minot and ms. heath. >> i'm sorry. i may not have stated that clearly. i said you received two letters yesterday. >> i thought you -- >> and did not receive any addition until comments. >> ok. thank you. that's good. thank you. ok. yeah. i have a lot of concerns about this relative to the historic resources because i shared the concern that mr. bueller stated about a complete lack of consideration about the historic about this in the proposed scale of the project and the notion of trade-off since this will be seeking to get some height relief to permit this seems like a reasonable exchange that, for preservation, that there is some relief from the height limit. and, again, we're not -- we can't talk about that, but the alternatives do talk about that. i found that i was appreciative of the alternative c because i remember talking about that and that one comes in at approximately 99% of what the proposed project is. and it is hard to imagine 300-foot towers there. but if you can imagine one, you can imagine two. so i don't know if that is the only alterna