we have efforts like the embarcadaro seawall and rehabilitation programme that are limited to the northern waterfront and in southern waterfront, we're commencing through the front, similar to the northern waterfront kicking off the seawall programme. we are requesting author requesn to amend the contract port-wide and we're trying to integrate efforts like the embarcadaro seawall and army corps wall study. as we're adding resources, we're being mindful and trying to take advantage of the creek study, which is cal-trans finished with the army core work and we're efficient with public money. we've incorporated your recommendations from prior discussions. the change to the report that i want to flag for you, actually on page 7 of the report, we were projecting a 23.42% spaw spaws e participation and we got approval just yesterday in advance of the commission meeting. the exact mission is 21.9%. we expect that will go back up to the 23.24%. there are some lbes where paperwork is in process and they're being added and that will be before the board of supervisor's approval. as an overview, we h

staff worked with local makers in san francisco who were willing to put their own energy in our seawall programme, specifically coffee and brewery and they made seawall theme drinks and coffees to get the word out about the programme. black hammer hosted a meet-the-engineer happy hour to promote their beer, seawall puppy and get the public engaged connected to our engineering team working on the programme. the blend was available anywhere coffee was sold in august of september of 2018 and included five locations in popular grocery stores through san francisco but importantly, the label told the story about our seawall and introduced the public to the seawall programme in touching audiences that we wouldn't traditionally touch. so i'm proud of k irster salvy as our lead. you're always pushing the envelope and getting the word out. that concludes my report. >> thank you. is there any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. i would request item 9a be moved to the end of the agenda after item 10a. >> good afternoon, commissioners. i am presenting item 6b, the informational item and pos

has been done in a quate coordid with on the port's resilience programme and rfp preparations for the embarcadaro pier projects and the seawall, as well. where we've been able to have interactive discussions to show how the policies relate to actual project initiatives that we're trying to advance, it's helped, i think, the public to understand why the waterfront plan is there and what the policies actually mean and to that end, rattler the historic district, we did get a comment about, perhaps, clarifying the policy language to make it clear that the high-revenue generating uses that are allowed for in the embarcadro policies is for the purposes of generating the financial capacity to be able to seismically upgrade and deliver the trust access and oriented uses and not to be just an an office development opportunity. that it's an integrated package. i think there are improvements that we can make on the language there to make that more clear. we did get some comments just yesterday from john collinger from the working group with concerns around the general office policy provision and we will follow up with him to answer his