mulligan. then i will next call of miles lockier. thank you for being here. >> let's see if i can get my. >> chairman: are we up and running? >> i -- well, it should be. it's slide one of 10. okay. >> here we go. good morning and thank you for inviting me. ni nammy name is miles lockier, and i am appearing here today in my private capacity and not officially for the labor commissioner. and the views that i express are mine and not necessarily those of the state labor commissioner. with that, let me start by this: the labor commissioner's office enforces state laws dealing with wages, workers' conditions, and also protections for employees. there are generally two sources of that law, okay? one is the labor code itself, and the other sorgs is whaother isthe i.w.c. the i.w.c.was established about a century ago. a five-member body that essentially had constitutional authority to establish minimum conditions for labor in the state. and there are about 16 or 17 different wage orders that, taken together, they deal with separate industries

>> director mulligan, i did have a question kind of on your last point, around how o.s.c.'gations rely on state law to define "ememployee." the current state law is the abc law? >> right. >> and the recent ruling says back pay can be owed to misclassified workers going back four years prior to the date of the dynmex case. what would it take for the city of san francisco to issue judgment to get misclassified gig workers the money they are owed. >> it is a great question, supervisor. i appreciate it. that would speak to some of our specific investigations that are ongoing. i wouldn't want to disclose any of the efforts of our office or the city attorney's office towards that. there is some concern around some of the state precedent, which is why the legislative clarification at the state level would be helpful for our efforts. >> thank you. and just a followup question: what policy questions would need to be answered for you to calculate if gig workers were making san francisco minimum wage? >> we would need to see also the payment records from employers, which in some cases

they want a mulligan. they want to start the process all over again. they have the right to do it. the president also has prerogatives for those who work in the executive branch to say, look. i've said i didn't have to allow them to participate with mueller and i did, fully. what more can we learn? >> let's test the case. >> the biggest point is that this president never testified or submitted to real questioning. his lawyers, several times. the raskins, sekulow, giuliani, coaching to keep him out of the chair. he violated his own rule. if you've got nothing to hide, testify. so this isn't a second bite of the apple because they never got the first bite. in the mueller report he says, here are the findings. i can't do anything about them. that's congress' doing. so this isn't a do-over. it is an extension. >> he's wrong about saying that. bob mueller's job was to report back to the department of justice. his findings. it was not to have a call to action from congress. if that's exactly what he did in the report, and i think that's fair, i think for many americans, that's when he lo

to sing this alicia it was a possible sing a longs just a little supergirl mulligan if i can and those are how much this formula your voice moving i am just going to post was my the money to fix the way i can as it is issued sometimes even to someone who's more hey you can't measure them for tomorrow saw was a joke as to how saw them works in the us and you know my school mates also might find you so well. this is the main thing they kill fish in mall in the l. a f a q valving music involved valving involving. l.b. that is all affected by all of my different pain down the law. and when things you could see no use and don't. question my rebooking will look at my book because i did seem a down with you and i watched and watched no more than that it was done. 2 but i mean to keep. it to my office if it comes to the. question on the inflammation why should we do. so many other more i'm standing you so we're going to call this is a anything specific that makes. me a phony yet. taken to. some. point psychiatry those loves to yourself give to somebody and have those i give no cost to these of

now i understand that the president likes his mulligans at golf, but you don't get a mulligan in the supreme court. the supreme court struck this down. it ruled that it was illegal to try to put this question on the 2020 census. and what reason they try to contrive now, i don't think it will make any difference. >> part of the strikedown of the supreme court, the whole case was basically you were arguing that the administration lied about why it was trying to put the question on, that it was misrepresenting it. it misrepresented it before the court and congress, and basically they'd they did so it egregiously that two different courts and the supreme court said you're lying and that's against the law. justice roberts said come back with maybe another reason. they basically nod to furnishing another rationale. it seems to give away the game that there are some people who are going to invent some other reason? >> that's what they seem to suggest that they may try to do here. but i want to make clear what chief justice roberts' opinion for the court said. it said the administration's re

i'm joined by jonathan lemire and katrina mulligan.he way, by the chairman? i respect burr a lot. i think he's from old school of senators who work together across the aisle, especially on national security issues like intelligence. does that mean he's voting for this guy or not? i can't tell. >> well, there is actually another update, chris. i can provide some real-time richard burr news. he stopped well short of endorsing ratcliffe. he doesn't know him and said clearly more research is needed. so he can certainly move to advance the nomination. doesn't necessarily mean he's going to vote for him when all is said and done. and i think his fate remains uncertain. there are some republicans, particularly those like collins and gardner who, you know, have vulnerable seats who are up for re-election whose states did not vote for donald trump last time around and may not again who i think will face some pressure to not send this nomination forward, to not vote for this nominee. there is real concern that ratcliffe not only is perhaps too p

julia mulligan, chair of the national rural crime network.got coming up in her programme at 10. we meet the surgeons in syria using ground—breaking research to help children who have been injured by bombs. what are these men doing with his legs? currently doing an adjustment for a new reconstructed socket for his limb. he needs to do an adjustment to the bone every one year, one and half years, because the bone will keep growing, there is more skin and muscles to grow with the bone, so it will be painful. join us at 10am on bbc two, bbc news channel and online. we will see victoria at ten o'clock. now time for a look at the weather with simon. good morning. the weather turning a bit more u nsettled unsettled from today onwards. some rain in the forecast. it is moving its way in from the west, northern ireland and western scotland this morning, the rain moves in and it will gradually push its way into wales and the north west of england and the east of scotland later today. a few showers ahead of the cloud generally increasing in england and w

we going to hear from management over the next couple of weeks, they have to justify there's no mulligans with the stock market at all-time highs, they have to justify where they are and tell a good story and look out more than a quarter and see what it looks like six months from here. >> you see ceos blaming trade when they're at a loss, they're blaming trade. i don't think it will be different. >> i think there will be nuances in the earnings season when the earnings report came out they blamed the china tariffs. they said they were able to pass on part of the cost increases to pass on the tariffs but they're seeing inflation in raw materials themselves that price increase can't offset all of the rise that they're seeing because of tariffs plus actual inflation so if there is actual inflation, it is going to educate us on how we think about the economy. >> and it is going -- and how we think about companies and how we think about their margins for the second half. >> yes. >> if you think about the cpi number out yesterday, you were up .4 a percent. here we are first time saying we haven

louise mulligan had that experience without your permission. and she was renouncing marie's husband, announced he was dead on national television. the government didn't have a chance. they didn't know and they couldn't confirm or deny it. you gave a good quote about she had us over a barrel. you would do anything to get that information through, but there was a price to be paid in terms of the propaganda you are subjected to. i had a lot of interviews about that, and of course jane fonda, famously sitting on the antiaircraft gun in that photo. >> actually dealing with ross perot, he was very supportive. he took letters for us. >> yes, ross did a lot of that. >> yes, he did. he was wonderful. >> did politics ever come up within members of the national league? where there folks who got frustrated the way things were going, or did you feel you maintained cohesion, as it gets to be 1972 and the war still isn't over? >> i think our main purpose was trying to find out who was dead, who was alive, how they were, and how they were going to come home. t

expectations are low they put up a decent enough print into a weird quarter i think they have a mulliganlmost with the trade stuff and i think the stock goes higher and option prices are probably pretty reasonable enough to make an at-the-money bet to get a breakout at that level the trade is simple to me. if you are bullish and you think it has the potential to outperform like google, you buy a call when the stock was trading at 208, you could buy the august 210 call playing 4.25 for that that breaks even at 214 a quarter. that's up only 3% from the current stock price here you are risking about 2% of the stock price for the next three weeks. i want to make one point because, tyler, you just said it about ten minutes ago, we got apple next week. we have the fed. we have jobs there's a lot of stuff going on. we have trade. this is kind of an easy way if you are willing to risk 2% on a name that has a big catalyst. >> you like the call on calls? >> what you know is you are targeting where the breaks even is at the 215 level. that's where the stock faltered on earnings. on may 1st it gappe

what's going on when it comes to immigration i made a fire on a state they could have gave me a mulligan on that they said it not to and they fired me so they didn't really give me a chance to implement a communications plan but if you have an interest in it just punch up scaramucci comms plan on cobol and you'll see i would have taken a different approach to the situation at present let me take issue with the word concentration camp sorry i bet the yad vashem might bend to concentration camps what's going on at the border are not concentration camps so if the left wants to use that word to incite people or crazy media for they can do it after it's just it's just not accurate now they're like ugh why can't the trumpet ministration get the message out that the that president obama was the deporter in chief or does just trump secretly quite like it for his base well no i don't i don't even see who really likes anything anybody likes what's going on at the border the problem is is that this is a money making exercise in central america and southern mexico and so everybody is got the fear of

. >> me and then richard mulligan who won. >> jimmy: from "empty nest". he pete abeat all you guys?n, a 10 year old daughter and 6-year-old son. >> jimmy: has your 12 your old son been nominated for any emmies yet? >> he's done nothing! i had fired three agents by the time i was his age. >> jimmy: he's got to get his act together. >> they do nothing, jim e amy, of them. i was doing commercials at 6 years old. >> jimmy: do they ever say to you, do they know? have they ever watched the wonder years? >> they've seen "the wonder years." my mom show it s it to them at house. i desperately want them to love it and think i'm super cool. and so we landed somewhere in between. like they're aware of it, and they think it's pretty cool. it's okay. >> jimmy: it's interesting to watch your father go through puberty on television, you know? >> they enjoy it very much. >> jimmy: do they watch your stuff in general? are they watching your new show? >> they're watching the new show. they're on the new show. my wife and kids come on in a couple episodes. they're going to be on it. >> jimmy: maybe the

to carry on a mulligan investigation and start all over again with these people who have spent hundreds of thousands on lawyers. >> the money can't be the issue. >> why destroy people to go through the meat grinder one more time? >> why is it destroying people? >> bob mueller is your boy. >> he's not my boy. >> he's a minted republican. >> let me speak for myself about that. did i the first political check on james comey. i'll start there. he was not a rock ribbed republican. >> i'm talking about mueller. >> bob mueller might be a registered republican but he was a trump hater. someone we call a never trumper. >> he interviewed to be head of the fbi right before he did this. >> yeah, why is there an obstruction of justice to get rid of james comey who he never replaced? he never brought that up to the president. >> why would bob mueller ask the president the day before he's picked to be the special counsel for the job of fbi director -- >> he was asked to come in to interview. he didn't ask for the job. that's not my understanding. he was asked to come in by a mutual friend. >> you don'

there's no mulligan here. >> so they also, the president in the wake of this decision has also seemeds motive for wanting to put this question on census which has been the subject of all these original debates. take a look at how the president framed it. >> you need it for many reasons. you need it for congress, for districting. you need it for appropriations. already with the funds going? how many people are there? are they citizens? are they not citizens. you need it for many reasons. >> isn't the president essentially making the case there is that has all about politics, it's all about redistricting. > he is making the case that it's connected to a long-term strategy to try to drain political representation from communities of color and to boost the prospects of the republican party and which secret documents revealed non-hispanic whites in the words of a republican redistrict strategist. i think it directly connects to the allegations that from the beginning this has been motivated by an attempt to harm minority communities. >> dale ho, thank you very much for your insights today.

there's no mulligans here.he deadlines are passed. >> mike, i know you, on this long holiday weekend, you read the transcript of that conference call. your reaction to that? the bewilderment going against an official position of the commerce department that this was said and done. >> i always said the deliverance of our system would be people doing their job. when it's government workers carrying out the trump agenda. those workers seem to be behaving in an ethical manner. it was there that they were confused and befuddled. they didn't understand what the government was trying to do, on the part of people they were arguing for. the questions i have, are, it does seem with the travel ban, sometimes called the muslim ban, that the administration used the courts as a process. they floated out two or three. they said the quiet part out loud. in court, donald trump was saying, ban the muslims. similar to this, why -- now the travel ban, a part of that did pass. why won't this pass if that's the parallel. >> for the

. >> going back to the crime bill of '92, there was a lot of things we wish we would have a mulliganl. people like joe lewis. joe biden wasn't alone. now going x number of years forward, cory needs to win south carolina. joe is right now winning it. i don't think it is a bad move for him to kind of punch up but it will be interesting. on stage tonight, cory is only 2%. he has to show what he stands for. he has to tell the people he is ready to be the next president. ainsley: if all goes well, what does the ticket look like? joe biden on top? >> i have too many friends. i will speak with you thursday. we'll see how it goes. ainsley: want the friend to remain intact. >> exactly. ainsley: thank you so much, robert. great to see you. >> they helped keep us safe every single day. now these three nypd officers are reaching new heights, climbing mount kilimanjaro for a good cause. they will join us, to share their experience what motivated them. hey, guys. ♪ there. i have a system. -keith used to be great to road-trip with. but since he bought his house... are you going 45? -uh, yes. 55 is