you go to new england, ohio, pennsylvania. you see what happened in north carolina. you have factories reeling from nafta. the usmca is a good deal. pre-nafta we had huge surpluses with mexico. with nafta we have huge deficits. we'll lose $100 billion a year on trade with mexico. does that sound good? this has been going on many years, so i stopped it. you said the wall was being held hostage by democrats. is there anything you would have done differently? pres. trump: no. could i have done it differently? no, not really. by having a shutdown we have set the table for what we are now. if i had not come up would not understand the subject. now they understand the subject. they understand what a humanitarian crisis it is. it is called setting the table. for setting the stage. we have set the stage for what will happen on the 15th of february. i do not think they will make a deal. we are not giving one dime to the wall. that is ok. but if they do not give money to the wall, it will not work and the politicians are wasting a lot of time. >> [indiscernible] pres. trump: i

i could live pre-nafta, before even left ohio, pennsylvania, i people even before even left ohio, pennsylvania, i mean you still have empty steel factories all over the place and other factories. i can live prenafta very easily. but the only thing i'm not living with is is nafta. that was one of the worst trade deals ever made. those are american taxpayers -- which you consider mexico pay the wall? -- reporter: which you consider mexico pay the wall? -- paying for the wall? president trump: many, many times over. the usmca will make in the form that we right now are losing approximately 100, hard to believe, this doesn't include the drugs pouring in which is a much higher number than anybody would even know, in addition to destroying lives and families so horribly. we are losing close to $100 billion a year. on trade with mexico. for many years. not only that, they have a tax of 17%. we don't have a tax. so, they have a value-added tact of 17%. we don't have that tax. that deal was bad the day it was made. because they charged a tax before the deal was made and we didn't. it was an obsolete de

wisconsin, ohio pennsylvania, michigan came on line for the wasy because the president not necessarily running an orthodox, conservative republican campaign. that allowed the party to bring working-class voters in. the face of the party was still excited. suburban republicans were on board. that coalition fell apart in 2018. we saw some strain on that. to my mind, the most critically important thing we do in the minority is to start taking very seriously the question of what specific policies would be needed to be the glue that holds a coalition like that together going into 2020. the president when he was a candidate tapped into the anxiety for those parts of the coalition. i don't think he fleshed them out clearly in the governing agenda. i think some of it was there. it is not holistic. our role in the minority is to help the administration figure out what that governing agenda could look like. so what we want to do at heritage action is going into these districts that were lost in 2018, and a lot have a combination of suburban republican voters who did not want to vote for the pres

and the people of ohio, michigan, minnesota, pennsylvania, they're the ones that were sold a bill ofoods. if he or someone like amy klobuchar who is also from that neck of the woods, if they can make the case that you have suffered from the trade wars that he's fighting, you have suffered from everything he's doing, then you have aith foi f shot. i think democrats as an imperative want to beat trump and that sounds obvious. that might start crowding out policy considerations. people are going to look and say is sherrod brown the best person to knock out donald trump. >> what do you think? >> i don't know who the best person is, but it's going to be a tough fight. it's not going to be a fair fight. >> is it going to be howard schultz some. >> nope. >> why not? >> he has as much shot than i do, maybe less. >> he was at an event last night, he got heckled by a crowd member, the only thing you're going to do is hand donald trump the presidency again in 2020. howard schultz says i will not be a spoiler in this race. what are his options? besides not run. >> he could run as a democrat and

ohio, pennsylvania. klobucharown, senator , those people are talking about the voters. has talkedsey publicly about a possible 2020 bid. biden keeps telling people that he is the front-runner, the best person to take on president trump. but he has to prove it. it will be a competitive primary. even though he was vice president for eight years, he will not have the same kind of front-runner status that secretary clinton had. she was challenged by senator sanders, but she always had so much of the donor class and party leadership class with her. biden has a lot of support but there is not a groundswell to make sure he is the nominee. he may be waiting for that groundswell. but in this new dynamic where people within instagram feed or twitter feed can have 2 million , youmillion followers can't sit back and hope it comes to you. host: what do you think elizabeth warren faces? what is the biggest hurdle? is still facing questions about her heritage and her native american dna test. she was able to turn the conversation back toward economic populism and fighting the wall str

most likely, the guy or woman who will most likely give us trouble in wisconsin, michigan, ohio, pennsylvania, for one, i think vice president biden and whomever else gets in the race we need to have a robust primary on democratic side of the aisle and we've got great democrats to jump on the side of the race, not the previous gentleman. >> howard schultz. you're not going to mention his name? >> run, howard, run. >> so i have to say that speaks to a fundamental misunderstanding what also was happening in 2016. in 2016, a number of folks on the democratic side of the aisle did not come out, particularly young african-american voters, young latino voters and folks needed in milwaukee, in michigan, in pennsylvania. those voters come out in 2020 as they did in 2018 in a lot of places, i think the electorate looks different. had those voters come out in 2016, hillary clinton would be president right now. >> the president is focusing on two people, joe biden and elizabeth warren. that's why you've seen him criticize them so much. those are his two primary worries. but it's interesting because some

they felt like there were people from us again, ohio, pennsylvania, wisconsin who felt like the middle class had been left behind in both parties were not attentive to what they were saying but it was an immigration or trade or their personal economic conditions. trump really tapped into that rage and thought before anyone else did. i love these people. go to his rallies and you see bus drivers and school teachers and construction workers and veterans and you despise how many blacks and hispanics would show up. i remember one of the favorite stories was typically 3500, 1000 motorcycles parked on the side of the arena because trump dominated the biker votes. these were people upset about washington and thought that washington had become really self-indulgent and completely out of touch with america. they were right. >> host: it was interesting because when i read your book and am always trying to think about the trump phenomenon and dale carnegie the greatest coach in american history and use to say the most important thing you can do is to make the person you are talking to feel import

northern indiana, ohio, pennsylvania, new york state, all day today we will see the snow take hehold. as we go into tonight, there is? th this transition from snow to rain, just to the north of that, just to the north ofi-95, the potential for some icing. that means sleet and freezin rain. farther north of that, all snow. this is whwe have a very tight gradient on who will see how much snow. you go up into central and northern new england, looking at a foot to possibly two feet, some of the ski resortould see closer to three feet. farther south, there is the chance of well north of the city across ldst of massachusetts, and into pennsylvania, we c see a half an inch to perhaps three quarters of an inch of ice. that could weigh down on the treesnd power lines and that could knock out power. and with temperatures the coldest we've seen so far this season expected on monday, it could be one of those situations where you reay need to get the heat back on quickly and this could impact that. >> all right, dylan, thank you. >>> now to a coauple big developments ought of washington, the first

that do you think you could have beaten hillary clinton in ohio, pennsylvania, wisconsin, all those statesyes. i absolutely do it. sure, i absolutely do. >> laura: because of your positions on trade? >>> oh. >> laura: immigration, things that motivated those voters to turn out. obviously he had the money raised, too >>> there's no question i think that hillary clinton was an extraordinarily flawed candidate and the she needed someone who was going to be direct and go at her and call her out on all the things that they she had done as secretary of state and the things she was proposing and how p prepot of troughs they were. the way we would lose to hillary clinton is if we had a candidate who was not direct, not blunt, who was part of the old guard, whether jeb bush or marco rubio or scott walker. i don't know that those guys would have been able to pull it off because they would have been more. c. >> laura: they weren't in tune to the party, i'm getting you caught in a prosecutorial rap. you don't even need it? >> look at you. >> laura: i asked you whether the party went in a good or bad d

do you think you could have beaten hillary clinton in ohio, pennsylvania, wisconsin, although states?? >> i absolutely do. >> laura: because of your positions on trade, immigration? the things that motivated those voters to turn out. obviously had the money raised. >> there's no question that i think hillary clinton was an extraordinary flawed candidate and she needed someone who was going to be direct and go at her. and call her out on all the things that she had done as secretary of state and the things she was proposing and how preposterous they were. the way we would lose clinton is if we had a candidate who was not direct, who is not blunt, who was part of the old guard, whether that was jeb bush or marco rubio or scott walker. i don't know that those guys would've been able to pull it off because they would've been more pc. >> laura: they weren't entombed to the party. i'm getting you caught in a prosecutorial trap and you don't even know it. that's why i love having you on. [laughs] so look, i asked you whether the party went into a good or bad direction and you said the old gu

party, and i've seen what happened with my former client, hillary clinton, in three states, ohio, pennsylvaniamichigan, where a third party candidate, i think the, derailed her opportunity -- kennedy: good, i'm glad. i hope we have more third party candidates. third, fourth, fifth -- >> i think it'll be very problematic. but the first -- kennedy: why should it just stay republican and democrat? that is empty. >> why he wants to run. if he really wants to defeat donald trump, maybe running for president should not be his thing, because he cannot win as an independent voice. this presidential cycle is not there. kennedy: yeah. we're -- >> where's the place for him in. >> find a place. kennedy: he's not a progressive democrat like tom steyer. >> he can help voter turnout to, he can do voter education. you don't have to run -- >> maybe he doesn't feel represented by either major political party finish. >> him as a third party candidate will not move the ball forward, and if his mission is to defeat trump, it will not work. kennedy: i don't know, man, it's an apple world. >> i am totally convinced.

to win the presidential campaign, ultimately you're still going to win the states michigan, ohio, pennsylvaniain and of themselves it's unclear whether a message like this is the primary message they would be interested in rather than a standard economic message. but the ideas themselves that are being presented really aren't that new. in 2008 when i worked for then senator obama running for president, we talked about a green new deal policy constantly. it was a large part of his energy independence plan. so these ideas aren't new. i think packaging it altogether in something this broad is significant. climate change is an issue you're going to hear a lot more on the 2020 campaign, i think similar to some of the health care arguments she is making. how it translates to a general election as opposed to just her base interest is unclear. >> dana: i am curious, liam, how republicans will continue to try to claim the mantle of fiscal responsibility. no one is talking about any sort of intolerant reform. we know that's what's eating up most of the budget. we know there's ways to do that. the republ

that is a place where the democrats need to come back and win michigan, ohio, pennsylvania. but he's not the only person out there. sherrod brown. senator klobuchar of minnesota. these are all people talking about those voters. even the senate democrat from pennsylvania has spoken publicly about seeking a 2020 bid. biden because of his stature can wait, but he keeps telling people the best person to take on president trump, but he has to prove it. it is going to be a competitive primary. biden, even though he was a vice president for eight years, will not have the same kind of frontrunner status as secretary clinton had in 2016. she was challenged by senator sanders significantly, but she always had so much of a donor class and party leadership with her. biden has a lot of support, but there is not a groundswell, even among the upper echelon of the democratic party to make sure he is the nominee. he may be waiting for that at some level, but in this new dynamic where people with an instagram feed or twitter feed can suddenly have 2 million to 3 million followers you can't sit

across the midwest in states like ohio, pennsylvania, states that were critical to president trump ining to come bang ack and there's a case they're making against the president's industrial jeagenda. >> one of the spokespeople for fox conn talks about the high cost of making tv screens in the u.s. actually, i think we have a full screen of it. here we go. in terms of tv, we have no place in the u.s., he said in an interview, we can't compete. he's basically saying when it comes to manufacturing, higher labor costs are just too much here. news flash, we already knew that. >> positions have not changed since they announced the jobs. wages in the u.s. are going up a little bit but they're not that fast. so this is part of their playbook. big splashy promises about opening factories in u.s. they did it in pennsylvania. they did in brazil. and then they don't follow through. this not a shocker to anyone it is expensive to manufacture stuff in the u.s. like tvs. the idea that anyone bought this from the start, that fox conn was going to bring this back to the midwest, it's a fantasy. >> we

i think the people in the factory towns of ohio or pennsylvania or wisconsin or michigan -- they knowhat happened to them. >> you mentioned automobiles. and we've been talking about tariffs. there's a thing called the "chicken tax," which i know you know what it is. the chicken tax is a tax on light trucks. >> yeah. one of the few really strong sectors in our economy is light trucks, and that's because we have a 25% tariff on that. >> is there a possibility -- >> they're not looking at the chicken tax. >> they're not looking at the chicken tax, but is there a -- >> the chicken tax is sacrosanct, okay? >> but is there a possibility that it could be extended to all automobiles? >> the president has raised, repeatedly, the prospect of imposing some level of tariffs on imported autos if he can't get fairness from our allies. >> yeah. it sounds like you're saying, "yeah, there's a good chance we could impose tariffs on automobiles." >> the president is looking into this. but, again, it's like -- he only takes these actions if our partners are unwilling to stop treating us so poorly. >> do

prenafta, before nafta, before everybody left new england and left all of the different places, ohio, pennsylvania. you still have empty steel factories all over the place and other factories. i can live prenafta very easily. but the only this evening ing i living with it prenafta. >> those are american taxpayer dollars which you consider mexico paying for the wall? >> many, many types over. the usmca will make in the form that we right now are losing approximately -- hard to believe and this doesn't include the drugs pouring in, which is probably a much higher number than anyone would know, in addition to destroying lives and families so horribly, we are losing close to $100 billion a year on trade with mexico for many years. not only that, they have a tax of 17%. we don't have a tax. so they have a value-added tax of 17%. we don't have a tax of 17%. that deal was bad the day it was made. because they charged a tax before the deal was made and we didn't. it was an obsolete deal when it was made like 30 years ago, whatever it was. no, no. all of this stuff is changing now. this is a fair deal. thi

i could live prenafta, before even left ohio, pennsylvania, i mean you still have empty steel factories all over the place and other factories. i can live prenafta very easily. but the only thing i'm not living with is is nafta. that was one of the worst trade deals ever made. those are american taxpayer thats, you consider -- which you consider mexico pay the wall? president trump: many, many times over. the usmca will make in the form that we right now are losing approximately 100, hard to believe, this doesn't include the drugs pouring in which is a much higher number than anybody would know, in addition to deindustrying lives and families so horribly. we are losing close to $100 billion a year. on trade with mexico. for many years. not only that, they have a tax of 17%. we don't have a tax. so they have a val-added tax of 17%. -- a value-added tact of 17%. we don't have that tax. that deal was bad the day it was made. they charged a tax before the deal was made and we didn't. there was an absleet deal when it was made like 30 years ago, whenever it was. no, no. all this stuff is cha

i can live before nafta, before everybody left ohio, pennsylvania, you still have empty steel factories all over the place and other factories. i can live pre-and a half take o nafta very easily. >> but these are american taxpayer dollars which you consider mexico paying for the wall? >> many, many times over. look, the usmca will make in the form that we right now are losing approximately 100 -- hard to believe. and it didn't include the drugs pouring in which is probably a much higher number than anybody would know in addition to destroying lives and families so horribly. we are losing close to $100 billion a year on trade with mexico. for many years. not only that, they have a tax of 17%. we don't have a tax. so they have a value added tax of 17%. we don't have a tax of 17%. that deal was bad the day it was made because they charged a tax before the deal was made and we didn't. it was an obsolete deal when it was made like 30 years ago, whatever it was. no, no. all of this stuff is changing now. this is a fair deal. some a good deal for mexico. frankly, oil companies and other compan

go up to new england, ohio, pennsylvania, you look at those factories that were wiped out.rade deal. and it will take in, and we will, look, billions and billions of dollars a year will be made now as opposed to nafta which was a disaster. you know that, everybody knows that. [inaudible question ]. >> president trump: more impressive are the a little themselves. look at them, these people are incredible. [ applause ] we have, you hear about them, when you meet them it's different. you meet these people. they're a great group of people. they happen to be very good looking, i have to say that. they're good looking people. they're smart, they're tough, they have got the whole package. i want to tell you, they are impressive. and i met a lot of them, i've met -- we just left a big room loaded up with border patrol and i.c.e. and law enforcement. there's something different when i meet them here as opposed to seeing you at the white house or seeing you in an office. they do an incredible job. [inaudible] on the border, have you met with any of them? >> president trump: we have,

before everybody left new england, all the different places, ohio, pennsylvania, you still have empty steel factories all over the place and other factories. i can leave prenafta easily. only thing i am not living with is prenafta. reporter: would you consider essentially mexico paying for the wall? >> well, many, many times over. look, uscmc make -- usmca will make in the form, approximately 100 -- hard to believe, doesn't include the drugs pouring in which is probably much higher number than anybody would ever know and in addition to destroying lives and families so horribly. we're losing crows to $100 billion a year on trade with mexico for many years. not only that, they have a tax of 17 percent. we don't have a tax. so they have a value-added tax of 17%. we don't have a tax of 17%. that deal was bad the day it was made because they charged a tax before the deal was made and we didn't. it was an obsolete deal when it was made like 30 years ago, whatever it was. no, no, all of this stuff is changing now. this is a fair deal. this is a good deal for mexico. frankly, oil companies an

before left new england and left all of the different places, ohio, pennsylvania. you still have empty factories all over the place. i can live prenafta very easily. the only thing i'm not living with is nafta. one of the worst trade deals ever made. >> those are american taxpayer dollars that you consider mexico paying for the wall? >> many, many times over. look, the usmca will make in the form that we right now are losing president -- hard to believe. this doesn't include the drugs pouring in, which is a higher number than anybody would know in addition to destroying lives and families so horribly. we are losing close to $100 billion a year on trade with mexico for many years. not only that, they have a tax of 17%. we don't have a tax. so they have a value-added tax of 17%. we don't have a tax of 17%. that deal was bad the day it was made. because they charged a tax before the deal was made and we didn't. it was an obsolete deal when it was made 30 years ago. all of this is changing now. this is a fair deal. this is a good deal for mexico. frankly, oil companies

postal service i suspending service today in michigan, indiana, illinois, ohio, and pennsylvania. to s if your zip code is affected by the service and the disruption there, you cane view alerts on usps.com. >>> let's turn now to nbc meteorologist bill karins to see when this is going to come to an riend. >> his doesn't even begin to tell the story of this. negative 70 windchill yesterday in eli, minnesota. chicago had its second coldest day ever recorded in their city's history, which goes back to late 1870s. very historic stuff.s todayhe third day of it. yesterday was the peak. today is still bitterly cold. 're going to slowly come out of this. friday and saturday a lot of relvery. windcharnings continue still from the dakotas all the way through the northeast. windchill advis for all the big cities and i-95 as the cold pushed in with those snow squalls yesterday. avght now the coldest windchill temperatures we is still located in areas near fargo and also northern portions of minnesota. green bay at negative 40. chicago, negative 39. you probably won't even notice the differencf

before everybody left new england and left all of the different places, ohio, pennsylvania. i mean, you still have empty steel factories all over the place and other factories. i can live pre nafta very easily. but the only thing i'm not living with is nafta. that was one of the worst trade deals ever made. >> so those are american taxpayer dollars, which you consider essentially mexico paying for the wall. >> well, many, many times over. look, the usmca will make in the form that we right now are losing approximately 100 -- hard to believe. and this doesn't include the drugs pouring in, which is probably a much higher number than anybody would even know, in addition to destroying lives and families so horribly. we are losing close to $100 billion a year. on trade with mexico. for many years. not only that, they have a tax of 17%. we don't have a tax. so they have a value-added tax of 17%. we don't have a tax of 17%. that deal was bad the day it was made. because they charged a tax before the deal was made, and we didn't. it was an obsolete deal when it was made like 30 year

northern indiana, ohio, pennsylvania, new york state. snow take hold. as we go in to tonight, there's this transition from snow to rain, new york city, new jersey, connecticut, long island, northern new england, just to the north of that, i-95, we're looking for the potential of icing, sleet, and rain. farther north, all snow, which is why we have a tight gradient on who's going to see how much snow. if you go to northern new england, we're looking at a foot to two feet. some ski resorts could see three feet. if you go to the south, you see icing. this is across massachusetts and into pennsylvania. we could see a half an inch to perhaps three-quarters of an inch of ice. that could knock out power. and with temperatures, the coldest we've seen so far this season expected on monday, it could be one of those situations where you need to get the heat back on quickly, and this could impact that. >> thank you. >>> now to big developments overnight out of washington. the first involving a rare public statement by defense counsel disputing a "bu

you look at the scars all over our country where even in new england, ohio, pennsylvania, you see whatin north carolina. you have factories that are still out to you from what happened with nafta. the u.s. mca is a great deal. pre-nafta we had huge surpluses with mexico. with nafta we have huge deficits. we lose $100 billion a year on trade with mexico. does that sound good? this has been going on for many years here so i stopped there. [inaudible] -- held hostage. is there anything you would have done differently? >> could have done it differently? no, not really. by having the shutdown we set the table to where we are now. if i didn't do the shutdown people would know. they wouldn't understand the subject. now they understand the subject. they realize what a humanitarian crisis it is. it's called setting the table or setting the stage. we've set the stage for what's going to happen on the 15th of february. i don't think they're going to make a deal. let's do this but were not getting one dime for the wall. that's okay. but if they're not going to give money for the wall it's not goin

many car companies going to michigan, pennsylvania, ohio. and other places.ut they are coming back into the united states, in most cases, they have left. now they are coming back. we are happy about that. i'm going to camp david, we will be discussing many topics. north korea, the china trade deal which is coming along very well, both of those subjects coming along very well. obviously, we will be discussing the wall. which is desperately needed. even if you read some of the papers that do not report accurately, of which there are many, but a couple in particular, they say the search -- the surge to come into our country has never been stronger. and it is very unfair to people that want to come in legally. the surge has never been stronger. we have to build a wall or a barrier. the barrier, or the wall, can be steel instead of concrete if that helps people. it may be better. but i'm willing to do that so are a great steel companies, which are now back in business, they were very -- they were doing very poorly. now they are doing very well. a lot of steelworke

a better job messaging to the working class and talking to voters picked up in places like ohio and pennsylvaniaith his populist pitch. >> do you feel like they have done a good job in the last few years talking to that working class voter? >> no, i don't, it is not the same transcript party of a couple generations ago. i think they are too tight with business and finance. >> i think we could do better at focusing on that. i don't think it is that we have not been for those things, i think we could just do belter bt expressing it. >> i think too often they're just reacting to the president. >> think about how democrats are often drawn into responding to what trump just said. i think one of the things that democratic voters are grappling with is do i want a progressive that will constantly throw red meat at the base or someone with electability that can win in iowa, wisconsin, and more. they said right now that is not really a choice. he thinks you can campaign on progressive policies, excite the base, and make a working class pitch are you can pick up some of trump's voters. that is probably wha

parts of ohio, pennsylvania and vermont got up to 18 inches. >> temperatures across the northeast thissingle digits or below zero. yikes. windchills right here in new york city are just 15 degrees below zero. and listen to this, it's negative 25 in burlington, vermont. we're feeling balmy here. in killington, vermont, with the bitter cold. yes, you need to jump up and down, go ahead. >> reporter: good morning from killington, vermont, where the temperatures are below zero. the windchill factor, well below zero. in fact, we were going to try to go to the peak of the mountain here in killington but the snow caps freeze. we're here at the base of the ski resort. the temperatures up there are actually much colder. all of this may look pleasant, it may look nice, but this storm from california to new england, is dang russierous and deadly. the storm buried parts of the northeast in snow and ice. in upstate new york, the hudson river froze over. people in glen falls, new york, near the vermont boborder, spen the day digging out. plows could barely keep up with whiteout conditions on intersta

the leading edge is going through ohio and pennsylvania. it will be arriving on the i-95 corridor around 5:00 this afternoon. a cloudytart here this morning. an opportunity for a little light rain at b tinning of it, around noontime, may start out as snow north and west of for ut becoming all-snow the d.c. metro area by 4:00. and snow ending by 8:00. mostly looking at that 1 to 3al inch sno range. and the wind machine cranks up for tomorrow. falling to near 10 degrees to do. many spots, a few degrees below zero by thursday morning. there's a chance for an inch or two on friday. >>>109,southbound, no problems right now. looking in virginia. we have the police activity there, only one lane is open. that is the right lane. 66, 95 looks okay. 95outhbound afterquantico, seeing a slowdown. laurel, b.w. parkway, both ways, between 197 and 198, caution there. multiple potholes reported across the area, and various jurisdictions. inner loop and outer loop of the beltway, we don't have issues. everything there is rolling along just fine. >> thank you

cities and buildings all across america paying tribute deck out in blue in ohio, pittsburgh, pennsylvania'sicipal building, maryland governor's mansion among those marking the occasion by celebrating. we salute each and every one of you. most-watched, most trusted and most grateful you spent the evening with us good night from washington. i will be back tomorrow night. '. 12 hours? 20 dogs? where's your belly rubs? after a day of chasing dogs you shouldn't have to chase down payments. (vo) send invoices and accept payments to get paid twice as fast. (danny) it's time to get yours! (vo) quickbooks. backing you. whoooo. did you know the exact same hotel room... ...can have many different prices? that's why tripadvisor searches over 200 booking sites to find the lowest price on the hotel you want. your perfect hotel room for the perfect price! we know that when you're spending time with the grandkids every minute counts. and you don't have time for a cracked windshield. that's why we show you exactly when we'll be there. saving you time, so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite re

or as you say hit the road, ohio, or pennsylvania or wisconsin. there's a sense that would look like another trump rally. it wouldn't carry the meaning and weight of what a state of the union is supposed to do. >> when the republicans go into their caucus, whoever the modern day equivalent of a frank luntz is, don't they have someone to stand up in the front of the room and say guys, ladies and gentlemen, we have to go very carefully here because we're all getting tagged with this? >> what's really interesting is polling so far has shown that the president has been tagged with this first and foremost, then democrats, but most polling actually puts republicans kind of on the side because people associated the shutdown with trump, so they've kind of tried to squeeze by on this, but the truth is republicans are really afraid of the base that is still very loyal to the president. trump is very popular with republicans, and he won this election with a promise of the wall, and so he is doubling down, and it's forcing them to double down. there's a handf

napuse i can live with no too,can live pre-nafta before everyone left new england and went to ohio, pennsylvania. you still have empty steel factories all over the place. i can live pre-nafta very easily, but the only thing i am not living with is nafta. >> so those are american taxpayer dollars which you consider essentially mexico paying for the wall? president trump: well, many, many times over, -- look, the usmca will make in the form of what we are losing, this does not include the drugs pouring in, which is probably a much higher number than anyone would even know, in addition to destroying lives and families so horribly -- we are losing close to $100 billion a year on trade with mexico, for many years. not only that, they have attacks of 17%. ofdon't -- they have a tax 17%. we don't have attacks. ofy have a value added tax 70%. we don't have that. that deal was bad the -- 17%. we don't have that. the deal was that the moment it was made, like 30 years ago, whenever it was. all of this stuff is changing out. this is a fair deal and good for mexico. friendly, oil companies and other compani

what stops the president of the united states from going to michigan or ohio or pennsylvania? get the theme. delivering a speech saying this is the state of the union, delivering a written version as well to the congress and seeking to one up nancy pelosi. you were very careful to read that letter precisely. she didn't disinvite him. i know some have mischaracterized him as having been disinvited and it's brinksmanship and it's gainsman sh ship relevant to the shutdown and he loves being the disruptor in chief and at the white house they're thinking what's our next move? >> she could disinvite him, though, right, if she wanted to. >> it's her house. it's really -- it's really laying down the gauntlet of sorts and reminding him very early in this second half of this first term who is boss at least in the house of representatives. so she was laying down a marker in that regard, but i think it's all about trying to bring pressure to bear on him relative to the government shutdown. i'll tell you one thing i don't think it is. i don't think it's an effort to deny him that moment in

my answer was, they didn't go ohio and pennsylvania and michigan and wisconsin to get feeling on theto talk to the people that were there. the same thing should be happening there. we should be seen reporting from the boarder and on those situations like you talked about, whether it be drug trafficking, human trafficking. those are the reports we shouldn't should be seeing instead of people hiding from afar of what people should think, s after the accident n. >> great analysis q. we come back, our big announcement, that's up next. moving? that's harder now because of psoriatic arthritis. but you're still moved by moments like this. don't let psoriatic arthritis take them away. taltz reduces joint pain and stiffness and helps stop the progression of joint damage. for people with moderate to severe psoriasis, 90% saw significant improvement. taltz even gives you a chance at completely clear skin. don't use if you're allergic to taltz. before starting, you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if

he won ohio, michigan, pennsylvania. that's how he won.ouldn't scoff at that and people try to denigrate and bring down the president. there's a lot of good things that have happened. that's what i try to spend my time on in the policies and one of the big things that this president will do that hopefully nobody haas done is declare victory in war and come home and the establishment is so petrified that we could win a war and the people would be ecstatic. our troops would be ecstatic and the money we would save. we spend $50 billion a year in afghanistan. some of the money could go toward the wall, toward a debt, building bridges and roads in our country. the foreign policy swamp of which i would include romney, they are just petrified that we could end a war. i'm absolutely all in with the president on this. if he can end a war, he will be a hero that all the independents will look at as well as some democrats for finally being a president that ended war. >> neil: let me ask you, you let bygones be bygones and a lot of the personal back a

buildings all across america tonight paying tribute, decked out in blue, including columbus, ohio, pittsburgh, pennsylvanialand governor's mansion, among those marking the occasion by celebrating in blue. we salute each and every one of you. thank you for all you do for our communities. most-watched, most trustful trickle trust and, most grateful you spent the evening with us. good night from washington. i'll be back tomorrow night. i met henry ink the best company's succeed as a team and our shirts from custom ink help bring us together. we order custom ink to welcome new employees, personalize team shirts, and even for company events. the design lab is so easy to use. we just upload out logo and if we have any questions, customer service is there to help. seeing our team together in custom ink gear is an amazing reminder of how far we've come as a business. - [narrator] custom ink has hundreds of products to help you look and feel like a team. upload your logo or start your design today at customink.com upload your logo or start your design today this is a commercial about insurance. but let's be honest.