and a number of viewers agreed with charles moore, such as alan, who said...thers feel that those supporting brexit dominate and object to the frequency with which nigel farage in particular is invited onto the programme. in may he had his 33rd appearance so far, which prompted dan in york to e—mail... bbc which prompted dan in york to e—mail. .. bbc news which prompted dan in york to e—mail... bbc news said in response that... they added... the arguments around brexit and much more complex than the choice between leave and remain... that edition of the programme in may was a particularly lively one with nigel farage clashing with the opponent of brexit, mp anna soubry. you clearly were not listening, you never do, do you? applause canl applause can ijust applause can i just say, applause can ijust say, you're talking about the toxicity of the debate and the kind of hot tempers we see here on the kind of stuff we see online and outside parliament. talking like this is exactly surely what we are talking about. as people, we can be better than that. for some aud

, who appeared in april to vale nt charles moore, who appeared in april to valent —— balance ofber of viewers agree with him. such as all—in, for whom... —— alan. others feel those supporting brexit predominates and object to the frequency with which nigel farage, in particular, is invited onto the programme. this appearance in may was his 33rd so far, prompting daniel yorked to e—mail. .. bbc news told us in response that... they added. the arguments around brea ks they added. the arguments around breaks that are much more complex than the choice between leave and remain —— brexit. and that's why counting up our people voted in the 2016 referendum is no longer as releva nt. 2016 referendum is no longer as relevant. that edition of the programme in may is a particularly lively one with nigel farage clashing with the opponent brexit, mp anna soubry. you clearly won't listening. you never do, do you?! applause . cannotjust say... can ijust say you're talking about the toxicity of the debate on the kind of hot tempers we see here and the kind of stuff we have seen online and outsid

moore reports. during last month's visit to the uk, mr and mrs trump met prince charles and the duchess of cornwall.spotted another face he recognised — the uk's ambassador to washington. hi again. you know everybody. hi, mr president. hope it's going well. now it is not pleasantries, but put—downs, that are being exchanged. the president could onlyjust be heard above the sound of a helicopter engine. the publication of comments made by the ambassador about the president have prompted an official investigation at the foreign office into the source of the leak. the trade secretary, speaking in washington, said the leaking was unethical and unpatriotic. i think that our diplomats have to be able to give a bit of colour in their views, in both directions, about how they view the political scene. i think the question here is about the behaviour of someone that would leak a document which has a limited circulation, for obvious reasons. in the short term, at least, sir kim darroch seems safe in hisjob. he is due to retire at the end of the year anyway. meanwhile, the journalist who wrote the original stor

moore reports. during last month's visit to the uk, mr and mrs trump met prince charles and the duchess of cornwall.lso spotted another face he recognised — the uk's ambassador to washington. hi again. it's going well. now it is not pleasantries, but putdowns, that are being exchanged. the president could onlyjust be heard above the sound of a helicopter engine. the publication of comments made by the ambassador about the president have prompted an official investigation at the foreign office into the source of the leak. the trade secretary, speaking in washington, said the leaking was unethical and unpatriotic. i think that our diplomats have to be able to give a bit of colour in their views, in both directions, about how they view the political scene. i think the question here is about the behaviour of someone that would leak a document which has a limited circulation, for obvious reasons. in the short term, at least, sir kim darroch seems safe in hisjob. he is due to retire at the end of the year anyway. meanwhile, the journalist who wrote the original story has hinted there might be more revelat

moore reports. during last month's visit to the uk, mrand mrs trump during last month's visit to the uk, mr and mrs trump met prince charlesll. the president also spotted another face he recognised, the uk's ambassador to washington. hi again. it is going well. now, it is not pleasantries, but putdowns that are being exchanged. the president could only just be heard above the sound of a helicopter engine. the ambassador has not served the uk well, i can tell you that. the publication of comments made by the ambassador about the president have prompted an official investigation at the foreign office into the source of the leak. the trade secretary speaking in washington said the leaking was unethical and unpatriotic. i think that our diplomats have to be able to give a bit of colour in their views, in both directions, about how they view the political scene. i think the question here is about the behaviour of someone that would leak a document which has a limited circulation, for obvious reasons. document which has a limited circulation, for obvious reasonsm the short—term, least, sir kim darroch seems safe in his job. the

charles: since the beginning of the year, major indices are seeing new gains. i want to bring in heritage economic advisor steve mooreyou and some of your colleagues says there is a certain way to go about governing in this country that will unlock the potential and i guess right now we're seeing it. it is certainly reflected in the stock market, aren't we? >> i was listening to the previous conversation and i was thinking about paul krugman, he said the stock market never recover. at that time the dow was 18,000. now it is at 27,000. that is a 50% increase in stock values. what a story that is. a lot of commentary about the market has been wrong. everyone saying fed reducing rates that shows there is weakness in the economy. i don't understand why people would buy stock if there is weakness in the economy. that wouldn't make sense to me. mother's milk of the market is of course profits. companies can only make profits if the economy is doing well. i'm here to tell you the economy has shown another burst of new life in the last several weeks and it is being reflected in the stock market. you mentioned jobs, manufactu

moore reports. during last month‘s visit to the uk, mr and mrs trump met prince charles and the duchess of cornwall.ce he recognised — the uk‘s ambassador to washington. hi again. you know everybody. hi, mr president. hope it's going well. now it is not pleasantries, but put—downs, that are being exchanged. the president could onlyjust be heard above the sound of a helicopter engine. the publication of comments made by the ambassador about the president have prompted an official investigation at the foreign office into the source of the leak. the trade secretary, speaking in washington, said the leaking was unethical and unpatriotic. i think that our diplomats have to be able to give a bit of colour in their views, in both directions, about how they view the political scene. i think the question here is about the behaviour of someone that would leak a document which has a limited circulation, for obvious reasons. in the short term, at least, sir kim darroch seems safe in hisjob. he is due to retire at the end of the year anyway. meanwhile, the journalist who wrote the original story has hinted there