i'm curious as to why they even staged it in this way because this is -- this is in the rose garden. >> members of the cabinet. >> the idea that this is some celebratory moment for this president in this administration. it certainly isn't the case. this is a shutdown that he caused. this is a shutdown that he called for and here he is now we expect basically saying that this is going to be something that's going to be reversed at least for three weeks and what the way forward is on this wall. it looks like we're setting ourselves up for three weeks down the road for where we are right now which is the president saying that he wants a wall and democrats essentially saying no wall. >> on that point, brooke, three weeks from now, i don't know if the president's going to take questions or not from reporters when he's out there, but it seems one of the immediate questions that the president is going to have to answer is, so what if on february 15th when that money would run out if they have not come to terms on wall money and again democrats are refusing to appropriate any money for a wal

now this. after the july 22nd, 2016 release of stolen dnc e-mails by wiki leekds, a seep, could trump campaign official was directed to contact stone about any additional releases and what other damaging information wikileaks had regarding the clinton campaign. stone thereafter told the trump campaign about potential future releases of damaging material by organization one. david gregory, the words trump campaign and wikileaks all over those two paragraphs right there, the trump campaign robert mueller's team was aware of and directing at a certain level coordination with wikileaks. >> right. and we expect that mueller will establish that these hacks were conducted by the russians. and that wikileaks was passing them off. so they are the link to the trump campaign. if we pull back even farther, we understand something that we've understood for months, which is the trump campaign was open for business for any oppo research, whether it was from the russianors anybody elsrussians else. that's a ke

i believe this house should reject this motion. at this crucial moment in our nation's history, a general election is simply not in the national interest. just decided to put the question of membership -- parliament decided to put the question of membership. 52liament invoked article trigger the process, and now parliament -- 50 two trigger the process, and now parliament must finish the job. i will give way in just a moment. a general election would mean the opposite. far from helping parliament finish the job, and fulfill our promise to the people of the united kingdom, it would be extending article 50 and delaying brexit for who knows how long. >> she's lost a quarter of her cabinet. gone.mbers of her -- are she has experienced the biggest defeat in parliamentary history. what shred of credibility does our government have left? p.m. may: the honorable gentleman might not have noticed that what we are debating today is a vote of no-confidence in the government. he has an opportunity to express his opinion in a vote. >> as somebod

we could do this one. >> this i would equate to the old carrot before the horse. >> this will motivates to keep running. >> yeah. gets more interesting the further you go. you get the rotisserie chicken at the very end. >> fire up the treadmill, open wide. >>> okay. the theory was much better. >> once you have that tension built up in your muscles. you need to cool down, stretch out. >> reach for it. with both hands, reach for the cake. >> he's got a cake stretch. >> he will be limbering up a lot to make sure he can get that cake. >> tell me you wouldn't sign up for this gym. >>> hedgehogs, who knew so many people were obsessed with them. >> they're adorable. >> they are. they also celebrate birthdays and get birthday cake. >> gosh. >> kevin the hedgehog here. >> the little hat stuck on that i enjoy. >> after all that eating. late rub-down. this is not kevin, this is a different hedgehog. but it's having a great day. >> yeah. this is the life, right? >> the mini glass of wine is the only thing missing from this moment. >> belly rub there. yeah. >>> in this one, a little stretch. >> no!

i see this as a canary trap this. were red flags if you paid attention. >> tucker: one of the reasons this countryo is so volatile is people don't trust others in authority. they're discredited and nobody is held accountability for misdeeds and screwing up intentionally or not. here you have a publication to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars for business. buzzfeed hasar a huge market ca. they printed the dossier without verifying any of o it. it was false, a political document. then they run this story. at a certain point buzzfeed has only been around two years, they have runr two of the biggest hoaxes of this moment is. there any accountability, at all? i>> i don't think . so the only accountability the public -- journalists have one job. one, to get the facts right when you don't get the facts right and the public upwards 80% to 90%w, of conservatives don't trt youu that says, you suck. pardon my language. >> if your job is to sell a car and you don't sell a car you're fired. when 90% of a political party

so on this one, where are we? you said that mueller is going to inherit this, and he inherits this. what is the status of this investigation now, adam? >> you know, don, if i knew that, ie'd be on tv hosting my own show. i'm kidding. i don't know what the status is, you know, but my assumption is that, you know, mueller will have -- since he did inherit this investigation, if he does write a report, he's going to have to -- it would seem likely he's going to have to answer that question. but more importantly, don, i think the american public wants an answer to that question. doesn't the american public want to know if the president was, in fact, colluding or conspiring with the russians? isn't this what the mueller investigation's about? isn't that the expectation? >> yeah. adam, will you stand by for me, please, because i'm going to need your help as we go through this. i would appreciate it, sir. >> sure. >> let's bring in now john dean and juliette kayyem. good evening to both of you. i got to ask you, john, reading this report and hearing what ad adam said, just give me your ini

this is a sham. i would ask respectfully to defeat this bill, which is a charade, a sham, will not open the federal government. everybody knows that. everybody knows that it will not reopen the federal government, and it doesn't have any input from the house and falls short for florida farmers and other farmers around the country. thank you, mr. speaker, i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from alabama has seven minutes. the gentleman from georgia has a minute and a quarter. the gentleman from georgia is recognized. mr. bishop: i reserve at this time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. the gentleman from alabama is recognized. mr. aderholt: i reserve. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from alabama is recognized -- reserves. the gentleman from georgia is recognized. mr. bishop: i am prepared to close. i have one speaker. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from alabama is recognized to close. mr. aderholt: we have no more speakers. we are prepared to close. the s

this is not a fight i wanted. i didn't want this fight. we have to think about the people of our country. i am proud to shut down the government for border security. >> as the president tries to cut a new funding deal with democrats, he is facing this new bombshell from his campaign that puts his familiar twitter mantra, no russian collusion, to the test. new court documents filed by paul manafort's legal team accidentally revealed that he allegedly gave sensitive information to a russian operative with ties to the kremlin while he was trump's campaign chairman. the most significant sign yet of possible coordination, aka collusion between the trump campaign and russia. we'll dive on in to that in just a hot minute. to the exit plan of the trump official who oversees the russian investigation, we're talking about deputy attorney general rod rosenstein, a source says rosenstein plans to leave the justice department shortly after trump's new attorney general pick is confirmed, william barr, seen here today will begin his confirmation hearings

♪ >> sean: this is a fox news alert on this friday night big bombshell news.he buzzfeed so-called bombshell you have been hearing about all day it is a dud. it is a fraud. it is a lie it is all fake news. so the professional trump haters and the fake news media they have yet done it again. and earlier today buzzfeed news reported a salacious story about michael cohen and president trump alleging that cohen briefed trump about a building project in moscow numerous times and that the president directed michael cohen to lie about the existence of that project when it already had been well-known. the story allegedly sourced two anonymous federal law enforcement officials. as it turns out this report was total fake news. everyone at buzzfeed should be ashamed of themselves. special counsel's office issued a statement they wrote buzzfeed's description of specific statements to the special counsel's office and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding michael cohen's congressional testimony are not accurate. not accurate. but are

>> so what's hard to know at this exact moment and anne sort of hinted at this, is whether this is allr has on roger stone or is this the beginning? because it is notably an indictment that's focused only on really those false statements and that obstruction and it doesn't get into some of those charges that we would expect to see like conspiracy against the united states or campaign finance violations that could point to sort of those larger questions of collusion. so the question is, is that still to come? >> all right, guys, dig in, get a copy of this indictment we're looking at, dig in. we're going to have much more on this. stick around. breaking news, roger stone taken into custody by the fbi. what does this mean for the mueller investigation? more coming up. man 1: this is my body of proof. woman 1: proof of less joint pain... woman 2: ...and clearer skin. woman 3: this is my body of proof. man 2: proof that i can fight psoriatic arthritis... woman 4: ...with humira. woman 5: humira targets and blocks a specific source of inflammation that contributes to both joint and skin symp

this is a view showing a cut. this is the stiffener that's present at this location. this is the flange plates here, and this is the weld that joins them. the survey showed the plate and the welds to be suspected, so there was nothing deficient in the welding itself and nothing deficient in the steel plates that were used for this -- for the buildup of these plate girders. we also performed an extensive amount of mechanical testing. the two primary were sharpie toughness impact tests and that's a test that resists the strength of the steel plates. and this diagram shows where the toughness specimens were removed from as well as the tensile specimens were removed from. we performed the same kind of tests on the first street girders, and this is just a layout of what those looks like. this looks like complicated data, but basically what it shows -- this is the temperature along the x axis, and this is the toughness level along the vertical axis, and what we found and what we typically find for these levels at the toughness surfaces of the plate are very good, and as you

barbara, is this then telling us this is bigger than what we thought it was before or is this exactly, for the most part, what we thought the mueller investigation scope might be? >> well, i think it confirms that there is more to this case than it publicly disclosed. in sp ways, this news is really shocking, that the president of the united states is the target of a counterintelligence investigation. but i guess in other ways, in light of all of the things that we know and fact the special counsel was apointed and conducting this investigation, i guess it should not be surprising that if the fbi found information that gave them pause and gave them concern to believe that there was in connection between president trump and russia and they had a responsibility to open a case like this. i suppose it just helps confirm what perhaps we've all suspected all along, this is not just about seeing president trump as the victim of russian intelligence dangles, but that he was also a player in all of this. that could be what this is saying. >> malcolm, these could go on for years, right? and so

the public deserves this. federal workers deserve this. contractors deserve this. the parks, our museums should be open for visitors to visit. we need to get this government working again. thank you again, chairwoman betty mccollum. i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the chairwoman reserves the gentleman is recognized. mr. calvert: i thank the gentlelady. i yield two minutes to the gentleman from alabama, mr. aderholt. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from alabama is recognized. mr. aderholt: thank you, madam speaker. thank you, ranking member calvert, and thank you, ranking member calvert for your leadership on this bill that we passed back in december. but unfortunately as you know i'm rising, madam speaker, in opposition of h.r. 266. what we have before us today, however, is yet another democratic appropriation bill that fails to reflect the house priorities. this time it ignores 93% of all the house member requests included in the house bill and in the report. i'd like to point out just a a few of the many house member prioritie

those critical of it will say this is more -- this is the witch hunt again, this is they're going after. it seems to appear this special counsel has been consistent with him, oh well, this is what we need to do. >> two points here, richard. one is that even though the grand jury has a six-month extension does not mean this investigation, this probe, will necessarily last six months. that is the outer limit, unless the grand jury is renewed once again, but it certainly could wrap up well before then. but number two, we know this is not a witch hunt because witch hunts tend not to catch witches. this investigation has resulted in charges, indictments, in sentences, even in prison terms and at least one of those targets having already completed his prison term, too, i think actually in this investigation. that suggests there is actual criminal activity here and not just a phantom witch hunt that the president and his supporters like to point to. >> ned price, joyce vance, thank you. >> thank you. >> it's a new day on capitol hill and there's a new congress in charge on this saturday. we're

watch this. >> the special counsel issued this very big statement.e are here know what you are talking about. >> do you stand by the reporting that you guyss published which is, you know, a scoop thatat no one else has or has not a confirmed? >> yes. as we wrote, we have two federal law enforcement officials, no gameme playing with those titles who have told that's president trump directed michael cohen to lie to congressre about negotiations to build the trump tower in moscow. >> sean: a bold stance from one of the leaders in fake news and it gets even worse. remember, this is the same buzzfeed news, supposedly, that published the phony hillary clinton bought and paid for steele russian dossier and they never ever tried to robert any of the details. and guess what? the latest devastating report contained no direct corroboration. i have been watching this all day.o and one of the buzzfeed reporters that broke the story even admitted he never actually saw the evidence that were referenced by his s anonymous sources. watch this.er >> you have two law e

how does this relate to this?t, but, my point is that he's finally confronting the fact that we have a border problem and he's holding the feet to the fire. congress has done nothing all of these decades, not years, decades. it's not the democrats, it's the republicans. >> how you do it matters. he's holding on to this farce of a wall that was a campaign gimmick. >> look, we have a president that actually fulfills campaign promises. i mean i know that's pretty shocking to people at cnn. but i think it's admirable. i think he's a guy that likes to get results. there's a harris poll out today that says 70% of americans would like to see the president and the congress compromise on this issue. and i can tell you, i believe donald trump is a guy that likes compromise. he will do -- it's nancy pelosi and the democrats that won't budge one inch. >> he shut down the government. he didn't have to do it this way. >> i think he's making a statement because it's the only power he has is to say, hey, if you don't want to do a

i'm authorized to speak on behalf of the latino historical society this morning -- sorry, this afternoon -- as well to express our strong support for designating the interior of the church. i had the opportunity to tour the building a few weeks ago with the current owners and stewards of the building, and it's been the first time since i've been inside in about six or seven years, and i was immediately impressed by steps already taken to restore integrity of the interior. the last time i toured the building, it was filled, the sanctuary was filled with temporary classrooms. that's all been removed and much work done already to restore the interior integrity. it's important to note and give credit to some of the other steps that are already underway by the current owners including resurrecting the annual procession of former congress cs which happened last week, and this is important for the congregation and important gesture of good faith. you all, of course, realize that this would make the church one of only a handful of interiors designated as city landmarks in san fransisco, and it i

this is breaking as we speak. i want to repeat this statement.e are talking about. peter carr, he is a spokesperson for bob mueller is saying, buzz feed's description of specific statements to the special counsel's office and the characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding michael cohen's congressional testimony, are not accurate. the reason i'm reading that slowly and going over it again, corey, is i'm looking for daylight. are they picking and choosing? are they saying maybe one line in the story is not true but other parts are, in fact true. i am reading it closely. it seems to me that second phrase there about the characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office not being true is important. the whole story hung on the idea that this was not the testimony of a liar in michael cohen against the president, man versus man. it was documents proving the president wrong. now, the special counsel is saying, we don't have those documents. >> ed, it was supposed to be text messages and e-mails and o

this bill offers us a bipartisan way out of this crisis. it is the compromise that the house and senate negotiators worked out last fall. i think that merits repeating. this bill is the bipartisan compromise that house and senate negotiators worked out last fall. while the c.j.s. section does not contain everything our side might want, it does contain important investments in science, innovation, justice, and economic development. and in fact, very few changes, this portion of h.r. 648 very closely mirrors what the senate introduced just a few days ago. the c.j.s. section includes increases for the census bureau, nasa, the national science foundation, and the f.b.i. it rejects the administration's proposed cuts to the economic development administration, the minority development business agency, and the manufacturing expansion partnership program, and more. it is a commonsense solution to the shutdown and lets our federal employees get back to the business of helping our nation. i urge members on both sides to vote for this bill, and i just

this c.r. would pay employees, it would reopen government through february 28, providing time for congress to come to full year agreement without further jeopardizing vital services or the pay of federal employees. the order of business would be simple, my friends. reopen the government. pay federal employees. and then let's have a serious negotiation on border security and immigration policy. maybe i'll repeat that again. because the order of business is very simple. reopen the government, pay federal employees. and then negotiate on border security and immigration policy. it is long past time for my colleagues across the aisle and across the capitol to come to their senses and end this shutdown. mr. speaker, i urge my colleagues to vote against this motion to recommit, open the government today. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: debate on the previous question has concluded. without objection, the previous question is ordered on the motion to recommit. the question is on the motion. thos

this is a good product. did somebody bring you this design? -noemi: no, this is me.lemonis: well, i'm noticing that noemi has a keen sense of fashion. but while noemi's talent tells me this company has a real shot at success, these financials are telling me a very different story. the loss on this statement shows $500,000, which is what you told me. -stephanie: exactly. -lemonis: okay. professional fees of $250,000. stephanie: we went through a tough lawsuit last year. lemonis: was it the divorce? stephanie: yes. lemonis: ah. so, this is not a recurring... stephanie: no. no. this does not happen normally. lemonis: so, if i look at the financials for last year, i take out the lawsuit, which means i still lost $250,000 for the year. we have about $900,000 of inventory. how much of that would you say is wrong? stephanie: right now we're stuck with about $400,000. lemonis: you have cash tied up in inventory that isn't right for your business. i understand that they lost $500,000 last year -- $250,000 from a lawsuit and $250,000 of bad inventory. but that's not the real p

this is a moral crisis at this point.ou cannot allow politics to trump compassion for people, and the president has allowed that. >> we'll leave it there for you. i want to talk about another headline inside the house of representativities. that a head live that stretches from washington d.c. to iowa. the call is raising for steve king to resign. the des moines register says he should step down. king was quoted defending white supremacy and is being kicked off his committees as a result. then there was the house vote that condemned white nationalism. in a new interview now king is defiant. he says he's not going anywhere. >> from this day forward now the heat dials down because they got the resolution done. it's behind us. and what are they going to do next? after they get done asking me to resign and figuring out that's not going to happen, and it's not going to happen. >> does he survive it? >> no. i don't think so. this isn't anything new. i think we should have gotten rid of him a long time ago. i'm glad we're finally

show me best of prime video into this... you'll see awesome stuff like this. discover prime originals like the emmy-winning the marvelous mrs. maisel... tom clancy's jack ryan... and the man in the high castle. all in the same place as your live tv. its all included with your amazon prime membership. that's how xfinity makes tv... simple. easy. awesome. >>> in his first ever live address from the oval office during his presidency, tonight president trump repeatedly claimed the united states is facing a crisis on our southern border during his pitch for a border wall. now, it's the same thing we heard, the same word we heard from his vice president, mike pence, this morning, hours before the president's remarks tonight. >> there is a growing humanitarian and security crisis at our southern border. this is a humanitarian crisis, a crisis of the heart and a crisis of the soul. democrats in congress have refused to acknowledge the crisis. to every member of congress, pass a bill that ends this crisis. >> the president will speak about this crisis on our southern b

speaker, i ask this of the house. vote against this deal. vote against this deal because we've had a very long and very detailed debate in this house. more members have spoken in this debate than almost any other debate i can remember. they have given a heartfelt analysis of this deal and a very large number have said why they will vote against this deal. quite simply, mr. speaker, this deal is bad for our economy, a bad deal for our democracy, and a bad deal for this country. i ask the house tonight to do the right thing, reject this deal, reject this deal because of the harm it would do, and show that we as mps are speaking up for the people that we represent who recognize this deal is dangerous for this country and bad for them, their living standards and for our collective future. >> mr. speaker, mr. speaker, this is 54 hours of speeches with powerful sincerity from over 200 honorable and right honorable members. it has been historic for our parliament and for our country. we have heard contributions from every perspective, looking at al

is actually this this is not a strategic decision this is more tactical i don't think based on previous experiences in the region where the u.s. has made interventions regardless of some of the differences in the details that the u.s. is not really going to pull out completely they have committed this is an investment for them so i don't see it as happening the way that everybody thought it was going to happen based on things i heard you know i have to still talking politics and strategies or lack of strategies and a tweet going out and then affecting foreign policy but what difference does this make to syrians who are still living in syria well i was going to talk about that actually and i think this is a problem if if the u.s. pulls out without court meeting with with some of the actors this will create the vacuum that you know talked about and there are so many groups that could fill that regardless of who you consider terrorists but i think some of the more dangerous ones would be the regime taking back this area and it considers a lot of the residents in this area the civilians its

this was supposed to be the public fight that was going to at least get them through this week and this undermines that. >> look, of course, he had been told again and again in this fight over the border wall and the government shutdown that he needs to get out there, make his case more and there's no bigger platform for a president, practically, than the oval office address. this is the first time he's used that particular venue to make an address in the primetime to the nation. but clearly, as you just read, he's not bought into this strategy. he doesn't think it's going it be useful. he didn't want to give the speech. he was talked into it. and he's, you know, and he even said that to these television anchors. now, the television anchors were off the record. they haven't reported this, but, you know, you say that to a large group of people, particularly people, you know, who are visiting you from the media, you have to expect that that tone, anyway, is going to shape their understanding even if it doesn't get out the way it did tonight to my colleagues who helped report that. so, you

because if that was done, a lot of this would have came out. this is just me. one commissioner speaking. i'm not speaking on behalf of all the other commissioners, but the public deserves to be heard and have their concerns taken, you know, strongly. thank you. >> thank you. phil, eddie, everardo, thank you so much for the presentation. i do want to say that when we started this project in -- when we started the planning for pier 70 in 2007, it has been a very long process, and i think we have come a long way because at that point, we didn't know if we would find anybody to restore these buildings, and we thought we would have to pay them, and so this -- this project has been extremely successful, and you have done a work of art out there at pier 70, and so we really appreciate that. i think that we really do need to stay on top of the public access benefit of this project and make sure that that is happening because the public has been behind this project since day one, and they've spent a lot of time monitoring and looking at every detail, so i hope that we c

talking about this investigation and this president. it's the fact that we're only seeing the part that we can see right now. the potential impact of mueller's findings are what he has in total. and think what phil refers to, you know, don't forget that his long time cfo i believe of the company has been cooperating with mueller. so, you know, michael cohen is just one piece. and mueller's been doing this a while. he's not going to just come in with a witness who's going to have his head taken off for credibility without having a lot of backup. >> yeah. i mean, cnn has not confirmed this, this is just the buzz feed reporting that we're attributing. so much still has to be confirmed, nia. but, if and when it is confirmed, this puts all sorts of lawmakers, particularly some of the president's supporters and republicans in a real bind because this came up during the bill barr confirmation hearing this week and lindsey graham, i think we have that sound, asked him specifically about suborning perjury. >> so if there was some reason to belie

outside, and on this -- at this beautiful building outside. welcome everyone to the grand reopening of the center. [applause] this project has taken the better part of ten years to complete. from early conversations about where we would expand, to creating our own unique funding source, to pay for the project, to the years of hard work and incredible engineering to where we are sitting today. today to really reopen this building that has been such an important part of the pulse and heart beat of the city for so many years. our goal was to keep this venue competitive, and ensure that the meeting space would lead its way into the future. the center now features 504,000 square feet of continuous meeting space, almost doubling its former dimensions. it includes a new column free 50,000 square-foot ballroom, perfect for major keynotes and receptions. the facility will be platinum certified, making it the only convention centre in the nation to have achieved such levels of environmental sustainability. twenty% of its power, yes, that deserves a roun

this is baking the cake. i don't think anybody wins this. i don't think minds are going to be changed by the way it is resolved. i don't think that is a threat to anyone. we just need to move on. what we can't do is put ourselves in a position where the president gets to use this tactic now and then be confirmed as a president who can shut the government down to get something that he wants. >> thanks very much, as always. >> thank you. >>> top of the hour, 10:00 a.m. eastern, 7:00 a.m. out west. if you are just waking up, buckle up. i'm poppy harlow. >> it is a busy news friday morning. i'm jim sciutto in washington. in just about an hour the former trump campaign adviser who opened his door to gun wielding fbi agents will be due in court. roger stone found out he has been named in a seven count indictment. agents who are not getting paid because the federal government shutdown executed an arrest. cnn was there. listen to this exclusive video. >> fbi, open the door. >> so roger stone has been charged with seven counts including obstruction,

we know this element and this group of folks. they have gone through background checks and they are currently involved in our system right now. they are in our schools and in our workplaces. this is a group of students and young adults that we all know as a nation that lived down the street from us, go to church with us. so for this group of individuals, i just don't see an issue with that, and i don't see that being amnesty. this has been a long-term issue for us as a nation that they can be resolved. >> and senator, i want to end here by showing you a video that's gone viral this weekend. teenage trump supporters taunting a native american veteran at the end of the indigenous people's march here. ure state has one of the highest native american populations. what's your message to those teenagers and has the president created this environment doing things like calling elizabeth warren pocahontas? >> well, i would say a couple of things about the video. one is obviously that young man is standing awkwardly close to someone. that

how real is this idea he could get it done in this way?> this is something that the president has raised a number of times privately. and we know this is a president who likes to test the limits of his power. he has asked the white house counsel's office about this, and previously, he's been told by his lawyers, you can't do this. the president's response to that is often, let them sue me. that's what he did in business and what he's wanted to do in the white house and what his aides have tried to prevent him from doing. whether they'll be able to prevent this moving forward is an open question. to laugh at the president's statement would be a mistake. we don't know what he's going to do. we've seen him tip-toe toward ways of getting out of this by funding this wall from getting money from other cabinet agencies or calling a national emergency. that's a way for him to get out of this situation. i think he's looking at that though we haven't seen him back down yet. i think he's looking at ways to get out of this such as that moving forward.

in this city. indeed what we all celebrate doing from long one language to another from one dream to another knowing all of our differences. we knew and constantly still know how much we'll do two different. differences and by listening to you dear chancellor mr president i had in mind what this sometimes said. when my home is looking forward in front trench and cannot find it i sometimes find it in the germany. this brings a lot of emotions. the words that we do not understand the words that we cannot translate. but each and every. closer. and their words for which we need the language because what is it what i cannot understand in german. brings some things for men to and charming which sometimes i no longer find in the french language. it is something we shall carry. it will never be in any of all. but this is the monte called before i bring hold of what we share today so yes we love all countries. we love. only friendship and what unites is and we love you. we shall continue to build your. ten

so i want to push this whole party and i want to inform this debate in this country about the fact thatcould go a lot farther. we could be a lot bolder. >> so you're ruling it out? >> i never rule things out because you never know what life brings but i'm focused on the work i do now and getting out this message. >> kirsten gillibrand looks like she'll probably throw her hat in the ring. she's progressive. could you back her? >> i don't talk about hypothetical situations. there's a lot of good candidates. my point is the message and the idea that we should be talking about. there's not a consensus yet in our party. there is still, i think, a lack of recognition that if you have tens of millions of people hurt, we're not speaking to them. donald trump spoke to them. i've got to be blunt about this. donald trump, i remember those two-minute ads at the very last day of the campaign in 2016. trump's ad seemed like a populist message in a good sense of the word populist, that it was speaking to people's pain and challenges. unfortunately we could hear a lot of the negativity we later saw in

this period of time. the depute aturny general offering to wear a wire and record his conversations with the president. talking to other justice department officials at the time about invoking the 25th amendment and the prospect oz of doing that. now we know they open the counterintelligence investigation. this tells us what was going on inside it the justice department after the firing. what -- how scared they were. what really unnvred them and what they were willing to do to get to the bottom of it. >> you mentioned the rosenstein piece and that's what i flashed back to. do you know the connection between the two? when we first heard about it, it seemed almost outlandish or surprising that rod rosenstein would say do you want me to wear a wire when i talk to the president? and your sources say no he's not joking. is it in this context this was uttered? >> the discussions going on at the fbi. the fbi at the time was in a very unusual position because they were skeptical of rosen tine in all of this. beca

this is the w. news live from france and germany renew their vows the two countries sign a new friendship aimed at reenergizing the european union as a time of crisis but is there any substance amidst the symbolism also on the program the taliban launches one of its deadly attacks in months that's making the car bomb of a military base in central afghanistan and killing dozens from the country's intelligence agency.

that's not what this is about. this is about a political stunt. this is literally a political messaging point meant to hopefully garner the support for some member of congress that has a swing district so that they can send a message and take it. his, mr. speaker, mr. speaker, i am here today to let you know that we don't need words, we need compromise. and i take the gentleman from missouri's word. if we're willing to work together and find a compromise, i think we all would prefer that there's never another shutdown. in fact, i think we ought to propose legislation that would suspend congressional pay for every member of congress if there's ever another shutdown. and so hopefully my members opposite would join me in that. where we can put some kind of pain to make sure that we're there. with that, i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from north carolina reserves. the gentleman from missouri is recognized. mr. clay: thank you, mr. speaker. i'm sure my friends on the other side will agree, it does no one, it doe

this office has a bipartisan way out of this crisis. it's a compromise that house and senate negotiators worked outlast fall . while the cjs sections say everything the outside might have wanted, it does contain important investments in science, innovation, justice and economic development. and in fact with a very few changes, very closely mirrors what thesenate introduced just last night . ets had investments in the census bureau, nassau, the national science foundation and fbi. we reject the administration's proposed cuts and economic development and administration, minority development, manufacturing extension partnership and a few more. urge members on both sides to move this through quickly and support it on the floor. we need to end shutdown and reassert our authority as a coequal branch of government. our constituents deserve no less. >> thank you very much mister solano, mister pritchett. >> thank you. thank you mister vice chairman and ranking member. i appreciate the opportunity and i feel like i've been here before. >> is you

tell me what this means to you. how do you interpret this? >> well at first blush i think people have the sense that's crazy, he can't do something like that. in fact, legal experts who looked closely at statutes congress has passed over the years granting the president the ability to redirect military funds in any presidentially declared emergency say there are serious arguments that the justice department could offer in defense of trump if he tries to do something like this. doesn't mean he wins. one way of thinking about this is that it is a way out of this impasse that's threatening to become the longest government shutdown in history with no end in sight because it's a way for trump to sign appropriations bill re-opening the government that does not contain wall fungd, meaning the democrats haven't surrendered without him saying i surrender on my wall. so it's a solution to a short term problem created by this impasse that he's created. then channel this sort of chaos into a court case that could pretty well consume the rest of his presi

but congress should do this. this is too simple. it's too basic. and congress should do this. if they can't do it, if at some point they just can't do it, this is a 15-minute meeting. if they can't do it, i will declare a national emergency. >> so he's certainly not closing the door on it, but this is a bit of change. when we left it last night the white house was said to be laying the ground work, the legal ground work for an emergency declaration, including by using the word crisis over and over again at every public opportunity. as for the president he seemed ready to pull the trigger if not immediately, then certainly soon. >> i have the absolute right to declare a national emergency. i haven't done it yet. i may do it. if this doesn't work out, probably i will do it. i would almost say definitely. >> that almost definitely emergency seemed to morph into a maybe, possibly one at some future point in time which is a bit different in tone at least than how he was painting the border situation just this morning on twitter. he wrote, i just got back and it is a far worse situa

this one.his is on a south african nature reserve. here comes the giraffe. we've seen that before. but not with a lion riding its back. >> what? >> oh, my gosh. >> eyes bigger than your stomach. >> is that what's going on? the lion was going in for a kill? >> yes. the lion was. light onwasn't the lion wasn't alone. the giraffe was injured. for lion in a pride saw it and pounced. two on its legs, this one road on its back for two minutes. >> that was some pounce. >> you think he jumped on one of the other lions backs? >> a tramp line mayboline maybe. >> that ordeal is not over. the lions are still waiting for the kill. >> look how big that giraffe is. all it has do do is kicto do isd >> that's whatt sitting there. when they got close, they kicked. they said this giraffe is not going easily. let's go. >> that's something to see. the lion riding the giraffe. >> never seen that before. >> no. i didn't think they would attempt such a thing. >>> so much went wrong on this highway in china. there's on

what was this for? >> exactly that, to determine if there were intelligence activities that a foreign power was conducting, in this case russia, against the united states, and that perhaps americans of some sort witting or unwitting were enabling or helping or facilitating that interference or that intelligence collection. >> glenn, that's a high bar and a big decision for the fbi to make, to go after or to look in to a president of the united states. in fact, according to the article, i want to read a little more from the article. there was a debate within the fbi. it says "a vigorous debate has taken shape amongst some former law enforcement officials outside the case over whether fbi investigators overreacted in opening the counterintelligence inquiry during a tumultuous period at the justice department. other former officials noted that those critics were not privy to the evidence and noted that sitting on it would have been an abdication of duty." that this sort of investigation was necessary must

we are going to regulate this, pass this law, criminalize this, do this and that. this gentleman says it is complaint driven. that is nice. complaint driven. anybody go to the vehicle dwellers and say the neighbors have a concern about this behavior. if you don't correct it, we are going to have to regulate the street. scent that reasonable and -- isn't that reasonable? isn't that humanitarian? no, not this city. this city has a mayor that says we are going to throw you in jail, run you off, throw your things in the trash. you act like people have an option. this commission member i asked why is this taking so long? let's go back to the super bowl 15 days. pier 80 was open. within four days they had justin her man swept, the embarcadero swept the mission swept. they put them in pier 80. it is political will: i will leave you with this thought. there is say federal ruling out of idaho. you cannot evict homeless people unless you can provide a shelter space. they were talking about homeless encampments specifically. if you pursue this policy we are researching right

this is in the this turtle's caught up in debris.arine debris is the main threat to turtles in the muhammad almma that's a cement bag that got in the water and now it's a threat to this turtle. >> you guys ever been to a drive-through casino? >> no. >> that's because they don't exist. this car has rammed through the front. they're making their way out. no they're just revving up for some more. >> oh. >> if you're wondering who exactly the perpetrators are, father and son apparently the story goes they got into an argument with the security guard and the cashier of this particular casino. the words escalate to the point of we're going to kill you and it seems like they really tried to. you see these people have those stands sometimes that they use to separate people in crowds and they are wailing on this car. you hear things smashing. >> this is escalating. >> they try to get them out of the car. doesn't work. smashes through this other piece of glass. it looks like some people, maybe security, maybe even some police have turned up. t

this is just some language coming from an e-mail explaining what this app was all about you can seeit actually only mentions the word facebook once the rest of it really looks like something more of a scientific study so that was not clear is the thirteen year old supposed to read that and how are they going to read that right i mean and look at the language as included this is in the fine print it's very very it doesn't say what kind of data is being collected on say the extensive it the fact that this is even getting access to the very basic program on your phone it's really taking a lot of information there the app also violated the terms of. apple app store and in terms of the way that it was distributed one tech reporter called this the most defiance behavior he's ever seen from an app store developers so what is the potential fallout going to be then for facebook it's more about publicity of course for facebook this raises more privacy questions as a facebook needed more of those i think more importantly this could give some u.s. politicians a little bit more ammunition to per

me about where this is going. where is this ultimately going?ing economic difficulties on both sides, and i am wondering if this will start having a meaningful impact at some point? >> absolutely. you really nailed a key point. there is pressure on both sides, from financial markets and the broader economy for a deal. full donald trump and xi jinping -- both donald trump and xi jinping have reason to solve this trade war. we have seen the financial markets calm down a little in january. but it was incredibly tough before that over the u.s.-china trade dispute. and we have a long way to go. the deadline they are working toward is march 1, and there is a possibility that you will get some kind of mini package. the trade wars are not going away this week or next, or this month, or by march 1, i would argue. vonnie: according to people familiar with the matter, it is stanceessively tactical for huawei. how much does this matter in the trade talks? >> the chinese have long been sensitive about huawei. they had been working to get allies on board in e

>> come this way. >> come this way. >> this is a joy. it is a joy for me. this is my sister, leslie. >> hi, leslie. mike pence. congratulations to you. nice to meet you. >> and my grandmother norma. >> so nice to meet you. >> we met once before. >> we did, that's right. >> thank you. >> nice to see you again. >> good to see you, too. congratulations. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> amazing. >> over here. >> i will go over here. >> there we go. >> i need to be behind there. >> can you step over here? >> can you hold this bible? >> yes. >> thank you. >> okay. raise your right hand. and face straightforward. >> okay. >> put the spouse in the middle. the senator on the side. >> oh, you want me over here. >> over here. >> and you can hold the bible. >> you can hold the bible. >> oh, now we got it going. >> can you hold it straight and flat and high so daddy can -- just don't put it in your mouth. just like that. i'm going to put my hand on it. there you go. >> are you ready? >> face a little more forward. >> oh, this way. >> okay. >> is you bet. >> i'm the photog