a conflict of interest law that applies only to that department or commissioner board the rent board has a statement of incompatible activities and among other things, is generally described outside activities that are incompatible with service on the rent board. i have not analysed this particular situation. i don't know enough about the facts. i'm happy to do that before -- following this meeting. >> what i am citing as a california government code, 1126 >> right. section 1126 is not a self-executing conflict law. but several years after 1126 was adopted at the state level, the voters adopted a local law that required the ethics commission to create the statements of incompatible activity. there are about 35 of them right now in the city. they are all available on the ethics commission trash out website. there is a statement for the city attorney's office in a statement of activity for the board of supervisors in a statement for the rent board. generally, the statement of income possible incompatible activities as they could not engage with an activity that impair your ability to d

this is a quasi judicial board. i want to know board of appeals which is an important body, for the first time, will not have one attorney sitting on the board and as i said to ms. tanner, only she is lacking is a law degree. when i was president of the board, i think i uniformly made sure that there were processes and i really am worried that the board appeals without having at least one attorney on that body. person who it leaving, ms. wilson is an attorney at law. i will not be voting for ms. tanner today. >> supervisor cohen: i want to acknowledge that supervisor peskin is correct. ms. wilson is leaving. she did a fantastic job. i have the one who nominated her and fully vetted her. i nominated ms. tanner. i hope you will support her. she's in position to serve on seat two of board appeals. you should note that she has served as a senior planner for planning department and has worked for -- she's managed multimillion dollar capital projects and has familiarity with the san francisco planning code which i believe

i suggest we pass this on to the board for your reading. that's off the internet i saw this morning. thank you. >> thank you. >> that concludes members of the public. moving into red eregular calendar. >> i'll present this item to you. this is $510,000 cost to reimbursement man m.t.c. for the >> this money will come from the program reserve. we intend to capture the cost later on when the results are out. we know what caused the fissures. >> i like to moved item. >> members of the public wanting to comment on the item. [roll call] item nine is approved. >> item ten is authorizing executive director for lease agreement. >> good morning directors. tjpa facility manager. i update today will focus on retail leasing update. i'll present one lease for approval and provide a tenant approval schedule overview. i'm going to focus on the signed leases metric, similar to last month's report, the numbers do not reflect a slow down in interest or activity. rather they reflect a slowing in the amount of decision-making and negotiating time. lincoln is re

it was boarded up storefronts. now there's all kinds of new businesses, bars, couple of new restaurants and i have a cafe out there as well across the street. we're very excited about this opportunity to work with this license to improve the area and bring some very good food to the area. any questions? >> supervisor mandelman: seeing no questions. thank you. are there any members of the public who wish to speak on this item? seeing none. public comment is now closed. >> supervisor ronen: i'm happy to make a motion. >> supervisor mandelman: we can do that without objection thank you. mr. clerk please call the next item. >> clerk: memorandaing the police code to prohibit post secondary institution from using application form that contains questions ban applicant's criminal history for the purpose of deciding whether to offer admission. requiring institutions to retain records for three years. >> supervisor mandelman: thank you. i believe we have her from supervisor cohen's office to talk about this item and some ame

the parole board to determine release. —— falls to the parole board.based purely on risk and it is imported the parole board hearing is imported the parole board hearing is not a retrial of the offence, it is not a retrial of the offence, it is purely an application and a risk test. no doubt the parole board could be better at making sure that victims are fully informed of the process but the parole board also relies on the other parts of the system to do theirjob effectively. it is also the responsibility of the prison and probation service to ensure that victims are informed of the process. it is a complex system and it all needs to work together to ensure that victims are fully informed, that they have a role to play in the hearing and four incidents, victims can have a role in saying what might be in the licence conditions, which are attached to people when they are released. you talked a little bit about the delays, simon, that have come about since thejohn worboys case but varies greater transparency now, danny shaw was telling us that summaries

i want to go back to 2007 and read fifth resolution by the board that says the board of supervisor urges it's sfpuc to explore and develop water supply option that's will not divert water from the walt river. they have the support and commitment of san francisco to develop alternate water supplies. thank you. >> it was asked which things were important to you and you can see protect and restore the bay, protect and restore is above affordable housing. this is a call state fullerton survey of san francisco voters. it's remarkable to me. the second point is, if i get there, is just to point out, that this is a good popular subject that does well with voters. the l.a. mayor, in 2014, said l.a. will reduce its water imports to 50% of its supply. and then in 2017, not a causal relationship but he won by 81%. the point here is he an astute politician who understand his con at thiconstituents and san o strong support the environment. thank you. >> good afternoon, jackie flynn of the institute san francisco. i'd like to ask all my community members to please stand up. i'm here because i like to

>> this is important for the board to know. divestment does not reduce the use of fossil fuels, it simply changes ownership. we sell to someone else. what changes -- what reduce the use of fossil fuels is reduced demand. there's two ways, renewables, solar and wind or change the composition of existing traditional uses of energy. meaning, less energy, more oil and gas. that reduces carbon emissions by going from carbon from coal to oil, reduces it by about 50% and from coal to gas reduces it by double. what changes it is reduced use for energy. those are not investment driven. they're driven by consumer behavior or government policy. >> when we look at it and how it effect the world, no question this is critically important issue. we are not debate org resisting in any way that climate change say very serious social issue. what we are saying is divestment does not address the issue. it simply changes ownership. >> then we get back to the issue and i've had discussion with those in the calpers, when you divest you lose your seat

-- state board of equalization. [applause] >> president cohen: thank you. >> i want to do that first and foremost. i have family and friends in the room and i want to thank you as well. i would ask you to please stand up. >> president cohen: family and friends, look at that. >> thank you so much. i'm honored that i'm one of the african-americans in san francisco who has not been outmigrated. i want to say that first and foremost. it's been wonderful growing up in the city. i came here in 1955. i went to james denman middle school, balboa high school, city college of san francisco and san francisco state university. and social services and advocacy, and work alongside so many leaders. a lot of them women leaders, leaders such as ms. elois westbrook, ms. shirley jones, and the first advocate woman that i came in contact with was ms. mary helen rodgers, while working at way pack, the citizens arm to deal with redevelopment in what was the fillmore and now is the western addition as it was being discombobulated and peop

and the board's executive director. we will also be joined by representatives from city departments and cases before -- for cases before the board this evening. we expect joseph duffy, the senior building inspector starting department of building inspection and deputy city attorney representing the department of public health. the managers with environmental health branch of the department of public health will also be here. the board meeting guidelines are as follows. turn off or silence all phones and other electronic devices so they don't disturb the proceedings. please carry on conversations in the hallway. the rules of presentation are as follows. permit holders and respondents get seven minutes to present their case in three minutes for a rebuttal. people affiliated must include their comments within the seven or three minute periods. members of the public who are not affiliated have up to three minutes each to address the board and no rebuttal. please speak into the microphone for rehearing request, the parties w

kyle, the board has come out saying in a very unusual thing, to hear from the facebook board that they pushed samberg and zuckerberg -- sandberg and zuckerberg to push faster but they continue to support their leadership. incents change happening mark zuckerberg being the ceo and chair or sheryl sandberg being is number two? kyle: for the same reasons articulated earlier, the controlling shares in the company, i do not see a change being forced upon them. i think there will be substantial change in the way the leadership governs himself and the way they behave and potentially, the way the board interacts with the leadership. you can imagine an astute thing ando to convene investigative panel by one of the terror members able to work independently within the company to investigate how facebook handle the issue that's handled the issue. -- handled the issue. emily: you're suggesting the board once an internal look into how these things were handled? i think even if we take mark zuckerberg and sheryl sandberg at face value and believe they're doing their utmost now to rectify this issue,

executive and the board. to effectively leverage ceo oversight as a mechanism for preventing and addressing workplace harassment, boards must work to get a more well rounded view of the chief executive's performance while simultaneously respecting the distinct roles of the board and the ceo. beyond the whistle blower policy, the best and primary way to do this is through a thoughtful annual evaluation process that incorporates direct feedback from staff. more specifically, boards should construct an evaluation process that includes at least some of the following inputs. direct 360 feedback from the ceo's direct reports. staff surveys that illuminate cultural issues within the organization, staff retention metrics, and publicly available commentary and feedback. boards that fail to invite team feedback as part of these annual reviews including the 40% of non-profit boards that do not do annual ceo evaluations at all are missing an important opportunity to better understand the ceo's leadership which may in fac

meeting, pursuant to board rule 4.7 the clerk of the board will call the meeting to order and additionally, given that the president is not present, the members will decide who, among them, will be the presiding officer for today's meeting. historically, the most senior member of the board is appointed to be the chair. but it can be another member of the board. once this member is appointed, the appointment will terminate at the end of the meeting today. the nomination requires a first, a second and a majority of the members present. and if you are ready, i will call the names on the roster as they appear. if there is one nomination, we will just vote on that nomination. if there are more names than one, then a different type of voting will occur and we'll cross that bridge if it's necessary. so, if you are ready to make a nomination, nominations are open. supervisor ronen, your name is on the roster. >> thank you, madam clerk. i have an opportunity to talk to supervisor yee and ask him, as one of the senior most members of this board if he would be willing to pre side as president pro tem

please speak to board staff during a break or after the meeting a call or visit the board office. this meeting is broadcast live on san francisco government t.v. , channel 78. we will broadcast at 4:00 pm as well. now we will swear in our -- or affirm all those who intend to testify. any member of the public may speak without taking an oath pursuant to the rights under the centre and ordinance. if you intend to testify and would like to have the board give your testimony evidentiary wait, stand if you're able, raise your right hand and say i do after you have been sworn and/or affirmed. do you swear or affirm the testimony are about to give will be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? thank you. ok. we will now move on to item number 1 which is general public comment. this is an opportunity for anyone who would like to speak on a matter within the board's jurisdiction but that is not alternate but just calendar. is there any member of the public who would like to comment we will move on to item number 2 commissioner comments and questions. >> on behalf of the boar

board delegate to membership organizations, any reports? other reports by board members. commissioner murase? is. >> commissioner murase: i just wanted to give a shoutout to danielm daniel menendez and. it was very successful, faculty and staff facility appreciated. it was a lovely way to encourage networking. >> president cook: thank you. anyone else? okay, we have the number 4 calendar of committee meetings for budget. we have november 28, 2018, at 6:00 p.m. buildings and grounds, november 26th at 6:00 p.m. we had a notice about curriculum already. for rules, policy, and legislation? >> that will be tomorrow at 6:00 p.m., november 14th. >> president cook: let's see, the ad hoc committee on student assignment will be announced at a future meeting. the meeting -- the ad hoc meeting on personnel matters, labor relations, and affordability will not be meeting until january of 2019. and ad hoc committee on the school district and city college joint committee will be announced at a future meeting. section m., other informational items. let's see, posting the agenda on the fol

already before the board. superintendent's report, dr. matthews. >> thank you, president cook. good evening, everyone. in an effort to promote civic engagement, the department of elections offered a high school poll worker program in which 500 san francisco unified school district students served san francisco voters on this past election day at neighborhood polling places throughout the city. the students learned about the election process and gained valuable experience for their resumes or college applications. thank you to the department of elections for the opportunity for our young people to engage in and learn it the electoral process. this sunday, students -- this thursday, students at the edwin and anita lee newcomers school will get their first taste of a traditional thanksgiving meal compliments of the hilton district hotel. the meal will feature oven baked turkey, gravy, vegetables, and dessert this will welcome our immigrant families into the district family. i'd like to let you know that we contin

the board may consider an override of the veto within 30 days. and that would expire. >> president cohen: we're approving the minutes from october 2, 2018, board meeting. is there a motion to approve the minutes? motion made. seconded by fewer. we can take this without objection. without objection. the meeting minutes will be approved after public comment. madam clerk, please call the consent agenda. >> clerk: items 1-9 comprised the consent calendar. they're considered to be route an. one may be severed and considered separately. >> president cohen: seeing there are no names on the roster. >> clerk: [roll call vote] >> clerk: there are 11 ayes. >> president cohen: thank you. these items are passed unanimously. let's go to regular agenda and call item 10. >> clerk: ordinance to amend the health code to revise the regulation of massage practitioners, establishments, outcall services and sole practitioners. >> president cohen: any discussions? without objection? this ordinance is finally passed. madam clerk, next item. >> clerk: an ordinance to ame

i want to tell the board we need -- >> thank you, your time is up. thank you. [microphone was cut off] >> we need to be fair, your time is up. >> as reminder to be fair to everyone, everyone has two minutes. is there any other member of the public that would like to speak? all right, seeing non, public comment is closed. supervisor safai. >> thank you. clarify one point, i know -- amendments talked about were actually covered and we have already dealt with in the legislation. the director and the department have the discretion to work with city departments. so, that has already been covered. city attorney givener, is that the case, with regard to passing on fines, the budgeting process and so on, we have a lot more flexibility as it pertains to city departments. >> yeah, last week the committee amended in a provision that excludes city departments. >> say that again. >> excludes. >> city departments from the administrative fines provision in the ordinance. >> okay. thank you. >> i just wanted to clarify that. the other thing, the waste stream for hospitals that

. >> next board meeting, we're tallying up costs. this board meeting we present to you the impacts powering forward. i do want to clarify one item to director her point, we will not open the building until we ensure that the building is sound. we think we can do that in parallel. assure the board and director hursh as well, we will not open the facility. >> following up on director gee's question on the analysis and steps taken on the testing, i'm glad there's good collaboration in the process of everybody working together towards get to the right answer. you might get to the finger pointing stage. everybody on the same page to this point of a entire process? >> there have been an amazing amount of effort behind to get to this sampling and testing procedure. yes, we have 100% commitment on all sides now. that was a finalized at the project team last week before we really got into the testing. everyone is on the same page at this point for testing as well too. it's been an incredibly important element to that to make sure we got every

please. >> madam president, members of the board. according to the controllers october 15, 2018, memorandum to the board of supervisors, the estimated increased cost is $500,000 in fiscal year 19 -- fiscal year 2019-20. if the minimum compensation for employees of non-profit organizations having contracts with the city is increased by approximately $0.50 per hour, from 15.50, to $16 per hour. if non-profit organizations increase the wages of higher paid workers, to maintain wage differentials, the estimated costs of non-profit organizations in fiscal year 19-20 is at least 3.5 million. estimated increase costs in non-profit organizations in fiscal year 19-20, increased minimum compensation on july 1, 2019, to 16.50 per hour, as an adjustment of 3.35%, that cost would be 1.3 million. if non-profit organizations increased their wages of higher paid workers, to maintain wage differentials, the estimated cost of the non-profit organizations in 1920 is at least $7 million. the city would have the discretion on whether to fund the increase

the board meeting guidelines are as follows.he board request to turn off or silence all phones and other electronic devices that they will not disturb the proceedings please carry on conversations in the hallway. the rules of presentation are as follows. appellants, permit holders and department respondents are given seven minutes to present their case and three minutes for rebuttal. people affiliated with these parties must include their comments within the seven or three minute periods. members of the public were not affiliated have up to three minutes each to address the board and no rebuttal. please speak into the microphone to assist the board and accurate preparation of minutes, you are asked but not required to submit a speaker card or business card when you come up to speak. speaker cards are available on the left side of the podium. if you have questions about requesting a rehearing or schedules, speak to board staff during a break or after the meeting or visit the board office. we are located at 1650 mission street. th

urge the state board to act in november . apparently your staff is now working to undermine the resolution that they support. that's not acceptable behavior, it is not an acceptable way for your staff to treat your community, the community that you represent, the community groups that you represent, the bulk of the organizations that signed that letter are either located in san francisco or have members in san francisco. today, the p.u.c. is the leading voice opposing protections for the bay delta over the state board. we're on the brink of extinctions, and right now, the p.u.c. is the leading voice in slowing down that crisis. the p.u.c.'s position is giving cover to antienvironmental voices in the central valley and the trump administration. it's not news that the central valley farmers and the trump administration oppose this, but it's sure news and sure persuasion when your staff does that. your staff is painting a doomsday nair joe. there's a dramatically different picture if you look at demand today, and just the tools

next speaker. >> good afternoon, members of the board. my name is clifford gilmore. i am with the center city s.r.o. collaborative, and i am with the s.r.o. task force. i am completing my second year on that body and it is a very effective body in terms of making recommendations that go onto the board. so i ask you to support the new composition and also the -- set a new sunset date for this body and also appreciate your support on this. thank you. >> supervisor safai: great. any other members of the public wish to speak on -- oh, thank you. >> good afternoon. my name's diana martinez. i am the program manager of the mission s.r.o. collaborative and one of the members of the s.r.o. task force. i am also in support of the new composition of the s.r.o. task force and furthering the effective and important work that this group does together. since i have become a member of the task force, i have not only been able to learn more from the perspectives of s.r.o. owners and operators and s.r.o. tenants, but i've also had the opportunity to work more closely with members of

-e-i-s for your consideration at the board meeting. as you know, the san francisco county transportation authority board passed a resolution to suspend tgpa's $9.2 million extension 30% design. this suspension of funding will stay in place until the san francisco city controller's office conducts an audit of tgpa's management and delivers phase one and delivery of phase two, the downtown extension. i will report to the commissioners that the tgpa welcomes this, as it will provide tgpa with valuable lessons learned. [inaudible] >> -- california high speed rail, and sfcta. we work with sfcta executive director, tilly chang, and the san francisco controller's office to complete these two efforts as soon as possible so that funding can be reinstated and work on the downtown extension can resume. moving onto transit center operations, as you know, all bus operations continues to be conducted from the temporary terminal. since the transit center's temporarily closure, we took steps to reduce staffing levels on all our operational activities.

she served on the board selected corporations and organizations. one of the few women of color to do so. working to help define and execute structure for 21st century firms organized for triple bottom line impact. creating place, protecting community and expanding wealth. excellence in innovation has been acknowledge and sharing of 25 patents and human interface did it acquisition and predicted system. each patent present product built and executed. her passion was found in a lesson of her parent on fairness. she said, i learned early on that you must find a way to participate, to be a catalyst for change on fairness and inclusion. at the time of her passing she was pursuing executive fellowship on research and development projects completed over the last five years of her work. she's survived by her sister angela r. jenkins and active resident leader and 20-year resident of district 6. i ask that we end in her memory and thank her for her work. >> thank you. supervisor mandelman. >> supervisor mandelman: i'm joined mayor breed that will allow san

i hope we can pass this out on the 26 to the full board. our office will work with the planning department as well as the two offices here to ensure the outreach that is being requested is done before monday, november 25th. >> thank you for understanding. i think this conversation goes hand-in-hand with the need for improved public transportation. that is number 1 thing that comes up when we talk about proposed development in our district. even if it is few and far in between compared to other districts. that is the number 1 thing. so if we can couple these changes together, which i know is hard, but other wise, i think we will continue to feel that resistance from families. i totally get it. in any case. >> yes. a point of clarification. i wasn't saying you couldn't live in the city has a family. i grew up in the city on the east coast like you did that had a world-class transportation system and i rode transportation from the time i could walk. i am 100% respecting and acknowledging that you can live. my point is that there are certain ne

items will appear on the november 13 supervisor's board. item number 1, resolution authorizing the controller to enter into the 11th amendment of a software license and support agreement with jobaps increasing the contract term by three years and increases to not exceed $3.1 million. >> president cohen: she brought todd with her. ted represents the controller's office. this is a resolution to amend the contract with jobaps who currently run our city's job's board. the contract is from 2009 and this is the 10th amendment to the contract. we're going to be extending it for three years. ms. howard, welcome back, good to see you. the floor is yours. >> good morning, kate howard, department of human resources here to talk to you about item one which is extension to our contract with jobaps which is applicant tracking system with the city. it allows us to accept online applications for employment with the city and county of san francisco. i have todd who is going to talk to you about the numbers and then i'm going to talk to you about where we're

wield go around the country and try to go have our meetings at a board and each one of the board members mdiocese, and we were ready to go to new york, and the member of the board was pamela hays a lawyer in new york, and we got word that cardinal eagan who is actually from oak park. he would like to say chicago but he's from oak park, said i don't want that fbi agent in a skirt coming into new york. that's the kind of pushback that we got. and i know kathleen as she went around and her men and women went around to investigate not all diocese cooperated, is that right kathleen. >> that's correct. first let me finish on what you said. i did go to new york and it did matter. and i probably wore a skirt too. neither here nor there. [laughter] there was a bishop who declined to take part of the audits for several years. that was the bishop of lincoln nebraska, he's since been replaced and they are participating in the audit. but a real interesting point is the fact that all his brother bishops were participating, and the fact that he declined there was no consequence whatsoever. and i was wo