he may be the first to retire, am i right? mr. cronkite: that's right. secretary of defense. all of these nominees for the cabinet will be approved just after the ceremony when the senate goes back into session after their lunch, all with the exception of robert heckel. remember the roosevelt inaugural, they zipped them right through in a moment of uncharacteristic senate speak, they got the whole group confirmed. president nixon when he leaves the stand, he goes back to the room and signs his nomination and sends them up to the senate, so they can to receive this afternoon within an hour or so. william rogers, of course, one of richard nixon's oldest and most trusted advisors. you recall the period after the eisenhower heart attack when mr. nixon retreated to the arms of his friends, he retreated to the home of william b. rogers, then attorney general. he has long counted on his advice. one of the major way stations on the way to the nixon presidency, there are the johnson daughters. mr. mudd: right behind them the nixon daughters. patricia the blonde, 22 years old, graduate

can you identify some stability in china right now? mr. tipp: no. i think the only stability i can flow --table comedies stable, slow deceleration. what that really works for is fixed income at this point in the cycle. i think it is riskier for equities. the fed is trying to squeeze in these last couple of rate hikes. you've heard them say we are going to be more patient but you haven't heard them say we are really looking to go the other way or we are really done. and so i think that that is going to make it kind of a ping-pong year for equities. it depends on whether some of the tensions on trade art easing, whether the fed is looking to hike, but what will bring them to wait, as we saw last year, is a tightening of financial conditions, like falling stock prices. i think it will be tougher to be productive on the equity side. on the fixed income side, spreads have widened a lot. once things calm down like we have seen in the past week, all of a sudden you see the money starting to come back into the long-term fixed income. jonathan: what is your

mr. speaker, i reserve the right to object. the speaker pro tempore: is there objection? mr. scalise: i reserve the right to object. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. scalise: thank you, mr. speaker. i first want to thank the gentleman from maryland for working with us and i especially want to thank the gentleman from north carolina, mr. butterfield, for his fairness. obviously emotions ran high as the vote was moved through without a recorded vote. and for our members who want that recorded vote, maybe on both sides that want a recorded vote, i made parliamentary inquiries to the chair, i made motions as well. some were in order, some were out of order. but every request i made of the speaker to provide that direction on what was in order for motions to make, that the speaker was incredibly fair in those deliberations. i want to thank the gentleman from north carolina for that fairness. i'm glad i never had to go before you as a judge. in those days. but i respect your friendship and your feigns -- your fairness, as well as the fairness to the gentlema

mr interest. is there a mention in this report of any concern about a bulge in a right pocket no is there any mention and his report of a knife or shards of glass. i don't know sir thank you that's all i've got to say. commissioners. mr holmes who make a movement towards right back you know. thank you you misstep down. if we have other officers to act like you and they need to be removed from the force why things were started it he does not need to be a police officer for the city of milwaukee ever. going to direct your attention to exhibit one thirty six did you drafted for officer many i drafted it for a number of officers on the shift yes you wanted him to be recognized for meritorious service right yes i did during the period that you supervised him did you come to any opinions about officer may's work ethic yes what were those opinions he was a hard worker would you say officer man he was one of the best officers you ever supervised he was one of the best. and if officer me was reinstated today would you have any problem with him working under your command i don't please would you welcome him ba

the remaining part so we have to get the quantity right otherwise you can not get to quality well mr right and i still have questions of my let's on my list but unfortunately i cannot pose them to you because our time is up i really appreciate you being with us today thank you very much for sharing your perspective and i encourage our viewers to keep this conversation going on our social media pages and hope to see you again same place same time here on worlds apart. what politicians do. put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president. or some want to. have to go right to be cross that's what before three in the morning can't be good. i'm interested always in the waters of my house. for sure. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy from day shouldn't let it be an arms race often spearing dramatic development only personally i'm going to resist i don't see how that strategy will be successful very critical time time to sit down and talk. with goal make goods manufactured consent instant of public wealth. when the rulin

mr. pence: please raise your right hand. do you solemnly swear you will support and defend the constitution of the united testates against all enemies foreign and domestic. do you bear truth and allegiance to the same. that you take this obligation freely without any mental reserves or purpose of evasion, and that you will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which you are about to enter, so help you god? >> i do. >> congratulations senators. [applause] >> the clerk will now read the names of the third group. >> casey claimer cruise, feinstein. >> mr. pence: please raise your right hand. do you solemnly swear you will support and defend the constitution of the united states against all enemies foreign and domestic, that you will bear true faith and alet mance to the same. that you take this obilation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion and that you will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which you are about to enter, so help you god? >> i do. >> congratulati

the remaining part so we have to get the quantity right otherwise you can not get to quality well mr right and i still have questions of my lips and my lips but unfortunately i cannot pose them to you because our time is up i really appreciate you being with us today thank you very much for sharing your perspective and i encourage our viewers to keep this conversation going on our social media pages and hope to see you again same place same time here on worlds apart. they're bred for a single purpose. they have a superman. they start training very young. eight months of intensive schooling. rats. and they save lives. the most important moments are when the principles of the foreign minister or the president actually ask your opinion when that happens you are on your own and young just into the so you actually. have to say what you think. i'm not. a probe finds the u.s. military is linked to sites in yemen where jailed terror suspects have reportedly been tortured and abused at the pentagon tonight claims made by the associated press. and fox did over.

since i was a little girl i wanted to have a bicycle off my home and it took me mr been right there. finally they gave up and went on buying on bicycles entry turns because sewing machine sewing i suppose was more apropos created for goes than writing advice as knowledge i was a. woman back home full of bones by going to kings and social homes and informed him of old dead basic rights my name is dave out of the home and i wore t. to. move. on i'm the spasm here. as well people need to just learn to be normal around them. that's what this report is about. she's just shoot uli on draxler you spend time jam it was all going on and on the room lots of us use words like retardants baz without thinking i don't know anyone with disabilities so i'm doing this report so i can change that for me. we're here on the side of march. today they're offering an open afternoon and there will be a disco later on but let's see how this goes because i will be. so welcome to my team's club. this is braman largest center for people with disabilities to use the politically correct term i have no idea how to

[music playing] natalie morales: she thought he was mr. rightnt, handsome surgeon, until the good doctor seemed to turn sinister. he had put his hand over my face and said, go ahead, and try and leave. i had nowhere else to go. i mean, she just broke down.d. natalie morales: taunts, threats, then something deadly. they had said that he had hired natalie morales: a doctor plotting a murder. he's giving you a way to kill someone. very detailed, precise instructions. natalie morales: investigators would

mr. stern: that's right. but by adopting one policy of enforcement discretion the secretary doesn't box in her successer. a prosecutor who believes that a particular statute is unconstitutional or doesn't cover certain kinds of offenses. and maybe the attorney general issues a decision to that effect. the subsequent 30 general could overturn that. jacobs: -- judge chin: the government would be in a different position if it had given a different explanation or justification for rescinding. but it gave a reason that, frankly, i don't think makes sense. so that is why we are in this situation right now. mr. stern: your honor we think that the decision regarding the union of locomotive engineers, the supreme court's decision makes the fact that an agency gives a reason for an overwise unreviewable decision does not make it reviewable. that makes total sense. if the acting secretary had said nothing, there would be no basis to review. when the daca policy was adopted in 2012, there's not a lot of elaborate discuss

right mr speaker the rights owner paul lady. she knows as the nothing has changed prime minister we will also continue to work to deliver on the solemn promise we made to the people of this country to deliver on the results of the referendum and. the government must remove must remove really once and for all the prospect of the catastrophe of it no jailbreak certainly and all the chaos that would come as a result of that do not take this responsibility likely in my government will continue its work to increase our prosperity the opposition or should we cut and smell the coffee. tree some may is soon expected in brussels for crisis talks on brags that she will be hoping to win concessions from the e.u. officials and to negotiate changes to the current deal ms may well then present her plan b. to parliament on monday m.p.'s will debate and vote on it on the twenty ninth of january currently in the u.k. scheduled to leave the e.u. on the twenty ninth of march as things stand it may leave with no deal at all on the world trade organ

the shredding or smelting process with them looking at about one year of fifty per kilo is that right mr housing. that's about right here we have a good plug in board with nice gold plated parts and without any contaminants here we're looking at about two euro zaidi per kilo. off to this people. that's why it's cost effective for the company to dismantle the computers by hand. cables housings and circuit boards a carefully sorted old two televisions and monitors the less valuable even though the shielded cables are full of copper wire. but they also contain toxic elements such as lead and cadmium in germany these must be disposed of properly so they don't end up in the drinking water. small sure it is a use specifically for hard drives that contain data that customers want destroyed . specialized facilities take care of the masses of material later the smelters separate the metal fragments and melt down the shredded material. that mark it's a global market that's why the disassembly can be done worldwide as well as the flow of the materials and the processing of art you. dominick dunne c

thank god i'm pleased that this house has expressed its confidence in the government and i am right mr speaker the right honorable lady will. be knows as the nothing has changed prime minister and we will also continue to work to deliver on the solemn promise we made to the people of this country to deliver on the results of the referendum and. the government must remove must remove clearly once and for all the prospect of the catastrophe of a no deal breaker for me and all the chaos that would come as a result of that i do not take this responsibility likely in my government will continue its work to increase our prosperity the opposition or should we cut by and smell the coffee right was. last forty eight hours helping there in westminster we got the latest a little bit earlier from london with our teas to see a trick and i. what we have going on right now is these political games are figuring out exactly what brooks it is going to look like and who is going to end up getting what they want really continuing in full swing and it's really clear that there is going to be a bunch of peo

there are consequences all around, you are exactly right about the impediment it presents to the deregulatory agenda. mr. donohue: thank you, neil. that was helpful. the last one was right behind. reporter: i had largely the same question -- what do you think of the shutdown's impact on permitting? mr. donohue: i don't know whether that microphone was working. what do i think about? reporter: the shutdown's impact on permitting? neil: permitting. mr. donohue: i don't know but it is probably another thing i will put on my list, it sounds good. look, now, around the room here, myron brilliance over there, jack howard at the hill, a lot of our experts, you want to go ask them there are some on that side. if you want to go ask those guys questions, and ladies, they are smart, they will be glad to hear from you. and probably because of the issues you cover you know a bunch of them. thank you very much for coming, thank you for your patience. thank you for your coverage and and let's do it. see you. [chatter] this is one thing that did not get accomplished last year. i know there was a lot of pressure to get

mr. schultz right now. that's because he can pull a ross perot. vote to the party. >> there is no doubt by the. he could be the ross perot of modern times. let's not forget michael bloomberg that can self-fund a campaign and go toe-to-toe with including schultz, they would take away votes from democrats. they will offer an alternative that sound a heck of lot better than what the democrats are offering. trish: do you think this is real or is this his way of saying, guys, get your act together. forget this nutty, leftist venezuelan-style stuff you are trying to promote and start remembering real economic policy that will benefit the middle class? is that what this is? i could see if mike bloomberg were to get into the fray, that maybe that would be his goal. you shape the party to give it a nudge in the right direction. >> i'm afraid will schultz is not powerful enough to turn back socialist agenda to which the democrats seem to favor. i think it's a bluff. i think he's sincere that he made a decision to run as an independent. the question is what

mr. barr, there are individuals right here in the united states who have no fourth amendment rights. mr. president, this is an important issue today, and it will become more important in the days ahead. now i've already stipulated that i think there are serious threats to our country overseas. and what troubles me is that as telecommunications systems around the world become more globally interconnected, more and more innocent americans are going to get swept up in these searches. and to me, when you're talking, as mr. barr seems to be doing, that there are individuals in our country who have no fourth amendment rights, that's why i think all senators should be troubled about these positions he has long espoused. there's also the matter of collecting business records, sensitive information about americans that are in possession of a third party. now here we're talking about your purchases. it's who you are communicating with. it's where you're located at any time of the day. mr. barr believes that the fourth amendment doesn't apply to any records held by a company or other third party

and she called the procedure of an aa portion, and i quote again, a fundamental human right. . mr. speaker, abortion is not a human right. abortion, to the contrary, is death. antithesis of abortion is life. for years we have been fed the same argument, that planned parenthood operates to ensure women's health and prenatal care. but straight from their c.e.o., we know this is not the truth. planned parenthood's mission is abortion. planned parenthood's mission is death. and their actions prove it. planned parenthood ended the fundamental right to life rough 321,384 abortions in 2016. -- is 881 abort deaths aborted deaths per day. the c.e.o. said in the same tweet that the organization will never back down from that fight. to not only expand access to abortion but to deem it a human right. mr. speaker, as freedom-loving americans, we must stand on our core principles that all are created equal, and we cannot back down from the fight to preserve life and to protect those who can't protect themselves. i look forward to continuing work to ensure that our taxpayer dollars do not fund dea

mr. bercow: prime minister. prime minster may: the right honorable gentleman can say what he likes, but he opposes any -- theey the government thernment -- he opposes deal that the eu says is the only deal. that means no deal. the only way to avoid no deal is to vote for the deal. it is the right honorable -- if the right honorable is uncertain about what i am saying, he might like to use a lip reader. mr. bercow: jeremy corbyn. thate prime minister says is the only deal available. if that is the case, why wasn't it put to a vote on december 11? why has there been a delay of five weeks on this? the prime minister says she hopes to get written assurances before the vote next week. can i ask the prime minister this, will the changes she is looking for be made to the legally binding withdrawal agreement itself? mr. bercow: prime minister. prime minster may: i say to the right honorable gentleman, as i said earlier in my remarks and previously, there are three elements we're looking at. when is the undertaking and assurances we are looking for

can you identify some stability in china right now? mr.ipp: the only thing i can see is stable deceleration. what that really works for is fixed income at this point in the cycle. it is riskier for equities. the fed is trying to squeeze in his last couple of rate hikes. you've heard them say we are going to be more patient but you haven't heard them say we are really looking to go the other way or we are really done. i think that is going to make it kind of a ping-pong year for equities, depending on whether some of the tensions on trade are easing. whether the fed is looking more the hike. but the things going to bring them to wait as we saw last year is a tightening of financial conditions, falling stock rices. -- stock prices. the biggest going to be tougher to be proactive on the equity side. on the fixed income side, spreads have widened a lot of once things calm down the we've seen in the last week see the money starting to come back into the long-term fixed income. jonathan: what is your stance on treasuries and how do you see the c

mr. arnesen: right here. >> thank you. i would imagine that a majority of the guns were manufactured under contract to the government for the military purposes. but there were also guns manufactured for private use for hunting, for duels, for whatever else. i was wondering how much production was actually done on spec with the intention of perhaps selling it to somebody as opposed to produce under contract. and, did the quakers make any distinction between military weapons and guns produced for private use? prof. satia: another great question. yeah, from what i can gather, gunmakers really preferred having contracts, because there was a sense of security that what we make will be used. because these guns were so perishable. they were prone to rust and rot, worms, all kinds of things. they did not last very long. it is not like if they made them and no one bought them they could just warehouse them and sell them a year later. they would go bad in that much time. so, they really liked the security of having a contract. that

pakistan and the united states as well as pakistan and the national unity government i think mr mistrust right now remains basically the biggest enemy of any potential success in this round of talks and that's a great point and what your thoughts on that that there has to be trust between these base parties involved to even move an extra. well. the lack of trust is probably the biggest obstacle in moving forward. no doubt. was david and for certain still within their goal that pakistan is exceedingly important. that the recent steps are encouraging but at the same time because of the lack of trust there are enormous doubts whether these efforts are sincere will have to be seen as to how things unfold but at the same time i think we need to realize that the to what extent pakistan can push things forward it can certainly prevent taliban from making peace but whether it can deliver taliban or deliver peace. that is debate among. the rest and relax and even. suppose the pressure that the taliban came under from pakistan to produce to to bring them to talks in islamabad in the refused or. encourag

mr. barr. regarding the voting rights act, this is for mr. johnson and mr. muir murial. yesterday mr. barr testified that he would vigorously enforce the voting rights act, section 2 since there hand been a single section 2 proceeding brought by the justice department, what specifically could mr. barr -- what would you want mr. bar to do to vigorously enforce the voting rights act as he testified yesterday? >> i think number one that he should review the decision by the justice department to switch sides in these two cases. one has been resolve. number two, he should ask the voting section of the civil rights division to present to him all instances where the justice department has been asked to initiate section 2 climb claims. number three, i believe that he should investigate, evaluate, and review those states that have passed voter suppression laws to determine whether, in fact, they are discriminatory and, in fact, if they're discriminatory, to initiate a section two claim. the issue is is for the attorney general, and there are many competent lawyers in the civil rights can divisi

right. i read the statute. mr. dvoretzky: under 355 04-8, the secretary has a statutory obligation, if it believes a warning is warranted, to work with the manufacturer. if it disagrees with the changes, it is obligated by the statute and it shall initiate discussions to reach agreement. it cannot just say no to a warning if it disagrees with the framing. chief justice roberts: where in the back and forth for you have references to atypical fractures? mr. dvoretzky: the term atypical femoral fracture is what we are causing the risk -- what we are calling the risk the respondents are concerned with. that term was not settled upon until a task force that came later. what is clear in the back and forth and the response letter is warningck proposed a in a low energy fractures certain region of the femoral shaft. the letter begins by noting that to warnedrck proposed about in both sections of the label, so we know that is what the fda is thinking about. we also know from the fda's treatment of the adverse reactions sect

, and center right after this small victory one would call it, a rare victory for mrs. may last night, she called on leaders of all parties to start an almost national dialogue, a consensus within parliament to try to get through the log jam, and as she quite rightly pointed out, parliament knows what it doesn't want, but it doesn't seem to have a majority for what it does want in terms of brexit going forward. mr. corbin laid another trap, of course, for mrs. may right after saying if you drop the no deal brexit as the default, then i will join these talks, of course, but if she does that, then there is a real danger she will lose support want only from the eig, and there's 118 mps who backed her last night, but went against her on the previous night, but she could also lose more cabinet ministers from the more harder brexit leaning part of the party as well for mr. corbin, of course, the traps are there for him. if he goes into a dialogue with mrs. may along the lines of let's find a soft brexit solution, then, of course, he is alienating those in his party and there

mrs. butterworth, right? mm-hmm. yeah. but somehow she has a british accent. kids were super into mary poppins back then. still missing a step. take one of these things up to your rooms. put everything in it you don't use. can't we just do this next weekend, or, like, never? no. i am starting my new job and i want to leave things as organized as possible. most people just throw stuff into a closet.

mr. barr. the voting rights act, this is for mr. johnson and mr. murial. know that after the shelby county decision, there were many, many states that passed all kinds of legislation that would be considered by a lot of voter suppression. and yesterday, mr. barr testified that he would enforce the voting rights action, section 2 of the voting rights act. to the two of you, since there been a single section 2 proceeding brought by the justice department, what specifically could mr. barr -- what would you want mr. barr do vigorously enforce the voting rights act as he testified yesterday? number one that he should review the decision by switchtice department to these two cases. one has been resolved. should ask the voting section of the civil to present ton theall instances where justice department has been initiate section 2 claims. three, i believe that he investigate, evaluate and review those states that have passed voter suppression laws to fact, theyhether, in are discriminatory and, in fact, discriminatory to initiate a section 2 claim. is for the att

>> that's right, mr. chairman. >> do you know a lisa page or peter strzok? >> i've heard their names. >> do you know them personally? >> i don't. >> this is a message, a text message. trump's not ever going to become president. right? right. >> strzok reponded no, no, he's not. we'll stop him. strzok was in charge of the clinton e-mail investigation. miss page worked for the department of justice. i want to believe the path you threw out for consideration for office that there's no way he gets elected, but i'm afraid we can't take that risk. it's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before 40. march 4th, 2016. page to strzok. god, trump is a loathsome human being. october 20th, trump is an fing idiot who is unable to provide a coherent answer. you can have any opinion you like, but you're supposed to do your job without an agenda. do you promise me as attorney general to look into see what happened in 2016? >> yes, mr. chairman. >> how do these statements sit with you? >> i was shocked when i saw them. >> okay. please get to the bottom of it