vroom also had allies within the government linda fisher of the e.p.a. also oppose the circle of poison bell so take the case to linda fisher she was an e.p.a. official who argued against a circle of poison bill during the 1st bush administration after that she went to work for months on to actually as a lobbyist after that she went back into government back as a high official of the e.p.a. in the 2nd bush administration and since then she's become a high official at department is a perfect example of how the revolving door of officials moving in and out of government regulating pesticides and other toxics and then going to work for the people that produce. the big fix are the 6 agricultural companies that control upwards of 75 percent of the global has to sign trade and the big 6th i name her monsanto now they're syngenta. m.b.a.'s and the 6 global corporations really controlled in terms of food in farming. that. you know they need to leave. your feet to be. wanted ok bye. well moron if women i guess would not go many of them with ball but it gets a lot

monetary interests with major biotech and pharmaceutical companies so for example let's consider linda fisher here was someone who was with the e.p.a. and then she went to join and become the head of government affairs at monsanto and now she's the vice president of safety health and environment and chief sustainability officer dupont so her interests are not only to ensure the advancement of dupont but she also used to be at the e.p.a. and she understands all the loopholes 'd within the e.p.a. to advise her organization of how to get through safety issues another example is terri medley here's a person who is an administrator at the u.s.d.a. and at the f.d.a. and now serves of the director of regulatory and external affairs of dupont corporation's agricultural enterprise you can also look at someone like clinton uter who is also at the u.s.d.a. and was a u.s. trade representative and he's on the board of my kitchen which is a wholly owned subsidiary of dow chemical but perhaps one of most egregious ones is michael taylor who was appointed by the obama administration prior to joining as deput

vroom also had allies within the government linda fisher of the e.p.a. also oppose the 2nd poison bell so take the case to linda fisher she was an e.p.a. official who argued against a circle of poison bill during the 1st bush administration after that she went to work for months on to actually as a lobbyist after that she went back into government back as a high official of the e.p.a. in the 2nd bush administration and since then she's become a high official at department is a perfect example of how the revolving door of officials moving in and out of government regulating pesticides and other toxics and then going to work for the people that produce. the big 6 are the 6 agra chemical companies that control upwards of 75 percent of the global has to sign trade and the big 6 names are monsanto now they're syngenta. m.b.a.'s and the 6 global corporations really controlled in terms of food in farming. bookie. you know they need to leave. your feet don't have to be. on an. it will not be a flamenco many of them with ball but it gets a lot of fame to be the m

also oppose the 2nd poison bell so take the case to linda fisher she was an e.p.a. official who argued against a circle of poison bill during the 1st bush administration after that she went to work for a month actually as a lobbyist after that she went back into government back as a high official of the e.p.a. in the 2nd bush administration and since then she's become a high official at department is a perfect example of how the revolving door of officials moving in the out of government regulating pesticides and other toxics and then going to work for the people that produce. the big 6 are the 6 agra chemical companies that control upwards of 75 percent of the global has to sign trade and the big 60 names are monsanto. there suggest you can't n.b.a.'s and the 6 global corporations really controlled in terms of food in farming. that. you know they need to leave. your feet don't have to be. wanted ok bye. it will not be a flamenco many of them with ball but it gets a lot of fame to be the moments that are how did he come from. sunday in south moonshot just emphasize

also oppose the 2nd poison bell so take the case to linda fisher she was an e.p.a. official who argued against a circle of poison bill during the 1st bush administration after that she went to work for a month actually as a lobbyist after that she went back into government back as a high official of the e.p.a. in the 2nd bush administration and since then she's become a high official at department is a perfect example of how the revolving door of officials moving in and out of government regulating pesticides and other toxics and then going to work for the people that produce. the big 6 are the 6 agricultural companies that control upwards of 75 percent of the global has to sign trade and the big 6 names are monsanto now they're suggest. n.b.a.'s and those 6 global corporations really controlled in terms of food in farming. bookie. you know they need to leave. your feet on to the big. one and. if women i guess would not go many of them with ball but it gets a lot of offensive e-mails and said oh how did he come from. sunday in south moonshot just emphasize on not th

you want to read a great thing about poverty lines, read linda barrington and eric fisher's piece, its glorious. it is a great piece and she describes it. i picked up on oscars'estimates for the earlier -- oscar's estimates for the earlier timeframe. trying to be as consistent as possible with the poverty line. there is no also the personal consumption they spend it shares .e.a. putex which the b out. you use it, the income is 31% higher than in 2000 -- officials since 1970 is basically rising at the rate of the cpi but it doesn't mean per capita income has stayed the same. it depends on how well you have adjusted for other things. ,mployer hiring manufacturer weekly hours and weekly earnings, but i realized they are deceiving a cousin tell you the wages. they don't tell you about benefits. it is important to include benefits listed here. and othersod job including this in historical statistics. i can't adjust them at the state level but only at the national. this includes contributions of employers for social security and also for the other kinds of things the government-based becaus

also opposed to suckle a poison bell so take the case to linda fisher she was an e.p.a.official who argued against a circle of poison bill during the 1st bush administration after that she went to work for months on top actually as a lobbyist after that she went back into government back as a high official of the e.p.a. in the 2nd bush administration and since then she's become a high official at department is a perfect example of how the revolving door of officials moving in and out of government regulating pesticides and other toxics and then going to work for the people that produce. the big 6 are the 6 agra chemical companies that control upwards of 75 percent of the global has to sign trade and the big 6 names are monsanto dow bear syngenta. m.b.a.'s and the 6 global corporations really controlled in terms of food in farming. bucky that. you know they need to leave you know. your feet don't have to be. wanted ok bye. well moron if women i guess would not go many of them we fall but it gets a little offensive emails etc how did he come from. sunny in south moonshot j

i am using, you want to read a great thing about property lines read linda , barrington and eric fisher'siece, it is glorious. it is a truly great piece and she describes it. i picked up on oscar's estimates for the earlier timeframe. oscar did pretty much the same thing as molly did in the 1960's. trying to be as consistent as possible with the poverty line. there is no also the personal consumption they spend it shares price index which the b.e.a. put out. it seems to do a better job, apparently about quality. if you use it, the poem -- in, or the property line is 21% higher than the official poverty line. the official line since about 1970 is basically rising at the rate of the cpi but it doesn't mean per capita income has stayed the same. it depends on how well you have adjusted for the other things. i regionally just had weekly earnings, but those are deceiving because they just tell you the wages. they don't tell you about the benefits. it's important to include all the benefits listed here. that's where the employer cost comes here. bill did a good job and others including this in