crisis op our border, security concerns and the president's fight to build a wall, of course, steve rogerst trump 2020 advisory board member, a former navy lieutenant commander and former fbi joint terrorism task force member. steve, great to have you here. >> pleasure to be here. lou: let's start with the caravan. the president doing the right thing, securing the border. he's being attacked as he is always, no matter what he does by the establishment, the left, the right, wall street, business round table, chamber of commerce and chum schumer and all of his budkes. >> lou, after 9/11 i was assigned to the fbi joint terrorism task force. we were gathering information about the border and we had concerns by then who is crossing the border. our concern was who would bring a dirty bomb across the border. but we know there was a drug cartel and human trafficking. nothing was done by donald trump became the president of the united states. lou: he's the first presidential candidate to speak openly about the drug cartels and their role in corruption not only in mexico but at the border. by the wa

joining me, steve rogers. what do you think of these defense cuts?, to begin with, the president of the united states is the american military's best friend. in 2018 he significantly increased the budget. he's very well aware that we need a strong navy, he's funding the navy to forward deploy them in the pacific and the middle east' region to discourage anybody from attempting to challenge our u.s. military. remember the space force. he's forward thinking. he'll fund that space force to make sure we'll have the weapons necessary in the future to defend this country. what is he talking about? he's talking about waste. he wants to get rid of the $1,000 hammers we read about. the $2,50 t -- thes 2,500 screwdrivers. liz: he's been made fun of by the media about the space force. >> i can remember thinking about what are we going to do with the 21st century. is anybody going to come with the vision to build a space force? president trump decides to look to the future to start building weapons to protect us in the years to come. liz: defense spending protec

steve bannon's breitbart employees asked assange, what's he got. hope it's good. stone replied, it is. then he encouraged him to follow-up, saying clearly, he, rogerne, knows what assange has. what do you make of it? >> and let me finish the loop here because then steve bannon yee e-mailed and said i have important stuff to work out. seems like he was dismissive of stone. people in the campaign didn't know what to make of roger stone. one thing ni know from my reporting is roger stone it talk to the president, he presented himself as somebody i believe who knew a lot about wikileaks and when they would release certain things and what they would release perhaps. he e-mailed his friend sam nunberg, said he dined with assange which would presumably be in london, and then he said i think that was just a joke, but i don't think anyone knows what to make of him and whether he was telling them the truth or not because when you look at the entire history of roger stone, dating back to what nixon days, he is a trickster. >> he is. you're never sure what he is saying is true, could help him probably in the court of law. but yes, steve bannon blew him off. d

steve bannon. >> what is new is the direct communication between roger stone and steve bannon, communication whichoger stone denied, vehemently denied. tuesday he told the "washington post" there are no such communications and if bannon said they are, he would be desepl bling. >> the special counsel's theory of the entire case is conspiracy to defraud the united states and they have shown that by the indictments by the russian intelligence officers who were trying to defraud the united states out of a fair election. that's the big umbrella. there's another subset of things whether roger stone facilitated some of the hacking, and that seems less likely, but if he falls under the broad conspiracy under the efforts to defraud the united states that would be a charge in and of itself. what is interesting is this is the connection to the campaign and there's no way the trump campaign can somehow disavow steve bannon, he was an integral part of the campaign. these particular communications seem to be being released by stone himself, and so these are probably the communications that perhaps put him in th

think we're going to have a pretty ok it's going to be an interesting few days isn't it steven rogers steve perry thank you so much for joining us on the news grid. thank you andrew i purposely talk to there about turnout about people coming out to vote because you've been looking at the celebrity effect on that yeah and one of the reasons why people are feeling like turnout might be a bit higher in this in this final stretch just like all final stretches of these elections we see some pretty big names on the campaign trail we've seen the previous president barack obama and oprah winfrey to actually knocking on doors in the state of georgia some of these really big names on the trail to try and sway voters especially in places like florida and georgia as i mention and now we're used to the quote unquote oprah effect another celebrity and her social media post may tip the scales for democrats in a very red state that's the state of tennessee so last month singer taylor swift declared her support for a democrat running for senate it was significant because she has always avoided politics and

that's, again, from roger stone to steve bannon. , he didn't cut a deal with the clintons? now, what these e-mails show, jake, is that roger stone, who is full of bluster and says a lot of things that seems to be all over the place, he was in touch with one of the top people in the campaign, the ceo of the campaign at the time, if you remember. and so, what this tells us is that the mueller investigators who have these e-mails and have been asking a number of people about roger stone's connections with the campaign, it tells us that they are still pursuing this question and obviously we know that mueller's not speaking right now because of the upcoming midterms, but certainly after that, everyone is expecting that there is going to be some more action from mueller. does that mean that roger stone is next? we do not know. roger stone himself says that he believes robert mueller is going to indict him, so we shall see. but you know, the bottom line here is that mueller is still pursuing the collusion questions. certainly the idea of a

about wikileaks. >> robert mueller and his team have interviewed seven or eight of roger stone's interviews and steve bannon has been called before the mueller team. what kind of case potentially is mueller building against roger stone and potentially others? >> first of all, we don't know whether roger stone is actually bluffing or whether this is actually true, right? that's the essence of what the issue here is, but this is one reason why we keep saying that the collusion case is still very much alive. it is still very much something that robert mueller's investigators are pursuing and you can see perhaps a conspiracy case against roger stone if it is a proved that he did know something that perhaps if he was conspireing with wikileaks, and he was in communication with people in the campaign, that's where the crux of this lies, whether or not this is actually what mueller -- remember, this is what mueller was actually assigned to do, and so this is what, you know, the central case that they can make. as you said, nine of roger stone's associates have been brought before mueller and have provided i

and then finally on october 4th, steve bannon e-mails roger stone asking him, what was this morning.hat was in reference to a press conference that julian assange had held. and then, of course, roger stone replying, fear, serious security concern. he thinks they are going to kill him and the london police are standing done which we actually think he means down. >> shimone, let me ask you. the first one is from boyle to stone, right? >> that's right. >> and then stone replies to boyle, right? and then bannon replies to stone after he said he can't get in touch with bannon. >> that's right. that's exactly right. >> sorry about that, go on. >> really, what's interesting here, don, we know steve bannon was in to see the mueller team on friday, and he was presumably asked about these e-mails and other concerns about his contact with roger stone. what's not clear is if roger stone was actually serious in all of this. but certainly when you look at these e-mails, it is clear that roger stone, at the very least, was acting like he had some knowledge ahead of time -- ahead of time that julian

your colleagues reported that steve bannon had been back in to talk to robert mueller and mike's reporting today, the tie and the e-mails and the contacts now with roger stone. talk about how steve bannon has been overlooked as one of the potential key figures in tying wikileaks and roger stone and the dirty tricks he was engaged in to the heart of the trump campaign. he was running the trump campaign at the time that donald trump said russia, if you're listening. how about looking for those missing e-mails? steve bannon is often overlooked because he's done so much filling in of the narrative and fire and fury and other places of people's culpability he talked about weisman and the money laundering guys going through manafort and jared and we haven't spent time talking about what may be legal exposure for steve bannon himself. >> steve bannon was a key figure during a key and critical time of the trump campaign, not just the role he played in the campaign but also his connections to top donors like the mercers who he mentioned. his connections to the breitbart website which was a place he used to get out of a lot of information. and what bannon's inv

roger stone doesn't think so. he issued a statement today blaming steve bannon or an associate of steve bannon who used to be an associatef roger stone for just giving these e-mails, offering them to "the new york times." roger stone said bannon or his hatchet man sam nunberg, who used to be stone's hatchet man, leaked this e-mail exchange to the various media outlets. now, this program has no history of trafficking in stolen e-mails. i did not read the e-mails that north korea stole from sony studios when other media in this country was trafficking in those stolen e-mails and falsely calling them hacked e-mails instead of the fruit of an international crime, which is what they were. the news media has actually never stopped to consider what our standards should be for handling and talking about stolen e-mails. and so during the presidential campaign the e-mails stolen from the democrats were constantly being read aloud on television and they were being referred to as hacked e-mails. the words stolen weren't used very much, and they were printed in all the major newspapers. now, steve bannon interestingly is not publicly

steve bannon and roger stone about key issues in wikileaks. i'll tell you what they mean. donald trump's new willie horton style ad attacking immigrants and what is not in it. i should seri veelg statement from fox news saying the press should only report news the way trump wants it reported. >> saying if you don't want to be called the enemy, then get the story right. be accurate and report the story the way that i want it reported. >> tony schwartz here to talk about that, trump's mind-set in the closing days. i'm ari melber and you're watching the beat on msnbc. always a catch. like somehow you wind up getting less. but now that i book at hilton.com, and i get all these great perks. i got to select my room from the floor plan... very nice... i know, i'm good at picking stuff. free wi-fi... laptop by the pool is a bold choice... and the price match guarantee. how do you know all of this? are you like some magical hilton fairy? it's just here on the hilton app. just available to the public, so... book at hilton.com and get the hilton price match guarantee. if you find a l

sorting through all kinds of developments that can further tie the trump campaign insiders like roger stone and steveannon to the wikileaks campaign. let's go to kara scannell. >> it seemed to preempt "the new york times" story. based on that e-mail exchange, we understand that this is really the first indication that roger stone was in touch with any senior members of the trump campaign about wikileaks. bannon is following up asking him what was going on. our understanding according to a person familiar with the investigation is that mueller's team has copies of these e-mails and at least one campaign official has told investigators that roger stone was telling them, telling other campaign officials that he had ties to julian assange. this is really the first link that we know the trump campaign was giving the impression or being told by stone he had links. roger stone maintained anything he was telling people about this was already public and he was just echoing what wikileaks and assange had said publicly. we know mueller's team has been bringing in all of stone's associates in the last couple of

i discuss this further we're now joined by political commentator steve malzberg and rights activist anthony rogers right for reaction to this a gentleman this is always a minefield when we talk about this on t.v. especially three gentlemen discussing a transgender woman's rights here but. getting right into it let's start with steve . it's been found that transgender inmates are around ten times more likely to be sexually assaulted by fellow prisoners for whatever reason they are considered to be particularly vulnerable prisoners this can lead to self harm and suicide what should be done to protect these vulnerable inmates. well everything should be done to protect them i mean every inmate should be protected equally and the fact if in fact this this inmate is not being protected then. other steps have to be taken let me point out we're talking about about twenty transgender inmates in the entire prison system of illinois that's what we're talking about here now the trumpet ministration recently loosened and change regulations that came down under the obama administration they say that if you're i

steve banonon writes, "what was that this morning?" roger stone says "serious security concern, he thinks they're going to kill him and the london police are standing down," i think is what he meant there. "however, a load every week going ford." a lot of people were scratching their head saying does assange really have anything, is he still going to dump any more documents in october? this is roger predicting more docks a documents are going to come. he said assange said there was more to come. he appeared to be getting in front of a the "new york times" story saying mueller's team is looking at these e-mails, as well as various other contacts roger may have had about julian assange and about wikileaks. they were trying to discern whether he had this back channel to wikileaks and it gets to all of these associates we know around roger who have been called in to appear before the grand jury or provide interviews to the special counsel. the big lingering question, brooke, is whether prosecutors are going to be able to figure out if it was jus

there's also reporting in "the new york times" that steve bannon was in receipt of an e-mail from roger stone that turns around this access, this very question of whether those two were one of the links to wikileaks. can you tell us who you'd like to see back in front of your committee? >> donald trump jr. certainly and his phone records. that june 9th meeting almost tells us everything about the intent of the trump team during the campaign. within days, they set up that meeting. they moved heaven and earth to make it happen. that showed how willing and eager they were to receive the information. but there is a call after donald trump jr. talks to someone in moscow and in between another call with someone in moscow, he talks to a blocked number. that's how it shows up on the verizon call receipt we have. we're seeking to unseal that call to see if that goes to his father because we have other evidence from other witnesses that donald trump, the candidate, that his phone number was often blocked. and that would go to donald trump's knowledge. >> and on the judiciary front, if there's som

election-related documents to come out before november 8. >> after that, steve bannon reached out to roger stone to ask about it, writing, what was that this morning? stone responded, a load every week going forward. "the new york times" reports, quote, in an interview on wednesday, mr. stone insisted he did nothing more than posture, bluff, hype based on wikileaks twitter feed and miscellaneous tips. stone has issued similar denials about alleged ties to wikileaks in recent months, while also lashing out at mueller. >> it is not inconceivable now that mr. mueller and his team may seek to conjure up some extraneous crime pertaining to my business or maybe not even pertaining to the 2016 election. but i had no advance notice of the content, source, or the exact disclosure time of the wikileaks disclosures. >>> it's now abundantly clear that the special counsel seeks to go through every aspect of my personal, business and political life, try to conjure up some offense to pressure me to testify against the president. >>> i know that there exists nowhere evidence of russian collusion or wikile

prisons policy towards transgender people with a political commentator steve molds burge rights activist anthony rogers right. trumpet ministration recently loosened and changed regulations that came down under the obama administration they say that if you're if you're judged on what you are based on your biological sex ok so this person that we're talking about in chicago in illinois though i would be judged a male under the trumpet ministration and the reason it was changed is because female prisoners in texas had a similar situation and they sued they didn't want a transgender male who said he was a woman coming to their prison they said it was an invasion of their property that you keep everybody safe but you don't start making accommodations special accommodations and gender dysphoria is accepted by the american medical association in american psychological association as distress from gender assignment at birth so this isn't just something that people are doing for fun this is a recognized medical condition based on science based on research and decent study so it's very very important that we tr

john, steve, john burns, noel, roger, linda, matt, julie, ray. and you can speak in any order. >> well, you called my name first, so here i am. >> president hillis: well, that's perfect. >> my name is john herbiel. i'm here representing the simonian trust, we own property down the street. our concerns have to do with air quality. based upon the proposal, they're going to be removing, what, 18,000 cubic yards, okay, which will take over 690 trips with a double trailer, and we're concerned about dirt being blown off the trailer, so they have to be properly tarped, and we should have some restriction on how many truckloads they can do every day. traffic is also a concern, and parking on the street is another big concern. we have a lot of merchants up and down on the sacramento street corridor who are goes to suffer during this construction. not only because of our the activity and the trucks going back and forth, but with the loss of parking, as well as spaces are reserved for the contractors. we'd like to have some restrictions on that. also of imp

whether there was any basis in fact or not. >> this is a conversation between roger stone and the ceo of the campaign, steveut wikileaks. we did not know about that before this week. that's interesting and that's something the mueller team will want to look at. yes, there's an issue that even if roger stone new, what is the leg illegalality there. a political adviser to the president was connected to in conversations with somehow near the hacking of democratic e-mails by the russians. >> absolutely. it certainly raises questions about what bannon knew and when. remember, you know, everybody knows hacking is illegal. one question you could ask is why was steve bannon looking into this at all? shouldn't he has been saying this is illegal activity, i don't want to get involved in this or know anything about it. it's not a crime to ask what is going on, but when you think about, you know, the categorical denials we have had from the trump campaign, we did not know anything about this, we were not involved, this edges close to a ref yao taeugs of that. >> i know you do not have a crystal ball. >> i don't. i have

roger stone ran an op-ed in some publications. what is new in this story? >> we're learning for the first time that steve bannon, then the campaign chairman was essentially directly in touch with roger stone about the wikileaks e-mail releases days before wikileaks started dumping the podesta e-mails. that day was the same day, minutes after the access hollywood tape was released by "the washington post." what's really important for mueller to understand here, and i think what he's trying to get at, is whether or not that was a coordinated release, whether or not the campaign now knowing that roger stone apparently had this line into wikileaks and julian assange and knew that e-mails were coming then coordinated in some way so that if something damaging came out about trump in days before the election then wikileaks and the e-mails that had been hacked by the russians could respond appropriately. >> october 7th, of course, an hour after "the washington post" publishing the access hollywood tape, the first -- happens. coincidence. >> there's a bigger picture here, what mueller is doing. he's not putting t

with that said also, as we saw with the steve bannon e-mails where roger starts attacking me, in that story, roger was also persona nongrata. he could have had direct access. what he's doing is on the obstruction, it's harder for the committee to argue on obstruction that he's obstructed this case. he's handed over documents. he's never fired anyone. >> did you say donald trump has never fired anyone? >> yes. >> you know that's not true. he fired james comey and put in the letter you cleared me of wrong doing. he linked it -- >> i'm talking about with mueller. >> the new york times said he attempted to fire mueller. >> true but he didn't. this is more on the politics side and you know a lot of these folks. you're familiar with the term talking trash. then there's the notion of hot trash. trash so hot it's on fire. i'm referring to a dumpster fire and a critic of the administration who married into the administration. we called that married to the game. george conway who is married to kellyanne conway. >> i'm watching this thing and you know it's like, the administration is like a [ bl

that includes retired federal appeals judge, janet rogers, transportation counsel steve bradbury.five names floated around. secretary of state john sullivan. bill barr who served as attorney general under president george h.w. bush. or excuse me, george w. bush. there are names and people in the hopper. not the biggest surprise we see this relationship coming to a close. charles: misty, it is a resignation letter but it seems apparent that jeff sessions was fired. he does mention at your request. he is submitting his resignation. does that change the dynamics of this at all? this was again something played out in the public and perhaps a long time coming? >> it was played out in the public and a long time coming. one thing we all have to remember these folks work at the pleasure of the president. certainly if there is contentious relationship, that is ultimately the president's choice to make that decision, whether or not the person will be effective in the role. that is what, that is what the president's looking out for, right? he wants someone to be effective in the role to work

steve bannon says what was that this morning? and roger stone responds, a load every week going forward. this was a reference to wikileaks and e-mails that might be coming forward. the truth is that wikileaks was saying some of this stuff publically. so it is not clear whether roger indeed had any kind of in with wikileaks, jim. it is clear that he was trying to set himself up as someone that had that kind of access. roger stone nowadays says he was just bluffing. he was just full of it. that's the problem with whether or not mueller can bring charges on this. if you were to ask me is roger stone going to get indicted, i don't know. roger stone seems to think he will and certainly we know that once the -- once the midterms are passed, we know we're going to hear again from mueller. so we shall see. >> thanks very much. there were a lot of other times that roger stone claimed to have advanced knowledge. >> exactly. so what does mueller believe of what he said. jeff, what is so fascinating? i remember interviewing roger stone the day after t

of course in the fall roger stone said he never spoke to steve bannon about wikileaks. ad. roger stone, also jerome corsi asked him to write a memo describing something that didn't happen. so roger stone be taken at his word. >> i understand what you are saying. i didn't remember that meeting between roger and that russian scam artist in may either. i had to refresh my memory and supplement my testimony before the house of representatives on that meeting. these investigators are asking and by the way you as journalists are asking all of us to remember things that happened two years ago. he couldn't remember an e-mail that he forwarded that probably took him, you know, seven seconds to forward to a friend in england. it is interesting now that we appear to be approaching the conclusion of the mueller investigation and we're all the way down to whether jerry corsi, who believes that barack obama wasn't born in the united states and that, you know, 9/11 is an inside job, et cetera, whether or not he remembers an e-mail and whether or not he ever was in touch with julian ass

you,er story to share with one in the washington post about roger stone and steve bannon. in is theoff headline. email, roger stone said julian assange feared for his personal safety, but would be releasing a loaded every going . the title of his opinion piece from roger stone is the treachery of steve bannon. we are going to hear from steve bannon it tonight at 7:00 p.m. eastern time. thes taking part of canadian debates. debating david from. it is 7:00 p.m. eastern time. we will go to golden valley, arizona. good morning to you. what is on your mind. i just wanted to make a comment about that guy who just called in about pro-choice. i think it says in the constitution liberty and life. life is the main thing. a woman has the right for her body, but that baby is another body. commentant to make a about people you should have on. why don't you ever have the president of the nra on there? host: we've tried many times. caller: i don't think it would be that hard. they haven't accepted our invitation. caller: oliver north hasn't? he was on christian television. people who are

and with that said, also, as we saw with the steve bannon e-mails where roger starts attacking me, but in that haberman story, roger was almost persona non grata once paul was out in terms of the upper management of the campaign. with that said, he could have had direct access. what he's doing is on the obstruction, it's harder for the and you know this from your watergate experience, on the obstruction. it's going to be harder for the obstruction that he's obstructed this case. he's handed over documents. he's never fired anyone. he has cooperated. >> did you say donald trump has never fired anyone? >> yes. >> and you know that's not true. he fired james comey and put in the letter you cleared me of wrongdoing. he linked it -- >> i'm talking about with mueller. >> "the new york times" said he attempted to fire mueller and don mcgahn stopped it. >> true, but he didn't. >> this is more on the politics side, and you know a lot of these folks. you're familiar with the term talking trash. then there's the notion of hot trash. trash so hot it's on fire. i'm referring to a dumpster fire and

a partial list of those people include jeff sessions, kushner, manafort, don junior, roger stone, keith shiller, stevechael cohen and others, and i suspect -- and i think we've already heard some reporting -- that there may be now a number of criminal referrals by the senate to my old office, the united states attorney's office for the district of columbia to consider possible perjury charges if any and all of those other individuals testified falsely the way himichael cohen did. >> tom, we just heard from congressman eric swalwell a few moments ago who indicated that they were, in fact, going back over some of the testimony that was given to the house committee. how concerned should some of the aforementioned be? the sessions, the bannon, the stone, how concerned should they be about lying to congress? >> it's always a concern because it's a crime. even if you're not sworn before congress, lying to congress is a crime the same way as if you were an fbi agent and we were talking about something that was being investigated and i lied to you. it doesn't matter whether i'm under oath. the concern should

roger stone decided to release the e-mails for the column, "the daily caller." in them in october of 2016, steveannon, one of the heads of the trump campaign writes to roger stone and says what was that this morning. it was a big october surprise and many of trump supporters thought that it meant a bombshell about hillary clinton. that is not what happened. instead, julian assange released no new information. in roger stone's e-mail reply to bannon, he said there were security concerns. he said however, a load every week going forward. this is another instance where roger stone is predicting what wikileaks is about to do. that has drawn the scrutiny of investigators. stone was just repeating things assange said publicly. assange said there would be more information that he was going to release. sure enough, a few days later, he did. this gets to the crux of what investigators are looking at right now with roger stone. they are trying to figure out if he did have some kind of inside track to wikileaks. if he had any information and shared it with any members of the presidential campaign or donald

and if they weren't talking to the president, is this political gossip as roger stone says or. steve mr. corsi says he has no communication with julian assange flatly. robert mueller not getting exactly what he is looking for. >> this is pretty rare when it comes to criminal cases overall. it's not rare when it comes to robert mueller. you know, he already has had problems with witnesses who have been involved in plea agreements. one stage or the other. usually these are witnesses who are desperate for deals and really would not risk ticking off a prosecutor. so, clearly mueller is not getting what he wants. the question is he getting enough to get him where he wants to go? steve: and then there is that lead piercing noise. brian: which martha insists on using. i don't know why. steve: there is some suggestion that ecuador may be preparing to turn mr. assange over to the united states. mueller will perhaps get his hands on him if that's true. ainsley: jillian has new headlines for us. jillian: overnight cindy hide smithyde smith wins run off election. she defeated mike espy by a wide

it was one that roger stone just didn't offer steve bannon anything that was actually new, and then twoggest push was the conspiracy theory about bill clinton's illegitimate son and roger stone was pushing that as something that should be an emphasis of trump surrogates. does this actually shed any new light on if roger stone actually is -- part of the genius of stone you don't know if he's actually just up to his neck and sinking or if it's all just one big farce and he's been hoodwinking us all. does this give us any additional insight? >> there's something very trumpian about there where mueller is being forced to investigate whether stone was essentially lying himself to other members of the campaign to increase his importance. and was he simply making this up to show that he had more information that he did to give him a higher currency in trump's campaign. i believe the real currency was what information you had to share and how could you help move things forward. and the question here is whether stone was basically doing things to overstate what he knew. and now mueller has to go

the report cites a never-reported email exchange between roger stone and the trump campaign chief strategist, steveter julian assange went public with those emails. "the new york times" is reporting, the email exchange not previously ported, underscored how mr. stone presented himself the trump campaign officials. as a conduit of inside information from wikileaks, russia's chosen repository for documents hacked from democrat computers." stone, who had publicly predicted wikileaks would release those hacked emails, is denying claims that he had any insight info, writing an op-ed in "the daily caller," which said "what i am guilty of is usg publicly available information o punk democrats on twitter. this is called politics. it's not illegal." is that what it is, charlie? >> charlie: increasingly it has become that. i doubt that robert mueller is a source of any of this information. that leaves a couple of the other characters involved as possible sources of these leaked emails. then you have to sort of think of, what's it for them and why are they releasing this stuff? >> it's a three dhs can game we

new e-mails reveal roger stone was in touch with a senior trump campaign official. steveikileaks during the 2016 presidential race. special counsel robert mueller's team has copies of the e-mails, a source tells cnn, part of its investigation into whether stone actually had an inside track with wikileaks and whether he shared any of that information with members of the trump campaign. in an e-mail on october 4th, 2016, bannon, then the trump campaign ceo, wrote to stone, what was that this morning? stone published the e-mails on a column thursday for the right-wing daily caller. bannon's e-mail came shortly after wikileaks founder julian assange delivered a speech billed as an october surprise. >> enormous expectation in the united states. >> but assange didn't unveil any new information, angering some of trump's supporters who were hoping for a bombshell on hillary clinton. in a reply to bannon, stone explained the delay. serious security concern, however, a load every week going forward. stone said his e-mail was based on public information. during his media event, assa

rogers there. following the ongoing oil slide. steve looks at new concerns about inflation. kate, let's start with you >> it is among the three major averages currently down about 1.8% it is on the verge of going negative for week. the russell 2000 down by more than 2%. it is also negative. down under half a percent. the biggest movers percentage wise activision and netflix. qurate retail and monster and twenty-first century fox are some of the names. steep losses facebook, apple amazon all down around 2 to 2.5% tech stocks including apple amazon, google, facebook, netflix all having the biggest negative point impact today. back to you. >> thanks for that crude oil slipped deeper today we have more on what's behind that particular plunge >> good afternoon. >> we finished over $60 a barrel we fell under that level today it is significant from a technical standpoint oil is down for the week, for the week, for the year wiped out all of the gains oils dragging the energy stocks lower too. both in the red. let's take a step back for the second chlgt most of it was a steady climb

team that in the lead-up to the 2016 election roger stone pitched himself as a way for the campaign to get information from wikileaks. former campaign chief steveleaks founder julian assange appeared in a video message promising documented related to the election. bannon e-mailed stone trying to ask him for days what was the morning? he relied a load every week going forward. the times says that the e-mail exchange between the two men emphasizes how stone presented himself to trump campaign officials as a channel of information from wikileaks, which was russia's go-to for documents hacked from democrats. bannon spoke with the special counsel on friday. stone published his exchange with bannon, saying that his prediction of a load every week going forward was based on assange's own public announcement hours before. >>> anyone out there participating in the new york marathon this weekend owes a bit of gratitude to bill karins because he's givening ingiving forecast for this sunday. >> the boston marathon this year was rainy and cold. new york looks fantastic on sunday. if you've been following the leaves, they're way behind schedule. we're finall

roger stone. he's repeatedly denied commute kating with wikileaks regard thing leak of hillary clinton's emails. "there are no such communications and if steveannon says there are, he would be disembleing." and stone claimed inside knowledge and promised more to come. remember in early october, he predicted the documents would hurt clinton's campaign. saying i have total confidence that wikileaks and my hero will educate the american people soon, #lock her up. breitbart editor follows up by asking quote assange what's he got? it is i i'd tell bannon but he doesn't call me back and ashurs bannon that assange will be providing a load go engforward. and stone himself published the emails in a daily caller opinion piece called the treachery of steve bannon. the author of stones rules joins me now. do you anticipate that when the midterms are over and mueller is back in action in a public means that you will be indicted? >> well, first of all i have to respectfully disagree with the interpretation of everything you just said. let's set some background. here on cnn june 2016, julian assange said he had a huge batch of material and repeated it on f

conclude mueller continues to be interested in roger stone largely because his own words are being used against him. >> if you have reported last night with steven the chief adviser of the trump campaign e-mailed about wikileaks three days before the group released stolen e-mails from the clinton campaign chairman. then have you this does this give you any speaking of context, context where the special counsel's investigation is when we talk about stone so much? >> yeah, it clearly seems as if mueller is looking at stone and others in respect to their communications with wikileaks. not only wikileaks, but the people who are identified in the russian hacking indictment. guccifer, dc leaks. the communications may be way more problematic legally than the communications with wikileaks. the thing we have to remember about wikileaks is how do we define them? they called them a holsz style service, others called them a birth protected news organization. so it's very complicated if you are going to charge someone with dealing with an organization that has a first amendment right and so it could be that these tampering obstructionist charges may prove t

steve kroft. >> i'm lesley stahl. >> i'm scott pelley. >> i'm anderson cooper. >> i'm sharyn alfonsi. >> i'm bill whitaker. those stories, tonight, on "60 minutes." (roger) being a good father is important to me so being diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer made me think of all the things that i wanted to teach my kids. (avo) another tru story with keytruda. (roger) my doctor said i could start on keytruda so i did. with each scan things just got better. (avo) in a clinical study, keytruda offered patients a longer life than chemotherapy. and it could be your first treatment. keytruda is for adults with non-small cell lung cancer that has spread... ...who test positive for pd-l1 and whose tumors do not have an abnormal "egfr" or "alk" gene. it's the immunotherapy with the most fda-approved uses for advanced lung cancer. keytruda can cause your immune system to attack normal organs and tissues in your body and affect how they work. this can happen anytime during or after treatment and may be severe and lead to death. see your doctor right away if you experience new or worsening cough, chest pain, shortness of breath, diarrhea, severe stomac