he has duchenne muscular dystrophy a progressive genetic disorder that requires constant care. despite his severe disability high believes he has a lot to offer the workplace. that i have a computer. because i cannot do anything by welfare. if people with disability now have a job of what they fear or be. being wheelchair bound and reliant on a respirator hasn't stopped from traveling the world and with no one willing to employ him he started his own business advising the people with disabilities how to study abroad. and. america you know that. when you look at that i'm all. wet or. if i want to do. something. yeah. i want to feel like walk like wall. you know that big thing. high feels as though japan holds him back he gets a care offensive in tain hours a day but the rest of his time must be spent in this welfare same time. and while the staff you do their best to care for people with a wide range of disabilities shoe height would rather be possible to go. and those who they are fed up with it doesn't make it. you know show me the way. i don't want to come here i guess i want

he has duchenne muscular dystrophy a progressive genetic disorder that requires constant care. despite the severe disability believes he has a lot to offer the workplace. i have. because i cannot. if people. know how. joe off. they fear. being wheelchair bound and reliant on a respirator hasn't stopped from travelling the world and with no one willing to employ him he started his own business advising other people with disabilities how to study abroad. and. i make up the word there want you to wall when you do a little bit of will. whenever i. actually. want to do from face. yeah even though. i want to do something much more like wall. that. feels as though japan holds him back he gets a carer a facilitator hours a day but the rest of his time must be spent in this welfare center. and while the stuff you do their best to care for people with a wide range of disabilities shoe high would rather be possible of the wider world . and those who they are fed up a bit differently if. you know show me the way. i don't want to come here i guess i want to or or. anything. if you could be

states are held either by asset managers or international banks or development financing is the duchennefinancing institutions. if you look at our balance sheet and think about it, in excess of 25% of that rand, is exposed to state owned institutions, the vast majority of which carry government their -- guarantees. vonnie: how likely do you think it is that south africa can avoid tariffs getting slapped on it? what with the impact be to your certainly a mike: downgrade is not good for anybody in south africa. if one looks at the banking system, we are very fortunate we have a strong banking system, it is well capitalized, and across most banks, 90% to 95% of the liquidity in the banking system in south africa is domestic. in the environment of debt downgrades, in an environment of exchange control, that money cannot go anywhere. yes, there might be some impact on pricing, but the larger impact would be on foreign lending, and that is limited in the south african sector. i think the safety and the soundness of the sector would not be compromised in any way, but growth and profit ability w

don't see -- they didn't all fail, and the fact that these amendments were added too the cause of duchenne and remained in the constitution until today, they are still there even though president trump has indicated he would like to get rid of at least the first sentence of the 14th amendment, is a sign that that impose your interracial democracy didn't totally fail. many other things. reconstruction is about many things other than constitutional issues, although most of those get discussed in constitutional terms at one point or another. many other things, establishment of black educational institutions, they survive. they didn't all fail. we still have black colleges veday which were found in reconstruction. the black church becomes a really major institution in reconstruction at the center of thoseer communities. as wb the boys said years ago, the very idea -- w.e.b. du bois, the very idea of an interracial democracy survive even though the limitation of it didn't to inspire subsequent struggles. that's why the civil rights era was sometimes called the second reconstruction, because the

but these contributed to the general public's distrust of psychiatric is to duchenne's and psychiatryt the time. , you there's another thing can tell us when it became put into use, but the lobotomy. what is a lobotomy? susannah: that is one of the darkest chapters of the history of medicine and psychiatry in particular. it was first created -- there was the first test on chimpanzees. it is basically a shutting off of the connections between the prefrontal lobe and the rest of the brain. it is supposed to produce higher functioning. it was intended to treat psychosis and a host -- this idea of one-size-fits-all insanity. it was used to treat homosexuality and psychosis and depression. it was just one of these disgusting sledgehammers we should be ashamed of. host: in 1991, the bbc did a documentary on mental health called "madness." they have interviews with two people who really popularized , maybe even invented this procedure. we have a clip to show people. let's watch that. [video clip] >> that is a picture of me. [laughter] and oswald freeman. [indiscernible] >> i had no misgiving

argument thats that causes duchenne guarantees youtubet to post on based on the company's vague notionty -- --rantees conservatives may be tempted to argument, but's they should reflect on the long-term costs of forsaking their constitutional principle. guest: it is such a series of non sequiturs. i read that when it came out. it is -- it should embarrass the author. is. not know who the author i do not want to embarrass him. we do not contend the constitution says private companies have to allow anything they want to be said. of course not. we are not suing "the new york times," because "the new york times" is a publication, so therefore it is governed by laws of libel and can publish anything it wants or doesn't want. but right now, google wants it both ways. they want to be protected from andl but be an open forum have no possibility of liability. they cannot have it both ways. the issue is not a constitutional issue. the issue is a free speech issue having nothing to do with the government. we know that. but you cannot be the conduit of 90% of the world's information and then pick