nafta was ratified in 1994. 1994. that is three years before wi-fi became available to the public, five years before u.s.b. drives were invented, 12 years before the launch of facebook and twitter, and 16 years before computer tablets were on sale. none of us are living with 1994 technology, so why should we be living with 1994 trade policy? president trump understands the need to modernize trade with two of our closest allies, and that's why he negotiated a great trade deal with mexico and canada, the usmca. patsing the usmca will allow us to compete in today's 21st century economy. it will provide folks back home in iowa with some certainty, certainty in a time where prices have been low and markets have been eroded from other trade wars. iowans want and need usmca. canada and mexico are our state's top two trading partners. in 2018 alone we exported $6.6 billion worth of products to our neighbors to the north and to the south. trade with canada and mexico directly increases the value of iowan exports like beef, add

the weak enforcement system of the old nafta. it is too easy on trade sheets and it's not good enough for american workers, particularly on the issue of protecting our working families and labor rights. now, our colleague, senator brown and i have proposed several additional tools to address specific challenges in mexico and it's my view, having talked to trade officials and gathering information elsewhere by all accounts there has been good progress on this front. additionally, one of the bigger challenges that have to be confronted is identifying the hundreds of thousands of sham labor contracts in mexico that have exploited workers there and harmed workers here in our country. mexico must remain on track to get those contracts renegotiated on behalf of the interests of our workers. now, to my colleagues who say this deal must be passed in the name of certainty, i want to make a point that i think is very important. during this overhaul, the original north american free trade agreement remains in place. workers, farmers, ranche

to america and some people blame nafta that nafta is what caused a huge trade deficit trumps unwinnable trade war gold explains why explaining the u.s. trade deficit this is from mr talk if it's not nafta and not china what is it because nafta is 1904 china joined in 2001 he says china did not cause a soaring us trade deficit but china did excel or at the issue nafta is not involved at all as other chart show so what happened of course is we went off the gold standard i mean that's quite obvious but you see it in the charts quite clearly that going back into the forty's and fifty's we had a trade deficit and then as soon as we went off the gold standard with a bit of inertia from 1979 and then dropped ever since every single year right the gold standard imposes a certain discipline and there is a way off the gold standard is because you need the growth to pay for wars typically but what the gold standard deal way to break out of the inertia of having middle class existence is through genuine innovation so genuine innovators you know the combustion engine the electric light bulb you know

i voted for nafta. i had any disappointments about it. i didn't want this just to be nafta-plus a little bit. i wanted it to be structurely different in terms of who benefits starting with american workers. so i'm happy about it and impeachment has nothing do do with p, it only has to do with our ooccoming to agreement and terms as far as the house of representatives is concerned. i have business on the floor.rnc i'm going to have to excuse e ar myself. thank you very much.e

i voted for nafta. i had my disappoints about it. i didn't want this to just be nafta plus a little bit. i wanted it to be structurally different in terms of who benefits, starting with american workers. so i'm happy about it, and impeachment has nothing to do with it. it only has to do with our coming to agreement and to terms as far as the house of representatives is concerned 37 as you may understand, i have business on the floor that i have to see to. so i'm going to have to excuse myself. thank you, all, very much. >>> house speaker pelosi finishing her weekly news conference, spending a good majority of it on the impeachment efforts, moving forward in the house today. shortly, the house is set to vote on approving the process against president trump. you can watch that debate and vote set for 11:00 eastern this morning as it proceeds on our companion network c-span. i should also tell you in just under an hour, 11:30 eastern, republican leaders will hold a news conference, and we'll bring that to you when it starts right here o

what happens to the new nafta if he fails to win? we will ask original master negotiator, ambassador charles reese, in a fox business exclusive. >>> and two ohio counties settle for the first of its kind lawsuit in cleveland in the 11th hour, right before trial was supposed to begin. four of its opioid opponents say we don't take any responsibility, but here's $250 million. the man who invented the life-saving antidote to opioid overdoses, dr. roger crystal, is here in a fox business exclusive. he is part of thesolution. does anything about this settlement solve anything and what is dr. crystal working on now? less than an hour to the closing bell. let's start "the claman countdown." liz: we have breaking news. there is more fallout from the fisher investment situation. it seemingly has not ended at the moment following allegedly sexist comments from the firm's leader, ken fisher. the latest to drop the money manager, a big one. fidelity. his firm had managed half a billion dollars in one of fidelity's small cap funds. now at this po

it may have been worse than nafta, and i never thought anything could be worse than nafta.re standing up for our great workers. and america is winning, winning, winning once again. and we're winning. we're winning. and we're respected again. we're respected. you know, respect is a part of winning. we're respected again, as a country. we're not laughed at. and it's getting more and more that way. and you know it, and i know it. and, you know, most importantly, other countries know it. they know it. after losing 60,000 factories -- so, when i first saw that number a few years ago, i said, "that can't be right." i got to be careful, because i have these people back here. and they'll say, "it's not 60. it's like 5." right? it's 60,000. so i had it researched and checked. and you know it's right when they never correct you. i've been saying it for years. it's true. it has to be right. otherwise, they'd say, "he's not telling the truth." but after losing 60,000 -- it's not even possible to believe that much -- 60,000 factories under the previous two administrations, we've now gai

with thet's go ahead usmca, successor to nafta.ou think that would not get through congress as long as democrats keep pushing on impeachment? david m.: it is all about impeachment. that is all we are doing. i think we have kind of reached a level where the facts have teetered out. there is no new news. they haven't convinced people that the president should be in peace. radical liberal base. we have to impeach the guy. stuck,elosi is kind of even if she wanted to help with the economy she would suffer political consequences in her own party. some of the people are probably telling her don't do it, don't help trump get a win or with the economy. sadly for the country they are making politics above what is good for the country. david: david mcintosh coming to us from washington. up next we will have more details on the stock market and how it has fared under various president and what a potential democrat could mean for the market. this is bloomberg. ♪ elect elizabeth warren president and the stock market will fall precipitously so s

this is president bill clinton on the signing of the nafta agreement. let's watch. fmr. pres.linton: it's an honor to be here today with this north american free-trade agreement. president jimmy carter gives great energy to our efforts and has been a consistent the motives his for many, many years now. president ford, who has argued this fiercely for expanded trade and for this agreement as any american citizen, and whose counsel i continue to value. these men differing and party and outlook, join me today because we all recognize the important stakes are our nation in this issue. today we turn to face the challenge of our own country, our own economic fortunes. in a few moments i will sign three agreements i will complete our negotiations with mexico and canada, to create in north american free trade agreement. in the coming months i will submit this to congress for approval. it will be a hard fight, and i expect to be there with all of you every step of the way. susan: the year after nafta was signed, the wto was created in 1994, you mentioned the protests that were created

and that's where he stood for 16 years until he joined trump, and then he didn't support nafta anymore. his positions are eminently fungible. that's who he is. >> but i would add that if he does have a path to the presidency, it will require the partner organizations at the council for national policy -- >> yes. >> and they tend to collect their bills. >> that's true. that's a good point. that's a good point. >> and i think that there are always penalties for politicians who renege on their agreements. so in terms of what they would seek, you can see it very clearly with the judiciary appointments that have been made at record speed including a number of judges for the federal bench who are rated as not qualified by the american bar association. we're talking about the latest appointment. he is 37, he has been appointed to a lifetime position on the federal bench. he has never tried -- he has never prosecuted a case as a lawyer. what he has is his political affiliation. and so, again, these people have been selected because of their willingness to realize a certain vision. what is that

nafta 2.0. usmca, usa, mexico, canada, there should a decent shot of that passing. china.f we don't have details a lot of opportunity for politician to say a bad deal. elizabeth: china has bought -- year-to-date. would they pullback out of phase i. or more tariffs on china good-bygood-bye christmastime -- >> they are looking for to cancel the tariffs due december 15, that is possible. that would finish up a deal you know in next two months. >> this is -- is this a play for thtrump administration. we know consumers pay thoser tariffs, is his play to get manufacturing from overseas back home. >> that is his long-term play. i think president -- >> do you think it working now. >> not yet, it takes a long time. people demand results right away, president has a result this year he did not have before, that important in my opinion in the election. just looking at our goods we send back and forth to china, president's number one election issue on china, china was taking money from us. that gap is falling, only fallen when he had recessions, now when our economy is doing fine. pres

this is a replacement for nafta. it's been done for months now and should have been implemented and ready to go. mexico has changed their laws that they needed to change to implement it and begun to do some things there. ktd hassed read it twice in the parliament they have to read it a third time. they won't read it a third time until we do wae we need to could. speaker ploerts is in charge if she brings it to the floor for a vote. we have the requisite number of votes to make it happen. if she doesn't she does it for thu things. one a majority of her team doesn't want it. and she can't put it on the floor or two, she is working in the democrat nominees best interests in 2020. so make it -- because president trump campaigned on dogt away with nafta in does away with nafta, resets it. every eefgs of thes the new deal sits better for the united states. not as good for canada. but for mexico and united states it's better. better in mexico for this reason. the labor standards are the best negotiated. not likely the democ

, this does away with nafta. every evaluation is this is better for the united states, mexico, probably not as good for cana canada. the labor standards, the requirements in this treaty are the best that's ever been negotiated. not likely the democrats could have negotiated standards any better. it will raise wages in mexico. it protects unions, organizing in ways it's never been protected down there to allow unions to represent and protect workers better against employers. their wages will come up. that's good for them. multibillion dollars new trade, agriculture trade for the united states as a result of this deal, so every evaluation says the usmca is good for america. put this on the floor and let us vote or does she operate on what best for the democrat nominees in 2020? only she gets to decide that. i had encouraging comments by one of my democrat colleagues from south texas in september that's one of her confidants that said it's coming to the floor and she's going to let this happen. so we'll see if that'

i voted for nafta. i had any disappointments about it. i didn't want this just to be nafta-plus a little bit. i wanted it to be structurely different in terms of who benefits starting with american workers. so i'm happy about it and impeachment has nothing do do with p, it only has to do with our ooccoming to agreement and terms as far as the house of representatives is concerned. i have business on the floor.rnc i'm going to have to excuse e ar myself. thank you very much.e us abou >> we're going talk about the 2020 election with david beckert who's the co-founder ander executive director of the center for election and innovation research. tell us about the work they do. >> we were founded in 2016 after i worked for several years in te pew team.conven before that i was enforcing federal voting laws.oninno we work to ensure the security of the overall election in the : united states and work to improve access for all voters. >> you're a dottering, so you'r. a nonprofit. how were you founded? >> by foundations and other est: donors. we are

ou know, nafta -- people don't realize this. nafta was three pages, i believe, originally when it was it was originally done. when it was passed is was over stacked.tall ust full of typical washington garbage that they tacked on to right toe president is rewrite it. and the usmca, the agreement -- it co has already agreed to and canada, their parliament, they have to pass it three times. twice.ssed it now they're waiting on this country. that's what people ought to be concerned about. ms. pelosi won't even bring that floor vote because they doesn't want this president to get a victory. jobs.housands of american it's millions of dollars. and she won't -- she won't bring the floor. regardless of impeachment, you select group this so-called ring these hearings in secret and then the rest of us, you know, we're still doing business but she allow this because of house rules. she can stop it. it's riles. working people, the american thise ought to be outraged impeachment is taking the oxygen out of the room and not allowing anything e

and that's where he stood for 16 years until he joined trump, and then he didn't support nafta anymore. his positions are eminently fungible. that's who he is. >> but i would add that if he does have a path to the presidency, it will require the partner organizations at the council for national policy -- >> yes. >> and they tend to collect their bills. >> that's true. that's a good point. that's a good point. >> and i think that there are always penalties for politicians who renege on their agreements. so in terms of what they would seek, you can see it very clearly with the judiciary appointments that have been made at record speed including a number of judges for the federal bench who are rated as not qualified by the american bar association. we're talking about the latest appointment. he is 37, he has been appointed to a lifetime position on the federal bench. he has never tried -- he has never prosecuted a case as a lawyer. what he has is his political affiliation. and so, again, these people have been selected because of their willingness to realize a certain vision. what is that

if joe biden wants to defend nafta, if he thinks we shouldn't be getting tough with our trading partners and demanding free and fair and reciprocal trade, we will have that debate every day. >> laura: on the issue of impeachment, it was reported he will take a more forward-looking role, you will be more engaged in the impeachment battle, is that the case -- and if so what form does that take? >> it has been three years of endless investigations and a partisan attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election. i think the american people have had enough. we went through two and a half years of the mueller investigation with outlandish accusations of collusion and obstruction until the justice department found no collusion, no obstruction, case closed. they took a brief break and we are talking about impeaching justice kavanaugh after trying to smear his name and reputation a year ago. then in the wake of all of this, suddenly we are back. two closed-door hearings on capitol hill, leaked informati information -- >> laura: what will you do in this effort? >> we are going to be out there

similar version of nafta and so that's fine. no one needed a huge change to and a hanafta and great, whatev they're going to do, but the idea that free trade with canada and mexico could go away has a lot of people freaked out. the reason why democrats care is it's much about the state. the farmers need this. autos and the industries that they, that they represent are very involved and you know with the chamber of commerce behind it, you can get a bipartisan coalition. >> stephanie, what would you have said the odds of passing usmca were over is summer and now. >> i've long heard in washington over the summer, the divide's getting way too big. like i don't know if usmca can pass, but i thought it could because of the political incentives i was just talking about. so my odd, i haven't put, let me think of what icht to say. around 75% probably and i don't think that's changed even with impeachment. >> wow >> i would have six in ten over the summer about four in ten now! i love this. i love this and i love the senate conviction, to

usmca upgrades modernizes nafta. it will boost our economy and it's a win for farmers, producers, and definitely consumers. we have an opportunity to take action on trade but the work must come first. it is our constitutional duty to start this process in the house. delaying the enactment of usmca hurts american jobs, border security, agriculture, as well as innovation. we cannot afford to let this opportunity pass. let's begin the work in the ways and means committee and let's get this done. it is time to pass usmca. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: the chair recognizes the gentleman from washington, mr. newhouse, for five minutes. mr. speaker, today i rise to honor the life and service of assistant fire chief christian johnson of fire district number 3. chief johnson recently passed away due to injuries he sustained while fighting the spring cooley fire in north central washington last september. mr. speaker, chief johnson is an american hero. he served our country honorably, retiring from the army after 22 year

nafta in its 25 years needs to be updated.here have been some deficiencies that have cropped up along the way, and we need to take into account the new economy that we're in, whether it's digital books, digital music, e-games and things like that. there's good support, but there's still some concerns, and that's why the white house under u.s. trade representative lighthizer has been meeting with a working group put togethery speaker pelosi to iron out some of the details, get a little bit more clarity, certainty on issues like enforcement. how do we make sure that mexico lives up to its agreement? how do we make sure that there are ample protections for the environment so that american companies are not at a disadvantage they protect and follow environmental regulations that other countries like mexico won't. so we need to make sure that those are in place. so those are some of the issues that folks are talking about and trying to hammer out. liz: all right. so when people are trying to convince others and we all saw lincoln,

china trade deal, nafta 2.0, will that be ruined by impeachment. >> i wrote in my column today what shapingusmca, it looks like pelosi is putting up of obstacle she can from putting this to a vote, even though the votes are there. but she is adding all sorts of other things, talking about maybe you have to agree to reenter the paris climate accord, and she wants a pension bailout bill attached and reopen several elements the trade -- you know that could you know be very destructive to the process. elizabeth: stay on that, it sounds like you are bringing news, nancy pelosi today and yesterday said we're moving toward nafta 2.0 that is her rhetoric but you say otherwise. >> i hope she is, so far -- look, this should have been voted on a month ago. >> a year ago. >> right. so why this taking to long. and my sources on capitol hill, say, pelosi is not doing this because she still uneasy about handing donald trump a political victory. even though it has been good for the economy, good for workers, this is a frustrating process, i will take her for her word, if she wants to move it along, do it,

helicopter that's weird >> when we come back, democrats looking to hammer out details for the new nafta. they are traveling to mexico to get it done. how the trump administration is using trade deals to protect certain companies from legal battles. an interesting story you got to hear that is coming up. d nails step . it's the number one brand uniquely formulated for silky hair, glowing skin and healthy nails. nature's bounty, because you're better off healthy. you should be mad at leaf blowers. [beep] you should be mad your neighbor always wants to hang out. and you should be mad your smart fridge is unnecessarily complicated. but you're not mad, because you have e*trade which isn't complicated. their tools make trading quicker and simpler. so you can take on the markets with confidence. don't get mad. get e*trade and start trading today. don't get mad. servicenow put our this changes everything. you're right sir... everything. no not everything, i mean you're still blatantly sucking up to me gary. brilliantly observed, sir. always three steps ahead. six steps ahead. sixteen. so many s

my favorite word, reciprocal trade, replacing nafta that was a terrible deal, but with the usmcarc ica, companies realize r is never a better time to hire, vist, build and grow in united states of america, this hottest time we had. it is incredible wha what is happening in the country. my administration started the pledge to american workers thanks to again ivanka's leadership, private sector partners will produce many more jobs over a very short period of time. and today, i am pleased to announce louis vuitton is also signing the pledge, ensuring antion for all 1,000 texas workers here in johnson county and thank you, we have 1,000 more workers we can add to the list. louis vuitton stu. -- thank you, thank you very much. >> truly fitting that name of this facility is rechambeau ranch. named for french general who helped general george washington win the decisive battle of american revolution and secure american independents that is great, today france remains oldest ally but one of our most trusted and cherished, we have a grit relationship with chance, we have our little disputes wit

comes into effect there will be an agreement to govern trade between the nafta countries called nafta. it will be turbulent. it will create enormous difficulty for u.s. exporters if suddenly you went from having nafta to having nothing but risk is that britain will go from having eu membership to having nothing. now our prime minister will meet the british prime minister tomorrow in england. he's going across to the north of england to meet him, and we are committed to trying to find a solution, but sadly there's a lot of toxic politics that surrounds the brexit issue at the moment, and while a no-deal brexit ought to be a zero percent possibility, sad lit percent and risk of a no-deal brexit is far greater than that which is why we're so preoccupied with this issue and why we earnestly hope that an agreement can somehow be found tone able the uk to leave the european union, but in an orderly fashion which minimizes damage to the irish economy, to northern ireland, to the peace process and to the european union. thank you very much. [ applause ] >> thank you, ambassador. thank you, mr

in the trump era, to the party that that we should renegotiate nafta. obama promised to do that? they won't pass the usmca only because it means a victory for trump. the party that was antiwar rattled against trump bringing our troops home, deployments that were supposed to last for months, not three years. the democrats are just only too happy to force their core issues and beliefs. if they believe it will bring down donald trump. but the mask is finally slipping, and the masquerade officially ends november 2020. that's the angle.ma joining us now, we are delighted. ed henry, matt schlapp, and richard goodstein. look, everyone's a hypocrite. no one is a perfect person. but this goes beyond that. we are talking about not just the blackface controversy, not just the lynching word they are outraged about one minute. they said 5 minutes ago. this is about a fundamental contradiction in core beliefs on key issues like trade, even china. even deporting criminals in the united states. one needs to be in favor of. they all flipped. the party moves left, but more so in office because tru

one of the problems in nafta. there weren't enough restrictions and guidelines to make sure mexico labor, that their wages came up. that is something that the current president mexico, so we need to change. the need to brent they do recognize that having low wages in mexico means that they don't get a middle-class mexico therefore they cannot be consumers. is a big push in putting on right now is how to build that up in mexico is committed to doing that. in the past the changes that they need to make and then they are starting to put that into effort and budgeted for that appropriation candidate just come through elections, they were waiting until after elections that due process. bring it up for a vote. we need to bring that usc mca to the board. we need to pass it. i thoroughly need think it will pass. >> better labor protections that were in the previous nafta. you are staying that whose version does a better job at it. spak does a better job and puts, present office done a good job with his administration and

i don't think it is as dramatic a difference from nafta as others have talked about.out basically raising wages, for producers in mexico, and canada mostly mexico. making sure that they kantner cut american workers, so that is a protectionist move i don't think going to be particularly helpful in terms of growing our economy. maria: okay. so, you are not looking at usmca as a must pass? to move the needle on economic growth in? >> well, again as i said, i think it would be very nice to have that resolved primarily no one likes uncertainty, just having this thing hang out there we don't know what the rules are going to be, is not a good thing for business, particularly when you are thinking about manufacturing, automotive so forth. maria: yeah. >> so that is that is the problem there. but i think in terms of the difrs between usmca, and nafta they are not that pronounced to the extent there are differences the differences are primarily in terms of what i would think of protectionist moves raising wages in other countries. maria: i got you -- >> that might have some eff

we call it nafta 2.0. it's not that different.e of, that labor and environmental protections, what they already agreed to the language, put it in the agreement. there's a big, wet sloppy kiss to big pharma in there. we've got to get that out. you could do those couple things and probably have 390 votes in congress. but it took the white house 45 days to respond to us. i don't know how serious they are about this. what's really hurting is in the farm economy in nye my district it's all the tweeting tariffs out with china and watching what's happening to the markets. and that assistance we're giving farmers is a joke. for the average dairy farmer it's 1% of the cost of 100 weight. it's not even close to helping them. my soy bean farmers are hurting, corn growers are hurting. that's the reality. that's why i think donald trump will have real problems in places like wisconsin next year. >> congressman mark pocan, thank you for your time. appreciate it. >> sure. thank you. >> this ukraine situation is a straightforward and simple argum

now we are replacing nafta with the brand new u.s.-mexico-canada agreement. [applause] and the usmca will be a victory for farmers and ranchers and growers and workers all across the state. i don't know if the farmers are goingg to need it after china. they may say, we can't do it anymore, please, please, we don't want anymore, mr. president. they'll be calling me from nebraska and iowa. remember, i used to say it. we're winning so much. please, please, mr. president, we don't want to win so much. we're not used to it. they'll be calling me from nebraska. they'll be calling me from iowa. they'll be calling me from that beautiful midsection, which was so beautiful bright red. you had a little blue on the edges. and if there was honest voting, i really think i would have won that, too. but there's not. there's not. whatever they tell you, there's not.o. but they'll be calling, please, we don't need any more. we can't do it. we're working too hard. they want us too much. that's a nice feeling, though, isn't that great? democrats in congress should get back to wo

out -- nafta california produces 80% of the world's almonds, a lot of them produced around here. we have less than 1% of the world's consumers. there is only so much almond milk we can drink. we need to be able to sell our product, not just almonds, but dairy and everything else, all across the world. the first solution is our partners in mexico and canada, which usmca would address. we are working hard to get this to yes. and i feel like -- i was hoping to get this to a vote by the end of august, that did not happen. i am hoping to do it before the canadian elections by october , 31. that could slip and now we are hoping for maybe the end of the year. it is very frustrating for me to see that folks are not actually getting something done on this because it would be getting -- solving some issues with it, it would lead to a boom in the valley. what usmca does for this region is, it opens up the canadian dairy market. we have lost 90 dairy farms in san joaquin an stanislaus county over the last 10 years. a lot of dairy farms are in trouble. and just when we are getting back on tra

it is the replacement for nafta.t has been done for months now and it should have already been implemented and ready to go. mexico has changed their laws that they needed to change in order to implement it and they have begun to do things. canada has read it twice in their parliament, they have to rated a third time but they will not do that until we do what we need to do. speaker pelosi is in charge of speaker pelosi is in charge of this issue. i think that we have the requisite number of votes. if she does not take it to the floor, then she will do either of two things -- one, a majority of her team does not want it and she cannot put it on the floor, or two, she is working in the best interest of the nominees in 2020. present trump has campaigned on doing away with nafta, this resets it. this new is better for the u.s., it is better for mexico and probably not as good for canada, but from mexico and of the u.s. it is better. it is better for this reason. the labor standards and requirements in this treaty are the

we are replacing the nafta disaster, and we have to get this crazy nancy pelosi to put this thing up for a vote. we have together. and the usmca is a giant victory for texas farmers, ranchers, manufacturers, workers, and oil. the democrats should pass it overwhelmingly. they will. nancy has deported up for vote. do-nothing democrats. they are do nothing. nowhere is the democratic betrayal of our nation more dramatic than on immigration. in recent debates -- did you see these debates? do you believe what i'm competing with? i don't know. when i had to compete with ted cruz, that was brutal. you know, he was the national debate champion. a story i've never told. i never did that before. i ran for office. all of a sudden, i'm supposed to be debating tomorrow night. i said who are these people? i don't know all of them. i know a lot of them. i contributed to a lot of them. the used to treat me very nice when i contributed to them. not so nice when i was their opponent. he changed a lot. but i said let me see. i want to see. who are these people? i'm going to debate. i never debated. my w

well can get a really positive domino effect if we pass the nafta replacement bill and start gettingn small concession out of china in that scenario, earnings will explode for the weakest part of the economy, the industrials on top of that, the administration can go higher which ends the nonsense about the inverted yield curve and we no longer need to worry so much about what the feds are going to do will larry be right? i don't know but it's a real possibility. and after this morning, you need to start factoring it in for you start doing a lot of selling right into this market so stay with cramer. oh, wow. you two are going to have such a great trip. yeah, have fun! thanks to you, we will. aw, stop. this is why voya helps reach today's goals... ...all while helping you to and through retirement. um, you guys are just going for a week, right? yeah! that's right. can you help with these? oh... um, we're more of the plan, invest and protect kind of help... sorry, little paws, so. but have fun! send a postcard! voya. helping you to and through retirement. fidelity now has zero commissio