well the same dilemma they had opposite solutions aristotle proposed what we would nowadays call a welfare state to try to reduce inequality. so the same problem that solutions one is reduce inequality will have this problem and the other is reduced muckers. if you look at the history of the united states it's a constant struggle between these two tendencies democratising tendency that's mostly coming from the population pressure from below and you get these constant battle going on periods or gratian periods of progress in one thousand nine hundred six for example were a period of significant democratization for. searchers and if i feel a sure that we're usually passive apis it became organized active story pressing their demand. and they became more and more involved in decision making activism and so on. they just changed consciousness in ways. minority rights. really don't want. women's rates. force it's a. concern for the. american as. they supplied orig of my own safety nets all the survival of position to aggression through to those who criticize us while the militants the abundance

systems aristotle's politics. he says of all of them the best is democracy and at any point said exactly the flaws that medicine put into. if athens were a democracy for free men the poor would get together and take away the property the rich. well the same dilemma they had opposite solutions aristotle proposed what we would nowadays call a welfare state to try to reduce inequality. so the same problem that solutions one is reduce inequality will have this problem and the other is reduced democracy. if you look at the history of the united states it's a constant struggle between these two tendencies democratising tendency that's mostly coming from the population pressure from below and you get these constant battle going on periods or gratian periods of progress in one thousand nine hundred six for example were a period of significant democratization. sectors of the feel asia that were usually passive and the city became organized active story pressing their demands. and they became more and more involved in decis

aristotle: not at all.tial that you guys have -- like, we were excited about that. you came in here with this opportunity to be a part of a team, and it never really felt like you wanted to be a part of the entire team. parker: before, this was just taylor and i sitting around, you know? it's different to work with more than just taylor. lemonis: sometimes people don't do well on teams. travis: i'd rather not fight with these guys every day. lemonis: i think the reality of it is that you guys have expectations that this group isn't going to be able to meet, not today, not tomorrow, not next year. brad: i just don't think these guys are gonna be happy ever with the way things are structured and working on other brands that aren't making money right away. lemonis: want them in the deal or not, brad? brad: i just don't think they can be in the deal. lemonis: juli, yes or no? juli: no. lemonis: travis? travis: i don't think it's possible. taylor: i'm sorry you feel that way. lemonis: i don't see how things move

when you think of the great men in world history you think of aristotle of william shakespeare or of donald trump but you never think of george crumb that's a shame he was an american assistant cook and of the twenty fourth of august eight hundred fifty three he invented the potato chips potato chips are indispensable in modern world even here in my practice only after we have closed of course because they're not that healthy. why are potato chips so addictive. researchers in the us have find a connection between a desire for salty food and the release of the dopamine hormone it plays an important role in the brain's reward system a team of german researchers led by pharmacologist andreas has looked at how chips affect easing behavior and brain activity. to find out what component of the chips cause the kind of loss of control that seen in addiction the scientists fed lab rats different mixtures of food. they found that the animals did not show any major response to salt or glutamate but rather to a very specific ratio of pot to carbohydrates and. when we offer the rats different to

also my view that is, to quote aristotle, politics is the art of the possible.have got more on the withdrawal agreement, but in every negotiation, every international treaty, you don't win everything. you have to have concessions. this is raw politics today, this is hardcore politics today, this is hardcore politics and pragmatic politics. yes, if we hold out for everything that we want from the eu, do you know what? we will never get it. we will end up losing brexit. there are not the votes to push through a no deal. there are the votes, i believe, to extend article 50. all of those with delay brexit. i think they would frustrate brexit and, ultimately, leads to brexit is not happening. i don't think my constituents or association wants that, and i don't think that is in the national interest of the uk.m there a sense here that this really is it? but this is make up your mind time? and are we now talking about raw politics taking over? exactly, thatis raw politics taking over? exactly, that is why i say to my colleagues, i understand your view, i know how princ

and to the fourth century bc when the greek philosopher wrote aristotle wrote, it is more proper that law should govern than any one of the citizens. president trump issued a proclamation rather than the winds or the dictates. for we have ensured liberty. the president recognize law provides a framework and it's best to reflect moral choices and the principle decision to protect citizens fundamental rights. it is a system of restraint and then everyone to a prosperous society to allow businesses to enter two contracts protection for discoveries from dangerous criminals that allows us to resolve differences so kennedy explains the rule of law system you have a right and have an obligation to give it to you. in many countries that concept and that does not exist. if it does not just achieve the appearance without accomplishing it that i can summon the spirit but will they come when you call them and he agreed us pawn rules that it is not sufficient. not just about the written precept. with the character. those that were faithfully implemented. and it is crucial with james madison to rec

of people who go to work every day don't like their job and you know, we're pretty slow learners, aristotle said in 384 b.c., pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work it's the leadership that has to do that. so we go to work every day creating an environment and we have a 93% employee engagement 99% of our tribe members globally say they love to tell people they work at the company. >> i thought that was cool the culture, the power of our people, that you have results average, i thought this was the most important i love to tell people that i work for wd40. 99% like to say that that's fantastic >> so 99% means that women have to say it, too and it's international women's day, what do you have to say >> the chairman of our board is a female the head of our operation in the u.s. is a lady our head of marketing in the u.s. is a lady just this week, our first employee in our china operation 12 years ago was a lady. she's worked her way through the organization and yesterday, she was promoted to the general manager of china so we love diversity whether it be by gender, geography. we love

when the greek philosopher aristotle wrote it's more proper that the law should govern than any one of the citizens. last year, president trump issued a proclamation explaining that we govern ourselves in accordance with the rule of law rather than the whims of an elite few or the dictates of collective will. through law, we have ensured liberty. as the president recognized law provides the framework for freedom. at its best, law reflects moral choices. principled decisions that promote society's best interests and protects citizens' fundamental rights. john macarthur mcgwire described law as a system of wise restraints that make men free. the restraints preserve liberty. because they are prescribed in advance and they apply to everyone without regard to rank or status. the rule of law is indispensible to a prosperous and thriving society. it allows businesses to enter into contracts. it gives innovators protection for their discoveries. it keeps people safe from dangerous criminals. and it allows us to resolve our differences peacefully through reason and logic. justice anthony kenned

>> i love that. >> if aristotle had said these are the best -- what was the origin of the quote? of the things i love about benjamin is that he's allowed us to sometimes split infinitives, which i just did. >> whoa. >> and i was wondering, well, you know, that's -- i once started a story in "time" magazine with the word but. >> exactly. >> but that was a long time ago. and it was evan thomas, my friend who was editing that week who took it out. so, i was going to ask, benjamin, when can we split infinitives and why were we not allowed to up until you gave us permission? >> and when can the word but be a sentence? because i tried to do that in your column the other second, remember? instead of that line, just "but, dot, dot, dot." >> or forever, dot, dot, dot. >> i did that, too, and you nixed it. >> yes, i did. >> i think that you can boldly split your infinitives whenever you feel like it. the way it was taught to me as to why it's such a sort of an odd and useless and pointless rule. >> yes. >> is that it was one of the many rules that were devised in the 19th century by extrem