>> commissioner: for the police department. >> commissioner: thank you.someone from the police department here? >> i'm carolyn welch from the police department. >> in regards to the overtime paid out oside of the departmen, what are the policies around that? is it other departments that pay for it or private parties >> the ad membership code is non-government -- admin code are non-government entities who want to ask for police secure. one of our largest clients is the giants any event at oracle park the giants games or any concerts they have. the admin code says any athletic events. the breakers event this sunday, the private party sponsor has to play for the police officers to work that event. same with nike women's marathon and other athletic events and anything that requires a street calendar. closure. they cover the scheduling and payroll and accounting processes. >> commissioner: and with the giants, sit required whatever they want the police department staff to do that it had to come from the police department? >> i'm not sure. >> is there any polic

. >> commissioner: good. before we move on, i want to interour two new s, commissioners, sophie maxwell and tim paulson. you have the minutes of april 23. are there any additions or corrections. >> mof move for approval? >> any public comment? seeing none. those in favor. the motion carries. and i assume the new commissioners did not vote, correct? >> clerk: they are allowed to vote. >> commissioner: okay. moving on to the next item, please. >> clerk: item 4 is general public comment members may address the commission on matters which are not on the agenda or in their jurisdiction. >> commissioner: i have two speaker cards. francesco. >> commissioners, my name is francisco di postra. i'm here to state a few things. it pertains to morals, ethics, standards having your heart in the right place so we can go to a better place. the san francisco public utilities commission in the year 2019 has a very very important role to play. and there is no time for wheeling and dealing. there is no time for conflict of intere

. >> commissioner: thank you very much. madame clerk will you please call item number 1. >> clerk: the hearing of the practice of assigning city-owned vehicles to ployos for personal use and the related budget impact and requesting the budget and legislative analyst office of the city administrator. >> good afternoon, supervisors. i'm from the budget and legislative analyst office. and i would want to say we were requested by supervisor fewer's office to survey city departments on their use and policies for take-home vehicles. i do want to introduce ashley clark who is one of the main personal -- bern -- personnel working on the department and we evaluated their annual cost and policies. the administrative code actually has the provisions for when city departments are allowed to assign take-home vehicles for individuals who use their vehicles to and from work. i want to say when we say take-home vehicles i'm referring to permanent assignments not pool vehicles. in the admin code the provisions for when a take-home vehicle i

thank you very much. >> commissioner: commissioners. >> thank you. . >> commissioner: i have a seriesof questions if you'll bear with me. let me restate a little bit of history. the water supply assessment came about 20, 30 years ago when east bay mud said they didn't have enough water to supply the valley a proposed development within their service area. that set off a fire storm that ended in legislation creating a two-step process. one for projects of a certain size that is the water agency had to assess and if they couldn't supply they had to say how to meet them. you can't just say no and go away, you have to tell us what you'll do about it. the water supply assessment we're looking at is a product of that it's to answer the question, do you have enough water and start a process and inform the planning people with the answer and if the answer is no, start the second phase which is to assess what it would take to serve them. one question for the city attorney, i think the intent of the legislation is out of the water supply assessment would come a yes/no determination. is that in

[taking roll] >> commissioner: commissioner richards can recused. >> welcome commissioner fong. i'm ashley lindsey the planning department staff and we have conditional use authorization to install a new at&t wireless communication facility at 990 pacific avenue. the project includes installation of new macro wireless telecommunications and one frp screen box and four antennas behind one frp screen box. there will be 16 radio units mounted to the existing stair wall and ancillary equipment cabinets at roof level. the project sponsor held a community meeting at chinatown branch library, 15 community members attended however 9 of the 15 signed in. the design site selection and radio frequency were discussed and one attendee requested a rf screening test. the department staff has received public comment from one community member regarding the project. due to public comment and request, at&t has agreed to provide an informational workshop for residents at 990 pacific avenue regarding emissions related concerns. in order for the project to proceed the commission must grant a conditio

can we have a motion to excuse commissioner ronen and temporarily excuse commissioner brown. motion made by commissioner stefani and seconded by commissioner haney and we will take that without objection. commissioner yee, do you want to say something? >> i believe commissioner walton -- >> i have not heard from commissioner walton, but if you have, i am happy for you to excuse commissioner walton as well. we'll take that without objection, and next item please. >> item 2, citizens advisory committee report. >> mr. larson, good morning. >> good morning commissioners, i'm john larson and i'm here to report on the april 23rd meeting. the c.a.c. recommended approval of item 5 on your agenda, the allocation of funds for two neighborhood transportation improvement programs or capital project requests. both the intersection immater l improvement and bikeway is an example of the projects that the funds were to facilitate. as per the update, c.a.c. members reiterated concern about business impacts along the construction zone and we're frustrated with the lack of performance data rega

>> correct. >> commissioner: thank you. any other questions. >> commissioner: what happens when you get reimbursed? does it go back to general funds? >> typically a department will consume the general fund budget in the year in which the mutual aid is responded and it goes back to the general fund. in the subsequent year when the reimbursement is received. >> commissioner: general funds to the department? >> and closes out to the general fund as a whole which is the balance you appropriate in the subsequent year budget. >> commissioner: thank you. >> commissioner: and there's management overtime isn't there? >> owe them mandatory overtime is two times. if an officer's responding to a qual or processing an arrest and they're shift ends they have to continue to process what they're doing. and then we have about 20 days of the year that are special event days, new year's eve, 4th of july, chinese new year. there's 20 we don't allow anybody to take time off and we're allowed to change their start shift by seven hours. we ask th

commissioner hirsch. >> aye. >> commissioner taylor. >> aye. >> commissioner mazzucco. >> aye. >> commissioner hamasaki. >> aye. >> commissioner h elias. >> aye. >> commissioner brookter. >> aye. >> it passes unanimously. >> next item, please. >> line five, general public comment. the public is now welcome to address the commission regarding items that do not appear on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission. speakers shall address their remarks to the commission as a whole and not to individual commissioners or department dpa personnel. under police commission rules of order, during public comment neither police or dpa personal no, sir commissioners are required to respond to questions presented by the public but may provide a brief response. individual commissioners and police and dpa personnel should remain, however, from entering into debates or discussion with speakers during public comment. >> general public comment. >> hello, commissioners, chief, and deputy director. my name is zack dillon. i work thank you public defender's office. i've been -- >> c

commissioners? commissioner wolfram? >> commissioner wolfram: i want to thank members of the public coming here to tell your stories and speaking, and i'm in full support of this proposed ordinance. >> president hyland: thank you. commissioner johns? >> commissioner johns: thank you. i want to thank those of you who are pioneers and stewards of your culture for getting sponsorship of the district going and having us involved in this. i think it's terrific, so thank you for that. the other' thing that i'm very kbrezed with, looking at the previous cultural districted is the -- where we're headed is -- in this industry is creating this institutional framework for how these districts go forward. i think that is unique in the united states. here we are, san francisco, on another pathway, like the historic committee. i think this is really important, so thanks -- and this is a lot of work going into this, this framework. so -- and i guess the thirt thing ththirt -- third thing that i'm interested in is i heard the word space

on that motion commissioner fong. >> commissioner fong: aye. (roll call). >> so moved that motion passes unanimously 7-0. >> that will place us on item 11 sea level vulnerable and consequences assessment. >> good afternoon, the city wide planning division. i am here to update on the sea level rise adaptation work. specifically the consequences assessment. i am joined by memberses our team including i don't know if bryan is here. brine strong chief officer along with henry rogers. steven, consultant chris may who can help with answering technical questions. i am going to go through project background and key findings. from the report and the next steps. to put this report in context. sea level rise adaptation is part of the climate program. that resolves how we mitigate the impact to climate change and adapt to the climate change and where we can find synergy between the two. winterizing the building can help reduce the emissions. on the adaptation we are thinking about a wide range of habits from flooding to air quality, extreme heat and drough

yeah. >> commissioner: thank you, commissioners.madame secretary please call the next item. >> clerk: the next order of business is item 9, commissioners questions an matters. mr. chair. >> commissioner: anything? nothing? okay. call the next item. >> clerk: the next order of business is item 10, closed session. there are no closed session items. the next item is 11, adjournment. mr. chair. >> commissioner: fellow commissioners i need a motion to adjourn. >> i move we adjourn. >> i second. >> commissioner: great. we have a motion. and we are juniored at 2:27 p.m. thank you.

commissioners? >> commissioner green: thank you for the report. i was curious in light of the community needs assessment where it said that 40% of the new jobs in san francisco are expected to be low wage. and $120,000 is needed for a family of four to live here. do we have a sense of where the jobs within the department fit in terms of the numbers? in other words, as we try to advance equity and diversity. and yet we have these significant cost of living issues in san francisco. do we know the percentage of employees that live here? or do we have data about how our jobs will make it affordable for families to continue to live in san francisco? >> we do actually. i was looking at statistics today at d.h.r. and i think they said -- i think it's 57% of our employees live outside the city, which is one. and then, two, when we do the training on friday and we were trying to talk about these things. we had a grid that showed income by classification and race. and showed high income and low income, but not benchmark cost to live in the city. we are look

commissioner. was there a reason you didn't trust the i.r.s. commissioner to handle this? was there a meeting between i.r.s. and treasury leaders directing the i.r.s. to stand aside or stand down on this? and have you discussed chairman neal's request with the president or anyone in the white house? did you get any direction on how to handle this matterer from the president? secretary mnuchin: let me start with your last question first. i have not discussed this with the president or anybody in the white house. again i just want to clarify one of the things i publicly said earlier is with our legal department originally early on in this process, before we received any request, did have a discussion but it was not to seek guidance or anything else. that was way before we received any request. that was just in the legal department. i have not had any discussions with the president or taken any direction from him or anybody else in the white house on this issue. now, on the -- the other issue, again i

>> commissioner: i think we have some questions, if you don't mind. know that the response from the airport was these were approved by the board. >> we include the allotted number of vehicles in the 2018 san francisco airport operating budget. we had received approval for 40 city vehicles. we have 39 that are currently assigned. 17 of those are to commissioner employees and the remaining are two airport bureau police and fire department personnel. >> commissioner: so when you request the vehicles were they specifically requested at take-home vehicles. >> i don't know the answer to that but i'll find out and they were in our operating budget. the numbers vary and we look at who has them and how they're being used. i do know in 2018 we had 40 of these vehicles in our budget. >> commissioner: so would you agree that when you're requesting for a budget allocation for vehicles there's a difference between a vehicle used by many individuals in your department versus a car assigned to one individual to come and from work. would you consider that a big differ

yeah. >> commissioner: thank you, commissioners.madame secretary please call the next item. >> clerk: the next order of business is item 9, commissioners questions an matters. mr. chair. >> commissioner: anything? nothing? okay. call the next item. >> clerk: the next order of business is item 10, closed session. there are no closed session items. the next item is 11, adjournment. mr. chair. >> commissioner: fellow commissioners i need a motion to adjourn. >> i move we adjourn. >> i second. >> commissioner: great. we have a motion. and we are juniored at 2:27 p.m. thank you. >> my biggest take away is that you can always find a way. most people who go into public policies really want to make a difference and have a positive impact on the world, and that's what i love most about my job. i feel like every day at the sfpuc all of the policies that we're involved in have major impacts on people's lives both here in the city and across the state and the nation. in 2017, california senate bill 649 was released. it would have capped the fee

. >> commissioner: so the city and county is reimbursed for those hours from the giants. >> yes. >> commissioner: is there an administrative fee on top of that? >> yes. >> commissioner: and everyone pays it, the giants and everyone pays it? >> correct. >> commissioner: the city then seems to benefit from the overtime hours. would that be a correct assumption? >> i'd refer to the department. i think the administrative charge charged on 10b is in an effort to the cost of administering the department including overhead but should not be a fee that exceeds the cost of the service. it should recover the cost of the service and not exceed it. if i were to it would be a tax. >> commissioner: so when we see the 12.9% in overtime hours thor the police department, are you saying to me it's because they've been attending a lot of parties? events? >> if you're referring to in the report the increase from '16, '17 to '17, '18 we had 23,000 hours of growth in the 10b. so what we have done is we have added more staff to assist with scheduling when we have more going on. >> commissioner: how's this coincide wit

motion made by commissioner yee, seconded by commissioner brown and we have a different house roll call please. [roll call] >> we have first approval. >> next item please. >> item 5, allocate $663,500 in prop k funds. this is an action item. >> good morning commissioners. i'm presenting to you two requests today from the san francisco municipal transportation agency and these are for neighborhood transportation improvement projects for districts 5 and 6. the first question is for divisadero intersection improvements between turk street. daylighting willing installed, pedestrian safety zones, as you can see in the photos. longer crossing times, and larger signal lenses, which is the material that covers the signal lights so they will be shining brighter. we will be doing outreach between now and november, including door-to-door outreach, and the majority of construction will be done in january and completed by september. the next request is for the howard street project, and this is for district 6, a portion of the funding is coming from the neighborhood transportation improvement progra

is there a motion to excuse commissioner mar we. >> motion made by commissioner singh, seconded by commissioner fewer, we can take that without objection. commissioner mar is excuse for this item. mr. goebel, please continue. >> thank you, madam chair. commissioners, i'm very excited to reports that we have chosen it winning bidder for our survey of on-demand workers in san francisco, and i have sent each of you and your staff a copy of the proposal. first little background of how we arrived to today. we originally issued a request for proposals in january, and extended the deadline to the end of march. i did outreach to a number of organizations who have experience in this area, and though i hoped we would ultimately get multiple proposals, in the end we received only one, but it was a strong one that exceeded expectations. because we only received the one proposal, i served as a sole r.f.p. evaluator, and examined it based on its merits on the criteria outlined in the r.f.p. it scored high in the proposal and the interview evaluations, and last week i announced we had -- we tend to wear the c

commissioner pearlman? >> commissioner pearlman: thank you. i feel particularly connected to this because as i was reading through this, i have walked the -- through so many threads of my life have led through the castro, and, you know, i came to san francisco with a connection to the aids project and working on the quilt project, and i volunteered there. mr. haynes mentioned pink saturday. i was on the committee for the first pink saturday event. i was the one who managed the garden that was at 16th, noe, and market for a decade or so that grew food for food open hand. many, man -- project open hand. many, many things in my life over the last 30 years connect me to this. so i think this is an excellent thing. one funny story was back in the early 90 ess, i was on a committee, and i don't remember what it was for. i was sitting in a room of about 20 people, and they pointed to me like i was the man, i was the white guy in the room because of the incredible diversity, everybody was lgbtq +, and i w

commissioner adams. commissioner dooley is absent. commissioner dwight. >> here. >> commissioner laguana. >> here. >> commissioner zouzounis. >> here. >> a commissioner ortiz-cartagena. >> here. >> commissioner yee riley is gone. >> and number two is public comment on items that are not on today's calendar and suggest new items for the future consideration and discussion item. >> do we have any numbers of the public who would like to comment on any items that are not on today's agenda? seeing none, public comment is closed. next item please. >> ie them 3 is being moved to the next meeting. >> you need to read it. >> recognition of traci teraoka, president of the sacramento street merchants association, discussion item. >> i continue to move this to the next meeting since traci is stuck in traffic and cannot be here tonight. >> second. >> all in favor? aye. next item. >> item 4, approval of legacy business registry applications and resolutions. discussion and action items. the presenter is richard kurylo, legacy business program manage

i'm finished. >> commissioner haney. >> thank you chair peskin and commissioner yee on your leadership on this. one of those individuals that lost his life over the weekend was in my district and we held a vigil yesterday and i'm very happy to see this resolution come forward and to have urgency on some of these high priority projects. do you have a list of what the top priority safety projects are and will those be as part of this process, will those be provided on a regular basis? >> they will, i am sorry i don't have a slide with me right now but i can read them real fast. the majority are in district 6. >> is it okay that he reads the priority safety projects? >> howard street, which we already done, that's the first of the ten, and then townsend street, sixth street, fifth street, brannon street, taylor street, almani boulevard, california street, indiana street, and terry francois boulevard. many of those projects, commissioner, you'll note that on streets like sixth and taylor, we are doing a full reconstruction of those streets and we're looking for capital funds for that. we w

commissioner hillis. >> commissioner: so it's a great project. i love cheese but i also love well designed housing projects even better. it's a difficult site because of the l shape and i appreciate the changes you made and hopefully you'll continue discussions. this is not the end of the process. you have to get permits through d.b.i. and elsewhere. you'll have to stay engaged on this. i think this is an appropriate site. it's appropriate use and well designed and i like it and am very supportive. >> commissioner moore. >> commissioner: i'm in support. it's a lovely infill project and sense difficult designed. i want to call out the presentation of the thought process which went into this and was well documented. i wish we had more of that. i hope everybody hears me. it's the ability to look at a project and how it's being crafted and sculpted and it's contextual in terms of the moves are well perceived. i like the sensitivity towards the stoops on the larkin street side. something i talk a lot about. everything we wanted is done. could you expl

commissioner said. you can see some like the 1990s or the 2000s and it's when you look into the future to see what is timeless, though it mimics the past and it's the present. >> president melgar: thank you. >> clerk: item 92018-014905cua at 1711haight street. >> before your presentation i introduce to you katie wilborn, a new planner on the northwest quality rant and arrived at the planning department as an intern last summer and focused on writing the russian heritage context statement. she originally hails from louisville, kentucky and has a masters in interior architecture and a graduate certificate and and we be thrilled to have her and to introduce her to today. (please stand by) >> there are no other massage establishments in the haight street district or within a 300 radius. it's necessary and desirable and the department's recommendation is to approve with restrictions. i'm available for any questions. >> commissioner: do we have a project sponsor? >> i'm paul horcher, retired. it's my pleasure

he's joined by commissioner ann lazarus, commissioner rachael tanner. we expect commissioner darrell -- darryl honda shortly. at the controls of the board legal assistant, -- i'm the board executive director. we'll be joined by representatives of the city department this evening. we expect scott sanchez zoning administrator representing the planning department and planning commission. the board meeting guidelines as follows. the board request that you turn off all electronic devices so they would not disturb the proceedings. please carry on conversations in the hall way. rules of presentation are as follows. appellants and department respondents are given seven minutes to present their and three minutes for rebu re-- reb. people affiliated with the parties must include their comments seven or three minute period. member of the public have three minutes each to address the board. please speak in the microphone. to assist the board, you're asked but not required to submit a speaker card when you come up to speak. speaker cards are available on the left si

commissioners? commissioner moore? i strongly suggest that we teach planning in school. i was in first grade and we had a big sandbox and each of us assumed a role of the baker or librarian or whatever and we would build accordingly a place that reflect what we do and that's the way you think about it. we all come from families but ultimately, how do we live together and what do we all do to create the city some and i think you are doing that in a fabulous way and i do hope that some of you will become professional planners and sooner or later work right here in this department. >> thank you, commissioner. >> thank you all for being here and your ideas. we've spent a lot of time at this and many of the ideas that you came up were the same we come up with. s we need all owe need all of tu talked about. i have a fourth grader and i try to tell him what i do here and when hes down fortnite, i explain it to him but i'll show him this video. >> could we walk around to see the models? i think that would be really fun to do that. >> sure. wrap. >> you have to say it into the mi

thank you very much, commissioner. what that means is we're going to have police officers walking or most likely on bicycles that are patrolling these zones constantly throughout the day, and we'll work with the community to figure out the best times for deployment. but we'll be out there dealing with any possible loitering, issue that we come across. and to your other point, we want to -- if we encounter people that do need service ms. that zone, we want to be -- services in that zone, we want to be able to refer them to services in that zone. >> i'm sorry. i'm cold, which is why i'm shivering a little bit. >> you have two zones -- the first zone is basically a zone where the police officer is assigned to this seven days a week, will be patrolling, and then, the department of homelessness can explain what the outreach zone is. >> we can put the slide back up and walk-through the details. thank you, randy. sf >> so on the pink zone is the safety zone, and the blue zone is the primary outreach zone, and this is the zone