man who murdered his mother, blinded his father. and here he sat apparently confident, highly prepared, ignoring most of the time the surviving members of his family, a scant to feet away. >> you know, we locked eyes, but -- i have nothing to say to him. >> reporter: melissa sat with her father, their father. front row seat. prosecutor karen keagan told the jury a horror story. the state's version of what happened. >> the man for whom the gunman had signed on to commit a double-murder. a man who was intimately familiar with john and susan sutton. that man -- their son. christo

still in charlotte that it must be a morrison. a master of rhythm and blues. your concerts in forty five minutes on t.w. . germany which. any time any place. video never. happened at the back of the. songs to sing along to download it is to come from soup. to a. very close is kind of into active exercise is the hard thing about that d w joe come slashdot engine and i'm on facebook and am still. jammin for free w. . a lowered welcome to focus on europe i'm brian todd. europe's nationalist and the far right parties are continuing to make gains in europe and in germany that's especially true in the country's east one of the consequences germans out on the streets protesting against immigration are now finding themselves side by side in demonstrations with skinheads and their nazis.

that it must be the band morrison that a master of rhythm and blues does. most of your concerts in forty five minutes long t.w. . should put. a link to the screen africa. or link to exceptional stories and discussions. of easy town while with safety dep. it comes to join us on facebook. for. something tyson and i ask him to jurors or dealing with any matter of a killed many civilians i mean gosh coming clearing my father. says i was a struggle because i wanted to build a life for myself like these totally but suddenly life became alledge kind of. providing insights global news that matters d.w. made for mines. hello and welcome to the latest edition of in court africa your environment magazine today we're going to visit a few of our because national parks.

prior to my appointment at new york university i was the alexander morrison professor of law at the university of california berkeley what i thought for 12 years come service faculty director of the berkeley center for reproductive rights and justice, and served as interim dean of the law school. like judge kavanaugh i, too, am a graduate of you law school. over the course of these hearings much has been made of judge kavanaugh's warmness and kindness towards clerks and those in his community. these accounts resonate with me as judge kavanaugh and i have traveled in similar professional circles over thetr years. in fact, i have lunch with him and i can attest to his feminist and charming demeanor. but this nomination is not about whom i would befriend her with whom i would have lunch ticket is not about how brett kavanaugh treats a handful of women from elite institutions. it is about real people on the ground, people like the women to my right and the people they represent who will not have lunch h with judge kavanaugh, wo will notau meet with judge kavanaugh but you'll nonetheless depend on

she has been involved with a lot of big companies, including rbs, coca—cola, morrisons, for example.your take. judy make the big story with aston martin is that they are trained to reconfigure their board and management in a bit more business oriented way to avoid repeating a lot of business mistakes that they have made earlier in their history. from that perspective, i think that the appointment of the first in a chair is significant because it shows that they actually, that companies are now no longer limiting themselves in the way that they used to, look into that kind of executive talent. so i think it is very healthy to have an economy where there are not those kinds of disk and military barriers to companies finding the best management for the shareholders. peterlee will float soon. and annie palmer, the chief executive, he is determined to this to bea executive, he is determined to this to be a great success. we will talk about this in the future. we have picked out the story especially so you garjoseph, because you are from the us. this is a look at the mayor of kenner, which

morrison is from kagan's law review article. she also said this in a magazine stanford lawyer three years ago and it says justice kagan has called justice skalia's dissent one of the greatest ever written and said that every year it gets better. we're in recess. >> tell me when you're ready, judge. >> thank you. >> senator flake. >> thank you. judge kavanaugh, if it's fourth quarter an you're down by one point, what play do you call, and which one of the young ladies in the front row do you give the ball to? >> i can't choose. they're all great players, as you know, senator. it's awesome to have them all here. >> do you want to let us know who they are and what team is here? >> these are a variety of teams that i've coached. i started coaching many years ago, and some of these girls are as old as tenth grade now. so they're older than my daughters. i started coaching the team four years ago. so the oldest girls, caroline an and abigail, tenth grade. madison, ninth grader. the girls over here -- well, these are my two, of course.

leader and foreign minister julie bishop putting randolph and the man in the middle, the treasurer morrison representing the center of the party, ultimately he was the winner. earlier in the week though he had the also backing malcolm turnbull as a loyal treasurer and someone who didn't want this change to happen at all . >> thank you mister speaker, my question is to the treasurer. the handbook applies to all ministers. is the treasurer aware of conflicting media reports of the treasurer'sloyalty, with the treasurer doing the numbers for the prime minister and himself . >> does the senate to retain enough confidence to remain treasurer? >> absolutely mister speaker, the prime minister has always enjoyed my support and i'll tell you why. he's commended on my left together with his name, the prime minister and i have insured that we have turned the corner on deck, we are bringing the budget back into balance. we have together seen economic policies in the single greatest increase in employment misterspeaker on economic record in this country for jobs . with the young people getting the jobs,

what about morrisons? clog up trade, but britain's fourth largest supermarket group believes it is better placed than most to cope. in its second quarter, group underlying sales at morrisons rose by 6.3 percent, an eleventh straight quarter of growth, boosted by britain's record—breaking summer heatwave, the soccer world cup and the royal wedding. so no change on interest rates? not that exciting, but it is quite interesting. the economy is doing well in some respects, strong figures coming up. we saw the purchasing managers index, wages going up. some figures show the economy is going pretty strongly. the reason they are holding back, and it was unanimous, is because of uncertainty, an old favourite. we can go and talk to james bevan, chief investment officer at sea cla investment management. it is brexit and stopping —— that is stopping them putting up interest rates. otherwise, the economy is going pretty well. mr carney said in august that we should expect about a quarter of 1% every year, and he has h

tony morrison's writing, word work is sublime because generative, the way in which we are like no other life, we die, that's makes -- that maybe the meaning of life. but we do language and that may be the measure of our lives. >> pages celebrate the achievement of the brain. in between the pages my hope to engage in dialogue with you, the reader, about my concerns, first, the plasticity and precipitate most essential thought process, critical analysis, empathy and reflection to the detriment of our democratic society. second, will the formation of the same processes be threatened in our young who have not acquired the same brain that all of you have. to be sure each of the human processes is endangered, yet each has accelerated across the centuries. we can take comfort from that, but less comfort is to be found in my third concern. for just as there were miss in evolution in which whole species traces vanished because the environment did not support their continuation, there can be misses in the genetic changes to cognitive capacities as we rightly enthusiastically acquire new essential