by all republicans and all democrats in this chamber, and he sent his house allies off to tilt at windmills. everyone knew yesterday long before the house vote that the president's wall lacked 60 votes in the senate. it has proven to lack even 50 votes. it will never pass the senate, not today, not next week, not next year. so, mr. president, president trump, if you want to open the government, you must abandon the wall, plain and simple. the senate's not interested in swindling american taxpayer for an unnecessary and wasteful policy. what we do support, democrats and republicans, is real effective border security, but not a wall. the wall is president trump's bone to the hard-right people. it's no way to spend $5 billion for a political bone. i've heard the president and his allies in the media say democrats don't support border security. nothing could be further from the truth. democrats have always been for smart and effective ways to secure our border. we're pushing for technology, like drones and sensors and inspection equipment. every single proposal we made to the president included

progressive capitalism, like the green party, windmills, solar and all that. something that money, even marijuana like a $10 billion industry now. anyway, as far as trump, i want to see all his policies. if he's like pritikin but if he's wrong, we will be calling you folks and reading your books, what happened, just like in 2005 and in 2008 game. oh, what happened to the banks,, my house and all that? they are blending mexicans. what if mexicans and black eyes of the house? wasn't bailing us out. one more thing, this stimulus from obama runs out in 2024, and then let's see. have a good one. drama that was thomas picked any response for him? >> guest: i was having a little trouble understanding a little bit. >> host: there wasn't really a question in there. some statements so we'll let them stand at that. but in your book, gina loudon, "mad politics," you asked yourself if you're a racist trejo well, i did ask myself that at a certain point. >> host: you write about that. >> guest: everyone should for any bigotry of any kind. i think that something we should do

you know the windmills. bong, bong, bong. bing, that's the end of that one.oad is no longer a straight shot. it's now wah. keep america great, exclamation point! the democrat party is radical socialism. venezuela. and open borders. >> trevor: what is that? ( laughter ) "venezuela." like, he's speaking and then all of a sudden-- it's like trump is a one-man barbershop quartet. like, he should start his speeches, like, with a pitch. he should just be like... ♪ democrat, socialism venezuela! ♪ democrat, socialism venezuela! ♪ that's why we gotta build a wall ♪ but not a real wall a series of metal slabs ♪ the dude is weird. and here's another thing, did you guys ever notice that whenever he's done using something, he just drops it on the ground? like, he doesn't look for a place to put-- here, take a look. ( laughter ) ( laughter ) >> it's a plan for the whole community. to unify... ( laughter ) >> trevor: no, here's the thing, here's the thing. like, the umbrella, i can sort of get, right. the water bottle. that's quirky. but the microphone,s that's just weird.

you know, like the green party, windmills, solar and all that, you know? it's about money. t'even marijuana. finish you know, it's like a $10 billion industry now? anyway, trump, hey, let him do his eight years. iwa want to see all his policie. so if they, you know, if he's right, great. if he's wrong, we'll be calling you folks and reading your books. what happened? just like in 2005 and in 2008. oh, what happened to the banks, my house and all that? and they blamed the mexicans. what mexican or black guy owned a house, you know? you wasn't bailing out us. you would have been bailing out, uei guess, 75% of the white people. but, you know, hey, i'm looking forward to i reading your book. and one more thing, the -- [inaudible] from obama runs out in -- stimulus from obama runs out in 2024, and then we'll see. have a good one. >> host: that was thomas in humble, texas. [laughter] any response to him? aanything you want to add to that? >> guest: i was having a little trouble understanding. >> host: yeah. there wasn't really a question in there, just some statements. we'll just

it's progressive capitalism, like the green party, windmills, soul and all that. even marijuana. it's like what, $10 billion industry now. anyway, as forrest gump, hey, let him do ages. i want to see all his policies. if these right, great. but if he's wrong we will be calling you folks and reading your books and what happened, just like in 2005 and in 2008 came, oh, what happened to the banks, the house and all that? they blame the mexicans. why can't a black guy owned a house? he wasn't bailing outt us. he would've been bailing out i guess 75% of the white people. what happened? hey, i will look for to reading your book. one more thing, the stimulus from obama runsut out in 2024. then we'll see. have a good one. >> host: that was thomaston humble, texas. in response, anything want to add? >> guest: i was having trouble understanding. >> host: the was a really a question in there. q some statements. we will just let them stand at that. but in your book, gina loudon, "mad politics", you ask yourself if you're a racist? >> guest: i did ask myself that at a certain point. >> host:

what people told us about what the importance of the windmills and the green houses and the flowers that used to be grown here and the wind, let's not forget the wind. >> we have to continue to invest in our city's infrastructure and creating new. this is a recreation center for the 21st century and for the 21st century communities. >> we finally made something after somebody that everybody needs and this is the park. . >> a lot of water heater in san francisco look like this may be yours doesn't too do you know it is the post earthquake problems we'll show you to brace our water heater hi, everybody i'm patrick director of quarter safety for the city and county of san francisco welcome to another episode of stay safe today, we'll talk about bracing water heaters water heater failure is a leading problem with earthquake fires you have a a single source you'll have in our home. >> how are you. >> so what are we looking here. >> this is a water heater 3 weighs from 200 to nine hundred pound during an earthquake that weight will try to move sideways we need to secure is. >> we'll brace the

the type we live with to this day, the chronic emergencies, the crises, though windmilling military buildupserything from icbms to special forces. the arrival of professors in washington. so-called national security experts in academia. and the think tanks. all of this put in place and excitement, a lack of strategic thinking to be sure that we had lived with to this day. and i'd now like to just open it up to questions, answers, criticism and commentary. as we look back on the initial decades that brought us to today. >> yes. i sort of felt very prickly in your description of british power and capability and it seems to me in your discussion of the relationship between the united states and great britain that you have left out the part that preceded world war ii, and the part that took place during world war ii. it seems to me that the british leadership starting from its utter collapse in asia, of its mighty armies, and the attempts by churchill to avoid a d-day invasion but to go into southern europe and all kinds of Ãbor to repeat the entry into greece and turkey. that the americans woul

markets so that people can start generating energy from their own solar panels or their own miniature windmills and allow others to buy into that. pluck into the grids and we're seeing the same thing happen with carbon credits. so there is a whole bunch of different models that are being played with right now. the good news is coming back to what i started with, we're really early in the game. no one here needs to panic about how far behind we are. but we need to act. and so there are models in place and there are companies that are already doing this. some very successfully. some not so much. some will survive and become the blueprints for how we go about to do that whether at a government level or the private industry. there is a couple of examples that i will share with you quickly. we can go into a lot, many more details later and happy to send you a list of all the companies in the space if you have interest in going through them and seeing what makes sense. power ledgeer is one of the earliest companies in this space that the australian company raiseded a lot of money from the model that

josh: and learn why windmills are so important to the netherlands. wouldn't be where you are today. jan willem: yeah. josh: my name is josh garcia. ever since i was a kid i've dreamt about travelling the world by ship, immersing myself in new cultures,

by all republicans and all democrats in this chamber, and he sent his house allies off to tilt at windmillsrday long before the house vote that the president's wall lacked 60 votes in the senate. it is proven to lack even 50 votes. it will never pass the senate, not today, not next week, not next year. so mr. president, president trump, if you want to open the government, you must abandon the wall plain and simple. the senate's not interested in swindling american taxpayers for an unnecessary, ineffective and wasteful policy. what we do support, democrats and republicans, is real effective border security but not a wall. the wall is president trump's bone to the hard right people. it's no way to spend $5 billion for political bone. i've heard the president and his allies in the media say democrats don't support border security. nothing could be further from the truth. democrats have always been for smart and effective ways to secure our border. we're pushing for technology like drones and sensors and inspection equipment. every single proposal we made to the president included $1.3 billion

amy: have windmills been outlawed here in poland?i don't know enough about poland, so i should not comment on that. but i do know the president did defend fossil fuels, which to us is almost like going to a podium and saying you are against the female vote. it is the equivalent of that. amy: speaking of women, what role -- the importance of women when it comes toto a decarbonine economy, sususinable way of livi? costa ra, one othe is the costaials rican diplomat who was executive desk secretary of the u.n. .ramework on climate change talk about the significance of this, but women overall. looks clearly, when you have soebody like christina being prominent, that is already very inspiring, and that has been obviously very visible for the new generation, but i can also give you examples of things that are happening right now. we are the first country in latin america to have a law that .ncentivizes zero emissions buses, trains, cars. we work with in congress is a woman who has to push for an idea that at the time two years ago was a lit

does not believe in having a deal with an institution that he is philosophically opposed to and windmillsy oppose the european union. i simply think membership of the european union for the purposes of the uk is no longer right and that is what i campaigned on and! right and that is what i campaigned on and i think the british people we re on and i think the british people were completely right. as for no deal, i don't believe no deal is the option we should be going for automatically, but they will come to that in just automatically, but they will come to that injust a automatically, but they will come to that in just a minute. automatically, but they will come to that injust a minute. i want to deal with these anxieties, i know that my honourable friend shares, because i think he is profoundly mistaken as indeed are all collea g u es mistaken as indeed are all colleagues in thinking we have absolutely no option but to go ahead on this basis, we have plenty of other options. in order to see the way ahead, we need to understand what happens on tuesday, if as i very much hope this great ho

if the farmer builds on his own area, and windmill, he got the profits just for himself. was good for him. overall, i think it was more than a million private citizens and small object vendors being involved, more than half of the new renewables were actually owned byy citizens, farmers, the communities. >> just a small question, what you've witnessed in your country and how that shifted because of what was created and what is being created. longest time the were in love with solar tv. they just love solar tv. maybe because were not so funny pic is cut of the ideal of the sun or something, i don't know. they love solar tv. that has actually supported the scheme which costs money because at the initial phase we had supports solar energy with, within the public scheme. the nice thing is that our triggers to wind and solar have reduced the cost to where we are today, so i think that our big contribution from germany to climate protection. now there is obviously also a debate how to confer the. still i think the ownership, public ownership helps but it doesn't out with everyt

puerto rico will no longer be wasting their over water reward and will be powered with waterproof windmills. all right, now now i have to stop because i did that for the staffer who wrote it. obviously i don't do this kind of stuff, and i lost the bet. however, despite the literation that went there, this is a good bill that will move us forward in energy production, especially in our territories of the united states, and with that i obviously urge my colleagues to support it and move us forward. and, you got it -- and i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. the gentleman from arizona is recognized. mr. gallego: mr. speaker, i yield myself -- i yield the gentleman from new jersey such time as he may need to discuss this wonderful water bill. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from new jersey is ecognized. mr. gallego: mr. speaker, i retract that. i apologize. we're running the shotgun here. mr. speaker, i yield myself such time as i may consume. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. gallego: this bill provides a number of be

i watch this, and the year after in 1969, windmill armstrong went on the moon, a woman came on the flightshe went into the control room, and all of the people in the control room have a recording of neil armstrong and she got that recording of neil armstrong for and everhat time, since then, i have kept all of his clippings, everything from the newspapers, and now it turns c-span on, and i'm hearing this, and i am all excited. i have my face right in the tv. i love it. thank you so much for everything you are telling us. this really brings back memories. host: rosslyn, thank you. robert kurson, your reaction. guest: well, i am as excited as she is, i have to tell you. it has that effect. again, i think this goes to something the inside our dna, this hunger we have to explore and to go beyond, it is something that space to all of us, especially, as we said, at the end of 1968, they did it, and i think we could use another apollo 8 for our time today. host: i want to go back to some more film. this is the white house dinner honoring the apollo 8 astronauts. keeping in mind charles lindbergh

his mind on the bipartisan senate bill passed unanimously, he sent his house allies off to tilt at windmills. everyone knew yesterday, long before the house vote, that the president's wall lacked 60 votes in the senate. it is proven to lack even 50 votes. it will never pass the senate. not today, not next week, not next year. mr. president, president trump, if you want to open the government, you must abandon the wall. plain and simple. the senate is not interested in swindling taxpayers for wasteful policy. what we do support, democrats and republicans, is a real effective border security. not a wall. the wall is president trump's bone to the hard right people. it is no way to spend $5 billion for political bone. i have heard the president and his allies say democrats don't support border security. nothing could be further from the truth. democrats have always been for smart and effective ways to secure our border. we are pushing for technology. drones and sensors and inspection equipment. every single proposal we have made included $1.3 billion for border security. the trump shut down prov

by all republicans and all democrats in this chamber, and he sent his house allies off to tilt at windmills. everyone knew yesterday long before the house vote that the president's wall lacked 60 votes in the senate. it has proven to lack even 50 votes. it will never pass the senate, not today, not next week, not next year. so, mr. president, president trump, if you want to open the government, you must abandon the wall, plain and simple. the senate's not interested in swindling american taxpayer for an unnecessary and wasteful policy. what we do support, democrats and republicans, is real effective border security, but not a wall. the wall is president trump's bone to the hard-right people. it's no way to spend $5 billion for a political bone. i've heard the president and his allies in the media say democrats don't support border security. nothing could be further from the truth. democrats have always been for smart and effective ways to secure our border. we're pushing for technology, like drones and sensors and inspection equipment. every single proposal we made to the president included