mr. ginsberg, do you want to say something more? >> just a couple of comments and observations. thanks to our partnership with the controller's office and my team for all their work on this. we take this extremely seriously. it is very rigourous, and the big picture stats that we are most pleased about involves the disparities between higher scoring parks and lower scoring parks narrowing, and overall scores between parks and equity zones, versus nonequity zones and narrowing. that is a deliberate reflection of policy and values and investment. it is working, so i'm very proud of that. i would also note, however that this tool, while it is a terrific tool for us, does have some limitations, alice talked about court renovations and we measure these parks a few different times of year, but we don't renovate parks annually, so this is a mix of a cleanliness standard, and a deferred maintenance standard, and at times, in my view, it is an awkward match, so deferred maintenance, you know, we obviously tackle, and we know through this tool, and through our other tools that we track fo