anti-semitism we hear islamophobia so i am going to ask you a very specific question in minute touches can mr harkins peace or just hold on if you can just be quiet for five seconds before you take power. i would like to know what the parties on the right think about history did you learn absolutely nothing from twentieth century european history absolutely nothing you mr krause said learning our history is very important and you see here you repeat the phrases that we heard in the one nine hundred twenty nine hundred thirty s. it's outrageous now is your question mr touch and here we go you want a christian europe where does that leave those of us who are christian and we second class citizens we medical experiments what do you want with us and to you on the other side the left what do you do about these people what do you know of for the public to show these people for what they are and just do something about the mad men this time so we don't have a repeat of last time they're in touch inskeep ok so the christian europe is not muslim europe i don't want you slam ization i'm not the only thing they

course, the question about the fed actions causing inflation to be lower harkins to inflation expectations, the fed keeps raising rates. that maybe discourages people from thinking we will get there. jay powell says the current policy stance is appropriate. not looking for a hike or a cap. -- or a cut. , if not justto see lower inflation, lower growth for that to happen. david: at the moment he is sounding his support for a stronger economy, that is the view so far at least. any chance that low inflation might change his mind? first, the bet on the stronger economy, low-end -- low unemployment, he sees it pick up in the second half of the year. purchasing managers index fell sharply. hass still signaling growth been down. export orders are down. maybe he is counting on a trade deal soon so that some uncertainty is eliminated. we spoke to former federal reserve bank president dennis lockhart, he was there from 2007-2017, through the financial crisis. he does not think we will see a hike or a cut. when i pressed him on why inflation keeps falling, here is what he said. people can over read t

from harkins position is shared by a large community worldwide lawyers make is n.g.o.s they all one of the danger these agreements and upper tracing tribunals pose to citizens around the world. knew. we had the case is different solutions if an investor feels unfairly hummed which can happen they should have access to a state cool even before it is in a better position to balance the financial and economic interests of the investor against the general interests of the public who are directly affected by state regulations it's essential to maintain this balance of power. and investment up a trace in proceedings launched corporations can assert their will for the most part in utmost secrecy. this secrecy don't honey obscures the process from the public it's the very foundation of this parallel justice system that forces states to agree to supplement and wave is detrimental to the interest. the public and the environment. take this case in europe and 2009 swedish energy giant of what in fact one of europe's largest energy producers filed a lawsuit against germany over dispute with the cit

it harkins back to what the definition of "is" is. i think you saw barr being a very good lawyer. you know, clearly there is something more there, and who knows what it is, but i think there's more to that story. >> shan, when you look at this on reversal of rudy giuliani, what do you maybe of this 180? >> i like to think it's because he heard my comments, but i doubt that. it is sort of common sense that he shouldn't do it. it raises all sorts of questions about obstruction, because he said i'm middling in an investigation, but secondly, is he acting on behalf of a foreign power. and lastly, it raises a cloud over what kind of conversations is he have been with the president? is there a national security issue? are there classified issues? it's such a poor idea that i'm glad he thought better of it. >> turning to another member, who was once on trump's legal team, don mcgahn, we're now hearing that the president's attorney emmitt flood reached out to mcgahn, asking limb to say publicly that he did not believe that the president had obstructed justice. >> i think there's a few lin

s russia investigation known as crossre harkin. >> woodruff: in terms ofns particf somebody who follows f.b.i. all the time, what's the difference between investigating someone as ty did in this case and they acknowledge it, and spag on hemeone, which is the term attorney general used at onepo t and the president is using? >> i mean, you typically don't hear law enforcement officials use the word "spying." you know, it's court-ordered or court-approved surveillance. that seems to have become a loaded term, a pejative term. you know, attorney general william barr said earlier this week that it was a fine english word, and he had no problems using it, but for critics of trump, they see this as a way to, you know, delegitimize, you know, the f.b.i.'s efforts to try to figure out what was going on in really he can tick peri before the election. >> woodruff: well, as you say,e ump administration attempting, many of them, to sa that ts not a legitimate move on the part of the f.b.i.ad who would haveo approve it before it took place? >> and this was a sensitive nderation taking place in and, a

s russia investigation known as crofire harkin. >> woodruff: in terms of particlens of somebody who follows f.b. all the time, what's the difference between investigating someone as they did in this case and thy acknowledge it, and spag on someone, which is the term the attorney general used at one point and the president is using? >> i mean, you typically don'tor hear law enment officials use the word "sp ilu know, it's court-ordered or court-approved surnce. that seems to have become a loaded term, a pejorative term. you know, attorney ge earlier this week that it was a fine english word, and he had no oblems using it, but for critics of trump, they see this as a way to, you know, delegitimize, you know, the f.b.i.'s efforts to try to figure out what was gong on in this really he can tick period before the electioo >> wuff: well, as you say, the trump adminiration attempting, many of them, to say that this was not ait legate move on the part of the f.b.i. oko would have had to approve it before it tolace? >> and this was a sensitiven operatking place in london and, as i've said, the briti

pertain to conspiring with chelsea money to harkin two pence ago on computers rather than publishing information itself but a lot of his supporters and his legal team say that it's highly likely that if he were extradited to the u.s. then additional charges could be brought and they say that is a worry you prospect all along his lawyers have said that the reason that he sought asylum in the ecuadorian embassy was that he wanted that the fear that he could be sent to the u.s. to face charges which could carry the death penalty those arguments didn't get very far so far in the courts here in britain but what's clear is that his legal team will be fighting this extradition request all the way and it could take months possibly even years before it's concluded alan jones as a journalist at the press association has interviewed many times he explains the complexity of the court cases. the problem is there's been no precedent for this kind of case it's hugely complicated you know there will be there's already been books written about this there will be several more books written about this