to support the authority and to authorize city staff positions assigned to support the authority's operations. so with that summary unless there are any questions, i would like to turn it over to my colleague ton tonya who will address the report. (please stand by). my fear is that they're going to move to evict. and that's a fear that -- and it's a real fear. and i understand their frustration. the management companies. but they are more of like a machine. these management companies are bigger more of a machine where before the housing authority had much more of a one on one and people could call this person that person, to see who could help, but the management companies are coming in, a lot of them haven't dealt with things like this before. or if they have, they are dealing with them in a different way than we would normally deal with. let's get resources in there. i'm wondering is there funding and that capacity that we are working with the other departments to bring people into help these management companies deal with residents that are in a real need of that transition. and spending a

second, the business record authority. this allows the government to apply for the pfizer court in order to collect records, papers and other documents that are relevant to an authorized national security investigation. it allows the government to obtain many of the same types of records that it can obtain a grand jury subpoena and ordinary case. for exhibit, it can be used to obtain driver's license records, hotel records, car rental records, shipping records, and the like. in most cases, these are records the government obtains in ordinary criminal civil investigation without any court order. the pfizer business record because national security interest include the use of criminal authorities were because there's no criminal investigation underway and something that is purely an intelligence matter. this authority has been used several dozen times a year on average over the last few years. the business record provision is also the mechanism for the targeted collection of cdr's from u.s. telecommunications service provide

to support the authority and to authorize city staff positions assigned to support the authority's operations. so, with that summary, unless there are any questions, i would like to turn it over to my colleague, to tonya, who will address the report. (please stand by). my fear is that they're going t. and that's a fear that -- and i. and i understand their frustrat. the management companies. but they are more of like a mac. these management companies are e before the housing authority had people could call this person, d help, but the management companm haven't dealt with things like . or if they have, they are dealiy than we would normally deal wit. let's get resources in there. i'm wondering is there funding e working with the other departmep these management companies deall need of that transition. and spending all the money we dw coming back down because of beh. >> well, i think that it's a ime funding support and continue tor services and engagement and hou. i think what you are pointing oe that funding and infrastructure. so we have staff that are assigd ensure that resident services as

pool when authorizing new authorities in changing existing legal authorities under foreign relationscommittee jurisdiction since chairman, jesse helms. >> i grew up in north carolina and jesse is a throw guy. >> my former boss for a couple of years, chairman richard, incredible statement for whom am have incredible respect came very close. he passed an authorities bill. a more abbreviated but if you're not passing an authorization bill, i tell this to lindsey graham all the time, he is chairman of the appropriations subcommittee, that turned lindsey graham into authorizer in the appropriate her. he is a very powerful person. so my own belief and conviction if we cannot make this to consider an authorization bill for the senate foreign relations committee then let's start strapping it to the national defense authorization act and get it done and then maybe someday the super eight committee can become a full-fledged super eight committee. so just to help some of the audience with this. what would an authorization bill from the senate foreign relations committee do, what would it change

the assessment of the authorities is clearly expressed. but then they fail to follow through and issue an official directive. the last question is how does this benefit the firm in question. to name things are easier for the company because it hasn't clearly been stated that there are in fact 4 counts of illegal behavior not only one this looks more favorable before civil courts. or in simulation kids to go to. why don't the federal motor transport authority and the federal ministry for transport clarify the extent to which audi cheated on its emissions figures. there is no answer forthcoming to our concrete questions. how do you drivers like colorfully have to pay the price at the end of 2016 he bought an audi diesel 458000 euros but now he knows that for defeat devices have been built into his car to this interesting thing with. the best option for me would be if they'd take back the car minus the usual depreciation and that would be that. this. definite wants to know from his audi dealership what he can do now that it's not possible to

bill when authorizing new authorities and changing existing legal authorities under foreign relationsommittee jurisdiction since chairman -- any guess? >> jesse helms. >> he nailed it. walter is just -- >> i grew up in north carolina and jesse helms was a very thorough guy. >> my former boss for a couple of years, chairman richard lugar, an incredible statesman for whom i have incredible respect, came very close. he asked what we now call and authorities bill. see more abbreviated bill, but nonetheless if you're not passing an authorization bill, i tell this to lindsey graham all the time because he is chairman of the appropriations subcommittee. that turns lindsey graham into both the authorizer in the appropriator. he isn't -- he is a very powerful person, right? so my own police, my conviction is that if we can't make more time to consider an authorization bill for the senate foreign relations committee, then let's at least start bootstrapping it to the national defense authorization act. let's get it done, let's get it in the muscle memory and then maybe someday this super eight c

the right approach is to leave the authority available for our authorities to use. it has been significantly modified. the concerns raised up and addressed. there are questions about the whichof the question, takes place even with single and individual but they can be addressed through careful oversight. i will say it is embarrassing the justice department was unable to answer your question for a year. when i was at the justice department, we tried to avoid things like that. it is not acceptable. it is not acceptable you had members of the government come to -- coming before you and i given you examples of the quality of the program. we know the justice department has given us a dozen unclassified examples of the use of 215 prior to the change. some of them are credible. they demonstrate examples. none of them are the silver bullet but you will never get one in this climate. senator feinstein knows that from her time on the intelligence committee. it is about building blocks. i will say you will not find a silver bullet. but it is very dangerous and it would be a mi

the housing authority vouchers are another good source. unfortunately our housing authority isn't right there right now. it could be a couple years before any vouchers are available for them. >> how does the cue foundation obtain the money to provide the subsidiaries? does it come from the city? >> yes. >> and if you want a more comprehensive answer, maria can answer that for you but yes, it comes from the city. >> ok. >> i'm trying to wonder why the city doesn't do it directly or do more of it? >> maria benjamin. it does come from the city, there's a limited amount, it's really expensive rental subsidiaries. you know, because they're on going for as long as a person is living in the unit. and there are -- there's been work done to review and figure out other funding sources for more rental subsidiaries and i don't have anything real to tell you right now about it but we know that there's a need for more long-term rental subsidiaries. >> without the laboring, the point i thought that the tipping point and some other private sector actors t

the authorities sort. fight the acoustics function in july 28th noting that the functionality is being used as an un permitted defeat device. to see if so else as of it looks like they came up with the idea of using the software to solve the emissions problem. it all started with audi does. it by september this year there have been no recall of the euro ford vehicles. questions to audi regarding the acoustic function the company informed us that they could not comment during the current investigation. its 2008 shortly before the launch of the new diesel technology with at blue in the usa this is an audi manager advertises the cleanest diesel in the world and the american media. to prove it to takes a victory i mean obviously. very close to. the good. yet he must know that the cars are in no way clean because they conceal how much add blue needs to be consumed on the road. this is shown in a presentation code written by this manager saying current software functionality restricts the use of bad bluetooth wh

related to rule making authority, we do not as a general matter at the ftc have the authority to seek monetary relief for first instance violations. so we can get disgorgement sometimes or we can get redress for consumers, although that authority is also under attack in the courts right now. but in the case of privacy, that's very hard. it's very hard to measure what is an appropriate disgorgement amount, to measure consumer harm and tailor a number to that. it would be more effective to be able to have civil penalty authority for first instance violation. we have that as a general matter under capa because it's connected to a rule. the reason we could get a civil penalty in the facebook matter was because they were already under order for violating the ftc act. i don't think that's in the best interest of society for us to have to slap someone on the wrist once before we can create a financial deternlt penalty. the fact that we see case after case after case of privacy and data abuse violations tells me we do not have a broad enough detent effect right now with the authority that we

for more information you can visit the transportation authority website. i would like to thank staff who have visited treasure island at various times this year. to meet and do outreach to residents and stakeholders. they did a great presentation. as always, i encourage my colleagues to visit the island and get a feel for how it is being transformed. that is the end of my cherry part. is there any public comments on the report? seeing then. we please call the next item. >> item three, executive directors report. >> thank you. i just wanted to build upon earlier reference i made regarding caltrans and director visit to treasure island that was the transportation authority. i will read it again, it was an honor to be the new caltrans directors first stop in the. we met together with commissioner linda richardson as well as district 4 staff to provide an overview of all of the different sustainability features of the new development and all of the work that is happening on the island with transportation choices. we have been partnering successfully with caltr

h.r. 4863 re-authorizes the ex-im bank for 10 years and increases the bank's lending authority from $135 billion, to $175 billion. the bill strengthens support for small businesses which are the engine of growth in our economy, and it creates an office of minority and women inclusion, as well as an office of territorial exporting to support exporters in guam, puerto rico, the virgin islands, and other u.s. territories. . to creates an office for exports, energy strengthening the bank's environmental policies and encouraging d greater accountability with respect to local communities negatively e affected by bank supported projects. h.r. 4863 also to avoid a cedures lapse in the board's quorum so maintain its can full operational capacity. even when the senate is unable confirm board directors. the bill includes a number of that ex-im o ensure financing does not inadvertently support bad actors. example, the bill prohibits inancing for the chinese military, the chinese intelligence services, and any actors, including anyone who has criminal levi ated the foreign corrupt or -- criminal corr

are as dangerous as this author makes them seem.t back. look. only one thing's more exciting than getting a lexus... ahhhh! giving one. the lexus december to rembember sales event lease the 2020 nx 300 for $329 a month for 27 months. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. for $329 a month for 27 months. at outback, steak & oh no, it's gone.ck. phew, it's back with lobster mac & cheese. it's gone again. oh, it's back with shrimp now! steak & lobster starting at only $15.99. hurry in before these three are gone again. outback steakhouse. you have power over pain, so the whole world looks different. the unbeatable strength of advil. what pain? ♪ it takes a village to raise to build a bridge. to throw a baseball... to throw yourself into the unknown. to lose fear, to create hope. we believe that it takes a village of over 200-thousand dedicated, passionate, driven medical and non-medical professionals to deliver on our belief in total health for all. we are kaiser permanente. thrive. the amount of student loan debt i have, i'm embarra

are as dangerous as this author makes them seem. be right back. s this auth makes them seem. we'll be right back. performance comes in lots of flavors. there's the amped-up, over-tuned, feeding-frenzy-of sheet-metal-kind. and then there's performance that just leaves you feeling better as a result. that's the kind lincoln's about. ♪ i don't have to worry about that, do i? harmful bacteria lurk just below the gum line. crest gum detoxify, voted product of the year. it works below the gum line to neutralize harmful plaque bacteria and help reverse early gum damage. gum detoxify, from crest. well i didn't choose metastatic breast cancer. not the exact type. not this specific mutation. but i did pick hope... ...and also clarity... ...by knowing i have a treatment that goes right at it. discover piqray, the first and only treatment that specifically targets pik3ca mutations in hr+, her2- mbc, which are common and linked to cancer growth. piqray is taken with fulvestrant after progression on hormone therapy and has been proven to help peo

>> i think you might run into cheney's exception for an application of authority. there's a critical difference between that and this. here we are enforcing the law, you can understand why congress or the courts might say that you can review so it cannot enforce the law. congress in fact passes law to be enforced and you can understand why it might restrict the government's ability to not enforce the law. here we are enforcing the law, and it is very difficult to see why the congress would pass a law to say something was illegal and then try to hamstring the government's ability to enforce it. that's why we think we clearly fall within the cheney presumption that it is an exercise of enforcement discretion, and we don't fall within the cheney exception which would apply where congress itself restricts the discretion or there is a potential complete evocation of enforcement authority and cheney made clear and might also be -- >> just understand what you're saying, general, that would suggest that the original daca is reviewable but the rescission of daca is not? in

the author writes about the election coming up in 2020 and very clear that this author does not believe trump should be reelected to office and speaks about it that way. there is not necessarily a call to action for everyone serving in the government to suddenly resign or something of that nature. there is a discussion in the book about alleging that there was consideration of the 25th amendment, invoking the 25th amendment to remove the president from office but described in the book in vague detail without the support of evidence we would look for as journalists and been disputed by the way by the vice president. but rather, it's the author i think describing what he or she has experienced and felt in this administration and the alarm that he or she felt from the president's action but also from this person's colleagues, that the author writes several times there are many people in the government at a senior level at the white house who share these concerns and views about the president. >> peter baker, one of the things that the author points out is the degree to which over time sinc

act and in that statute congress included an authorization to use prior transfer of authority in addition to the transfer of authorities in that bill itself so congress could have if it sought to restrict the use of the transfer authority could have in the consolidated appropriations act committed that for any particular purpose or altogether read not only did it not do that expressly approved those uses . judge collins, going back to this question about what's denied and what's not, the gao has said that merely reducing amount is not a denial and i'm not aware of any other opinions that the gao may have issued about what constitutes a denial but one thing we know is that here is such attenuation. bill, different agency, different request that it's not within and gao is clear, it's notwithin the terms of the limitation . >> going back to zone of interest, on this record is there anyone you believe within the zone of interest that could challenge the board of law funding? >> it's possible. >> on this record. >> the record does include the details about the programs from within the funds we

that's argument the author makes. the other side is if you feel that strongly should you stand up. >> did you take it as the author comparing himself? >> no i did not take it that way. presumptuous tone, i don't think that's it, hugh sibley make an argument that sometimes say as opposed when you want to focus on the substance and the personalities attached and ominous works better. >> i think any points ours fo st on. i think the debate about the animpiece will affect this bookd the impact that it has and certainly if the author had decided to attach a name to, it would add greater meeting to what we are reading. at this point it's not clear if this person is still a senior trump of ministration official or former trump administration official. it is easy to some extent to say i am doing this or that to protect or affect policy without being able to attach b your name and allow fact checking and other journalist to do our own reporting and say is that true, did he or she actually say or do this, can we double check th

sweden in the us and will ecuador that you can't rely on any authority to protect your rights and this constant threats to be extradited to a country where you face a secret trial based on secret evidence you know judged by the jury elected in a population where 85 percent of the population works for cia n.s.a. d.o.d. or d.l.'s around alexandrian mr jinnah that the infamous espionage court judy created by the same judge as every single other national security defendant in recent years. this is not going to be a fair trial you know that so. if you're in this situation this constant threat to be extradited there and then to receive a draconian punishment of 175 years or maybe to reduce it to $120.00 in prison in the supermax prison and we know what the conditions are like there this is this crosses the line of cruel inhuman and degrading treatment that's not just my opinion that's a consistent opinion of myself my mandate my predecessors everybody that's actually seriously deals with that and that's the threat scenario he faced 4 years is not being taken seriously he's been ridiculed by

are differente authorities allowed, and just last year, we'd reauthorize that authority for collections against foreigners over seeks, called the section 702 program, and that does collect content, targetinghen you are people overseas, the when you're targeting a foreign power. guest: it does not have to have a connection to foreign power. under 702, any foreigner overseas, their conversation with americans can be intercepted without a word as long as the government's purpose is to pinpoint intelligence, which is broadly enough to include any information relevant to u.s. foreign affairs, but i would like to get back to the idea of the program we are talking about here under the because it is not -- is only phone numbers, the notion that metadata is somehow completely different from content and that it has no sensitivity to it, i think that it has been thoroughly to punk. -- debunked. sophisticated computer find out from the data who your associations are, and they can go so far as to figure out your political associations, your religion, some of that information. i will give you an exam

from british authorities to your reports there right now in effect has been psychologically tortured i visited to the us and more than 6 months ago it was a month of may 2019 about 4 weeks after his arrest and the 2 medical doctors and this is all been out there i mean it was clear concerns that he showed all the symptoms that are typical for psychological torture that the pressure on him needed to be alleviated quickly and both doctors said otherwise his state of health will spawn's for 5 months after him at that it and i made an urgent appeal for urgent measures to protect the innocent as health rights and dignity. on the same day i received a tweet then foreign secretary jeremy hunt accusing me of interfering with judicial authorities in the u.k. . and basically claiming you know that the right to interfere with justices but then he invited me to conduct that visit to report he is my counterpart so he had to expect a report now if it turned out negative and then also obviously claiming that i could have left the embassy at any time to which then i responded in a tweet which i woul

a little bit more background on the concept authorization. the transportation code provides basic requirements such as requiring an application, payment of fees and the ability to impose fines or terminate the authorization if needed. to complement these there would be a policy directive that would be issued by the director of transportation to describe the application requirements. the process for reviewing those applications and the requirement of public engagement plans. the criteria we would use to establish the terms or concept uppers station terms. -- authorization terms. we want to be as clear as possible and commuting what our expectations are so there is transparency throughout the process. we have been doing outreach with various groups. key stakeholders. we presented and discussed the proposal with the member of committees, such as the system advisory committees for the transportation authority and the sf mta. the city advisory body, that oversees accessibility, and bicycle groups. reaching out to other city departments and other g

authority.ecord that children from a local authority are placed outside of their local authority. will the minister look at an emergency action plan made up between the department for education and local authorities to address this matter, to assure that there are sufficient, appropriate, good quality, local placements for young people in care? in terms of staying close, i again agree with the noble lord. there are one or two situations when moving a child out of areas are important, for example, to get away from gangs or from county lines drug trafficking. but we are again trying to help in this area. we are initiating a move on accommodation offer in suitable and sustainable accommodation, located as close as possible to their former children's home and a package of practical and emotional support provided by a member of staff from the young person's previous children's home, providing some continuity in support during the transition to adulthood. the education minister, lord agnew. the govern

and 2017 and he was not only known to authorities he was already in jail for plotting that he's been affiliated with al qaeda spent 7 months in a london prison and was then released being monitored by authorities by an electronic tag a so authorities would know what his movements were but apparently could not prevent the attack yesterday so now investigators of course looking closely into why he was released after 7 months last december in 2018 he went free and on top of all of that shot i mean this is one of several terror attacks in recent years in the u.k. capital how long london is excuse me reacting. well londoners will be waking up to the news that the offender the attack was known to authorities and already in jail of course that will be quite a shock but yesterday there was quite a lot of panic on the streets. they're bringing back memories of course of that 2017 attack on the london bridge where many people died and dozens were injured those people that carried out the attack then with with the terror group islamic state so that brings back memories now the police presence a

the author clearly had to pull punches as jeff said in some cases. he or she discards the anecdotes in the meetings. the details would give away the identity of the person telling the story. >> host: you and i probably remember 1996. about six months when you and i were still anonymous was it a fun process because of the nature of your book? >> caller: it started out as fun. i was working at "newsweek" at the time. that's like this never so. random house, which published it, they were shocked because they kep kept coming over in onf printing up until the moment it was published and it exploded like a bomb. and i think that caused me to have some very lighthearted satiric post traumatic stress and impair my judgment over the next six months. i probably stayed anonymous too long. it did become a matter in our family we have young kids and my wife was adamant that i not come out because there was also going to be a circus on the front lawn and orchids walk to public schools within a block of the house and she thought it would endanger them so also it wa

existing legal authority.shut things down that are relevant or repurposed. certain functions of the federal government. the appropriations committee is charged with taking whatever budget amount that's been agreed upon due to budget process and allocating it to some of the things that had been authorized. the appropriations committee will remain a powerful committee but it's not good policy to mix the two. if we are going to mix the two let's just dispense with this notion that we ithave two distinct functions because you're not making much policy if you're not passing authorizing bills. you doing oversight which is very important. >> an authorization bill in your view for the senate foreign relations committee would say do we need to structure the state department. do we need to reconfigure our priorities so you actually give a legislative guidance to the department is that the idea? >> that's exactly the idea. unfortunately, symptomatic of not passing an authorization bill it's not uncommon for the fill comm

or if he said i am pretty sure we don't have the authority but carmine, generally. does your analysis change or is it only when he says as far as i'm concerned this is definite. it's illegal. to act we would argue your honor, there is a dive boat action that is presumptively reviewed mobile and the agency decides to basic decision on some discretionary choice but with an explanation or rationale was founded on litigation risk or legal doubt, that that would be rationale that - >> is an offering to see look i've got a decision from the circuit it tells me that this is illegal is benefit by the supreme court and ate a divided vote. this enough for me to see were not going to do it. it's. >> has brought enough to sustain the decision your honor in that on these circumstances given the nature of this program in the interest at stake, we don't say that amy genuine statement of legal doubt or litigation risk, would be adequate. but that's not what we have here. >> if you can't went through illegitimate balancing exercise, in other words, you talked about the law and what

you have the authority. presumably, you could operated on kind of a more arbitrary case-by-case standard or, what it seems like you are trending towards now, which is to develop certain categories that would strike everybody ask common sense medical compelling need versus people want to be here to age in place in the united states. is that you're thinking that you are tried to develop some directives for the people who make these decisions? >> a couple of points, mr. chairman. first of all, the authority you cite in the homeland security act is how you trace this back statutorily. it goes to the secretary. but the purpose of deferred action is it is inherently a prosecutorial discretion. thus my descriptions here today. and what you point to in the statute does not provide, other than case-by-case consideration, guidance or category -- >> can i pause you there and give a question to mr. albence? would you pursue deportation for people who had been granted deferred action for a medical purpose? do you know of

starting operations and to streamline the authorization process. we have many goals with this effort. we want to shift from a reactive to a proactive regulatory approach. we want to allow for innovation but through a clear path for the new mobility services. again very similar to the office of emerging technology. we want to standardize our processes and tools to administer and monitor, and enforce and we want to coordinate data reporting, and understanding the transportation network. again very clearly partnering with the office of emerging technology with this very important city family approach. why do we regulate? if you look at the pictures. i think the pictures say it all. you can see sea on the upper right that there is scooters all over the sidewalk cluttering the accessible path of travel. that is before regulation. after regulation we see a scooter locked to, you know, this facility, bike rack. thank you. we see that it is out of the way. it, there is an accessible path of travel because of this. that is our core regulatory values go to c

the authorization for the use of military force you a you m.f. and i have that paper with the authorization for the use of military force you a you m.f. and i have that paper with me here that i walked in me to the united states senate to do what he's doing tonight to the united states senate 2 days after $911.00 to vote on giving that authorization and i don't know if you can see on the camera here but it's to vote on giving that authorization and i don't know if you can see on the camera here but it says draft draft draft as a word crossed out this whereas whereas in this draft draft draft there's a word crossed out this whereas whereas and then resolve to give the president authorization to respond it says the president then resolve to give the president authorization to respond it says the president is authorized to use all the supreme court forces against those nations organizations or persons he's authorized to use all the supreme force and against those nations organizations or persons he determines planned authorized or committed on it go

authorization and they do authorize onsite cannabis consumption through article 8a permits under the health code, not the planning code. >> for these reasons, d.p.h. respectfully requests that the board uphold the denial of the appellant's onsite smoking permit. i want the board to know that d.p.h. staff are present and are available to answer any of your questions. thank you. >> i have a question. >> and i have a couple. >> it is clear that the condition that they use for the permit and clearly states no onsite cannabis smoking or vape. and if the permit holder wanted to extend the hours since that is the condition of use, who would they then apply to or go to? >> that would be a planning issue. >> would not be the office of cannabis, but a planning issue. >> yes. >> thank you. >> i am not going to argue your position. it is very confusing and misleading from the department of health point of view in my view that inspectors walk in, they walk in and they observe. they check the boxes. clearly there is a breach of law. clearly a breech of the conditional use. they have a nice day and

n a previous op-ed by the author gets at least this particular person into details about some anecdotes. in an anonymous book as opposed to with your name attached to it or keeping it to your self and that's an issue a lot of people are going to be looking at or keep quiet until you've left the administration. >> host: you are at the white house every day. what did you learn? >> guest:. over the last two and a half years. people were asked to boil down their talking points to one bullet point even as opposed to three or five. that is known at this point. it doesn't make the book less important but it's not i don't think landing with a major impact because a lot of what is in here is stuff that has become conventional wisdom. >> host: is there anything that you said that's not true? >> guest: i'm not in a position to say that about some of the things in here. we get a lot of access that we are certainly not in the room for everything for all of the comments that he make us. so i'm really not in the position to judge. the book is written within era of authority which is to say there's a l

we have had many long-term employees at the housing authority and they're there for 20 to 30 years. unfortunately, many of them may not have the -- at their -- they don't have the age to retire, so they would not be able to take advantage of the calpers retiree health that would be coming to them if they were able to continue employment. so we do want to express our appreciation and thank you so much for everything people have done to help support the housing authority people and the employees that transitioned to the city and county of san francisco. thank you. >> chair ronen: thank you so much. any other member of the public wish to speak? seeing none, public comment is closed. [gavel]. >> chair ronen: anyone like to make a motion? >> supervisor mar: sure. yeah, i would move we move this forward to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> chair ronen: great. without objection, that motion passes. [gavel]. >> chair ronen: thank you so much. mr. clerk, can you please read item number five. >> clerk: my apologies. just the motion was to recommend? >> chair ronen: yes. >> cle

activist, singer, entrepreneur, and author, lynn breedlove. come on up. [applause] >> supervisor mandelman: share some of your words right there. >> right here? awesome. this is awesome. this place is awesome is. i remember coming here when i was a bike messenger, but i didn't get to come in here, and most definitely didn't get to come up there. good afternoon. i'm going to read from a book of poems. this is called apocalypse and intimacy. you will make unpopular choices. your family will abandon you. you will desperate stab in the dark, miss your mark. you'll be tempted to give them what you want and see you have no choice. you will be accused of fucking over. you will be accused of selling out. what matters is not to drift apart or hide under beds where monsters lurk. standup in unicorn slippers and swinging trans flags. stick with who loves you, who inspires you in spite of what you choose. document things in chalk on broken benches before the rain washes them way. kung fu, wang chung, boxing gloves. not like when discounters sell ivanka's hit. offer y

with the critique of the trump presidency that we have heard with the previous op-ed by the same author anonymously but the depth of the concern of this person and some anecdotes so what are the things i thought was interesting was to learn the rationale to address this in a fashion other than with your name attached to it. but that is an issue that why not attach your name to it? >> you are down at the white house every day what have you learned quex. >> to dispel some things that we already knew and one was his reaction there wasn't any major disclosures that surprised me because for much of the reporting of president trumps style or to go into briefings for their talking points are put down to one bullet point that is known at this point. that doesn't make the book less important but that's not necessarily landing within a major impact because there is conventional wisdom. >> if you say no that's not true quex. >> i am not in a position but we get a lot of white house correspondence and certainly we are not in the room for everything. so i'm not in a position to judge. >> the book is