the new york times will end all political cartoons are just learned we suffer through the publisher syndicated new to new york to the cause the scandal for me this is the end of an adventure that begin to him 2 years ago. besides announcing the newspaper's decision cartoonist patrick sharp complained about the moralistic mobs influencing the news rooms however he also slammed the image saying it should never of run in the best newspaper of the world the new york times issued an apology soon after the cartoon was published. the cartoonist sponsible for the image fired back about controversy claiming the backlash was fabricated by quote jewish propaganda he also emphasized that his art had a political and religious meaning the decision of the new york times to abandon political cartoons completely has caused an uproar on twitter. the n.y.t. really did fail this time decision not to run political cartoons by n.y.t. opinion is spineless we need political humor now more than ever 4 years ago the new york times it was all just see surely now they're no longer publishing cartoons new york times are n

in the new york times, -- around - >> sorry. >> that's okay. >> the new york times, we have the revolutionf this card to that was published in the international edition of the new york times. >> what cartoon? >> you have really been working on that as well. >> that was something i could not miss. >> all of you have probably seen it. this image of donald trump being led around by netanyahu, -- the who sort of perniciously moving along, the unwitting non-jew by the collar. there were a lot of people who saw this and thought, this is not just dog whistle level anti- semitism. this is like out and out, like -- anti-semitism. what has it been like to you to be at the new york times, to be wrestling with this moment? what is the internal conversation but my? >> i was -- when the cartoon was published. i really would recommend for those who have not read it, although looking at this room, but you have. it was an excellent column that really summed up my views of the thing. just the take away, right? is, if anti-zionism becomes a normative political view, this is what follows. right? so, it is one

the new york times reporter. spent quite a bit of time in jail. i remember another reporter at that time had to actually reveal some sources. >> thank you for doing that. it is really worth clarifying that. editors and journalists have not gone to jail for publishing, as you would see in other countries as they have offended the government, they get arrested for what they have said. there are incidents, you have mentioned a couple, where reporters protect their sources have refused to abide by court orders. as a result of that, they they then have been put in jail to try to force them to name their sources. it comes up every so often. there was a big one in the 70s. a big one in the 80s. kind of every 10 or 15 years. even now when there are these leaked investigations that are not coming to me, they are not asking the new york times to reveal sources, it is still a very, very detrimental thing for journalism when people provide information to reporters that are in pursuit. it has the same effect. it has exactly the same effect. it cuts off the wil

sounds more like mid-level officials leaking to their favorite paper the new york times. resident should strike iran but the timing is suspicious. we should take more time to consult with allies and if there is to be military operation it wouldn't just be the united states but involve partners like saudi arabia and others throughout the gulf. >> plenty of skepticism about what they are reporting tonight. >> there is always a tendency to try to exacerbate divisions in the administration what if you look at the messaging and believes across this administration donald trump is not a wimp on iran. the biggest part of his campaign, mike pompeo not just laying out iranian misconduct in the last two months since they threatened to close or tampa worshiping in the strait of hormuz in mid april, this regime exists to spread war around the middle east and kill americans, they started by taking americans hostage protect their embassies, killed 200 marines and the root, took americans hostage, tortured, killed some us officials in beirut, blue up towers, killed 1000 americans in iraq.

"the new york times," brand-new reporting, fox does not have this confirmed come up with "the new yorkump had become incredibly close, had authorized strikes against iran but pulled back at the very last minute. according to a senior administration official, that person told "the new york times" that planes were in the air, ships were in position, ready to go, but no missiles had been fired when the word came to stand down. officials said that the president had initially approved attacks on just a handful of romanian targets, things like radar and missile batteries, the strike was under take place just before dawn friday in iran to minimize risk to the iranian military or to the civilians. the big question is whether mr. trump simply changed his mind on the strikes or whether the administration had to alter course because of some logistical or strategical issues. another question is, well the attacks go forward? there have been a lot of discussion on capitol hill about whether or not president trump needs congressional approval to strike iran for what they did to this unmanned drone. d

emphasized that his arts and the political had it and not its religious meaning the decision of the new york times to abandon political cartoons completely caused an uproar on twitter. really did fail this time decision not to run political cartoons by n.y.t. opinion is spineless we need political humor now more than ever 4 years ago the new york times was all just see surely now they're no longer publishing cartoons new york times are not threw out to be with the bathwater yes there was a terrible lapse in judgment to print that cartoon so pollard gys and have a keener i free offensive cartoons john and art from completely a school cause who knows and all the 10 year old believes not being able to laugh at political leaders creates a serious problem for society. this is a pretty despicable series of events i mean 1st of all i don't think we need to throw an tonio portuguese cartoonist under the bus there really is but it's highly debatable whether his cartoon was anti-semitic or not and i think to portray him as an anti-semite despite the fact that he repeatedly has denied it is really egregious

the new york times officially stopped publishing political cartoons it comes just over a month after a strong backlash against the karting featuring a blind president donald trump led by the israeli prime minister in the form of a guide dog one of the paper's long term contributors revealed the move. the new york times all and all political cartoons are just learned we saw through a publisher syndicated no 2 new yorker to their caused a scandal for me this is the end of an adventure begin to him 2 years ago when the cartoonist their poetry surpassed he also complained about moralistic mobs influencing newsrooms and in his post he stressed that without humor we are all day new york times issues an apology soon after the offending cartoon was published while the disputed image of donald trump and many netanyahu was the work of antonio madera and to nez back in may he hit back over the controversy claiming the backlash was fabricated by quote jewish propaganda meanwhile the decision of the new york times to abandon political cartoons caused uproar on twitter. the n.y.t. really did fail

jim goodale is an attorney, former general counsel for "the new york times." encouraged "the times" to publish the pentagon papers, the information that whistleblower daniel ellsberg had. jim goodale is the author of "fighting for the press: the inside story of the pentagon papers and other battles." stay with us. ♪ [music break] amy: this is democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman with juan gonzalez. juan: as we continue to talk about the possible extradition of wikileaks cofounder julian assange, i want to turn to daniel ellsberg, who spoke on democracy now! last month about the justice department's case to indict assange on espionage charges. >> there hasn't actually been such a significant attack on the freedom of the press and first amendment, which is the bedrock of our republic, our form of government, since my case in 1971 48 years ago. but i was indicted as a source. and i warned news men in that would not be the last indictment of a source if i were convicted. well, i wasn't convicted. the charges were dropped on g

week, and with me ben rhodes, former deputy national security adviser, a piece posted in the "new york times," along with maggie haberman, michael schmidt, the president had approved military strikes against iran to take place before dawn friday which would be now. iran time. you write, but the action was abruptly called off for the evening putting a halt to what would have been the president's third military action against targets in the middle east. tell us about this michael. >> well, that's right. i with several colleagues doing good reporting do have the story, and as late as 7:00 or so this evening, officials in the u.s. government did believe that there would be strikes on iran. our understanding was that this approval by president trump followed a spirited debate among top u.s. officials in which key officials, including national security adviser, john bolton and secretary of state mike pompeo were pushing for some sort of military response to these iranian actions, that the president did approve a strike, the plan as we were told was for the strike to occur tonight u.s. time, which

don't translate into new york times again this time after an article about u.s. cyber attacks on russia's electric power grid or see the correspondent we're going to have a small this morning. it's difficult to pinpoint who declared this war but it is a war no most of no armies just articles tweets and a whole lot of hate failing new york times versus demagogue trump 1st battle took place before trump was even president ford the candidate and the pundits over objectivity was the 1st to fall in this bitter war if you're a working journalist and you believe that donald j. trump is a demagogue playing to the nation's worst racism nationalistic tendencies that he cozies up to and see american dictators and that he would be dangerous with control of the united states nuclear codes how the heck are you supposed to cover him. you'd think the obvious answer would be keeping your opinions to yourself and doing your job staying professional this is war things like honesty and impartiality only get in the way the n.y.t. even went against its own neutrality bible writers neg

divorced from the prospect or at least a part of it, i want to ask about this reporting from the "new york timesnd. the cyber command developed capacity against russia. i was struck by a couple of paragraphs in which pentagon and intelligence told the times that the president probably was not briefed on that. in part because it's about russia and senior officials including military officials don't trust the president to have sensitive information, particularly when it comes to russia because they are worried he would countermand it or talk to officials about it. that strikes me as half comfo comforting that they are trying to propro tenth our national security, but deeply wrong in terms of the way our constitutional chain of command and authority is supposed to work here. >> it's really not good. this was probably a deliberate leak to the "new york times" by national security officials. they wanted russia to know we have this capability. the message is if you hit us, we have the capability to do the same thing to you. and the next day because the president is peeved over something in the article

so i don't love bashing the "new york times." jesse: my parents the same way. sometimes you have to put that aside. somewhat happened was my dad sees this article in the sunday times. it's not fun for your dad to see your son's picture with the words alt-right next to his name. i fight the forces of collectivism and racism. what the "new york times" is doing is blatantly ingenuous. the import of the article is the kid was a lefty, then he became a conservative. then he went down the alt-right rabbit hole. then they implied watching videos like mine which is a so-called intellectual dark web to get people to discuss issues. we pulled him out of that. and at the end of the art kale's a full-on lefty. the premise of the article is youtube is radicalizes them to the right and he becomes a lefty. jesse: i don't like this. it looks like the media is teaming up with big tech and they are trying to slowly chip away at influential thinkers and personalities on social media. because big tech is usually to the left, they get bullied by the media and people on twitter into

that feels way out of line and the "the new york times" should be called out on this. s true. we have tried to reach out to if "the new yorthe "the new york t" haven't heard back. go ahead. >> it's coming from our backgrounds. you're focusing on the journalism part. i'm jaded and writing it off as typical behavior by them. but to take a premier law enforcement agency and have people at the top that are determined to write kiz and tell books and go on "the view" and provide deep thoughts on their twitter accounts. that was a culture that was problematic at the exact wrong time when it comes to sensitive investigations in the united states. >> you heard this? i've heard this from fbi officials around the country that the d.c. bureau was a law unto itself, it set its own policy and followed its own rules inside the d.c. bureau. your take on that, jim. >> i lost you. >> should i repeat the question? >> sure, please. >> is the d.c. fbi bureau a law unto itself? i've heard that personally. >> i don't think it's the entire d.c. setting. there's a lot of employees in d.c. that

this 6. 0 again that the new york times has officially stopped publishing political cartoons the move comes just over a month after there was a strong backlash against a cartoon featuring a blind president donald trump led by the israeli prime minister in the form of a guide dog one of the paper's longtime contributors 1st revealed that the car things would be dropped if the new york times all and all political cartoons are just learned we saw 3 published a syndicated netanyahu 2 that caused a scandal for me this is the end of an adventure that begin 20 years ago. well besides announcing the newspaper's decision cartoonist patrick shit party complained about moralistic mobs influencing the news hearings in his post he stressed that without humor we are all dead in new york times issued an apology soon after the offending cartoon was published or the disputed image of donald trump and then even yet in yahoo was the work of antonio where to nez back in may he hit back at over the controversy claiming the backlash was fabricated by quote jewish propaganda he also stressed that his art ha

nicholas kristof has a fantastic piece in "the new york times." "the new york times" tonight, trump approves strikes on iran but then abruptly pulls back as we're getting more information on this, we'll bring it to you. we'll be right back. thank you, nicholas. ♪ ♪ this simple banana peel represents a bold idea: a way to create energy from household trash. it not only saves about 80% in carbon emissions... it helps reduce landfill waste. that's why bp is partnering with a california company: fulcrum bioenergy. to turn garbage into jet fuel. because we can't let any good ideas go to waste. at bp, we see possibilities everywhere. to help the world keep advancing. it's how we bring hope to our patients- like viola. her team treated her cancer and strengthened her spirit. so viola could focus on their future. cancer treatment centers of america. appointments available now. cancer treatment centers of america. ♪ applebee's new loaded chicken fajitas. now only $10.99. whoa. travis in it made it. it's amazing. oh is that travis's app? . . # he thinks he'

"the new york times" replied to the president, "accusing the press of treason is dangerous." the "times" said it described the article to the government and national security officials had no concerns. and amid all of this, the president told abc news he has been briefed about navy pilots increasingly reporting seeing unidentified flying objects. >> i think it's probably -- i want them to think whatever they think. they do say -- i mean, i've seen and i've read and i've heard, and i did have one very brief meeting on it, but people are saying they're seeing ufos. do i believe it? not particularly. >> nbc's mike viqueira is joining us from the white house. mike, a lot to break down, but first, "the new york times" swiping back at the president on the cyber story. what more did he say? >> reporter: frances, it's a remarkable story, a lot of remarkable elements coming from "the new york times," reporting, essentially, that the u.s. is stepping up its cyber attacks against russia's power grid, its internal electrical and power infrastructure, this as a way of sending a message to

. >> there's only one nick kristof, the pulitzer prize winning columnist for the "new york times." this is one of those days when we wish there were many more. he delivered extraordinary reporting to "the new york times" today from guatemala where he asked people why they leave guatemala and head north toward our southern boarder. he basically handed his column over to those people in guatemala today and let them speak. and what i read in their stories of why they come is the story of why my people came to america from a starving country where they could not survive. you will hear their stories later in this hour and listen for something that might sound like the story of something that happened that made it your people come to this country. and as soon as i read that piece this morning, i asked if nick kristof could join us tonight and luckily he can. and so you will hear more of what nick kristof learned in guatemala. and this was a week in which president trump kept coming uncomfortably close to his personal decision to avoid service in the military during the war of his era. in

too late julian assange has been treated like a pariah by those same news outlets take the new york times in 2010 the times the u.k. is guardian and germany's there should be legal all collaborated with wiki leaks resulting in the publication of the iraq war locke's it was big news but on day 2 of that story the times ran a lengthy profile piece on a sandwich describing him as imperious dictatorial saying he was given to delusional grandchild it was an odd way to treat a collaborator on one of the paper's biggest stories in decades. and when essential later sought refuge in the ecuadorian embassy in london saying he feared for his freedom the times as well as the guardian failed in their editorials to come to his defense the sexual assault allegations in sweden may have affected their thinking but anyone familiar with that case and the numerous irregularities in the prosecution's handling of it would have to be suspicious of the motives at play and even now with all the a sanj indictments out there those news outlets are clearly more concerned with the possible legal precedents affecting

nicholas kristof has a fantastic piece in "the new york times.""trump and iran may be on a collision course, and it could get scarier," as we are seeing it play out now. and the headline in "the new york times" tonight, trump approves strikes on iran but then abruptly pulls back. as we're getting more information on this, we'll bring it to you. we'll be right back. thank you, nicholas. to keep you both comfortable. and now the queen sleep number 360® c4 smart bed is now $1,299. save $400. only for a limited time . imagine. megared omega-3 power for your whole body. now with an antioxidant blend for great sleep, refreshed skin and less stress. one softgel. 7 benefits. new total body refresh. power your day with megared. we all use our phones differently. i listen to music throughout the entire day, pretty much. my ear buds are always in. you're mostly watching things on your phone. yeah. i don't always have time to track what my kids are doing in their phone. verizon lets me manage and control things, so they feel like they have their freedom and i

the new york times sounds officially stopped publishing political cartoons the move comes just over a month since there was a strong backlash against the controversial cartoon the feature the blind president trump led by a seeing israeli prime minister the newspaper made the announcement of the one of its cartoonists leaked the plants. the new york times all and all political cartoons are just learned we saw through a publisher syndicated new to new yorker to their cause the scandal for me this is the end of an adventure begin to him 2 years ago signs announcing the newspaper's decision cartoonist patrick sharp parts complained about the moralistic mobs influence in the newsroom however he also slammed the image saying that it should never of run in the best newspaper in the world new york times issued an apology soon after the cartoon was published. the cartoonist responsible for the image fired back about the controversy claiming the backlash was fabricated by quote jewish propaganda he also emphasized his arts have a political and not religious meaning the decision of the new york

"the new york times" is now citing multiple u.s. officials who are describing "the placement of potentially crippling malware inside the russian systems at a depth and with an aggressiveness that has never been tried before." it is intended, "partly as a warning and partly to be poised to conduct cyber strikes if a major conflict broke out between the u.s. and moscow." this initiative has been carried out by u.s. cyber command, which is part of the u.s. military, and this is interesting. recent changes to u.s. law, thanks to both a presidential directive and thanks to a little-noticed new legal authority that was slipped into the military authorization bill last year. those new legal authorities allowed these kinds of actions that are described in this "times" piece. they allow these kinds of actions apparently to be carried out by cyber command. on their own say so without having to get specific permission from the president to do it, and also without having to get specific permission from congress. according to "the times," "so fa

do you believe that the failing new york times just did a story stating that the u.s. is substantially increasing cyber attacks on russia this is a virtual act of treason by a once great paper these are true cowards and without doubt the enemy of the people enemy of the people they don't like that out of all the things from school them that's perhaps what hurts the most enemy of the people is not just a toss of a line it sounds good in the tweet it is a particularly pernicious phrase deep history no president has ever uttered those words in public what is side the president of the united states and once proud journalists virtually slinging. childishly that again perhaps this is healthy good for everyone else i mean the both of them in others the elites as they call themselves really needed to be taken down a notch has been running against elites his entire business and now is political career and that includes us a footnote to the story into the york times to fire a salvatore's back at the president according to the newspapers the us president's administration had seen

>> the executive editor of "the new york times." she wrote it in her book.n you have the leaders, the people who run the newspaper, the woman who around "the new york times" admitting this about "the new york times" itself and her observations about "the washington post," it is not conservatives who believe this about the media, it is a media itself. that's a problem. and why it will be so hard to ever recover the grounds of mutuality or fact-finding. or the things that the american people look to them to do. even when donald trump is gone, whenever his time is done, the media has so badly hurt itself. >> sean: karl, as i said, the branding of trump is tattooed into their foreheads, i don't know how you escape what ari is pointing out here? >> we have three sets of media, news coverage, several cable networks who seem to be just aiming everything at trashing the president. we then have the mainstream media that is dominated by three newspapers, only one of which, "the wall street journal" plays a reasonably straight coming , o that don't. and then we have th

howard: "the new york times" reported that tucker callson privately -- carlson privately advised presidentmp not to respond to iran, but the times story when he scrubbed the in mission included this sentence: no government officials asked "the new york times" to withhold the article. we'll get into the back story in the next segment, but was the paper worried in reporting this sensitive information at the time about a backlash? >> they must have, because they wouldn't have put a quote like that in their paper. you said it was reasonable for the president to do so, to not go ahead with this. so why isn't the media focusing on the positive of that? instead, they're trying to rip apart foreign policy. yesterday on msnbc the bottom of the screen led foreign policy lacking -- it's constantly arguing why the president has a problem with foreign policy, why he's -- he has to balance two sides; one, to not intervene but, two, to be strong and show that he's not weak and not caving to iran. you brought up a really good point, but i think nobody's focusing on that. >> if he were to wake up thursday

thed "the new york times," great deserved.on't miss it every sunday, the number one show on cable here on the fox news channel. when we come back, earlier this week, we told you about the crisis, the homelessness, the disaster that is los angeles. we send investigative reporter lawrence jones to the liberal city. wait until you see this "hannity" investigation, it will shock your conscience next. until you see this piece "hannity" investigati moving? that's harder now because of psoriatic arthritis. but you're still moved by moments like this. don't let psoriatic arthritis take them away. taltz reduces joint pain and stiffness and helps stop the progression of joint damage. for people with moderate to severe psoriasis, 90% saw significant improvement. taltz even gives you a chance at completely clear skin. don't use if you're allergic to taltz. before starting, you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection, symptoms,

president trump today accusing "the new york times" of providing false stories about his administration to the fbi tweeting out just revealed that the failing and desperate new york times was feeding false

brought it up, aimed specifically at "the new york times," "do you believe that the failing new york times just did a report stating that there are increased cyber attacks on russia, an act of treason by a paper so desperate for any story

didn't know and i can see why it would be frustrating for him but this attack he gave on the new york timesthey were virtually, it was virtually treason this isn't the first time we've seen this attack last year after the new york times published an anonymous op-ed from senior administration officials, he said that was virtually treason. rick: well is the president right to be upset about the article? doesn't the new york times revelation jeopardize potentially this whole operation , allow the russians to undo the work that's been done by apparently? >> certainly a concern we're seeing from a lot of republicans as you showed in your newscast earlier and i think it shows a wider concern that the president and some republicans have with people in the bureaucracy and government who are not friendly towards this administration and sort of acting on political motives and that's what we're seeing with the entire fbi investigation into how the whole mueller report investigation into 2016, the election interference started there's concerns that that was political ly motivated and so i think when he

new year's new york city 4 times to. lead you to surround us. one in some. of these which are whoredom del i dealt with the idea of going to the local butcher based on what. you own or one look you it seems lucas the chutzpah to look at your bullshit i look at you with this old shoe. that everyone. wants something. with no make this manufactured to sentenced him to the public wealth. when the ruling classes protect themselves. when the crime larry go round lifts only the one percent. we can all middle of the room signals. us crashing on the global markets so when that happens people buy gold nations buy gold countries michael some to back michael their mind gold mine for gold that's making all the. as an australian dollar almost russian rubles almost denies and canadian dollars almost dies and euro's. all over the world it's creeping higher because of the trust being eroded. the u.s. ramps up the pressure on iran continuing to accuse the country of attacking oil tankers in the gulf of oman we look back at washington's track record of claims against so-called

the subject line says new york times last shot editing is near completion.one last shot to here with ion, your reaction for that. >> a rash which is my god, a listening session to listen to information that helps law enforcement do their job, who is the source? if the public because it is with them but if a journalist is supposed to be objectively presenting is different. a different discussion. >> and covering the fbi. >> is accurate. >> defined emails concerning? course i do. they have to be looked at closely. >> doug burns, will you come back? >> yes.>> thank you for joining us. thank you and hope for watching. lou dobbs is next right here on the fox business network. have a good evening. lou: good evening everybody i am david asman sitting in for lou dobbs. president trump such to ramp up interior immigration enforcement this weekend. the present directing immigrations and customs enforcement to gather up 2000 illegal immigrant families facing deportation.the attorney general, william barr, has a radical dems in the deep state on notice, the review of the russia witchhunt origins