occupational and environmental medicine, another journal published a study in september of 2003 that found a 60% increased risk of non-hodgkin's lymphoma among farm workers in midwestern united states. and finally, cancer epidemiology, biomarkers published a study by canadian researchers in november 2011 that found a dose-response relationship between roundup and non-hodgkin's lymphoma. - has the world health organization issued any reports on this? - oh, they certainly have. in march of 2015, the international agency research on cancer, which is the cancer research arm of the world health organization, issued a report published in lancet oncology. which declared that the glyphosate contained in roundup probably causes cancer in humans. glyphosate was also added to california's list of known human carcinogens, effective july 7, 2017, according to the office of environmental health hazard assessment. and in new york, monsanto agreed to stop falsely advertising roundup weed killer as safe when studies indicate otherwise. - i'm thinking there must be a number of lawsuits that have been

a doctor, president of the american academy of environmental medicine states that people who live near cell towers and antennas are in jeopardy. enclosing, i have a native american indian quote. only when the last tree has been cut down, the last fish has been cut, in the last stream poisoned will we realize we cannot eat money. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> welcome back. >> hello, board members. my name is michael. i live in san francisco under the irradiation of 5g and four g. it is harmful to my health. if something isn't going to protect us, this will be a legally prohibited cell assault against us. and a dangerous and unavoidable tragedy. as explained to you by the briefs, the city and county of san francisco has the right and responsibility to protect the health and safety of its citizens. and to object the false acclaimed overreaching powers of the s.c.c. this was also explained in 2298 pacific appeal brief that was originally scheduled tonight until verizon withdrew the cell tower permit. of greatest importance to this board as it updates its risk report, th

medicines. and they did not vote for a decline in our country's environmental standards. mr. speaker, i am extremely privileged to be able to serve my wonderful people of constituency, and i will do my most to be an mp that they are proud of. thank you very much. >> thank you, i think the house greatly enjoyed listening to the honorable lady, and we wish her well. >> mr. speaker, i want us to leave the european union with a deal, and i voted three times to leave the european union with a deal. and i regret the fact that it has become necessary for this bill to be brought forward now. it is necessary now for two reasons -- firstly, because parliament stands paroched so it -- provoked, so we will not have time to bring parliament back within 30 days to see whether the prime minister has been successful in getting a deal, and secondly, because members of government have speculated openly that the government may not comply with legislation even if it is passed. we need to allow time not merely forlegislation, but litigation, as well. i will give way to the honorable member. >> we

they did not vote for long waits for lifesaving medicines, and they did not vote for a decline in our countries environmental standards. i'm extremely privileged to be able to serve the wonderful people of brecon rapture and i will do my best to be an mp that they are proud of. thank you very much. >> thank you. i think the house listened to the lady. we wish her well. >> i want us to leave the european union with a deal. i voted three times to leave the european union. i regret the fact that it has become necessary for this bill to be brought forth now. it is necessary now for two reasons. firstly, because parliament stands -- we will not have time to bring parliament back after my right honorable friend has had the 30 days he asked for to see whether he has been successful in getting a deal. secondly, because members of the government have speculated openly that the government may not comply with legislation even if it is passed. we therefore need to allow time for legislation and litigation as well. and because -- i will give way. >> we have heard noises to that effect. from certain members of the governm

medicines. and they did not vote for a decline in our country's environmental standards. mr. speaker, i am extremely privileged to be able to serve the wonderful people of brecon and radford sure and i will do my most to be an mp that they are proud of. thank you very much. >> thank you, i think the house greatly enjoyed listening to the honorable lady and we wish her well. speaker, i want us to leave the european union with a deal and i voted three times to leave the european union with a deal. i regret the fact that it has become necessary for this bill to begrudge forward now. it is necessary now for two reasons -- firstly because parliament roched so it will not have time to ring parliament to seethin 30 days whether the promised her is successful in getting a deal and secondly because members of the government as speculated openly that the government may not comply with legislation even if it is past. we need to allow time not merely for legislation before litigation as well. >> we have heard noises to that effect from certain members of the government and government sou

waitsid not vote for long , life-saving medicines and they did not vote for a decline in our country's environment at the -- environmental standards. to betremely privileged able to serve the wonderful people of brecon rapture and i will do my best to be an mp that they are proud of. thank you very much. >> thank you. i think the house listened to the lady. we wish her well. i want us to leave the european union with a deal. i voted three times to leave the european union. that it has fact become necessary for this bill to be brought forth now. it is necessary now for two reasons. firstly, because parliament stands for wrote. we will not have time to bring parliament back after my right honorable friend has had the 30 days he asked for to see whether he has been successful in getting a deal. secondly, because members of the government have speculated openly that the government may not comply with legislation even if it is passed. we therefore need to allow time for legislation and litigation as well. way.ecause -- i will give >> we have heard noises to that effect. from certain members of the government and government so

medicines. they did not vote for a decline in our country's environmental standards. decline in our country's environmentalstandardsmmond.” honourable lady and we wish her well. mr philip hammond. i want us to leave the eu with a deal and i voted three times to leave the eu with the deal. and i regret the fact that it has become necessary for this bill to be brought forward now. it is necessary now for two reasons, firstly because parliament stands prorogued, and we would not have time to bring it back to see if the prime minister has been successful in getting a deal, and secondly because members of the government have speculated openly that the government may not comply with legislation even if it is passed and we therefore need to allow time not merely for legislation but for litigation as well. i will give way just once. on that point, we have heard noises to that effect from certain members of the government and government sources, but would the right honourable member agree that if the bill is passed it is important the prime minister adheres to its terms because it is a fundamental duty of government to upho