and addresses the concerns of the neighbor of unpermitted demolitions? i suggest the bic establish a timeline for dbi to review neighbor concerns over section 103a.3 that addresses the current position of dbi. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> commissioners, my name is mary fredy. i'm directly adjacent to 655 eldorado street. i want you to know i signed an agreement with the foundation contractor, sunshine construction, to repair my foundation last friday, august 10th. also, i believe this is a tant amount to -- tant a mount to demolition. >> i'm glad this was resolved. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, everybody. my name is myra they. i'm the owner of -- eldorado street. just to clarify a few comments i will share with the chief inspector, mr. patrick reardon. there were cracks around the house. we approached the neighbors. every week i spent hours just trying to get a repair done. however, we have yet to not resolve or get a resolution. we hired an engineer to review the damage. he did mention that at this point, th

my name is jerry dradler and i've been working to reduce the reduction of unpermitted housing demolition in san francisco. i've filed two whistle blower complaints on the failure of the department of building inspection to enforce demolition without permit. in both instances, the department of building inspection issued demolition permit after the property owner removed the building, so it's clear the building removal met the building code criteria for a demolition without a permit. d.b.i. failed to enforce the penalty enumerated in the section 1038.3. if the penalty on the n.o.v. was consistent with the building code requirement, a very basic compliance audit. one of my complaints was referred to the city attorney,

my name is jerry dradler and i've been working to reduce the reduction of unpermitted housing demolition in san francisco. i've filed two whistle blower complaints on the failure of the department of building inspection to enforce demolition without permit. in both instances, the department of building inspection issued demolition permit after the property owner removed the building, so it's clear the building removal met the building code criteria for a demolition without a permit. d.b.i. failed to enforce the penalty enumerated in the section 1038.3. if the penalty on the n.o.v. was consistent with the building code requirement, a very basic compliance audit. one of my complaints was referred to the city attorney, and the second complaint, 655 alvarado was closed. when i sent an e-mail inquiring on the status of 655 alvarado, the response i received, and this is a quote, appropriate action was taken and the whistle blower program now considers your complaint closed. the answer is incompetent consistent with the mission of the city services auditor, which is to promote transparency and