. >> do you filed those congruently at the same time for both sides? >> right, the folks who have to file electronically, darlene has to go in and try and print off the fact that you've done it, everyone else who filed not with the department, files a paper copy, darlene has them as available if there is any kind of public request, but they're not required to be filed directly. there are categories of violators, and the board and i are a category that has to file electronically. >> god it. thank you for the clarification. >> this is a nonaction item. that takes us to item 15, retirement board members -- >> public comment on executive director chuck chart report. that includes item 14, item 15, the order of the retirement board members. go ahead. >> mr. chair, i attended, as well as i thank you were there as well, the bridge, and i would like to say that c.i.o., as well as the managing director both presented at the bridge today, and they did an excellent job. he was the keynote this morning for the bridge, and i was very proud to say that is my c.i.o.,

proposed use of general entertainment is principally permitted within the broadway district, and congruent with the zoning zoning district chapter controls which encourage a mixed-use characteristic and encourage further development of the area as part of a larger commercial and entertainment district. conditional use approval will not affect housing supply and should not overburden traffic or transit operations. this concludes my presentation. i'm available for questions. the sponsor has a presentation to follow with additional details. >> okay. thank you. we will hear from the project sponsor. you have five minutes. >> hello. i am a principal. basically, you stole my presentation, anyway, everything that he presented was on my notes. normally one thing i would try to explain is actually the nature of our business, because it is people who are talking with the community and talking to us, they were really scared that it would be a bar with loud music or generating huge traffic , which is not true. what we are doing is actually really small groups events and it is a mind game, which means

harmful to national security and my definition of what's harmful to national security were not exactly congruentfference here, alisyn, is at least we had the opportunity to make our case, and if someone's life was potentially at risk, responsible media would not publish that. >> yes, these are hard conversations that are had in news rooms around the country and the world all the time, but obviously all of us are curious to see when this is unsealed and we expect it to happen moments from now, what the charges are against julian assange. it sounds like if you believe his editor, we spoke to the wikileaks editor a few minutes ago, that it's about the 2010 publication and revelations, that it's not about 2016, but, of course, so much has changed since 2010 here in this country and you will remember that president trump said i love wikileaks, he encouraged wikileaks, he hoped that wikileaks would publish more from the dnc hack, he was quite sympathetic to wikileaks and a fan of wikileaks. so what does that mean now for the court case back here at home now that president trump is sympathetic to them?