dpa investigations. so the dpa sends their completed investigations to ied. you should not receive the iad investigative conclusions until you've received -- until they've received your report. is that accurate? >> correct. >> i guess it was director henderson who was here last time, his feeling was, as you just expressed it -- and i don't recall what the -- does somebody have any sense of what the opposition to that is? >> yeah. i can tell you what it is. >> okay. >> the reason that the department was getting or is getting the dpa's completed investigation is ultimately it goes to the chief who makes the final decision as to how the department and how he will charge an individual officer in discipline. the reason it doesn't flow the other way is that dpa is really an independent entity. they're an independent civilian review board providing oversight and i think the public is best served, the position that was taken was that the public is best served if the dpa comes to their own conclusion without any influence from the department, and after they do, they w

dpa needs a complaint to start that process. generally, generally we're ahead of dpa. the chief says i need to know what happened. ia launches that investigation. dpa is working on the same investigation based on the complaint from a citizen or another person. the chief has ordered ia to do it. as dpa will get everything ia develops as the investigation goes on. what we're talking about is when we do have concurrent investigations, that they get our conclusions and recommendations when they're done. simply, they base on all the facts they've gathered themselves independently plus our additional facts that we gathered, and there are times where dpa has more information. witnesses go to dpa that don't come to the police department. at the end, you would -- if we don't -- we're not collaborating. we're not arguing. we compare our charges because ultimately, if it's a commission case, you're not going to hear the same case on the same facts being presented by two different prosecutors, one from dpa and one from ia. sometimes information they have, we didn't have. they have

dpa's report will be limited to a brief description of dpa activities and announcements. commissioner discussion will be limited to determining whether to calendar any of the issues raised for future meeting. >> good morning. president hirsch and members of the commission, chief scott and members of the public. i have a few reports. we've received 256 complaints compared to 206 at the same time last year which is a 26% increase in the number of complaints received by dpa. closure this year is also up by 27% closing 229 cases compared to 180 cases at the same time last year. our pending case is up 23% to 317 cases compared to 258. so far this year, we sustained 31 cases compared to 11 last year. we have 33 cases over nine months, 186 which are told. in regards to mediation, we mediated 10 cases so far this year compared to five cases last year. we have one outreach event where dpa staff attended the community meeting. if the public has any questions, the investigator is the in audience ho can -- who can answer some questions. that concludes my report. >> any questions from

. >> ademas determinan que el pa s paasdo dpa pasado del agetnte y trastorno e estres post traumaticono se d podra mencionar en el jucicio . >> ttambien debtae ate si lla la del 911 es evidencia o no pero l la mujer que llamo a las a autoridades sera tesi juicio . >> padres de un adolecenscente e quien se disparo con arma no asegurada presneento con legis d legisladores la ley ethan en elcel capitolio pone estandaretandare el almacenanmmiento . >> programa que marca diferencia en el ahorro de energia podria b benefricificiar a residentes . >> podria causa rmilr mieles deo en proximos aÑos . >> costos para los angeles es el objetivo de un progarama pres a presentado en agencaiias . >> si esta disponible en ele a estado pero hay limitados fondos y ahorita hay mas de 48 apart e apartamento que estan en lista de epera . >> es para los edificios de de departamentos para personas de p pocos recursos ddodne los dueÑos deben remodelar el sistema de g agua, gas entre otros . >> puede tener paneles solares t tambien instalacion de sistemae as electricos y de gas y cambiando lavadoras tambien la

. >> varios estudios confirman que el papel tÉrmico contiene cancerÍgenos conocidos, dpa y dps y la granas. >> la verdad es que trato de no agarrar el recibo, no puede recibo sino que me llegue electrÓnicamente. >> aquÍ en california el tema lo toman con seriedad. el gobierno estÁ considerando legislaciones que requerirÁ que los negocios abandonen los recibo de papel y los cambien por recibos electrÓnicos. y no solamente por cuestiones de salud. los recibo de papel creando en heladas de basura que no pueden se recicladas. en todo caso de ahora en mÁs lo mejor es la prudencia. >> si no necesita recibo, no pida recibo o dÍgale nomÁs que no lo quiere. si quiere recibo, se necesita recibo por cualquier motivo, usted le puede preguntar al cajeros y ofrece mandarle el recibo electrÓnicamente por su correo electrÓnico. >> simplemente prevenciÓn. recuerde que haya tenido recibos en sus manos no significa que le vayan a causar cÁncer maÑana. luis mejÍa, univisiÓn. jorge: quÉ hacemos? ilia: eso te iba a preguntar. toma precauciones de muchas cosas. jorge glas. de entrada aquÍ el recibo no, muchas

we are hearing from every day and who has experience just doesn't match the data we are provided for dpa. i know you are brand-new i am looking forward to working with you to improve the situation. thank you for everyone who stayed during this very long hearing. there is so much brilliance within the community and so much experience and knowledge about how we can actually create a system that works, one that, you know, we have pieces and programs that work right now. an overall system of care does not exist where people can move hopefully down but sometimes up when needed, and really stabilize and be productive members of society. i wanted to mention one other thing, and our second to last speaker from conhard house set me up. mostly because it wasn't in the bla report and i want to make very clear that it is a top priority nor me in terms of the budget process. that is the idea of this co-op living. i want to talk about it for a moment because we didn't focus much on the housing piece today and the housing piece is crucial if we are going to stop the hamster wheel. as we discuss judgmen

or dpa. chief scott el told the board of supervisors it would take 294,000 hours to go through the everyone personnel reports. that averages 2 hours per record. 10 people are on it full-time. by his figures, they could have release 15 records a week. that's 10 5 records since it ended. >> our office is still certainly filing motions. the information you get from that, as many of you know is a name and address. under sb-1421, you get everything. you get transcripts of interviews, you get recordings of interviews. you get any and all information related to that request. and again, this is violence, use of force against a member of the public, this is firing a weapon at a member of the public, and this is sustained allegations of dishonesty against a person who's a member of the public. so those four categories are a subset of what d.p.a. and the police department have, but it is a large amount of information, i understand that. the 30 requests we have made of officers are of active cases. >> th

dpa are on site to coordinate entry into residential and outpatient treatment. people can meet with hsa staff to enroll in medical to get vouchers and a replacement i.d. there are monthly celebration and recreational outings. through a partnership with the national park service, they are taking a group of people to mere woods this month. adp funds 150 beds primarily for people under supervision. we created a re-entry -- a recovery pathway to prioritize housing services for people who successfully complete residential treatment and one of our programs, participants collectively staved $98,000 to support their transition out of our programs. one of our clients was recently able to purchase equity in a unit at the marcus garvey apartments. they were ask to take on the oversight of a programme that ran out of the mayor's office, the ipo employment programme for people originally 18 to 25, now 18 to 30 who are at high risk for crime and violence in their neighborhoods. through a partnership with hsa, community partners, young community developers, we provide year-lon

dpa are on site to coordinate entry into residential and outpatient treatment. people can meet with hsa staff to enroll in medical to get vouchers and a replacement i.d. there are monthly celebration and recreational outings. through a partnership with the national park service, they are taking a group of people to mere woods this month. adp funds 150 beds primarily for people under supervision. we created a re-entry -- a recovery pathway to prioritize housing services for people who

he is reportedly planning to defy that subpoena and dpas legal consequences for doing so. i mean, does michael cohen know that? i mean, michael cohen has just gone to prison and, remember, michael cohen has just gone to prison in part for arranging to pay hush money to two women right before the presidential election. donald trump jr. is one of the people who actually signed the checks that paid for that whole hush money scheme. but donald trump jr. is at large. michael cohen is in prison. michael cohen is also in prison now for lying to the intelligence committees about the trump tower moscow real estate deal that he worked to arrange throughout the campaign while the president was publicly maintaining that he had no business deals in russia. well, this week donald trump jr. is facing that subpoena to come back and testify again to the senate intelligence committee, reportedly specifically about trump tower moscow because of perceived problems with his testimony on that same subject before the same committees. i mean, inmate number 86067-054, the man on your left, is in f

>> if dpa is having conversations with more honestly discussing risks they have not told me. >> john referred to more and more work places having trouble finding people who are not on one form of addiction -- one form of drug or another. there is any data yet to -- on things like workplace accidents or maybe more generally things like traffic accidents? >> there's some data coming out of colorado and washington. in general, traffic accidents where thc is found in the bloodstream of the driver have again up. i don't know about workplace accidents. i will say that a couple times from people on the legalization side or scientists who favor legalization, they say, you know, this book does a disservice because you're talking but a risk of sigh exposes and the real problem is that a lot of people get addicted and it messes up their lives and they just don't really work, they just kind of float through life, they're not a successful as they could be, and i say to them, is that a reason to legalize? i'm confused about what you're saying here. it does seem clear that -- whether you believe th

if you look at it on its dpas, that's beyond dispute. i know that and you know that and nonetheless you're rushing to hold him in contempt. so despite your intent that the subpoena not require 6e material without a court order, that's what the subpoena you issued actually demands if you read it on its face. you and every single democrat member on this dais voted for that and that's the danger we're talking today about moving forward so quickly on these things. so here's the thing. i ask my good friends and colleagues on the other side, how explain today's sudden change of heart? is it true it is not your intent to force the a.g. to break the law to disclose 6e material, and if that is your intent, that proves what every republican on this dais has been saying all day. if it's not, the subpoena you've issued is dangerously overbroad and the question is are you going to reissue a new subpoena? it's a change of heart -- >> will the gentleman yield? >> i'll yield. >> no, we're not going to issue a new subpoena. we have no intention and never

do you ever any knowledge that these dpa loans are hurting worse than other dpa loans? >> i'm not familiar with the data. >> i think that's because there is no data. hud does not collect taxpayer i.d.s that differentiate between the tribal fha and a non-tribal fha. mr. secretary, i appreciate the role you must play in protecting taxpayers in the mmif, but if you do not currently collect the appropriate data, then perhaps we should collect the data before moving forward with this policy. >> i agree with this. >> thank you. if you do agree, maybe we can revisit this and look at engaging the public in the process before continuing. thank you. >> thank you. the gentleman from ohio, mr. gonzalez, is recognized for five minutes. >> thank you, madam chair. thank you, dr. carson, for being here and your attention to all the servicemen in the country. i want to start by commending you for taking on facebook and uncovering what i think most americans, if they knew the details of, would be sickened by. could you just briefly sort of describe what you found and kind of give an upda

if you look at it on its dpas, that's beyond dispute. i know that and you know that and nonetheless you're rushing to hold him in contempt. so despite your intent that the subpoena not require 6e material without a court order, that's what the subpoena you issued actually demands if you read it on its face. you and every single democrat member on this dais voted for that and that's the danger we're talking today about moving forward so quickly on these things. so here's the thing. i ask my good friends and colleagues on the other side, how explain today's sudden change of heart? is it true it is not your intent to force the a.g. to break the law to disclose 6e material, and if that is your intent, that proves what every republican on this dais has been saying all day. if it's not, the subpoena you've issued is dangerously overbroad and the question is are you going to reissue a new subpoena? it's a change of heart -- >> will the gentleman yield? >> i'll yield. >> no, we're not going to issue a new subpoena. we have no intention and never

to the internal kbugs engine they are moving rapid will i to the electric they don't have the right dpat's about to happen the old mod sell a hardware centric mechanical engineering modelle. now we are talking about batteries, robots, artificial intelligence, and the necessity of collecting miles of data in order to move into the new age they -- they are scrambling. they are scrambling. if you look at what they're doing, the bolt, the bolt sold five thousand electric vehicles bolt in the first quarter 5,000 electric vehicles. tesla 50,000 model 3s. you know moving up. >> that will always be the way. >> we're assuming any lose two thirds share in the bear case one third in the bull case bus you are right, someone is going to come out with a very interesting car. >> cathy, if -- if the stock analysts doesn't have a five-year time horizon presumably the credit markets do right now the benchmark tesla bonds mature in six years trading at 81 cents on the dollar yielding more than 9% what's the message there because presumably if in fact they are cash flow positive the rest of the year they a

affecting tax players, but if you do not currently collect the appropriate data to judge the success of a dpa program, then perhaps we should collect that data before moving forward with this policy. i yield back. secretary carson: i agree with you, actually. mr. mcadams: thank you. if you do agree, i hope we can relook at this and engage the public in a process before continuing. thank you. chair waters: thank you. the insulin from ohio is recognized for five minutes. mr. gonzalez: thank you, madam chair. thank you, mr. carson, for being here and for all your service to the country. i want to start first by commending you for taking on facebook and uncovering what i think most americans if they knew the details of would be sickened by. could you briefly sort of describe what you found and kind of give an update as to the status of the investigation the? as you know,son: it's in federal court now, so i cannot do too much, but i will say in general, they are able to collect enormous amounts of thatmation about people people have no idea is being collected. the real problem is when you use that

that's the pd dpa document first quarter 2019. request of chief of police to accept 16,6666 from the casa de las madres to go towards the domestic violence high risk program. this requires a motion. >> so moved. >> second. >> all in favor. >> we need public comment before we vote, please. is there any public comment on this one item? seeing none, comment is close the. we'vwe're ready for the vote. all in favor. >> aye. >> all opposed? it passes. >> line 2, reports of the commission discussion, a, chief's report, provide an overview of offenses in san francisco, significant events. chief's report will be a chief description of the significant events. commission discussion will be limited to determining whether to calendar any of the incidents the chief describes for future commission meeting. major events, provide a summary of planned activities and events occurring since the previous meeting. this will include an overview of any unplanned events or activities occurring in san francisco having an impact on public safety. commission