unmitigated gall. the seat of justice scalia was held open for a long time, a long time, and now, with no reason, my colleague says we can't do that. chairman grassley has to stop playing games, pretending like the nomination can continue to glide through while at the same time the senate conducts a review of these allegations. hastily arranged private phone calls with committee staff members is not even close to constituting a fair and thorough review. it is not part of any sort of regular order and does not substitute for an f.b.i. background check or a public hearing. again, let me ask my dear friend, the leader, what is the reason now that both judge kavanaugh and professor ford have said they'll come testify, that we don't do it? give me one good reason, one. it's unrelated to how this -- how we became aware of these allegations. whether you like it or not, there is a right for it to be heard. with allegations as serious as the ones before us, the senate must not, it cannot, the honor of the senat

trump was asked what did you learn from last year's storms, including hurricane maria, the unmitigatedisaster in puerto rico. this was his answer. >> what did you take from what happened in puerto rico, and how will you apply the lessons you took from puerto rico? >> i think puerto rico was incredibly successful. >> wow. all right. the president has been invited and refuses to make his case to you on this show. he'd rather hang out with his fox family, but the obvious pushback is you told us 16 died and then said it was 64. here is the closest sense of numbers we have. 2,975. the president used katrina as a benchmark of what a catastrophe is. look at difference. look at the difference with all the storms. this was the worst in a generation, and he calls it a success? who says he's right. this is his answer. >> the governor has been very nice. if you ask the governor he'll tell you what a great job. >> now, was the governor very nice? yes, he was. he praised the initial response as it was underway. most famously you'll remember with the president promising him to praise him in the oval

you see the unmitigated attacks, attempts to delegilegitimize the press, attempts to do things that should never be done. i thought canada was our ally and it appears that they are our fiercest adversary. the world is upside down and our democracy is indeed on the ballot. what we're doing is fighting for health care. fighting to make sure if you have preexisting condition you can retain your health care coverage. we're fighting to make sure that a union -- worker can join a union and organize and get good wages. those are things we're fighting for. that is what americans want in their leadership. >> brennan: you have the challenge of messaging against what our positive economic indicators right now. when you look at cbs polling in the competitive districts that really matter for you. the majority of americans feel positively about the economic direction of the country, either going from very good 26% to somewhat good, 45%. how do you push back against that? isn't what happens at someone's kitchen table going to dominate? >> it's very important. if you are very, very wealthy in this country

the atmosphere among labour mps is unmitigated fury. they feel alienated by the leadership.hould be prime minister. they feel utterly alienated. peter wilson, be prime minister. they feel utterly alienated. peterwilson, case in point, said jewish trump fanatics we re point, said jewish trump fanatics were making up allegations of anti—semitism. he was referred for diversity training, it is called, but he disclosed he hasn't had that training because he had a list of long questions for the diversity trainer that he hasn't had answers to. labour has a problem and he doesn't know how to deal with it. notably, jeremy corbyn hasn't commented on peter willsman's pre—election, even though it is a very controversial matter. we have speculated on how the conservative party conference might look with brexit. how might the labour party conference look with this? brexit. how might the labour party conference look with this7m brexit. how might the labour party conference look with this? it will be completely fraud. it was our people asked year after the general election. this year will b

manufacturing was waving, and he has the unmitigated gal to stand up in front of the country becausee hates donald trump so much and lie. >> the reason he is able to get away with it, because you have seen he had a complicit media. they never challenged him on difficult issues or tough questions. you see 93% negative coverage against donald trump and all of it was positive about barack obama. when he came out of the shadows to give that speech which was absolutely ridiculous. democrats have been saying since donald trump got elected, the economy is bad. it's so bad barack obama comes out and says i want to take credit for how good it is. donald trump comes into office and changes the policies. we are open for business. almost 4 million jobs created in this short period of time. we have seen wage increases. 30 years of stagnant wages. up 3%, that's the largest increase for a year in 10 years. that has nothing to do with barack obama. judge jeanine: it's about consumer confidence and the gdp. all the metrics are in a better position than they were under him. i don't know where these pe

i said earlier that it is not an example of unmitigated bliss, but many of the preserved facades have been integrated very, very nicely into buildings in victoria. so if you're thinking of going north of the border, it would be a very, very interesting, and i think informative, trip. >> commissioner wolfram: thank you. >> clerk: seeing nothing further, commissioners, we can move on to your consent calendar. the matter under constituted consent calendar, considered to be routine by the historic preservation commission. there will be no separate discussion unless a member of the commission, public, staff requests, in which event, it will be removed from consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or future hearing. 2018-005952coa, 59 potomac, certificate of appropriateness. >> commissioner wolfram: do i have a commission to adopt the consent calendar? >> so moved. >> second. >> clerk: thank you, commissioners. on that motion to approve item 6 under consent -- [roll call vote] so moved, commissioners. that motion passes anonymously 7-0, and places us under regular calendar

vonnie: you have tweeted out brexit is an unmitigated disaster. there are no economic advantages. only major losses to everybody. many. one tweet among at what point will this become obvious if it'll occurs as you say it will? >> i think the answer is it's becoming obvious at the polling gradually seems to move and as reality kind of his people. so what are you actually going to do? how are you going to negotiate a deal? what are you going to do about the fact that if you don't have a deal there will be shortages of food and medicine and huge traffic jams at the port and the governor -- government has to parties because of the potential of a 30 mile tailback. thee realities presumably population is getting to see and understand. when you get to something that's ,oing to make some difference people are going to see that and say, hang on. robert t is all very well. i have always said you can't eat sovereignty. there's a price. if the price is too high to do something daft than what you are doing will be in some senses or exit in name only. trying to reduce the possibility that there

>> agenda items number five and six are an ordinance and resolution about a lawsuit and unmitigated claim against the county and city of san francisco. >> madame chair, i would submit that perhaps we can approve these without going to closed session also in member of this panel would like to convene in closed session. but they seem pretty straight forward. >> ok. i actually didn't have questions on either item. so, can we do that with that discussion? ok. >> but we still need to take public comment. >> yes. yes. i will take public comments on these items but won't take a motion to convene into closed session. so let's take a -- why don't we open it for public comment on items five and six. seeing no public comment, public comment is now closed. colleagues -- >> i would make a notion move item five and item six to the full board with positive recommendation. >> so we have a motion to move both items forward because we did not convene into closed session, we don't need take a motion to not disclose so we'll take that motion without objection. mr. clerk, are there any other items before this

any one of these issues would be harmful left unmitigated. of an inch complete eastern neighborhood has devastated the mission. displacement of 10,000 residents, neighbors in churches, families in school gyms didn't have to happen. learn from the historical mistake us made. don't perpetuate them. support this appeal, take the time and require proper analysis and let's get it right this time. >> thank you for your comments. next speaker. >> thank you for allowing me to speak in solidarity. i am with the latino club. as a san francisco native who lived through the trauma of displacement. i understand the fear with the residents. the environmental intake does not take into account commercial uses. this needs studied with appropriate enforcements to make sure permanent housing built. the e.i.r. does not address lack of affordability and makeup of new residents much more affluent. 30 to 60,000 jobs will be coming to the soma making it a second financial district null we figure out a way to regulate tech companies to train and hire locally this wil

that would be an unmitigated disaster to the president. >> you sound, michael, that you're even more confident that it's going to happen despite last night's news? >> well, we're going to keep swinging and i am confident. and we're going to put this president on trial one way or the other, period. >> okay. we also have more reaction from stormy daniels that really doesn't grant a whole lot of interviews but here's what she told a dutch interview thursday. here it is. >> is there something you know now which we will know soon that could bring down this presidency? >> i say, yes, there's stuff that i know. and i'd say it's a 50/50 shot at this point. which is pretty scary odds if you're the president. >> not expecting that you're going to tell us specifically what she means there. but do you know what she's talking about? >> i do know what she's talking about. and i think the odds are better than 50/50 especially if we get donald trump under oath. that's one of the reasons why you saw this hail mary attempt by michael cohen last night. >> if you get a chance to depose the president wha

this accommodation to respect with an unmitigated good for society.the problem rather with the academic left and its powerful and road just as economic inequality and insecurity for the majority of americans regardless of race, gender or sexual orientation has taken a drastic turn for the worse. one shocking and sad fact about the numbers in the analysis in 1999 has barely changed in almost two decades. as he wrote at the time, if husband-and-wife beach with 2000 hours a year for the current average wage of production nonsupervisory workers from a $7.50 an hour, they will make that much, 30,000. but that will not commit homeownership or provide day care. such a family trying to get by because we tormented by fears of rollbacks, downsizing and disastrous consequences, end quote. in 2017, last year but has finishing this come in the federal minimum wage was still 725. more spectacularly higher education has risen dramatically with the rise of multiculturalism was the baby of communities thrown out with the bathwater of the midcentury consensus and ackno

so the idea of walking him into that is a complete unmitigated disaster because he will have no ideais talking about and will say whatever pops into his head. >> and we've heard so many things from rudy giuliani. last night he said that they would not answer obstruction questions. if that is the case, does that force mueller into a subpoena? >> no, it is not the choice of the areas of questions that would force him into the subpoena. even if he subpoenaed him, he might show up and might still try not to answer questions. the subpoena is really a way of forcing him to come on into speak with them and possibly to testify. and i still think mueller will be reluctant to do that. and giuliani want to the try to spin that as they have somehow goaded mueller into agreeing to questions. but i think most of that is posturing for his client, giuliani is posturing to keep the president happy. mueller just has to make a decision whether he feels that he can complete the investigation without getting to question the president. and what he might agree to do is agree to limitations and let him refu

any one of these issues would be harmful left unmitigated.of an inch complete eastern neighborhood has devastated the mission. displacement of 10,000 residents, neighbors in

and this president has the unmitigated gall to describe what he did as some form of success.ntment. these are american citizens. they are deserving of a proper and an appropriate federal response, and they didn't get that in this case. and donald trump and all throughout the system, there is enough blame to go around. you would think he'd be contrite and figure outweighs to fix it. instead he's patting himself on the back. >> what he points to is puerto rico's fragility, it's on them. of course the irony is if you knew it was fragile and people did know, why didn't you prepare more? you have puerto ricans in florida looking at the numbers on your race for whatever good polls are. you know the quinnipiac poll came out. you guys are basically within the margin of error from one another. it's a tight race. one of the reasons everybody is watching a governor's race which ordinarily doesn't draw as much national attention, but because it's florida and you've got over 93% in each party says i know who i'm voting for. one of the areas of spread is latinos, hispanics as it's termed i

unmitigated gall. the seat of justice scalia was held open for a long time, a long time, and now, with no reason, my colleague says we can't do that. chairman grassley has to stop playing games, pretending like the nomination can continue to glide through while at the same time the senate conducts a review of these allegations. hastily arranged private phone calls with committee staff members is not even close to constituting a fair and thorough review. it is not part of any sort of regular order and does not substitute for an f.b.i. background check or a public hearing. again, let me ask my dear friend, the leader, what is the reason now that both judge kavanaugh and professor ford have said they'll come testify, that we don't do it? give me one good reason, one. it's unrelated to how this -- how we became aware of these allegations. whether you like it or not, there is a right for it to be heard. with allegations as serious as the ones before us, the senate must not, it cannot, the honor of the senat

. >> so far this is an unmitigated disaster for kavanaugh procedurally and substantively. on the procedural side, you have rachel mitchell, this attorney, clearly trying to point out inconsistencies. >> or lay the groundwork for inconsistencies later. >> that's the problem. in this kind of proceeding laying groundwork doesn't work. you have her laying groundwork followed by punches from democrats where they help support the witness's credib credibility and then more of these sort of detailed questions which, in a typical trial, you would say, okay, we're going to get a chance, we're going to get a closing argument here but each one of the democrats is getting to make a closing argument at each stop. so it's a real problem for republicans. i wonder whether they're going to at this break start rethinking how they have to move forward here. are they going to change strategy and say, you know what, some of us have to be able to get in and speak. then you've got the substantive side of it which is so far, again, her demeanor as a witness. she comes across credibly. if that's go

republicans this is an unmitigated disaster. i really do. first of all, i think it has been a total the asko for the republicans. iasco for the- f republicans. these republicans did not have the courage to interview dr. ford. .hey had to outsource it you have the histrionics of lindsey graham. judge kavanaugh is toast. he is going nowhere. wasthey are saying that he prone to alcoholic blackouts when he was drinking. maybe that is why he doesn't remember anything. this is the headline from cq weekly, midterm migraines, the president threatening the gop majority. let's go to jim, delaware. good morning. caller: good morning. the reaction of my friends, many of them were going to vote republican. i think trump and this whole hearing has exposed the fact that no matter who they put up, they would draw people out of the room works -- woodworks to testify against the nominee. this has become a standard tactic of the democrats to trumpthe agenda. in delaware, i believe our senators are complicit in this whole conspiracy against keith l oranybody --

they're fine but the business is an unmitigated disaster and always has been loses on every car drainingan't get a production apparatus going. now he can't get the logistics going. it claims he has no car carriers other car companies have no problem obtaining car carriers here's one thing that's biting him. see, other car companies, the minute that car goes out the factory door, you bill the dealer the dealer has 60 days to pay. but elon musk has no dealers he has factory stores. so when the car goes out the door, he doesn't get any money the way another car company does he has to wait until that vehicle is shipped to a dealer and then actually handed to a customer that -- he doesn't get paid until the ultimate transaction so there's another huge disadvantage of this scheme of not having franchise dealers quite aside from the fact it ties up enormous amounts of capital. that's one of the reasons tesla has a tough time being profitable is because of their unique factory owned distribution structure so the whole company is one disastrous mess. and if i were that board, i would thank elon f

to take a piece of wetlands, drain it, put retention ponds on it and buy a piece of land that is unmitigatedmma set aside -- mitigated, set aside, but the fact remains you are putting a subdivision in a wetland. those are exemptions given to construction in and around our mores, which create exposure of people to flood appeared i'm sorry for that long answer, but we've got major infrastructure problems when it comes to how we are going to handle the water and where are we going to allow people to continue to build? don't even start about the federal insurance program. weve got places where rebuild homes over a dozen times and they still flood and we give the money to rebuild. there are some hard decisions, but nobody in the congress and the senate and no president has taken that on to try to fix that. host: and the washington times says the model is protecting 2 trillion to 11 trillion gallons of rain will fall on north carolina over the next week. that is enough water to fill the empire state building more than 40,000 times. roy in jacksonville, florida. general,y comment is thank you for y