chris wilkins agreed, writing... the topics on the agenda for louise minchin's interview on wednesday's breakfast with the conservative party chairman, james cleverly. as was the way his party had edited interviews with shadow brexit secretary keir starmer in a version put out by them on social media. the full form interview showed the labour party position on brexit was chaotic, talking about... how do people trust you when conservative party headquarters is putting out, and you say it is humorous, but some people will not have, may not have known, at that point, that it had been edited. how do people trust the conservative party when their twitter account is putting out information like that? it is so obvious that it is edited. following that encounter, those watching were encouraged by the breakfast presenters to give their feedback and many did. david from southampton wrote... but that was a minority view of viewers who contacted newswatch. wendy was more typical. a viewer called roger agreed. later in the week t

the way that story was reported on the bbc annoyed maria, who thought: chris wilkins agreed, writing:was one of the topics on the agenda for the interview on wednesday's breakfast with the conservative party chairmanjames cleverley, as was the way his party had edited and interview with shadow brexit secretary keir starmer in aversion put out by them on social media. the full form interview showed the labour party's position on brexit was chaotic, they are talking about... how do people trust you when conservative party headquarters is putting out, and his aid it is humourous, but some people will not have, may not have known at that point that it had been edited. how did people trust the conservative party when the twitter account is putting out information like that. it is so obvious that it is edited. following that encounter, those watching were encouraged by the breakfast presenters to give their feedback, and they did. the breakfast presenters to give theirfeedback, and they did. david from southampton wrote: but that was a minority view of viewers who contacted newswatch. wendy

that is chris clarkson and rob wilkins. i am so appreciative of the work they have done. let's get to appomattox. in the years since 1865, as many of you well know, appomattox has been become shorthand for the swift close to the civil war, probably by grant's you term, not to be disturbed by u.s. forces unless the broke the law, but as major general george ah sharpe, assistant provost marshal, observed only one month after the surrender "a large number of flee's army were not the paroled at appomattox." let's talk about that. of the men evacuated after petersburg, only somewhere between 26000 and 28, 000, or to use 28,231 soldiers officially paoled at mr. fleitz: between the ninth and 12th paroled at appomattox between the ninth and 12th. a conservative estimate would suggest at least 20,000 of the's lee's men were not paroled at appomattox. i have compiled a list of 16,000 soldiers from a database, who were paroled somewhere behind appomattox. appomattox therefore creates a great irony. it was and continues to be seen as the end of lee's army, and therefore the war. disc

the way that story was reported on the bbc annoyed maria shortall, who thought: chris wilkins agreed, was chaotic, they are talking about... how do people trust you when conservative party headquarters is putting out — and you say it's humorous, but some people will not have — may not have known at that point that it had been edited. how do people trust the conservative party when their twitter account is putting out information like that. it is so obvious that it is edited. following that encounter, those watching were encouraged by the breakfast presenters to give their feedback, and many did. david from southampton wrote: but that was a minority view of viewers who contacted newswatch. wendy cockburn's was more typical. and a viewer called roger agreed. later in the week, the heat was turned on the labour party with the resignation of its deputy leader tom watson being widely reported. it was swiftly followed by former minister ian austin who resigned from the party in february, saying thatjeremy corbyn was, in his words, completely unfit to be prime minister. that line featured in