he and john christy had donnism amazing work. i am confident that this resolution will save lives. i am confident of that. i know the work john and dan had done over the years had also saved you lives. this takes the amazing work they have done and support of chief hayes white over the years to allow the unit that is currently existing to come into existence and to operate under somewhat of an unofficial framework that goes to show how dedicated this chief was for actually creating, in my opinion, creating the beginning of this unit. whawhat i envision doing when i first shared this original version to the commission was and it is the same to take the work that the chief and the existing unit and all of the people who have been trained in peer support in the department and i see there is another training unit coming online in the next two weeks to take that to the next level. what this resolution does is says to the members of the department that we are going to look at post-traumatic stress in a different way. we are going to remove the stigma of post-traumatic stress and the sympt

there is an incident where john christie and some -- john quincy adams is trying to say something aboutislavery petitions and a congressman, a seven or but a fellow wig, want them to be allowed to say what he wants to say even though he doesn't agree with them. he says, it is his right to speak. a congressman from louisiana stocks over to the fellow who said let adams speak, and he always wore a gun and knife, and he makes visible the knife and says to this congressman, you do that again and i will cut your throat from year to year. because notthat long after, the fellow raised his hand and said, you know what , can i tell you about something that happened a while back that felt disorderly? that's one of the adjusting things about writing the book. you find incidents like that by accident. like when they are leaks or someone says something they shouldn't. very often, someone will say, henry wise had the habit of saying what he should not say. he would stand up and saying something, and the other congressman would say shh. i say hosanna to the evidence gods, because not only did he say i

christie: it started when harry reid got rid of filibusters on judges. john mccain and others warned him at the time, it's going to cause a real fracture in the way we nominate and confirm judges. and i think john mccain was right. i think that is what started it. and i think the garland move was in many ways the reaction to the killing of the filibuster, but to get to kavanaugh, i think unless the fbi report, and i was u.s. attorney for seven years so i have looked at a lot of fbi 302's, and when i went through a background check to become u.s. attorney, i ultimately foia'd my background file, and it's just raw data. they don't make any determination at all about the credibility of the person they are speaking to, the credibility of the story or evidence. you talk and they write, and they ask some questions that will be natural for what you have said, and they write it up and they handed in. and then you judge, you being the senate, you being the administration, the administration is getting a background check on some of their nominating procedures. jeffrey:

christie is an associate professor of the 20th century u.s. political economic and business history at the university of maryland baltimore county and a visiting scholar at johns hopkins where she's working on her own book flexible finance, finance capitalism and the evolving culture of risk and finally president and chief executive officer of the federal reserve bank of minneapolis from march 1985 way through augus august 2009 which is some kind of a record and also the co-author of too big to fail the hazards of bank bailouts published by the brookings institution in 2004. thanks to all of you for taking part in this discussion today. i'm going to start by asking several questions of the panel and after we are done discussing the book among ourselves we will open up in about 45 minutes to questions and answers from the audience which we will conclude and take part in a reception. i would like to start by asking the obvious question which is why did you choose to write a book about the city ended in particular i would like to know whether that's because you consider city story unique or because you think it illustrates a more pervasive problem with the bankin

in this state it's the christie and social union which as you say has governed the states almost alone for much of the last fifty six years and done it why does this. matter to john is the whole. well on the face of it very like to think of the state as first among equals in the federal republic of germany certainly that's what they've been telling me time and again over the course of the last week that we've been here reporting on this election in so far as germany is concerned will remember that. the christian social union merkel's allies in the federal government was so incensed about the migration issue that they threatened to topple the federal coalition if they didn't get their way there was an e.u. summit at a european level the c.s. used book concerns were discussed and and a solution was thrashed out to try to change the way that border control that migration is managed right across the e.u. so from one perspective from that perspective at least what happens here which governments emerges in this state ofter today's vote saying well that really could have a profound impact space in berlin and in brussels and then insofar as what is being reported here to

christie: it started when harry reid got rid of filibusters on judges. him at the warned time, it's going to cause a real fracture in the way we nominate and confirm judges. right. john mccain was i think that is what started it. and i think the garland move was in many ways the reaction to the killing of the filibuster, but to get to kavanaugh, i think unless the fbi report, and i was years sorney for seven i have looked at a lot of fbi 302's, and why went through a background check to become u.s. foia'd my i ultimately background file, and it's just raw data. they don't give any credibility to what is said. you talk and they write, and they righted up and they handed in. and then you judge, you being the senate, you being the administration, the administration did a background check on some of their nominating procedures. jeffrey: do you believe dr. ford? gov. christie: i truly believe she's a victim. whether she's a victim of brett kavanaugh is hard to figure out. this is the problem. there are people in this country, myself included, who don't agree with you, and i don't agree with you. but i could stand up here and kiss you. this is why politics are where they a