. >> commissioner woolford: last week, commissioner schnair and i met with you for an informal. and it appears that there may be detailed differences between what you shared with us last week and what we are looking at today and can you explain those and why we're seeing a change? a couple of for examples. in the single-unit toilet, which is essentially, a double camber cylinder with a concave web that intercepts them, it appeared that last week it was a deeper concave section and it's shallower now. and some of the details on the kiosks appear slightly different. and we would like to understand the changes. >> sure. the toilet kiosk has not changed. it's the exact, same shape we had before. it might be the appearance of the renderings, but it's the exact, same shape. the kiosks, we have changed, and we're searching for the right dimensions and curvature. so while one of the three elements looks similar to what we showed you, we're working through that. and it basically represents the strugg struggle of the shape. so we're still wrestling with it. instead of not showing anything

. >> commissioner woolford: i wanted to follow up on a couple of things then. commissioner pearlman, we had the same questions and concerns. the city has done a beautiful job with medians on cesar chavez and a year to 18 months later, they're wretched looking. so we urged caution and were promised that it would be maintenance examples and so we'll see. when you came to us last week, the example of the kiosk that we were looking at was 02.c. is that correct? i would endorse that version and not endorse the only two, which are more conventional, triangular shapes, with radiused corners. 02.c feels in keeping with the spirit of the gently inflated farm -- form that the toilets were. and that's what commissioner wolfram was alluding to, i believe. >> commissioner keehn: first of all, wasn't to thank jcdecaux for being so responsive to our committee and echo commissioner pearlman's comments and to note that both, i think, of our committees share concern around history and so i appreciate your comments around that. market street will be, unfortunately, in my opinion,

. >> because i think the point that commissioner woolford made about, somebody buys a property because it is deteriorating and it's like great. i have a project. now i want to fix up my house and shouldn't i be incentivized to do that and not penalized because of it. >> commissioner? >> i have another question i wanted to get to. but this brought up another question. are ellis act evictions? not going to be allowed? >> it's not -- it's not a factor that this commission considers. it is certainly that something that the board of supervisors brought up last year. but because it's not directly related to this benefit, it seems like we're on shaky ground . >> there are other issues. other topics and questions. >> the accessory dwelling unit. so, the repairs to convert to an accessory dwelling unit is added into this? >> yes. [all talking at once] >> the policy. [laughter] >> doesn't seem like that is a restoration -- >> typical rehabilitation scope. >> yeah. it seems like it is muddying it. >> no. we did see there. this is something that was also added to the delegation this year is that w