against that controversial extradition bill but now they seem to be about much more he spoke with hung congress in the streets today let's listen to what they had to say. no this is illegal demonstration in hong kong. ri would like to tell the government the hong kong people and the citizens would like to tell the government won't be asking for so that's why we're here after you call to our city so we are here and all together . i still think that i must come out. and. told out my opinion to a polish man because our opener and our forces important to change hong kong all the people in hong kong. do not. do not like the. filings. they have you try to protest. you know and also hong kong. but here as we are there no one is mentioning that extradition bill anymore and stand there talking about safety and violence has the focus of these protests shifted. well some people still do mention the extradition bill from time to time but it's true you do not see these these slogans against the extradition bill that much anymore people are still angry that the government has shelved this bill but not with d

. >> martha: especially if there's no tax, that's what justice roberts hung his decision on. he said congress contacts, and therefore this program is constitutional and then you got brett kavanaugh in the mix now, right? >> it's a very different court that heard this case and this would be a third bite essentially at the foundations of the affordable care act. the supreme court, it puts them in a terrible position because they don't want to be viewed as political, but they've rolled on this lobby for. it's very likely it could end up there again in the middle of the campaign. both sides are going to campaign off of him and those justices may have yet another very tough decision. >> martha: i was going to be very interesting. great to see you, we will see later tonight. coming up, charlie hurt here in studio with me. author of the new book. why america went all in on donald trump and white must do it again. that's charlie's opinion and that if the title of that book. ari fleischer, former white house press secretary, both are fox news contributors. austan goolsbee, president obama's former chi

inequality is not what provoked the most intense criticism of these congress with their positions on israel to the same wave that brought in hung ahmed and xander. and the she that live into office the same wave that makes bernie sanders so popular amongst young people that same progressive wave is actually creating speech for 2 congresswoman to support boycott davis by sanctions for the 1st time to criticize israel very openly and to call out the u. us his policy on israel more broadly the bipartisan nature of support for israel that for several decades has been sort of the standard position for any ambitious politician to take that has been blown wide open and part of it is the omar conversation part of it is the election and alicia to play we know that the progressive movement is increasingly seeing israel as an ally and increasingly are concerned about palestinian rights at the same time the critique and the punishment for critiquing israel is becoming much harsher we see that israel's influence is waning that the hetero doxie around israel as infallible as something that both sides of the aisle will protect we see that cru

inequality is not what provoked the most intense criticism of these congress with their positions on israel to the same wave that brought in hung ahmed and xander. and the she that into office the same wave that makes bernie sanders so popular amongst young people that same progressive wave is actually creating space for 2 congresswoman to support us by sanctions for the 1st time ever to criticize israel very openly and to call out the us his policy on israel more broadly the bipartisan nature of support for israel that for several decades has been sort of the standard position for any ambitious politician to take that has been blown wide open and part of it is the omar conversation part of it is the election of a militia to play we know that the progressive movement is increasingly seeing israel as an ally and increasingly are concerned about palestinian rights at the same time the critique and the punishment for critiquing israel is becoming much harsher we see that israel's influence is waning that the hetero doxie around israel as infallible as something that both. sides of the aisle will protect we see that crumbling so it

inequality is not what provoked the most intense criticism of these congress with their positions on israel to the same wave that brought in hung ahmed and xander. and the she that into office the same wave that makes bernie sanders so popular amongst young people that same progressive wave is actually creating speech for 2 congresswoman to support us by sanctions for the 1st time ever to criticize israel very openly and to call out the us his policy on israel more broadly the bipartisan nature of support for israel that for several decades has been sort of the standard position for any ambitious politician to take that has been blown wide open and part of it is the omar conversation part of it is the election of a militia to play we know that the progressive movement is increasingly seeing israel as an ally and increasingly are concerned about palestinian rights at the same time the critique and the punishment for critiquing israel is becoming much harsher we see that israel's influence is waning that the hetero doxie around israel as infallible as something that both. sides of the aisle will protect we see that crumbling so i

inequality is not what provoked the most intense criticism of these congress with their positions on israel to the same wave that brought in hung ahmed and xandra. and it is she that into office the same wave that makes bernie sanders so popular amongst young people that same progressive wave is actually creating space for 2 congresswoman to support us by sanctions for the 1st time ever to criticize israel very openly and to call out the us his policy on israel more broadly the bipartisan nature of support for israel that for several decades has been sort of the standard position for any ambitious politician to take that has been blown wide open and part of it is the omar conversation part of it is the election of a militia to play we know that the progressive movement is increasingly seeing israel as an ally and increasingly are concerned about palestinian rights at the same time the critique and the punishment for critiquing israel is becoming much harsher we see that israel's influence is waning that the hetero doxie around israel as infallible as something that both. sides of the aisle will protect we see that crumbling so

tell you about her is that in her conference room she only hung one thing on the wall and it was a portrait of abraham lincoln as a member of congressher members that lincoln once said that public sentiment is everything. that doesn't mean that she should act on it, but you have got to shape the sentiment before you plunge into it. in her view, without certain prerequisites this would badly backfire. probably it would elect a democratic majority in the house and allow donald trump to and it a new generation would help to elect democrats and state legislatures throughout america in 2020 who can start redistricting americans -- democrats out of congress. what she wants to do is shaped the battlefield a bit and the way you do that is you have these investigations with congressman shift -- congress ship on intel and she has empowered them to exercise oversight responsibilities, secret attacks lead, and when they are incontrovertible and of the facts require republicans to join in a bipartisan effort, at that point i think she will be receptive to it. that landscape does not exist now. david: were you at all concerned message getting the

hung for treason. in the middle of that's revolution, they paused, and they said every inhabitant of the united states should report waste, fraud, and corruption to congress and appropriate authorities, even if it barest the new government -- it embarrassed the new government. they passed the law and voted money for the lawyers for the whistleblowers who had been thrown in jail. and they released all of the ,apers that were controversial that were embarrassing to the government. the whistleblowers won the case. 1778, so this30, is not some token day. this is a day for every american to sit back and say, whoa, whistleblowers have been with us for a long time and they have done an incredible job. host: we use the term dead -- did we use the term whistleblower in 1778? guest: that came in the late 60's and early 70's. host: why then? guest: no one knows the origin. theas in literature in 20's, 30's, and 40's, some detective books. they say it comes from the british police blowing the whistle to get support. nobody knows. host: you have written a handful -- handbook for would be whistleblowers. rule number one in the handbook, which we have on the desk here w

congress. >> what does all of this tell you about the level of foreign influence that may have hung over the donald trump campaign. >> tremendous foreign influence. michael flynn was a paid consultant for a company called ip3, trying to lead the efforts to rush the sensitive nuclear technology. michael flynn, as you know, was the national security adviser for donald trump. and michael flynn, at the time that he was national security adviser, was trying to basically promote the interest of countries like saudi arabia and not to mention other countries like russia and turkey and others, when he should have been putting america first. supposedly their slogan -- apparently it was way slogan in name only, in words only >> bottom line here, how do you put this into plain english what this means for people who may not be so engaged in this? put a pin on it. >> i think basically the trump administration is putting profits over the public interests. in this case the profits of their donors, of people that are closely connected to them. and this is deeply, deeply concerning. the second issue is they s

hung in the balance. the world needed a saving grace. >> 1941, a date which will live in infamy. >> japan attacked pearl harbor, roosevelt went to congress and asked for a declaration of war. he got his declaration of war. >> in support of japan, germany declared war on the united states on december 11th, 1941. the united states was then officially an allied power. >> workmen are now breaking records manufacturing weapons for war. >> roosevelt called for production of 50,000 aircraft in a year. everybody thought he was crazy. they did it twice. it began right away to shift from a peacetime economy to a wartime economy, rationing of all strategic materials, food and everything else. >> as the home front ramped up for war, so did the soldiers that were to storm the beaches of normandy on d-day. >> i was supporting my mother and father and i was chosen from a regular infantry division. i was a platoon sergeant. >> i volunteered to go with the first airborne, not knowing what was what but i think it was one of the wisest choices i ever made. >> they were unaware of the critical role they would play in one of history's most pivotal battles fo

going on, the report is coming out the democrats really hung their hat on the impeachment hearings because half a dozen other probes within congressoing anywhere. they are kind of stalled out because the president is blocking them and they are trying to go to court to revive them. so this was sort of their last ditch push on the mueller hearing to get all of the other probes restarted and jump-started again because those are dying on the vine. neil: you think about it, i know we've got to go to break here, but a smoking gun requires that you didn't have a script ahead of time, right? unless he says something that goes off that report, or way beyond that report, there is no smoking gun. >> no. this is quite rehearsed, although the dress rehearsal right now isn't going so well. he clearly didn't practice quite enough to make himself come across as credible. but look, i think there's absolutely no chance unless something crazy happens this afternoon that we're going to impeachment proceedings based upon the mueller report. i think this is over and i think the american people have made a decision to move on. i don't think it will have

about prices what he needs from congress congress frs doing, starting to get relief but he made the point to say, that when mexico finally engaged president trump, hungds of their own agents at their southern border it had over 20% drop in people coming across the mexican southern borrowed illegally we still have too high a number coming over right now the big thing even mix officials us there this the broken asylum laws in america a magnet telling people to come here illegally they know they can read from a script, many, by the way, have turned downs asylum in mexico how can you ave credible claim for asylum when you turned it down from another country you came through coming in droves 3,000, 4 thoun illegally abusing young kids bringing them over they know a ticket in they get a certificate literally to be a here at least five years before court date, and with secretary told me over 75% of those people don't show up for the court date five years later, this is a broken system needs to be fixed takes congressional action you need to change the law, president trump, hasized that he wants to so many of we need to get it solved quickly. >> what i was g

hung for treason. in the middle of that's revolution, they paused, and they said every inhabitant of the united states should report waste, fraud, and corruption to congress appropriate authorities, even if it barest the new government -- it embarrassed the new government. they passed the law and voted money for the lawyers for the whistleblowers who had been thrown in jail. and they released all of the ,apers that were controversial that were embarrassing to the government. the whistleblowers won the case. 1778, so this30, is not some token day. this is a day for every american to sit back and say, whoa, whistleblowers have been with us for a long time and they have done an incredible job. host: we use the term dead -- did we use the term whistleblower in 1778? guest: that came in the late 60's and early 70's. host: why then? guest: no one knows the origin. theas in literature in 20's, 30's, and 40's, some detective books. they say it comes from the british police blowing the whistle to get support. nobody knows. host: you have written a handful -- handbook for would be whistleblowers. rule number one in the handbook, which we have on the desk here with