. >> i think it was a cheiron and it used to be alioto field. i do agree with my fellow commissioner. >> i'll move to deny the appeal and up hold the modification on the basis that the criteria were met. >> we have a motion from the commissioner to deny the appeal and uphold the rear yard on the basis it meets three criteria under 134e. on that motion been commissioners? (roll call). >> so that motion carries 4-0 and an appeal is denied. thank you. >> we are now moving on to item number nine and this is a special item, consideration possible action by the board to request that the department of pub health review an update of june 14, memorandum. it's regarding the health effects and allegation o commun. >> for establishing context and for any viewers that might be viewing in and for the public record, if you have participated, watched this board fofor any period of time, you he experienced deliberations over wireless installation items. what is a constant as part of those deliberations is the claim from the appellants that the 1997, i believe, f