lemonis: so you filed a claim with the eeoc.n't a healthy situation, but to find out that she filed a complaint with a federal agency for sexual harassment, and to find out that he's now terminated her employment after everything that's happened. this is a real big problem. let me get ahold of him, and i'll get back with you, okay? grace: sounds good. thank you. lemonis: take care. bye-bye. grace: okay, bye-bye. and this is a real person named mackenzie book. hi, i'm mac book. so mac, which laptop lasts longer? surface laptop lasts longer. hmm, interesting. and which one's faster? this one's faster. really? amazing. which one has a better touchscreen? the surface has a better touchscreen. because it actually has a touchscreen. oh, right. macs don't have touchscreens. you should get a surface. trust me, i'm mac book. well, there you have it. mac book says, "get a surface." number one in overall network performance.full of "awards". highest in wireless network quality performance. highest in wireless network quality performance in

i feel i should respond briefly on the eeoc case that's been mentioned a couple of times. that was a matter i was handling for a client. i wasn't, that i can recall, personally seeking to make any significant change with respect to the americans with disabilities act. the federal government had brought this case against my client. it was seeking to force u.p.s. to hire drivers for somewhat heavy trucks who had vision out of only one eye, and u.p.s. had some safety concerns and there were federal rules saying that to drive a good sized truck it was important to have vision out of both eyes. so i was just defending them in the case but i wasn't seeking to make any significant change in the law. finally with respect to coal miners, i confess that i would need to study more fully the exact parameters of the obligations that coal companies currently have to their workers, but my understanding is that they are currently obligated to make contributions to the fund. sey: it's a lot smaller. that's why the trust fund has run out of money. i would say on both issues, and i know we'r

>> this is an area that is the responsibility of the eeoc to a great extent, as you know. do think that in areas where it's difficult for one reason or another for individuals to come together and bling bring a clas action, there may be a greater demand on the federal government to step in. when i was at the labor department before, an area of emphasis for me was low wage and immigrant workers. i met with my staff to work on ways to change those programs to better address those conditions because i believed those were people among those most likely to be victimized and least likely to address it. i think in circumstances where class actions are harder to brick because of the supreme court's rulings and because of the rules that govern them, there may be a greater demand on the government. and as you know at the labor department we have what we have is an office dedicated to helping with research and in some circumstances outreach and education on accommodating people with disabilities. >> thank you. i notice you're well over time. thank you for your indulgence, mr. chair,

rutherford: i will probably be in one of the eeoc's. downmily will be hunkered at home. am about four miles off the ocean's coast, so i feel pretty three big but these the things are water, food, and fuel. have that backup for our going out, be prepared for that. fill up your bathtub. it possible to flush the toilet and all of that, and if push comes to shove, you can even drink. that. if you go online, you can find really good tips on how to do that, how much clorox to put in the water and all of that. host: congressman, we know it is a busy morning. we will let you go in a minute. when we started our program talking about the horrible mass shooting in texas yesterday in odessa. from your perspective, as a former sheriff, and with congress set to come back and perhaps take up some legislation, briefly, what do you think the priority should be? rep. rutherford: look, i think the priority should be looking at these red flags all's where these individuals, and i do not know the case in texas yet. at that.ill looking but i can tell you in almost every one of these school bi

in order to work efficiently and effectively with states as well as the fda and others, the eeoc activation facilitates that. >> i am from the san francisco bay area. when i go home, jewel is now spending $40 million or more in overturning local events. the san francisco municipal government says they e-cigarettes are banned until the fda comes up with the end of their investigation. recently, we had an executive and founder of jewel secure and from my perspective, say that their product is helpful to keep people away from tobacco. particularly young people. passedistrict, they just similar ordinance. it seems to me to be a preventative and cautious approach. there is a product out there that is leading in deaths. what can we do to make sure that ?his doesn't happen in the business of young people, willing to spend $40 million. i hope they investigate their political consultants as well. they are shameless when it comes to the information. getting the look health officials involved, this is a daunting task to see that the public understands, particularly young people. >> i appreciate the in

the nation in order to work efficiently and effectively with the state and the fda and others, the eeoc activation facility. >> i'm from the san francisco bay area. juul is spending $40 million in overturning local ordinance by the san francisco municipal government that merely says e-cigarettes are banned until the fda comes up with the end of their investigation. recently we had an executive and founder of juul from my perspective try to say e-cigarettes, their product is keeping people away from tobacco. in richmond, california, in my district, they passed a similar ordinance. in the second panel, there's a preventative cautious approach, the product is misleading at best. what could we do further is congress to make sure this doesn't happen? the company in my view that has -- in the business of addicting people particularly young people and is willing to spend $40 million on the fda announced the criminal division is investigating them and i hope the investigator political consultants as well. they are shameless when it comes to in formation. given that you are getting public health

susan: eeoc has found that walmart the largest employer in america, employing over 1 1/2 million peopleted 178 female workers paying them less and denying promotions in at least 30 states. one of the employment lawyers quoted in "the wall street journal" who saw the internal memos. they said this is landmark, this is interesting, in 2001 there was a class-action lawsuit women brought against walmart, alleging that walmart systematically paid 1.6 million less, denied promotions. this was struck down by the supreme court. they could not form a class action group according to highest court in the land. this would be a settlement and changes to walmart practices in the future. david: on a down day, walmart is in the green. it is not affecting the stock today. >>> purdue pharma files bankruptcy. $10 billion will be paid to state and local governments to help deal with the crisis. is it enough, is it too much? we're asking ohio's attorney general coming next. >>> we'll ask for the outbreak of vaping-related illnesses. california man has become the 7th person to die because of a vaping-related