from the university of applied sciences in berlin what are your expectations high expectations for tonight for tonight probably not now i'm actually really pessimistic that something really comes up tonight i would expect an additional summit in the wimber or december where actual actual dealing is prepared but fortunately. what what makes the pessimistic. well first the preparatory meeting on saturday and sunday was really unsuccessful and there is not really a good reason why over the last few days something should have happened and second i think it's part of the choreography if you like of the of the whole story that threesome may need spec in britain to sell a deal it has to be it has to be hard deal for for the british population or it has to be there has to be the impression that chief old actually hard for this deal and then it's easier for her to sell it back home and therefore i think it will take probably a bit longer than than tonight so you're basically saying these talks that have been going on for years now these negotiations as well and this back and forth and all these iss

economists fade in and fish is here from the university of applied sciences in berlin to talk about business and what this all means for business how have businesses or what sort of position have the brits put businesses in. in a way we don't know yet that's kind of the whole problem they they have put the whole union the whole european union and the u.k. in particular in a situation which is completely unclear and given that this is like the most fundamental change of the union for decades i would want to say it is excruciating that we're still we still don't know what is actually going to happen in some one hundred sixty days so they have put business as well as the whole population of the union in an extremely uncertain situation in an extremely uncertain position and for an extended period of time and for an extended period of time and probably for for a period which will not n.p.a. by the end of march by the end of march next year which is like the official directive date but even beyond that date and far beyond that date how does that affect costs for a company i mean investors have to

york university school of law, where he was an editor in chief of the "nyu review of law and social change." next to peter is dr. ray shawn ray, associate professor of sociology for applied social science research at the university of maryland college park. he is also one of the coeditors sociologyt magazine: for the public." formerly, dr. ray was a research scholar at the university of california berkeley. theray's research addresses mechanisms that manufacture and maintain racial and social inequality with a particular focus on police-civilian relations and men's treatment of women. his work also speaks to the way that inequality may be attenuated through racial activism and social policy. he has written for "the new york times," "the washington post," and nbc, and awarded the 2016 university of maryland research communicator award. dr. ray has appeared on headline news, algeria's era -- al nbc.ra, npr, and giving a very in warm welcome to all of our distinguished panelists. [applause] the way we are going to work the way these panels are typically done, i am going to ask the panelists a range of questions. those.e going to answer once they get through those questions, we are going t

dinicola will come from joe morris, the director of the political science department at mercyhurst university, also the director of the mercyhurst center for applied politics. your question for ron? >> when it comes to supreme court nominees, the u.s. senate that is responsible for giving its advice and consent. but i am curious to know if you were senator, would you have consented to brett kavanaugh's appointment to the supreme court? mr. dinicola: let me say this. he is on the supreme court, so he is accorded all the respect and responsibilities associated with the office. in terms of how i would've voted, i don't make votes on the fly. i would need to have participated in the hearings and seen the briefing books and have needed to be able to see the prior decisions, hear his testimony which i did not hear. i heard bits and pieces. i would not want to make a judgment on the merits without having had the benefit of the information. let's take on the big issue. the bigger issue is congress ought to be able to do with the great issues of our time in a civil way. i wasn't very happy with the conduct of the united states senate in this instance. we n

federalization of science, the academy said, okay, we'll apply for your money and we're going to tack on 50% for every research application that we're going to call overhead, and that money, we, the universities, will use as we choose, and so a lot of it that the engineering and science departments generate all this revenue, probably goes keep the dramatic language of the department to flow so there's not enough traffic. so now the academy roots for anything that is big government that it feel it can tie onto to maintain this relationship. roots of political correctness, there are many, mani fold and varied. mark: this is a very important point, you're not the first one i've talked to who mentioned this. there are different fields. the university of academy colleges more and more less in terms of pure science, less in terms of pure knowledge, less in terms of pure debate and so forth, more and more directional, more and more ideological. that's your point? >> yes, it is, and it's not just in climate change. in fact, i am just completing a book manuscript that looks more than climate change, it looks at drug policy, the opioid war and all these good things. it's called scientocracy, i think th