this category is the best with the network category. and the project that is in this category is the b.r.t., the bus rapid transit phase 2 project and there's $30 million left for the garry project and that's also in this current fiscal year. so we expect to see a request coming through in the next several months and presenting to the board. and there's a prop aa fee for program and there was a project to fund bus stop enhancements at about just over 3,600 bus stops around the city. so it wasn't a good fit for it but prop aa transit reliability and enhancements category is a great fit, taking funds that are currently programmed to geary and instead funding this bus stop enhancement project and moving the geary project into prop k so we can fund both projects. and caltrain has seen a good repair, i mentioned this in the last category, just like we're doing now in caltrain identifies projects and amend the 5ypps to amend them but right now they're just shown as capital match. and the c.t.a. and the city will need to work together over the

the other categories before they move into these categories. okay. in terms of risks and challenges , these are ones we have discussed in the past with this committee. we thought it would be worthwhile bringing them forward again today. they are the amount of building an infrastructure construction going on citywide which is driving up cost and it can sometimes add to the contracting process and the timing of the contracting process and fewer bidders are out there. we are seeing that in particular on some of the signals projects. large multi- agencies projects. we have a number of these projects which are coordinated with sewer, water and also with paving and coordination on those projects is going well but it does open up the window for additional delays to these projects because they are so complex. another one of the lessons we learned that we talked about a lot last year was that for some of our moving forward projects. we had underestimated the amount of time it would take to public outreach and engagement on these projects. i'm happy to r

sheldon: this is the best category. [laughter] elizabeth: who is the only justice to resign under threat of impeachment? >> [inaudible] elizabeth: that is correct. after it came to light he had accepted a bribe in exchange for seeking a presidential pardon for a former client who was faced with securities fraud charges. sheldon: all right. which justice killed a man in a duel? which justice killed a man in a duel? in fairness, there are two possible answers. elizabeth: surprising though it may be, there are two. >> [inaudible] [laughter] >> maybe we should go with that. sheldon: i think go with your first instinct. >> marshall. sheldon: i'm sorry, it's not marshall. there are two. elizabeth: let's see if team madison wants to steal. team madison? >> our first answer is stephen field. elizabeth: no. >> can we give another one? [laughter] elizabeth: why not? >> livingston. elizabeth: that is correct. do we give them half a point? >> so, fields wasn't a duel, is that the idea? [laughter] elizabeth: why don't you share what

it would limit one applicant in each category. it is for cultivation, incubation, delivery, storefront , you could still, one equity applicant could have multiple permits on the vertical

[applause] >> that concludes the first category. we will now move on to before they were justices. >> this category is before they were justices. the first question is about white, who took a leave of absence during law school to play professional basket -- football. what team did he play for? lions.oit >> correct. very good. [applause] >> he earned $15,000 per season. pretty impressive. ok. next up, which future justice fought to have the first ritual that mitzvah in her synagogue -- batmitzvah in her synagogue? >> kagan. >> and at the ceremony, she read from the book of ruth. another point for team madison. >> you go. team jefferson. which future great chief justice married the daughter of thomas jefferson's lost love, much to the dismay of jefferson? again? versus burwell [laughter] >> who will go with marshall. >> that's correct. chief justice john marshall, very good. when john marshall popped the question to polly, hi s love, se was so shocked that she ran off without answering him and finally sent back a lock of hair . it is

it would limit one applicant in each category. it is for cultivation, incubation, delivery, storefront , you could still, one equity applicant could have multiple permits on the vertical chain. it is just, again, it is designed to open up as many opportunities for as many equity applicants as possible. that is what mine is about. >> for clarification,

each category is scalable.mple, in the textile category, adding more scarves, linen, and paper will increase sales. in the home fragrance category, we can develop more candles, room sprays, and diffusers, including seasonal scents. the body care category includes a number of items, but it is anchored by monica's signature product, the sea buckthorn balm. and the last category is the gift boxes, allowing customers to compile the things from the previous three categories and create great gifting items. so is everybody on board on this is the business plan moving forward? monica: i don't agree to that right now. i'm not gonna agree to that. lemonis: what was the point of all this, then? monica: i need to think about it for a second. i really do. i'm not gonna be put on -- this took a long time to evolve. lemonis: obviously, i know there is extensions of this missing, and the full collection is missing. monica: got it. yeah, okay. then i'm on board. because we're basically coming full circle, which is really cool.

or that category depending on one of your grandparents. but over time, the melting pot is working. so, why am i pessimistic about hat happening? because of dem graphy. -- denothing raffy. -- demography. again, the native fertility rate in western societies is below replacement. i'm in favor of it. we need to have replacement immigration of some kind in order to have -- prevent the population from going into a death spiral. the east asian societies have avoided having significant immigration to date with not terrible impacts, but i think when your birth rate is 1.4% or 1.7%, and it takes 2.1% to maintain a population, and you are losing 1/4 or 1/2 of your population every generation, at some point there is a crisis there. i don't see the birth rates in the developed countries rising rapidly, so i think there will be continued pressure, which will succeed, for migration. but what that does is, it constantly replenishes the demographic political base for multiculturalism, which is a social reality in cities that are gateways for immigration.

you start using these categories in a widespread way.s some sort of union drive. >> are you allowed to disclose how they did this in google? >> i talk about it in the book. >> there wasn't a nondisclosure agreement? >> i think it is more for more management companies more insistent on figuring out argued that tharguethat directed type e leader saying we are going to determine your career path. i was classified as three quarters of the people on the retreat. >> all of this comes from the four humors. most of them are derived in some way and. >> i wasn't trained to take the exercise seriously. i'm going to go with the nice friendly people like what argue among ourselves to find out if that is the best way to do this. >> did you think you were mis- categorized? >> under the category system it's like saying if you get the wrong tarot card. something is postulated rather than established. you can show the picture. those are the people but also there are not many of those at the workshop and it's the outgoing v8 if visionary leader. you were p

so right now, there's nobody there that exists in this category. no one has gotten a permit yet. >> on the contrary. there are owners to the extent that they had received their approval and entitlements from the planning department through their commission. they would be exempt from the two dispensary count in this. that is not to say that it applies retroactively to existing storefronts. that is prospectively. i think that was designed as -- out of fairness and punctually does functionally going forward. >> okay. >> thank you. my apologies if i will ask a question you've already answered but could you talk to me about the specific number on the up and how you came about to select that two be the number. >> yeah, and thank you. i don't think there was a whole lot of science behind the two. i think the idea was to pick a threshold at which you have a stake in the industry and then we want to give other owners an opportunity to also establish a stake in the industry. the same reason we didn't say that your other applications would be deemed denied, i

there's a $50 category. it does not subdivide it, commissioner. >> supervisor fewer: so i would appreciate it to be subdivided. so i would appreciate to see what funds are being dedicated specifically to expansion to the west side. >> so just to be clear that the expenditure plan that was approved by the voters has 50 -- i'm sorry. i'm looking at the wrong category -- has $$50 million looking at the transbay rail crossing category, so we should submitted our request, saying we would like at least in the initial round of allocations about $1 million for planning work. >> supervisor fewer: so you're telling me the $50 million expansion, that money is dedicated to a second transbay two, and also expansion to the west side, out of 50 million, 1 million is allocated for planning to extend it out to the west side. >> nothing is designated? we're just sending out our initial signal for request would likely be on the order or magnitude of $1 million. mouch might actually come to san francisco to study something that

in order to move the amount from category to category, we did have to go through supplemental appropriation. i want to be clear that at this point in time, we don't see a need for that -- for any substance that -- subsequent supplemental appropriation. >> i will not make any phone calls today then. >> it was something that happens that was in the last 20 years. we don't anticipate it happening again. >> i am glad to hear that. i was troubled by that and i think what was at their government audit and oversight committee at one point last year had some complaints about how quickly you were dispensing and implementing some projects. and some contracts. i think this was one of the things that was holding up the process. it was worth noting and worth following up on it. but i appreciate what kevin has said too. >> no other comments? as i noted, are there any other public comments on the presentation? >> good morning. my name is jury. if i understand the problem that was defined correctly, there was a timing program but not of problems with the total funding for these individual projects. so as a

over time there is incentive to identify yourself as a member of this category or that category depending on one of your four grant parents but over time the melting pot is working. but -- so why am i pessimistic about that happening? because of demography. again the native fertility rate in western society is below replacement. so -- and i'm in favor. we need to have replacement immigration of some kind in order to have -- prevent the population from just going into kind of a death spiral. the east asian society have avoided having significant immigration to date with not terrible impacts. but i think when you are -- your birthrate is 1.4% or 1.7% and it takes 2.1% to maintain the population, and you are losing a quarter or half of your population every generation, at some point there is a crisis. [ technical difficulties ] and it didn't just vanish overnight. in 1965. so one can reject some of the more hard edged versions of multi-culturalism but at the same time i don't think we should simply say that it is easy to create a post-white supremacist idea, until i was a little kid to be an

deren: you have to look at a category by category.re are private labeled categories like amazon basics products. they have been less dominant in categories like women's apparel is a more decided purchase. if they are able to whether some of the storm because of the diversified stream and say i will go after the women's apparel category and cut prices on h&m and the other companies that have a much less diversified revenue stream, there is an opportunity for amazon. emily: do you expect certain categories to be impacted more than others and if so, which? deren: i think the luxury purchases will be less impacted. if you're willing to spend $1000 on an iphone, you are willing to spend $1100 -- emily: even if there are tariffs. deren: right. there are other categories like low-price women's apparel which amazon has not made good on. amazon walmart are not doing quite as well as wait there. -- wayfarer. the giants have this as an opportunity to grow sales over time. emily: all right deren baker and emma chandra, thank you. we will continue

looks challenging to me, but "people" is the category. you have 10 seconds.tterboard. do what you can. talk it out. good luck. social partygoers. um... oof. vocal partygoers. [ gurgles ] too hard. [ buzzer ] [ pat imitates gurgling ] i'm sorry, it's kinda tough there. - we have these-- - joyful partygoers. yeah. they're social and joyful. - and $36,000... - oh, thank-- ...we couldn't do. hey, she had a great night. you got a second child coming in. - all is good. - it's the minivan fund, pat. yeah, you're welcome. stay right there. vanna and i will be right back. ♪ "wheel" has a new letter! a new letter? no, a new newsletter. wheel watchers club members get video messages from us, fun games, and more. join the wheel watchers club at... without touring the majestic national mall, showcasing the monuments and memorials that honor our distinguished americans and our military heroes. they are national landmarks and distinctive symbols of our nation's capital. ♪ this is a beautiful spot. kind of emotional to be here, too. it's gorgeous, the national mall. yes, it

primarily of course fleams females, students of color and the 1600 gender categories. and that they are literally at risk of their lives and at that circumambient racism is so great that they should be exempt from such ordinary academic expectations as going to class minority students at brown, occupied the president's office and complained they were still expected to go to class because they were working so hard at "staying alive at brown." now, does a college president ever say, grow up? learn the difference between a real problem and a imaginary problem, microaggressions are imaginary problems, no, instead of course as we know starting with the 1960s, president's capitulate, tell-tale and groivel, and of course the growing diversity broadcast encourages this. there is a mutual co-dependency between gross -- students that who use the student breakdown to expand their dominion. nevertheless, it is something that can be taken on, because it is empirically provable that campuses at least american campuses we can prove are not places of discrimination. there is not a sin

there is about 25% that comes from other areas, and there's two broad categories. one is healthcare providers. they may tax a hospital or other and come up with revenue that way for the state share, and then the other is local governments, county governments, city governments may also contribute. >> what state has a unique program for covering this contribution. >> they are all unique. the amount of variety across the states and the way they finance and operate medicaid is really amazing. some states are 100% managed care. others do combinations of everything you can think of. >> explain what managed care is. >> managed care is where you essentially are contracting with an organization to provide all the services for a set payment. generally, it can be a per member per month but it has been a way for states to manage the cost and have a little bit more predictability of the cost. >> a map from the kaiser family foundation shows the status of state medicaid expansion adopted in 37 states, including washington, d.c. you can see on this map here, the states with the b

there are is category one which is a bundled renewable energy product, you purchased it ahead of time with the electricity and all of the attributes associated and that has to be delivered into the california grid. there is a category to resource which comes from out-of-state that also has to be delivered into the california grid. but it is not a state product and then there is a category three resources which can be unbundled in time and they can be in-state or out-of-state. they don't need to be purchased ahead of time and bundled. they can be purchased after the energy is generated. it they tend to be the lowest cost renewable resources. there are a number of options. i want to be clear. that is one set of options is to incorporate more category to renewable resources then we have another option would be to pause on the increasing of our renewable energy content so that we are not incurring those additional costs. that would be one way to avoid some amount of cost that we have budgeted for when we have not yet contracted for certain amounts. we might also look to purchase other low

so if you look at the far left, you will see the category of point solution. right now hss obviously has an expert opinion and it's called a point solution where you are plugging it into your healthcare delivery system. the space and services are expanding as you move to the right and they're broadening in terms of the scope of services they provide as well as the fees associated with those services. if you move to the right of point solution, we're calling advocacy and some of the actual services are around education, problem resolution, it's delivering to the individual to other resources within hss system and it is able to answer clinical questions. they're able to help you find the right doctor and explain the cost and quality and provide assistance and decisions support and really help with the care coordination and navigating the delivery system. if you move to the right of that, we're calling that health concierge where this model is where the concierge or the health navigation is the first point of contact versus going to the health plan. right now as

so those are the sort of seven metrics we ended up on in four categories.goal here is that looking at each of these four categories we can get a holistic, comprehensive view of climate risk. before we apply the framework, we did consult with a wide range of industry experts to really validate our thinking, validate our views. you could see those organizations on this screen here. i won't go into those in detail but happy to discuss what those organizations do, if you have questions. and then before i talk about the results of the framework, how we applied it, i think it's really clear to just reiterate that where this framework begins and ends, where it measures and doesn't measure, there are some issues we need to be aware of in terms of scope and limitations of a framework like this. one, we have only applied through public market portfolios not private investmentsment we have limited this to the oil and gas sector, so we haven't looked at thermal coal companies, which i will touch on at the end of the presentation. and then most importantly, the framewor

>> very few of our category with tariffs that have gone through thus far are included.e'll be ready >> are you taking solis in this decline in energy crisis and 20 bucks in a month or two is amazing to watch you think we are pass the peak fear of freight and what about wages? >> when you look at the trade offs, sometimes higher wages we have done this for many years, we know how to work to make the appropriate adjustments and at the top of the end making sure that we got the right products at the right values to do this at the right rate while taking care of customers wages right now, we are competitive. when you look at our colleagues on commission of what they sell, that's an advantage. 94% of our colleagues over the course nine months have gotten an incentive bonus that adds into whole picture of what we pay and how we invecent our colleagues we have seen good success. >> on the demand side trying to figure out how long this better consumer environment is going to last we do have lower gas and higher wages, that's a good thing how much do you think was the tax cuts a

in our system to begin with we deeply apologize to this era the white genocide conspiracy theory category was generated through a mix of automated inhuman reviews pretty neatly added interests ultimately proved by people we are ultimately responsible for the segments who make very little in our systems it was an investigation by the intercept and news site that on earth the offending category reporters used it to place ads approved by facebook that ended up reaching over one hundred fifty thousand people now it's not the first time facebook's been left red faced in this way by last year another investigation by another outlet was able to select anti semitic as a category facebook approved its promoted posts within fifteen minutes after being made aware of what had happened and the network of removed the posts internet law expert oh yeah the cohen things that social media helps to promote extreme views. facebook is providing a platform for hate speech but then what it also does it also able to collect information about who are these people or where do they leave who are they friends what i

and then, the fourth category, that's a total housing. that's at 20%. this is helpful because it helps us to see in the initial allocation before any of the projects have received funding, that you are staying true to the categories. i just want to make that comment. >> yes. and it's nice to view in parallel side-by-side with the financial side. it indicates we are sticking in those parameters, as well. >> any comments, commissioner chu? >> yes. there's a lot of flexibility in these loans, and i appreciate some of the things that you're doing to be as efficient with that money as well. however, it brings up the question of governance because you are making quite a bit of decisions and there's quite a bit in both of these loans where you're, you know, giving out money -- you're choosing who to give out money to. i like the lottery system, but i'd like to know who's governing this at that level. it makes me very nervous to look at these numbers differently -- you know, like, the fact that you can show them differently over and over again means there's an

it was an investigation by the into new sites that unearth the offending ads category reporters use it to place ads approved by facebook the tender that reaching over one hundred fifty thousand people is not the first time facebook's been left red faced in this way last year another investigation by another outness was able to select the semitic as a category facebook approved this promoted posts within fifteen minutes off of being made aware of what happens the network remove the posts internets nor experts yakker and thinks that social media helps promote extreme these. facebook is providing a lot for hate speech but then what it also does it also able to collect information about who are these people where do they leave who are they friends what is the political affiliation and it might be the case that it might well be all and facebook will be providing the authorities we need use of those all those people so it's so you know way his book is rouhani you know safe haven for people with extreme views but actually serves the state by doing duck the other way to look at it is to say we

baumgartel: the -- justice breyer: what in your opinion are the right categories? ms. baumgartel: the -- so the factors about sorna that are critical include the fact that it contemplates criminal sanctions. in touby, this court recognized that its precedents supported requiring greater guidance for the promulgation of regulations that contemplate criminal sanctions. justice kagan: but are -- isn't that all over the place we have confronted delegation challenges to civil regulations whose violation will result in criminal sanctions? so, i mean, there are numerous of those cases, but i'll just give you three -- kollock is like that, grimaud is like that, avent is like that. so these are all places where the delegation is to a civil regulation as it is here, but if you violate that regulation that some secretary or attorney general or whatever has written, you're going to face criminal sanctions. so what's the difference between this case and all those other cases where we said that's -- you know, that's -- criminal sanctions is not what matters? ms. baumgartel: well, ko

sensitive groups category.r mass is sitting overhead for the next 24 hours. so similar story for your monday as well. tomorrow pretty much the same setup we have right now. most spots reporting unhealthy air quality. tuesday a little bit of improvement. but where you will really notice it big time is coming on wednesday. air quality improves to the moderate category, and that's because rain will turn the forecast and help to cleanse our atmosphere of the smoke. right now it is chilly ensome spots. 30s in santa rosa. fairfield, 34 right now. overnight tonight here's accuweather, still hazy smoky skies overhead. 30s and 40s. so as you step out the door tomorrow morning a chill in our atmosphere. you'll want to have that sweater and heavier jacket first thing in the morning. tomorrow afternoon again unhealthy air quality across the region. upper 50s to mid-60s for our afternoon highs. here's the setup we have. live doppler 7 along with satellite, this ridge of high pressure, this has been the maine factor for why

facebook has again had to apologize after the merge that one of the categories it offered advertisers to target was white genocide conspiracy theorist. this targeting option has been removed and we've taken down these are it's it's against our advertising principles and never should have been in our system to begin with we deeply apologize to this era the white genocide conspiracy theory category was generated through a mix of automated inhuman reviews really needed interests ultimately proved by people we are ultimately responsible for the segments who make very little in our systems it was an investigation by the intercept a new site that unearthed the offending and category reporters used it to place ads approved by facebook that ended at reaching or than one hundred fifty thousand people for the first time either facebook's been left red faced this way last year another investigation by another outlet was able to select anti semitic as a category they spoke of proved its promoted posts within fifteen minutes after being made aware of what had happened the network removed the posts

it is irrelevant in the category. if a scientific lab is all female, great if they've been chosen by marriage but is instead they've been chosen because the nationals ryan foundation has been conducting research in the engineering and math, if any of you are so lucky to have been protected from this phrase i wish i could share it is the latest in academic victim politics to express the multitude of people who can check off numerous categories of the official victim categories. the nsf is paying the gender theorists to study intersection ouaudi in the sciences. this is so mind blowing it is founded by congress in 1952 advance science basic research and we are doing this intersection. this is not to be ignored. we are definitely against science education is being slowed down in order to not leave people out. there was an announcement this summer by the university of akron i computer science profesr that he was arbitrarily raising the grade of all of his female students as a part of his contribution to gender equity in t

what in your opinion are the right categories? >> so the factors about sorna that are critical include the fact that it contemplates criminal sanctions. in 2b this court recognized its precedent supported requiring greater guidance for the promulgation of regulations that contemplate criminal -- >> but isn't that all over the place? we have confronted delegation challenges, the civil regulations whose violation will result in criminal sanctions, so i mean, there were numerous of those cases but i will just give you 3. these are all places where the delegation is to a civil regulation as it is here, but if you violate that regulation that some secretary or attorney general or whatever has written, you are going to face criminal sanctions. so what's the difference between this case and all those other cases, where we said, you know, criminal sanctions is not what matters. >> well, that's a perfect example because this is very different than oleo-margarine label. >> you can say that. it's easy to make fun of oleo-margarine labels but