any other comments? any comments from the public? seeing none. all in favor. any opposed? motion carries. item c. requesting authorization to enter a new grant agreement with kimochi for the provision of intergenerational programs for older adults and or adults with disabilities during the period of january 1, 2019 through june 30, 2021 in the amount of $267,110 plus 10% contingency for total amount $293,821. welcome back tiffany. >> thank you. kimochi is a new intergenerational program called care. kimochi located in district 5. they offer services for older adults and adults with disability and their families. the services they provide are ethnically and culturally relevant. they are known for their expertise providing services to the japanese community. kimochi has broaden its expertise in serving the korean community. kimochi has an agreement in place with the japanese community youth council to attempt and coordinate care. the care program has four components where the first component involves the youth council's preschool program whereby older adults and adults with

if you have have any questions, let me know. >> any questions for miss culsa? >> are there any municipal utilities or districts that took a significant part of the grid or other aspects that allowed them to form through eminent domain? is that something that has happened before? do we have examples to look to toward that? >> the municipal districts have the power of eminent domain. i don't know of any specific instances and, perhaps, barbara has antidotes but i know that power has been used in california to acquire infrastructure, as these new utilities were just being formed. >> anything of the scale we would be talking about, maybe? >> so this has happened over time in california. more recent times city of moreno valley municipalized and the irrigation district is about the middle of a process now, ongoing for a number of years. i would have to look at history to see if there's any in the more distant past that are of the size comparable to what we're talking about. i'd be happy to, through your executive officer, you know, do that research and provide that i

happy to answer any questions. >> chair ronen: all right. so any questions? no? no questions. this makes total sense, and i really appreciate you bringing this forward, and i would be happy to cosponsor this legislation. i think it's really important, and i appreciate you filling this -- this small but very important gap. >> oh, thank you. happy that you would be a cosponsor. >> chair ronen: thank you. is there any member of the public who would like to comment on this item? if so, will ache have two minutes. seeing none, public comment is closed. -- if so, you'll have two minutes. seeing none, public comment is closed. [gavel]. >> chair ronen: on this item? without objection, this item moves forward with a positive recommendation. [gavel]. >> chair ronen: thank you, miss smith. mr. clerk, can you please read item number three. >> clerk: would you like me to read all the a-b items or just all at one time because we have some applicants that are applying for all three. >> chair ronen: i have a question for the city attorney. is it possible for an applicant to serve on more than

any discussion? all in favor? any opposed? motion carries. may i have a motion to approve the januafebruary 19, 2019 min? thank you. any discussion? all in favor? any opposed? motion carries. next item, reports. >> i just have a few updates since last commission meeting. as many of you know, commissioner mcspadden is in washington d.c. for a briefing with the n4a. this is for legislator to hear and provide feedback on areas of policy focus as well as provides members with thoughts and ideas. the older americans act expires at the end of 2019. they will work with policy makers and stakeholders to update the policy authorization. i'm not sure everyone is familiar with it. it was first signed into law in 1965 as president johnson as part of an initiative aimed at eliminating poverty and injustice among the country's population. it remains critical, given our growing demographic. in a nutshell, it allows ageing in place through a variety of support. it provides for local flexibility which is vital for providing needed services, and it helps older

colleagues, any questions? let's pof vo pivot to the b.l.a. then and hear the report. >> connor house is selected by the department through a competitive process. we summarized the competitive process in page one and page 10 of the report. this is for outpatient mental health services for supportive housing. the department entered into an interim contract for $8.5 million for physical year 2018 for the full contract. it increases the contract amount to $44.9 million, and that includes a 12% cocontingency. it is summarized on page two of our report, and we recommend approval. >> chairwoman: thank you very much. this opens up for public comment. any members of the public who would like to comment? >> seeing none, this is now closed. i noticed on the b.l.a. report, on page 13, that under the policy consideration, that you do an annual monitoring report on these community-based mental health providers, and you rate about the performance scores. and that particular organization rates very high. my question is: do yo

any comments? no? i'll just mention that last week, we had further information to clarify this contract. i think we are -- i mean, i -- you know, i was very vested in this because i understand that west side is the only provider providing culturally competent services for african american clients and wanted to make sure they would get any technical assistance that they needed, but also made sure that it wasn't from 180 to 80 participants and 80 is the number they were actually serving. that even though you had slots for 130, they were actually serving 80. >> that's my understanding. in negotiations between the department and west side, they reached that number. >> chair fewer: and because i think there's such high need, i'm wondering, what is the ultimate goal? is the ultimate goal that the intensive case management program would grow to 130 participants or is it the goal that they would stay at 80? >> the goal right now is to continue the contract the way it is. the department is undergoing a rede

providing any okay make. well hi he and lee and needs to implement the division okay so it's kind of an animator's liner all come into my own business. how to sign up for the language? and i'm hello anna. a and and see if you can you can you could do not someone -- in handy -- awesome phia on when i havave te any and then had decided senate enough via shahadah for brian thomas i don't think he can handle. it and of our please. have i had the the ailment to see me or ten feet now. the defeat of the invoices. and how they can. she was my and how the commandments as mimi santeria. all good things these. every. song is really happy with this line. happy she's happy. we did this last month [inaudible] is. the same group in general showed interest in sponsoring for next year. if they are building sort of a mini city animal -- inside arabia and they're looking into you know helping younger creative and people just graduated from college subsidize some of the run. shops just get them there small businesses up and run

any further comment? all in favor? any opposed? thank you. >> thank you very much. >> president serina: thank you. item f, requesting authorization to enter into a new grant agreement with kimochi, inc, for sustainability for nonprofit licensed residential care facilities for the elderly, rcfe, during the period of march 1, 2019 through june 30, 2020, in the amount of 175,3 # will $4 plus a 10% contingency for a total grant amount not to exceed $192,922. well come, fanny lappitan. it's been a while. >> yes. good morning, commissioners. i'm fanny lappitan, program coordinator for long-term operations at daas. i'm seeking authorization to enter into a new long-term agreement with kimochi. rcfes are assisted living facilities that have long been preferred community alternatives for those who are able to live on their own. they provide an increased level of care in a supportive and safe environment with 24-hour supervision for individuals aged 60 and over. in recent years, the number of rcfes in san francisco have costed due to decreas

i am happy to answer any questions. >> chair fewer: thank you very much. colleagues, any questions? if not, let's hear from the b.l.a. >> this lease actually renewed in 2013 and approved by the board. at that time, there was an increase in space being used by the department of human resources. as miss gorham said, the rent at $38 per square foot is actually considered lower than comparable rents in the area. there was a review although not a formal appraisal done by a third party, kinder matthews. we show the terms of the lease and summarize them on table one, page 12 of our report. the cost to the city over the initial five-year term is 2.3 million under the terms of the lease, and there is an option to renew the lease for an additional five years after the end of this lease, and we recommend approval. >> chair fewer: thank you very much. let's open this up for public comment. are there any members of the public that would like to comment on item number seven? seeing none, public comment is now closed. i would like to make a motion to move this to the full board with a positive rec

otherwise they should have accepted my visa earlier like any other visas. if they're interested in granting visas to palestinians they should allow them to come to the u.k. without a visa like the israeli people. the u.k. government is racist and it is supporting the israelis not the palestinians because it considers them as a danger that threatens that country in the hope that our beloved honestly if that finally does that you are not a victim of the occupation the child forced to fight for the i.d.f. is do you pity israelis. of course i pity them because they are dehumanised. that only filled with hatred as i said before it is not about occupying their land it is about occupying the mind of the thirteen year old settler who holds a gun has an occupied mind however israel only occupied ireland but they never occupied our minds. if the law will not. we are still resisting the occupation and the jewish people should resist and try hard to deliver the real image of their religion. they should deliver a message to all the people that the jewish people are diff

with that, i can take any questions. >> chairman: i don't think we have any questions. are there potential applicants who would like to testify before this body? please come forward. >> good morning, chair peskin and commissioners. my name is raini chang, and i live in district four. in my professional life, i've been motivated by the urgency of climate change, so evaluating impacts and developing policies, supporting new technologist. so i've worked with the u.s. federal government on renewable transportation fuels, at a non-profit foundation on energy technologies in developing areas, and now i'm with the bay quality on issues like electric vehicles and energy storage. i know that individual behaviors matter as well, and this is especially true for transportation, where it relates to a lot of decisions that we make every day. so these little decisions add up to a third of greenhouse gas emissions. so that's why i'm interested in being part of the transportation authority's citizens advisory committee, so i can learn about and weigh in on the transportation programs th

any opposed? okay. it carries unanimously. >> thank you. >> president hirsch: next line item. >> clerk: line item three, general public comment. the public is now welcome to address the commission regarding items that do not appear on tonight's agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission. speakers shall address their remarks to the commission as a whole and not to individual commissioners or department or d.p.a. personnel. under police commission rules of order, during public comment, neither police nor d.p.a. personnel nor commissioners are required to respond to questions presented by the public but may provide a brief response. individual commissioners and police and d.p.a. personnel should refrain from entering into any debates or discussion with speakers during public comment. >> president hirsch: the floor is yours, sir. >> okay. thank you. excuse me again for my mistake. my name is daniel paiz. i've been coming here since '85, so about 34, 35 years. i wanted to say som

will have the enforcement process to compel compliance from for any owner or any future owner. but otherwise, available for any questions. >> commissioner honda: you look nice and relaxed. >> feeling very good. thank you. >> i just received an e-mail to say from the permit holder, someone drove into his truck on his way here, but he's running late, so i just got that message. >> clerk: okay. should we hear from mr. kleinman? >> i was going to say we have an agreement from mr. lee indicating that he had three things he was going to address. when they finish construction, any stucco wood or paint that was damaged on our side would be brought back to the condition it was before the construction. i am not that naive in that i realize that that agreement and 1.85 will get me a cup of coffee at pete's. what we're concerned about or what we hope is that none of this is done without d.b.i.'s agreement. two issues. one, we're trying to avoid obviously spending $400 an hour on legal costs, which it may have to come down do, which i agree with the board in a that we don't have a lot of co

thank you very much. >> and i'm available for any questions should you have any. >> okay. any questions or -- public comment? >> is there public comment? >> hello. good morning. thank you to the commission for allowing me to speak. my name is dr. eric cabral. i've been the tenant since june 2013 where i started paying $3,495 on rent every time. i've been fully compliant. there have been months and months of construction over the last five years. i've been completely compliant of any construction company. i've listed several complaints by e-mail to the management company as well as to the owner. they've delayed. it's been five years now. i have an e-mail dated 2014. i have several photos that show that and videos that show that the leaking and intrusions are actually worse than when i first moved in. i have those on an ipad today. i've always been compliant, always paid rent. i've been fully compliant, my father's a contractor, and with all due respect, i had to hire a separate building contractor that has 42 photos and a report, showing that the work has been shoddy, negle

to take crimea though i'm not a big fan of ukraine either but i don't think i don't think there was any real real danger of an escalation was impressive about the crimea and the situation in fact is that they never got anywhere near a war between east and the west even though it created a lot of anxiety on both sides while if nuclear weapons were not necessary to deter a third world war have the at least been helpful in deterring american aggression because i think this is the framework through which russians are looking at those things if you compare the current circumstances of let's say north korea and libya aren't nukes the reason why one exists and the. other one doesn't know the very reverse but situation is in which the force has been used it's been they've been fairly minor and much of the time it's been an abject failure including the war and libya as well as the the unnecessary and infinitely stupid wars in my opinion the united states has conducted in the middle east the main wars the namely afghanistan and the and the one in iraq were triggered by the fact that the united st

conflicts of any sort. even the appearance of conflicts can lead to a lot of instability with the pension and trust that it is being run properly. but actually having conflicts can be detrimental to the performance in a substantial way. so this should be taken into account by the board of supervisors as they confirm an appointee to the requirement board. additionally, someone of strong world character is required. this is a very robust fund, as the supervisors have mentioned earlier today, and it is doing quite well. there are a lot of political needs facing the city at this time. it is very easy to sometimes take advantage of some of the funds to solve political funds. i'll speed up on some of these factors. one will be to work through the best interests of beneficiaries. the primary purpose of this is so folks can have a stable retirement when they retire. it is very important that person take that into account. and we want a diverse board, equally composed of men and women. it is very important. and the

any information that affects any part of their job needs to be saved.we have this law is for transparency, anderson, precisely for the reasons you say. if there are potential financial conflicts of interest, and if congress wants to conduct oversight, then there is a record that the american people can consult. if they do it privately, and that information isn't available, then the american people won't know if there are conflicts of interest. so that's why it's deeply problematic that they aren't preserving these records or that they're conducting this communication on private e-mail servers. >> in terms of the white house's refusal to turn over documents about the president's private conversations with vladimir putin, obviously it is of concern that we have no idea, the american public, other officials have no idea what actually was discussed between vladimir putin and president trump, even at helsinki, at this one-on-one meeting they had with interpreters only president. normally there would be some sort of a readout there would be other official the

ardern: in short is not with any certainty. one of the failings of our system means that we could have a range of weapons that are of this power and caliber and simply not know how many there are. madestimates that has been by officials is that the buyback could cost anywhere between 100 million and $200 million. but that is the price we must pay to ensure the safety of our committees. >> why not ban all semiautomatic's? p.m. ardern: potentially, the effect of this legislation will close that gap. australia had an exemption that allowed, for instance, farmers to seek permits to continue to use weapons like 22 caliber for legitimate use. there are 60,000 farmers able to use those kinds of guns. we have essentially achieved the same outcome, by looking at those specific weapons that are used for legitimate use, but are not designed to undertake the kind of horror and attack saw on friday. >> [inaudible] p.m. ardern: essentially, it achieves a similar outcome. they have a seat -- achieved a permanent process and have the guns dete

any nays? motion passes. [gavel]. >> clerk: item eight, small business commission planning session and retreat, discussion item. >> so commissioners, i'm just going to pass around, there's two documents. one for this item and then one for the director's report, so if you'll just take it, i've organized them, so just take it by the -- it's stacked one for each of you. >> perpendicular. >> yeah. >> -- to each other. >> so commissioners, i just wanted to take an opportunity -- so we will be having the commissioners on october 22. >> april. >> excuse me, april. april 22, and it will be for -- from 2:00 to 6:00, so it'll be for four hours. and i just wanted to take an opportunity, because it is four hours, it's not a whole day retreat, so we will be limits in terms of the scope of what we want to discuss, but i wanted to just sort of present to you in ideas and then have the opportunity for the commission to express ideas and interests of what you would like to see and have covered with the retreat. so one, we wil

any other public comment? number 10t additional opportunity for public comment on matters appearing or not appearing on the agenda. motion to adjourn? so moved. all right. we're adjourned. >> my s.f. dove -- government t.v. moment was when i received a commendation award from supervisor chris daly. then we sang a duet in the board chamber. [singing] >> happy anniversary san francisco government t.v. happy anniversary to you. happy anniversary san francisco government t.v. anniversary, anniversary, happy 25th anniversary to you. [♪] >> chair fewer: the meeting will come to order. this is march 15, 2019 meeting of the local agency formation commission. i am sandra fewer, chairman of the commission, and i am joined by my fellow commissioners. the clerk of the commission is cynthia somera. colleagues, can we have a motion to excuse commissioner gordon mar today? yes. moved by commissioner ronen, seconded by commissioner pollock. we can take this without objection. [gavel]. >> chair fewer: thank you very much. mada

to identify if there are any lists or any projects that would meet the 2808 authorities. made,e this request is that you will ensure us that you will keep us informed of the priority list on unobligated funding? >> our intent is to be fully transparent with the process. >> thank you. lastly, according to deity 2014,ation from 2001 to the department funded a total of 2808.jects under 10 usc currently the total number of national emergencies and effect is 32. is that also correct? >> yes, congresswoman. >> by law, evident by the 32 national emergency decorations in place, the president has the authority to reallocate funds through the declaration of a national emergency to address a national crisis. as a member of the appropriations committee i will work with other members on this subcommittee and the full committee and with the white house to ensure funding is reallocated appropriately and does not come at the expense of our military readiness. i appreciate again your time here today and your willingness to answer our questions. i'm sure as we move through this we will hav

any public comment? seeing none, all commissioner in favor? any opposed? thank you. minutes are approved. next item, 11. review and approval of the minutes of the regular meeting february 20, 2019. >> move to approve. >> second. >> a motion and a second. is there any public comment? no public comment, all commissioners in favor? >> opposed? thank you. next item, item 12, adjournment. motion to adjourn? >> motion. >> second. >> all commissioners in favor? we are now adjourned. 11:15 a.m. >> good noon. welcome to the hearing for march 20, 2019. i were like to remind commercialmembers ofthe public e any disruptions of any time. if you care to state your maim fonamebefore speaking. (roll call). we do expect commissioner johns to be absent today. general public comment. at this time, members may address this issue. with respect to agenda items, opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. each member of the public may address the commission for up to three minutes. i

regard who sends it or who it isn't we don't know without any background checks and he was right any other trolling no one has any proof that we are doing any massive trolling but why why did you why did you lie about it when it first came out the party didn't know about it the pilot about this sort of not until the party was not informed about and they said it wasn't true here because we could have said we don't know. nothing so you lied about it no we didn't like about it the ethics ombudsman to the istana public broadcaster called this fraudulent activity he said if any attempt is made to influence public opinion under a pseudonym this can be justified on the grounds of freedom of expression fact public decision i will be on the green with no rubbish because people write under the pseudonym all the time. uncertainty all the time doesn't make a right doesn't well if we all do it why we are singled out but you know there is no proof and there is no real there is no real operation on our part to have a massive army of trolls what we do have is a very motivated and quite large. number

any questions from the board? okay. seeing none, why don't -- do you want to go -- >> executive director huish: actually, the one thing i would say is that for -- staff is going to make ourselves available over the next month to talk through any questions that people have individually related to the proposed department budget. we'd be happy to provide background information, answer any questions, and so we'll be reaching out most likely the end of this week or next week to try and set up a time so that we can, you know, brief folks on where we are with the budget and what the budget looks like. so we'll be calling. you don't have to be briefed if you don't want to be briefed, but we're certainly offering the briefing. >> president stansbury: thank you. there have been some increases in the budget, so we'll have some questions about particular line items. anything else from the board? mr. huish? okay, great. do you want to go back to item no. 9, managers under review? or do you want to continue it? >> executive director

any other public comment? agenda item 3, draft minutes of the ethics commission february 15, 2019 regular meeting. public comment on this item? i move to approve these minutes. second from commissioner smith. all in favor. aye. minutes are approved unanimously. item 4, informational presentation on report required by s.f.c. and government code section 1.156 on public financing in the 2018 election. >> thank you chair chiu. i'm pat ford senior policy analyst. you want top introduce brian cox. lee ann -- leann will give you a full intro. i wanted to let you know who he was. >> chair chiu: welcome. >> talk about this agenda item. the report which i just handed to you in which is available on the table, public table for review is a report that the ethics commission must deliver to the board of supervisors and to the mayor after any election in which the city's public financing program is used. as you remember last year in 2018, we an election in june and in november and in both elections, there were races in which

it's human nature in any institution in any culture and there's going to be bad apples and unfortunately there are bad apples in the united states military just like there are in any other military in the world and. if these crimes are committed against foreign nationals in whatever country they are our military station and i want them to know that they have a boys that these these survivors of abuse sexual abuse by our service members if it occurs have a voice and if they have somewhere to go and they can pursue justice just because they were sexually abused by the united states military member does it mean that they have to stay silent if they don't want to you and i do understand that not everyone wants to pursue justice but at least they can know what their options are what their rights are and then they can decide to they can pursue justice and. to not be scared to do so. codes in syria are appealing for an international tribunal to prosecute islamic state members after the syrian democratic forces which is largely made up of kurdish fighters declared that the terror groups final en

you know it clearly shows that there was chemical weapons that was used but they didn't find any any evidence of that simply because they didn't have access to the site for two weeks now which by that point any any evidence was removed we're we're relying on on assad and russia to say that that that the area wasn't touched for those two weeks when they're the ones who carried out the attack moscow and damascus perth's said the it was for their own safety right but so you're saying that they they must have cleared the sarin gas but they left the chlorine there the chlorine is for one harder to to remove and oh b.t.w. is citing and at the same time the o.p.c. w even corroborated white helmet report of of the chlorine attack is as well as why it's easier to remove sarin than is to remove chlorine well simply because the evidence from the medical centers was reporting that the smell of chlorine was very strong so that by that same of the c w report they're saying that. they're saying that the medical centers in duma were reporting that the ship one the smell of chlorine was very strong o

thank you for your consideration and i'm here for any questions. >> president fewer: colleagues, any or comments? seeing none. there is not a b.l.a. report on this. let's open this up for public it comment. any members of the public that would like to comment on item number 2? please come up, you have two minutes. seeing none, public comment is now closed. colleagues, i would like to continue this to the meeting of april 3rd at the request of the sponsor. so i can take that without objection. thank you very much. madam clerk, call item 3. >> clerk: item number 3 is a resolution to retroactively authorizing the recreation and park department to accept the expend a grant for trust for public land in the amount of up to $520,50 for a feasibility study and concept design for improvement bees to the eugene l. friend recreation center, from the project term of october 2, 2018 through march 31, 2019. >> good morning, supervisors. so i'm here to request your approval of an expend resolution for an in-kind grant of a feasability study and concept design for renovations to the jean friend recr

you can reach out any time in the future if you wanted to discuss any of it. also just i wanted to highlight this was a real offic office-wie effort. brian worked closely with me on it and our audits division provided lot of this data. it's a real collaborative effort. this will be on our website as well. for folks watching at home, you can access it online. >> chair chiu: thank you this is a lot of information and thank you pat and brian and amy and everyone else in the office who put in the work to pull this report together. it's a lot of information to take in. open it up to my fellow commissioners if you have questions? anythincommissioner lee. >> commissioner lee: i have quick question, it's nice to hear opposition funding is really a very small amount compared to what public perception is in in the city, -- do you think that has some impact over the amount of opposition funding compared to other cities? is that a factor? >> i'm not sure. i would have to really dig into that and compare. i know that that's certainly one of the stated purposes of choice vo

any other comments or questions? any other public comment? thank you. colleagues, any comments? >> supervisor mar: i just wanted to thank mr. hill and mr. theriault for your commitment to our bridge board. we really thank you for all of your service, and i very much support you being reappointed. thank you. >> chair ronen: okay. is there a motion? >> supervisor walton: definitely looking forward to working with all of you, and i would like to make a motion that we forward this with a positive recommendation for sabrina hernandez for seat one -- [inaudible] >> chair rone >> chair ronen: thank you. is there any other items on the agenda? >> clerk: that completes the agenda. >> chair ronen: thank you. then this meeting is adjourned. >> chair peskin: good afternoon and welcome to the san francisco land use and transportation board of supervisors for march 18, 2019. i am aaron peskin, chair of the committee, joined to my right by supervisor ahsha safai and to my left raphael mandelman. with that, madam clerk, do we have any announcements? >> clerk: yes. [agenda item read]. >> chair p

any questions? let's move on to state and federal. >> these are just couple of high-level slides to talk about the state and federal budget time line and to highlight funding areas that impact the city most from the choices that are leaders and state federal government make. the governor submitted his proposed budget and my next slide will walk you through the highlights you see there. that is an opening proposal that gets debated amongst the senate and budget committees. they hold budget hearings in february through april. the governor puts out the may revise on may 15th. then through and june, the senate and the assembly pass revised budget and the governor signs on a time line to the mayor on july 31st for their fiscal year beginning on july 1st. the january governor proposed budget put out by governor newsom was $144 billion general fund budget. the two key themes that we noted in reviewing that proposal is that similar to governor brown, there's a focus on paying down debt and maintaining state

do any of my colleagues have any comments or questions? >> yeah. i just want to echo chair ronen's comments in really expressing really strong appreciation for all of the work that commissioners wolfrum, johns, and black have contributed to the historic pressiohistoric presern commission. i appreciate hearing all of the work that the commission has been doing, particularly around the cultural districts and the legacy program, and including our ethnic and cultural -- the rich history of ethnic and cultural history in your work. thank you all for your dedication and your contributions to all of that. and i'm very pleased to support your reappointment. thank you. >> i just have a question for clarification? do we have to take these separately, or can we do them together? >> i believe if we make a motion to amend all three of these items, to delete the word "rejecting," and make a motion to recommend all three of them as a committee report to tomorrow's supervisors' meeting. >> i want to make a motion to delete the word "rejecting" and move all three r

i don't have any data on how many those are. i know that the city attorney recently determined that those loans should be coming to the board and the future loans will be presented to the board. >> supervisor peskin: and through the chair, to deputy city attorney jon givner, the history of loans from m.o.h. without board of supervisors approval and is, indeed, that is what section 9.118 of the charter requires? >> mr. givner: yes. yes, the -- these loans should be coming to the board if they're ten years or $10 million, and as miss campbell said, we have recently looked back as past loans of mohcd, that 9.118 requires them to come to the board. >> supervisor peskin: thank you for rendering that advice, even if it's a fru decades late -- few decades late, but i would still like to know how many loans were authorized without approval of the legislative branch as required under the charter, so i do want that. the second policy issue -- and by the way -- >> chair fewer: actually, i think it would be helpful for the mayor's office of

is there any movement? and that was something i felt, you know, because the sheriff is an elected position, that it was really, you know, the buck stops with that position. and so it made it hard to really follow up and find out what was actually happening unless you talked to the families. i wanted to know if your experience was the same? >> we had the same experience. the best we can learn is an individual client has been moved from san bruno up to 850 bryant, and that hopefully provides them some protection from the kind of abuse they suffered or from retaliation by the same deputies that assaulted them. that's really the most we can learn from these processes. >> do you think they were moving them because of the complaint? they would just move them around so they wouldn't have to be around the same deputies they were complaining about? >> certainly in some instances, it was at our request or at the individual's request. >> okay. >> so i know for example at least one client that i represented at the time

you come to indicative votes, hands up who wants a norway style option, i do not see any chance of anya majority. that is the baffling thing, they are going to have these indicative votes, we are told they are going to have which somehow involves government putting the motion on the order paper or a collection of mps doing it and the government standing back? that is talking about stage two, the trading arrangement. we have not even completed stage one, the actual leaving. i wonder first before we get to that, what brian had to say about mrs may and the counter—productive remarks she made about parliament. it seems to me, as a schoolboy we used to talk about piling on. there has been a good deal of piling on in respect to mrs may. goodness me, could be not allow her some frustration after weeks, months, even years of suffering slings and arrows of the intolerant extremists in almost all parties and the insults they slung at each other, can we not allow her the indulgence of saying something which is basically true? she, like david cameron, has put party before national interest. she is

any report regarding child abuse or any report of assaultive or abusive behavior made confidential by the crime code, and lastly, any victim of sexual assault. so specifically from cisu which holds the majority of these reports, they receive annually roughly 20,000 requests per year. and again, the person can go to the website, e-mail, etc. the way cisu -- the way it's assigned, they will generally not release it directly. so for instance if you are the victim of a robbery, and just for the insurance purposes, you need the items that you listed on that report, they would go to the robbery inspector or the officer in charge of robbery, they would make the appropriate redactions or if there was issues to -- where they didn't want the pending victim to know, we wouldn't necessarily turn it over to do that. but all reports generally go to an investigative section unless they're basically a property report. could be fax, u.s. mail, e-mail, etc. in the event an investigative unit elects not to release a report, they do get a cover letter. it's provided to the requester and it lists why we r

are you hearing any feedback from folks that you think any of us should know up here about that? i know we generally try to clean it up and make it more simple. >> i think what -- i haven't gotten a lot of feedback from the field inspectors about conversations they've had with operators. i think it's difficult during the busy nights, friday and saturday, to be out there and having in-depth conversations with operators about the policy. what i have encouraged them to do is leave their business cards and make sure that they are encouraging operators or heads of security or managers to follow-up with them or me or any member of staff to discuss it in more detail if they have questions or if they have comments. i haven't gotten any feedback yet and we are planning on disseminating this wider and further on facebook and with e-mail, and on the blog coming up here real soon. i hope to work with our data-gathering expert senior analyst and try to get feedback from the public. >> great, this could be a case of no news is good news, or no feedback is good feedback. one other question, i j

in you look at these people they don't want to have any treaty that's good in any way constrain the united states as trump says we're going to outspend everybody we're going to out innovate everybody there is no reason why this cannot be renegotiated and why we should abrogate the entire treaty but the what washington does not want to be constrained by any treaties now there are there are legitimate concerns yes there is a legitimate concern about the fact that other countries are not included in this treaty but that was not the point of it in the one nine hundred eighty s. what we need is a much broader structure of international arms control negotiations that can bring other countries perhaps into compliance. syrian army forces suffered heavy losses this weekend in the north of the country eight hundred soldiers were killed during a surprise attack by jove. a syrian offshoot of al qaida the ambush and number of casualties were confirmed to r.t. arabic by the army and with washington recently putting up a million dollar reward for information on the some of bin laden's son it looks like t

any other comments or questions? any other public comment? thank you. colleagues, any comments? >> supervisor mar: i just wanted to thank mr. hill and mr. theriault for your commitment to our bridge board. we really thank you for all of your service, and i very much support you being reappointed. thank you. >> chair ronen: okay. is there a motion? >> supervisor walton: definitely looking forward to working with all of you, and i would like to make a motion that we forward this with a positive recommendation for sabrina hernandez for seat one -- [inaudible] >> chair rone >> chair ronen: thank you. is there any other items on the agenda? >> clerk: that completes the agenda. >> chair ronen: thank you. then this meeting is adjourned. sustainability mission, even though the bikes are very minimal energy use. it still matters where the energy comes from and also part of the mission in sustainability is how we run everything, run our business. so having the lights come on with clean energy is important to us as well. we heard about cleanpowersf and learned they had commercial rates and