joining us now is aaron davis, investigative reporter with "the washington post." mr. davis, i appreciate your time tonight. this is quite a scoop. >> thanks for having me. >> so you mentioned that mr. shanahan had been discussing these incidents with "the post," with you since january. it's remarkable that you guys have had this reporting project in the works for all this time while when he was not long ago confirmed as deputy defense secretary, this never turned up in any of the documents that were handed over to the senate. senators say they had no idea. this apparently didn't pop in any of his background stuff that was made available. >> well, shanahan in his interviews with us says there was some litigation of this very issue the first go-round when he was up for the number two slot in the pentagon, that that was communicated that a fbi background check was communicated to then chairman mccain and ranking member of the senate armed services committee. it does seem, though, there's been a much more fuller investigation by the fbi in the course of this much larger ro

information is the subject of an indictment.>> you obviously have a lot of experience with how washington post public plea post this information. what is your take on it? to make this a couple of things to consider, first of all there's 18 counts, the first one he was originally indicted on was a hacking charge, it was a conspiracy to commit computer fraud, then the back. >> can you justify to people who don't know, it was specifically about trying to help break the password. saying this is how you do it.>> coaching to crack a password. that charge doesn't bother me at all, we just don't we can't break the law, we don't try to crack codes, we are citizens, we are not above the law. we don't have policing, or the right to arrest. the charge, the other 17 counts are more concerning, sort of a slippery slope perspective, the idea that obtaining classified information and then publishing classified information, it's a threat to national security. and then somehow, it's treason, essentially. as i sit here today, knowing the kind of safeguards we have built into our editorial and legal process, not

but in essence, jeff bezos owns the washington post. was the newspaper where jamal khashoggi wrote his columns. after khashoggi's murder, the washington post was perhaps one of the strongest media organisations demanding a complete review of us policy towards saudi arabia. the saudis, i dare say, were very much less than happy with the washington post coverage. sojeff bezos is connected to that whole story. is he financing you today? well, he's not, i mean, and our engagement with jeff bezos‘s investigation team did not involve any kind of compensation for our time or for our work. it wasn't a contractual kind of relationship. i mean, that said, i would simply add to your descriptionjeff bezos‘s situation here, is that i believe at the time ofjamal khashoggi's murder, jeff bezos found himself in a bit of a quandary, in a bit of a complexifier, as he describes it. because this is a man who owned the washington post, for which jamal khashoggi worked, but he's also a man who had business ties and a kind of direct relationships with mbs. so

nbc news has not seen the court or police records used in "the washington post's" reporting. joining me from the white house, nbc news correspondent hans nichols and from the uae, covering national security and the pentagon, courtney kube. i understand we've just gotten a statement here. and what do we know about the background of this? >> so, yeah, we got a long statement from the acting secretary of defense saying that he would actually like to serve as the secretary of defense, but he cites what you just talked about in the intro there about this issue with his family. and he talks about how there is a deeply personal family situation from long ago that's been dredged up, and painted in what he calls an incomplete and misleading way. and he says that he doesn't want to relive this traumatic time in his family's life and put his three children through it. president trump when he tweeted about this just earlier today, he said that one of the reasons that acting secretary of defense patrick shanahan has withdrawn his name from contention is because he wants to spend more time

and according to "the washington post," the vote could also block billions of dollars in border wall nding announced by the president in february when he declared a national emergency. senate majority whip john thune tells the post, we have a lot of members who are very concerned about where this is headed. the president is threatening to impose a 5% tariff on mexican imports beginning next week and the rate rising incrementally to 25% tariffs by october 1st, and not to fix a trade deficit but to punish mexico for illegal immigration. so using trade as a tool for a different policy goal, it's got republicans concerned. >> we have said this before but this is a moment of truth for conservatives in congress, we shall see. >>> a setback for democrats in their bid to stop president trump from building a border wall. a federal judge ruled the president can transfer funds from appropriate accounts to pay for construction. the judge says the house lacks standing to challenge the president and concludes the courts should get involved in the fight between the president and congress. the ruling

as first reported by "the washington post" today, a spokesperson for the park police has confirmed thegency has been notified that trump definitely plans to speak at the memorial. meaning at the lincoln memorial. in order to accommodate the president's plans to speak at the event, they also have to move the fireworks. the fireworks are always on the mall. but this year because trump is going to be on the mall, the fireworks instead will be at west potomac park, which i'm sure will be fine. i'm sure it will all go fine. i'm sure it will be seamless and dignified and not at all partisan or embarrassing, and everything will just go step by step, just as they intend. it will have the desired effect, because, you know, if nothing else, this president and this presidency, they great at the protocol stuff, right? and the ceremonial stuff. last night on this show we showed this picture from the president's trip to buckingham palace. we showed this in part because of the news value of the fact that the president's adult children are there. it has been something of a mystery as to why u.s. taxpa

and a biden aide told "the washington post" that he would not have opposed it.bottom line, this is an institution ill suited for a 60-second sound bite. be sure to answer the question at smerconish.com. we're asking does joe biden owe any pauly for his past position on busing? so does biden's fuller explanation reflected in his memoir absolve his past role? i want to ask the leader of the harvard kennedy school. brooks is the former president and ceo of the naacp. professor, he distinguishes between de facto and unintent n unintentional and dejure, does that provide any cover or context for this? >> it provides context but it does not provide cover. it is important to make a distinction between dejure and de facto and segregation. but also segregation as a consequence of policy. that is to say, as schools, segregated as a consequence of law or policy. but also, segregation brought about as a consequence of housing policy. housing laws. residential segregation. so, in other words, children can arrive at segregated schools as a consequence of administrators and el

"washington post," thank you so much.d, we will be following all the democratic contenders on the road to miami for the first democratic debate of the 2020 election. only on msnbc, nbc and telemundo. a two-day event june 26th and 27th. >>> meanwhile, a quick check over in london. this look at president trump inside clarence house with prince charles and the duchess of cornwall as well. we are told they are all having tea right now in london. we will bring you more updates on this state visit as they unfold. >>> a brewing storm for big tech back here, though. why tech giants like google and amazon could face tougher scrutiny from federal regulators. >>> and how's this for a warm welcome? president barack obama getting a standing ovation last night as he took in a game. game two of the nba finals, actually. while it is still unclear which team takes home that trophy, the crowd decided on an mvp, apparently. [ cheers and applause ] there's so much scent in new gain scent blast detergent... ...you'll either love it or... mmm.

think this will allow them to have a pathway to a better life or not want john hudson is the washington post's national security reporter who obtained that order of quoting of pump a 0 and he joins us now live from washington d.c. thanks for being with us john to contrast imperius from compare and question are they looking at the same peace plan. right i mean this is a big climb down from the initial rhetoric of the ultimate deal secretary. was very frank in his remarks to jewish leaders is his view that it's very possible that this is not going to pan out they have all of these precondition plans for what happens if it's rejected outright and israel tries to annex parts of the west bank very much acknowledging that this could definitely pan out so jared has been the main architect of this plan of course and pump aoe has been largely watching from the side so it gives him a little bit of distance to look at it. but he has pushed very hard to promote the idea that this is something that's going to work john you say that pump air was frank here's some fairly incredulous phrases no guarantee is o

he tells "the washington post" he will answer every question without exception. conversation former u.s. attorney and msnbc legal analyst, and back with us tim o'brien who knows the role sater plays within the trump orbit very well. "the washington post" says he plans to discuss previously undiscussed details about his efforts to get trump tower built in moscow. people seem to be very enthused that sater is going to tell all. why are we so convinced he knows that much, a, and, b, that he is going to be honest? he's hardly a good character. >> that's the problem with felix sater as a witness. he is a career criminal, in an investment scam where he targeted holocaust victims. he has been a long-term and long-time partner of president trump. trump has denied this repeatedly in depositions but it is simply not true. sater had an office two floors beneath trump's in trump tower. they pursued the trump tower moscow deal together. they built the trump sojo together. they pursued other deals together. the question that needs to be answered is what does felix sater say ab

he spoke publicly about the incident and interviews with the "washington post" on monday. and tuesday. batd things can happen to good families and this is tragedy. he said drudging up the episode publicly will ruin my sons life. the post cites court and police records from florida and seattle ability the incidents. cited in their report. we should note we haven't seen the same documents. earlier today president trump said shanahan decided not to move forward with the process and spend more time with his family. the president was asked about him before departing for florida this afternoon. >> i didn't -- he walked in and said it will be a rough time for him. because of obviously what happened. i did not ask him to withdraw. he presented me with a letter this morning. that was his decision. >> i had heard about it yesterday. for the first time. i didn't know about it. i heard about it yesterday. it's very unfortunate. >> while it's not clear when trump learned about the issues white house aids and officials in the administration have known about the alleged domestic violence

the washington post explains why the brits are protective over this national institution.story. with xi jinping set to visit russia later today to meet with putin. the moscow times reports that crimea has the fastest growing economy in russia mainly due to vast amount of investment in the region. the la times reports that tesla has made a vast sum of money by selling their so—called "right to pollute" credits to other car makers. the daily telegraph says that in a world—first, france will ban supermarkets and producers from destroying clothes and electronics. instead they have to give them away. and in the new york times is a report that shows how the progressive paternity leave allowances in sweden are having a positive impact on the mental health of new mothers. david buikl is back as promised. let's get going. i thought this was really interesting. to look at what the us media is saying about president trump's visit to the uk, and the washington post in particular looking at this debate about whether the nhs is going to be about whether the nhs is going to be a part of

"the washington post" reports, quote, u.s. officials have said in recent days that the operation was not imminent and i.c.e. officials said late monday night that they were not aware that the president planned to divulge their enforcement plans on twitter. but the vice president of the national border control council tried to spin this in a more positive way. >> we're going to have to wait and see what happens. i can tell you that the i.c.e. agents are going to be very excited about finally being able to go out there and do their job, and if they need assistance i'm sure there's other agencies within the dhs that are more than willing to help them. i've had it up to here with all these individuals constantly trying to compare concentration camps to what we're doing. i was just at one of the detention facilities. the kids were outside their cell. because there are so many of them, they were on the floor playing puzzles, watching movies, eating cookies. >> that's fantastic. watching movies, eating cookies. of course he was respo

say the work in washington post had a positive view of the tory when the didn't have a positive attitude toward. the 2 newspapers to sit in nothing good about julian for years. and on that note do you think that this sudden change into the mainstream media is due to the fact that since julian will be like it's being sold off of i want to ask an object you think these newspapers are finally realizing julian's freedoms that it's yes. it's a bit light but welcome aboard get things. right and just finally julian sparrow of course that's been the fame for years is his spirit still still strong and his determination to fight is you know like he chose me to do this do that you know or when i was this sort of thing to do i'm here. and so the stewardess string you all stupid or weight of a 20 pound 10 kilos. which is not good good stuff it was you know i just want you think that the u.s. and u.k. are they making a direct intervention to the legal process oh the year we do you has constantly than the crown prosecuting. this has constantly interfered with the process of the swedish prosecuting auth

now "the washington post" is reporting that mexico ames to avoid the taxes with a potential deal that would stem migrant travel and allow the united states to deport thousands of central american asylum seekers. we don't yet have the details. it's in the details where the devil also lies. so we'll wait for those. earlier today, it was president trump that said there might be something miraculous to happen. whether this is the matter to which he was referring remains to be seen. when we have more, we'll bring it to you right away. >> they battled not for control and domination but for liberty, democracy and self-rule. the lives that they gave, the sacrifice that they made did not just win a battle. it did not just win a war. those that fought here won a future for our nation. they won the survival of our civilization. >> we know what we owe, to you, brethren, our freedom. on behalf of my nation, i just want to say thank you. >> shepard: the eyes of the world are upon you. the hopes and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you. those were the parting words from general

but if it's one in a hundred it's too many. >> i'm joined now by jennifer rueben, "washington post," writer, he's also an msnbc political analyst. always good to have you, jennifer if the what yo doh you make of the president's remarks there? how do you think they'll play with hispanic voters? >> i don't think they'll play very well and i think the challenge for the democrats is to take the antagonism that the hispanic community feels towards president trump and turn that vote out. we saw it a little bit in 2018. we saw it in texas, for example, with beto o'rourke. so trump's game may be to try to allay that anxiety or to try to suppress or deter people from getting to the polls. i don't think he's going to actually win people over. i think democrats challenge, as it always is, is to turn their people out. and there's plenty of reason for them to do it. and there's also economic reason do it. and that goes back to some of those bread and butter issues that democrats i think are going to have to stress not only to turn out hispanic voters, really any voter at all. >> i want to play an

jamal khashoggi was a columnist "the washington post."oes not say the prince is guilty of ordering the killi. eck out the today show. >>> and that is the news for . today we appreciate you waking up with us. >> the today show is next. we'll be back in 25 minutes with all our weather traffic and local news. until then, enjoy your day. ea >> make it a wednesday, everybody. when you get the diagnosis of cancer you don't know how you're going to handle it. you really don't know what's coming down the road for you. i was diagnosed with stage 4 oral cancer the doctors at g w hospital were fantastic. they were wi aing to advocate for anernative treatment that had better outcomes for me. a better life over a longer term with fewer side effects. i want to say thank you for getting me through cancer treatment and back to living my life. for life's defining moments the george withington university hosp defining medicine.g moments >>> good morning. four more years? >> i stand before you to officially launch my campaign for a second term. >> president

took a ship she's murder at the country's consulate in istanbul last year a columnist for the washington post was known for his outspoken criticism of the saudi government the saudi journalist jamal as he arrives at the saudi consulate in istanbul minutes light of the washington post columnist will be murdered inside the building by saudi agents now are you an expert says his enemies at the very top of the government to blame the execution of the war was the response of the state. shortly after she entered the embassy these 2 men left one of them was dressed to look like the journalist complete with a fake beard. this picture shows the 2 suspects in the background apparently disposing of evidence. members of the hit squad then left the country on this private plane but despite the coverup the u.n. believes it knows who the brains behind the operation were. what i do at it is if you don't suggesting that the response said b t's of high level officials may be engaged and therefore he's requiring further investigation into to kill the clue prince mohammed bin selman is literally the power behind

so the world washington post had a positive movie tory windy as opposed to that it took. 2 newspapers to sit and not feel good about julian for years. and on that note do you think that this sudden change into the mainstream media is due to the fact that since you're going to be like this being so often want to be asking are you think these newspapers are finally realizing julian's freedoms that it's yes. it's a bit light but. thinks. right and. just finally as julian sparrow of course was the famed for years says spirit still is spirit still strong in his determination to fight it you know like he tells me to do this do that you know over the years this sort of thing or doing i'm here. and so the spirit is strong the last of it away to about 20 pounds 10 kilos. which is not good but it's stabilized now i just want you think that the u.s. and u.k. are they making direct intervention to the legal process oh the year we do you k. has constantly than the crown prosecuting this has constantly interfered with the process of the swedish prosecuting authority interviewing julian in the embas

, one article by the washington post that talked about how there's a legal history of this goingd the clinton administration with flores settlement in 1997 but most of the media are silent on the need for a border and they're silent on the fact that this is something that's been going on for at least 20 years. >> kathy, other outlets shine the spotlight on dangerous and unsanitary conditions and force white house to react, is that a positive agenda? >> well, it's the tail wagging the dog, the media definitely got the dog going because pelosi and democrats rushed right away, they heard from latino leaders in the country and they heard also from constituents and others ho -- who said we need to do something about humanitarian crisis at the border that was created by trump, there's not saying there's a financial crisis in the country created by undocumented citizens, people, there's humanitarian issue at the border created by trump. it's a play on words, but the media has also been covering since the obama years, detention centers, photos taken there, they've been talked about in "t

we are so happy to have with us george will, conservative columnist from the "washington post" author of the conservative sensibility. thank you so much for being here. i am old enough to associate cur conservivism with two names. >> the book you are holding is dedicated to the memory of barry goldwater for whom i cast my first presidential vote. he lost 44 states but i think he won when they counted the votes 16 years later with the election of ronald reagan. the argument about conservatism is what we see represented in the 45th president whose name does not appear in the book or is it something that traces its pedigree to james madison and our constitutional architecture of separated powers? you just showed on the screen there, the president aghast at the idea that the republicans in the senate might act as an independentvivalerous branch with an opinion of its own. it's nice to see them talking about exercising their own judgment in opposition to tariffs, the least conservative policy you can imagine which is the government telling americans what they can buy at what price and in w

and according to "the washington post," the vote could also block billions of dollars in border wall funding announced by the president in february when he declared a fascial emergency. senate majority whip john thune tells the post we have a lot of members who are very concerned about where this is headed. congress is going to want to be heard from in terms of trying to limit trump's tariff authority. the president threatening to impose a 5% tariff on mexican imports with the rate raising incrementally to 25%. >>> a setback for democrats in their bid to stop president trump from building a border wall. a federal judge in washington ruling the president can transfer funds from appropriated accounts to pay for construction. the judge also says the house lacks standing to even challenge the president and it concludes the court should get involved in the fight between the president and congress. the ruling not expected to impact other lawsuits by house democrats and various states to block construction. >>> house is launching a top-to-bottom antitrust probe with google, amazon, facebook,

"the new york times" said that in the "washington post." they both recently in prints that most americans got aat tax cut from the 2017 tax reduction. >> host: with the report that he may have been referring to with the impact of the tax cut this from the "washington post" story about the research service noting that in 2018 the gross domestic product was 2.9%, about the projected rate published in 2017 for the tax cut on the whole it tended to show a relatively small than any first year affected the economy that's according to the report's summary of they couldn't indicate the effect on gdp they tend to rule out large effects in the short run so that's from the report. >> guest: the only effect to expect is the day that it has to actually the day the president of elected he saw the stock market showedd up because people couldn't project he would take the business tax from the worst in the world can add 35% over about the obama administration and never did anything about it or introduced a bill to fix it. everybody said it needs tosa be fix

considerations in another country, so we can try to read parts of that, what's on that sheet that the "washington post" snapped there. it's not going to be the full agreement. it does say something about another 45 days you can revisit this entire agreement. ali? >> hans, good to see you as always, hans nichols traveling with the president in iowa. i want to bring in "the des moines register's" politics reporter brianne, thanks for being with us. >> thanks for having me. >> what does the showdown mean in iowa? we're going to be seeing a lot of that over the course of the next few months. >> absolutely. what we're seeing here is dueling rallies on opposite ends of the state. president donald trump and front-runner vice president joe biden who are trying to keep the attention on each other right now. joe biden is leading in our most "des moines register" iowa poll, he's at 24%. and that leads the pack. so he's trying to lean into this front-runner status. he's trying to make this race about him and the president trying to show that he's got the grit, that he can take on this president, he can meet fire

this is "the washington post."fessional journalists who are not putting their lives and careers on the line to make up stuff about the president. so i imagine that the american people will believe it, but unfortunately, trump's base will not matter at all. >> okay. so i was going to say it's just all about the base for the most part. >> doesn't matter, yeah. >> amy, the president tweeted that former president obama would have been hailed as incredible if he'd made the same deals at the border and for the economy. what do you make of his insistence on shaping this narrative for himself since he's not satisfied with the media reports, and what effect does it have? >> well, i do believe that he's correct in saying that. in saying that. it's interesting, since i have been in israel, i did give a few of my friends heads-up notice they was going to be appearing on national -- united states national television this evening. a couple joked and said, oh, is that fake news that you're going to be appearing on? it's now becom

it's quite interesting to see how the washington post says the brits are fiercely protective.nd our health system couldn't be any more different to theirs. and the democrats were desperately trying to get the price of drugs down and were always getting towards the by the republicans in congress. this has political connotations for them, too. president trump did say on this subject maybe not the nhs, mayjust a part of it. he loves it. he can't get enough. talking it up. well, that's david buik‘s promise. let's move that's david buik‘s promise. let's m ove o nto that's david buik‘s promise. let's move onto the moscow times. going global today. it's really interesting. it looks at the crimean economy and how it has done since russia very controversially annexed crimea. this is classic putin. i suppose if i am hugely critical, i was a great fan of barack obama, but i think was a great fan of barack obama, but ithink in was a great fan of barack obama, but i think in terms of foreign policy, he was a nightmare because he didn't get enough done. we've given huge impetus to china and

>> throughout the campaign "the washington post" news pages have become noticeably more partisan, "the york times" pages were anti--trump, as where the post, some headlines in "the new york times" obtaining raw opinion as to some of the stories that were labeled as news analysis. but the more anti--trump, "the new york times" has perceived to be, the more it was mistrusted for being biased. who said that? >> sean: who? >> the executive editor of "the new york times." she wrote it in her book. when you have the leaders, the people who run the newspaper, the woman who around "the new york times" admitting this about "the new york times" itself and her observations about "the washington post," it is not conservatives who believe this about the media, it is a media itself. that's a problem. and why it will be so hard to ever recover the grounds of mutuality or fact-finding. or the things that the american people look to them to do. even when donald trump is gone, whenever his time is done, the media has so badly hurt itself. >> sean: karl, as i said, the branding of trump is tattooed into

for our leadoff discussion on a tuesday evening, carol lening, investigative reporter for the washington post. kimberly atkins and mika, veteran washington lawyer, former staffer for the house intelligence and arms services committees. welcome to you all. carol, i would like to begin with you. what will the democrats lose by not getting the testimony of these two young women, assuming they say no to that subpoena, as well? >> well, i think your opening was perfect in describing what they lose. both of these people are insiders in the most dramatic way in the trump white house. annie donaldson because she kept basically a running diary of important things that were being said by the president that were ultimately used as potential evidence of obstruction of justice by the president, efforts to throttle the probe. hope hicks is also a compelling figure, a person who is by the president's side whisperring in his ear what she thinks he should do and him responding he will agree with her or no and also some of what she saw was used as potential evidence of obstruction of justice in the mueller pro

this would who are dominating the ice you know what do you make of revelations in the washington post that suggest he wanted to take down the leader of britain's opposition jeremy cool been before he became prime minister just reported by the washington post and again i ask if people don't know going to listen to this if people are not going to take this seriously and react to it and press. for this then we are now very bad but we are not in about the way in the sense that the world is waking up to the importance of showing solidarity with whistleblowers with with with free press with a transparent source so that's a positive trend. thank you and that's a show we'll be back on monday with former prime minister as the european union meets to discuss its continuing support for the overthrow of the venezuelan government still then you can touch social media see them. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. let it be an arms race. spanning dramatic development only. i don't see how that strategy will be successful very. time you see. him talk.

this is a headline from "the washington post."democrats in california confronting deep divisions over how to handle the calls for impeachment. deep divisions were fresh when last marks -- last night's remarks by robert mueller raised new questions about whether president trump had committed impeachable violations, playing out time and time again in the first full day of the weekend convention. putting up a new fissure between democratic and congressional leaders and party white house hopefuls who are once again largely united in opposition to impeachment after the mueller comments, the list of presidential candidates calling for growing. more details available at their website. from sigmund -- host: let's get your phone calls. michael is joining us from winston-salem, north carolina. you support the idea of impeachment. why? caller: i think my take on all of this is i support impeachment because to me president trump is the most controversial president that we have ever had in this country. he just likes things his way. he doesn't

ante la nueva medida del gobierno estadounidense para detener la ola migratoria. >>> segÚn el washington postnald trump su territorio para frenar la migraciÓn centro americana hacia el norte >>> es una medida inhumana, injusta y que viola la soberanÍ de la naciÓn. >>> de ser implementada la decisiÓn, analistas coinciden que los migrantes simplemente tomarÍan rutas del territorio guatemalteco mÁs aisladas y peligrosas >>> va a incrementar el peligro y la vulnerabilidad de menores, de mujeres, de familia esa. >>> gobierno guatemalteco no se ha pronunciado en torno a la publicaciÓn. >>> sin haberse confirmado o concretado la situaciÓn. hay voces que con ello se violarÍa la soberania guatemalteca y en riesgo los flujos migratorios que salen de este paÍs hacia el norte >>> el secretario de seguridad interino kevin mc. al presidente jimmy morales en un marco para la estrategia para el trÁfico d personas en guatemala jenni corado noticias telemundo >>> estados unidos va a reducir el nÚmero de menores s concedmi que les concede derechos especiales anularon una prohibiciÓn en el gobierno de barack oba

here to tell me if i'm right or wrong, sarah ellison, staff writer for the "washington post." noah shackman, editor and chief of "the daily beast," and correspondent for "the atlantic," elena plott. thank you for being here. i was struck by how much attention mueller received. he did make news in his statement. do you think ultimately it had a significant impact on the public debate? >> i think it had the beginning of an impact for sure. it even had brett baier on fox news saying it was a very different message than what people had heard from william barr. so it was a short statement. you know, we were all sort of geared up for something very explosive. i do think it was a significant and important thing that he said. and so we can't judge just whether he should have done that or whether -- how many minds were changed. it was the beginning of the conversation. >> the beginning, not the end. the idea that the president is screaming while everybody else in the public sphere is only kind of quietly talking, am i right about that, or wrong about that? that trump's voice is so much

a fact checker on the washington post.828 days, president trump is 111 false or misleading claims. the database -- you can find them if you go to the website at washingtonpost.com. caller: are the fact checkers for like the polls when they said hillary clinton was going to win by 98% of the time? i'm not even sure i trust fact checkers because there is fake news out there. it is not a joke anymore. it is for sure. i would have to do my own research but i don't trust fact checkers. who are the fact checkers? kentucky., hazard, caller: good morning. i'm for president trump because trump does what he says he's going to do. you can look at what he's doing right now. he has got the country in better shape than what it has ever been as long as i have been alive. me, president trump says what is going to do any does it. we need the border wall because there are too many illegals coming across. host: linda in houston, texas. caller: yes, i am going to vote for either kamala harris or joe biden. my reason for not liking donald trum

that's from "the washington post." stocks are still at session highs.ct, they are climbing here, up about 200 points. >> i know i got a different story but just to reiterate what i reported on cavuto earlier today, gop senators are pushing back on this tariff thing. the general consensus is that they don't want the tariffs on mexico. they think that's bad for republicans running in certain states, texas, mainly farm belt, wherever, you know. liz: the market is a voting machine. right now it's voting against tariffs. >> you think what's going on right now is cooler heads are trying to tell trump to decouple the use of tariffs and the border. no one's denying that there's a border problem. liz: but charlie, can i just take the other side here? nothing has worked. this tariff threat has got their attention. >> but we can go into a recession with this tariff threat. liz: but the economy is strong. isn't now the time to take on this issue? >> that's the conventional wisdom but listen, ted cruz wouldn't be against it, john cornyn wouldn't be against it, who i

but three mac owns the washington post.per where jamal khashoggi wrote his columns after the murder, the washington post was perhaps one of the strongest media organisations demanding a complete review of policy toward saudi arabia. the saudis, i dare say, were less than happy with the washington press coverage. sojeff bezos is connected to this whole story. it's your financing you today? he is not. our engagement with the investigation tea m engagement with the investigation team did not involve any kind of compensation for our time or our work. it wasn't contractual. that said, i would simply add to your description of the situation here that i believe at the time of the murder, jeff bezos has found themselves in a quandary and a complex fire. this is a man who owned the washington post for which jamal khashoggi worked. he was also a man who had business ties and direct relationships with nbs. he had to be decided. we should remind everybody that when you say nbs, you mend the crown prince, mohammed bin salman. the defect

i thought this piece in "the washington post" was interesting. the idea that we need to focus on these sort of kitchen table issues. passing a prescription drugs bill, passing campaign finance bill, hr i, there is this piece in "the washington post" that that message is not breaking through. the chair of the dccc was sort of briefing fellow house leaders saying, like, no one's paying attention to these bills. that's not where the energy is. i was like, yeah, no kidding. >> so here's my thesis about the election, how this is going to work. if we are talking about trump four months before the election, trump's going to win. the idea is we need to dismiss trump. yeah, we don't have to put up with all his silliness. we can just say -- we can do what klobuchar did when she announced. do you think donald's hair would look like this in a snowstorm? then we need to talk about the kitchen table issues. trump is an expert getting people to talk about trump. that's all he cares about. he's nuts that way. >> don't disagree about that. >> let's not play his g

"the washington post" out with tremendous new reporting on the president's post mueller obsession, his own removal from office by congress. the post's ashley parker reports he has peppered confidants and advisers with questions of how an impeachment inquiry might unfold. and he has coined his own cheeky term, the i-word, that threatens to overshadow his presidency as he heads into his 2020 election campaign. that's where we start today with some of our favorite reporters and friends with us heidi prez bella, mimi rocah, and john heileman. joining us from washington, peter baker, and white house reporter with "the washington post" ashley parker. ashley we'll start with you and your reporting about the i-word, take us through it. >> basically what i wanted to look at was there was a theory floating out there -- a fla plausible theory, between democratics that the president and united states in stalling for these were trying to goad democrats into impeaching the president because he believed it would be beneficial for him. the truth is somewhere in the middle. . at the end of the day ever

galvanized media outlets alarmed at the implications not for julian assange and for themselves the washington post called the case a blueprint for making journalists into felons the new york times editorial board said the indictment aims at the heart of the 1st amendment and the guardian's former editor called the charges a grave threat to free media all that pushback felt like too little too late julian assange has been treated like a pariah by those same news outlets take the new york times in 2010 the times the u.k. is guardian and germany's there should be legal all collaborated with wiki leaks resulting in the publication of the iraq war locke's it was big news but on day 2 of that story the times ran a lengthy profile piece on a sandwich describing him as imperious dictatorial saying he was given to delusional grandchild it was an odd way to treat a collaborator on one of the paper's biggest stories in decades. and when essential later sought refuge in the ecuadorian embassy in london saying he feared for his freedom the times as well as the guardian failed in their editorials to come to his

>> some headlines this morning in the washington post. trump comes the first sitting president to set foot into north korea. the wall street journal has trump, kim agreed to resume nuclear talks. the storm says the u.s. and north korean leaders met in a spontaneous summit at a demilitarized zone separating north and south korea. they walked 20 steps into north korea. here is what that looked like. you will hear camera operators and security personnel throughout the video. [video clip] [indiscernible] [cameras taking pictures] >> move, move. >> clear. >> no. >> come on. >> wait till they move. >> this is a great moment. big moment. big moment. tremendous progress. ok. guy's, come on. come on. move, move. go. [indiscernible] >> how do you feel? >> i feel great. [indiscernible] >> chairman kim, how do you feel? [speaking foreign language] the president has walked across the demarcation line. that made him the first present to visit our country. -- president to visit our country. pres. trump: i just want to say that it is my honor. i did not

is now absolutely necessary into the crown prince of saudi arabia's regarding the murder of "washington post" journalist, jamal khashoggi. "new york times" nicholas kristoff will join us. times" nh kristoff will join us. when crabe stronger...strong, with new nicorette coated ice mint. layered with flavor... it's the first and only coated nicotine lozenge. for an amazing taste... ...that outlasts your craving. new nicorette ice mint. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, hmm. exactly. so you only pay for what you need. nice. but, uh... what's up with your... partner? not again. limu that's your reflection. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ >>> we have breaking news. democratic congresswoman from illinois posted a video announcing she has joined the democratic members of congress and one republican who believe that the house of representatives should open impeachment inquiry against president trump. >> today i am announcing that i believe that the house of representatives should begin an impeachment inquiry officially because president trump certainly

also with the washington post. congratulate the l.a. times for having such a strong package of stories. you had to read it and you had to subscribe if you wanted to read it all. they werehings discussing the coverage. my question is for angel. you had that compelling interview with their brother and it was a perspective that no other space had. can you talk about how you gain the trust of the family and how you were able to navigate that in your storytelling? been covering south l.a. for seven or eight years. coverage i am an community constantly. i am not writing from my desk area and i am in the coffee shop. everything's just place that i and soveryplace i am, away, mondayed night i wrote a story and then there was a memorial service but i was filing the story. i found it -- filed it in their work helicopters over our home. we were a mailing -- emailing back and forth, do you hear that ? i let my editor no and she said can you go out there and report what is happening? put this story down and the baby down. i want to go out. it was a