mr. cherry. are there any questions for oewd? seeing none, are there any public comment on items 8 or 9? seeing no public comment, do we have a motion -- supervisor safai? >> i just want to make sure, the streets will be accepted back and they'll be fully-accepted streets by the city? i understand the city will own those streets, but they'll be fully-accepted streets? >> yes. all of the streets that you saw in dark green, all of the streets will be fully-accepted, fully-owned streets. >> chair peskin: thank you, supervisor safai. so on item 8, i would like to insert the date being december 10. on item number -- there's a blank. so that's the -- -- >> apologize, chair. for the date, that would be the november 5 resolution. >> chair peskin: no, i think that's december 10. if we're talking about file 150969, this is the resolve that says notice is here by given on blank date, 2019 i believe was the november 5 date? okay. we will take that and fill that in and forward that to the full board with a positive recommendation. and then on

mr. cherry stands by his comments, and we are proud to have him on tonight. >> he's a big fan of yours, andexcited, because he's from boston. i had to say right off the start. >> tucker: amen, i'm glad he married an american pick i did come too, it is worth doing. tell us for those of us who aren't canadian, what you said -- unless i am misunderstanding it, you are basically saying we have a day where we honor the men who died fighting for canada, and people who moved to canada -- because it is a great country, and it is, i think, should acknowledge that and join in our tradition, because it is worth her remembeg these guys who dies. is that what you were saying? >> i thought i did a good thing, he had this book for diabetes, i did for two young lads who died in '15 and '17, that was never mentioned. i did a great thing, i thought, for 1500 troops at a hockey game in branson. they were all forgotten. the one thing that got me was "you people." i suppose, if i had to do it over again, i would have said "everybody." but "you people" are the people they listen to. the silent majority are alway

mr. jimmy and man, did he look pretty ill we decided that we would have a soda my favorite flavor, cherry song to mr. jimmy yeah, and he said one word to me, and that was dead i said to him you can't always get what you want you can't always get what you want you can't always get what you want but if you try sometimes you just might find you get what you need oh, yeah ♪ you get what you need, yeah, oh baby oh yeah i saw her today at the reception in her glass was a bleeding man she was practiced at the art of deception well, i could tell by her blood-stained hands you can't always get what you want ♪ housecer: all of the impeachment inquiry and the administration's response on c-span. unfiltered coverage on tv, our radio app, and online. watch primetime rears on c-span, or stream on c-span.org/ impeachment. >> the house will be in order. announcer: for 40 years, c-span has been providing america with unfiltered coverage of congress, the white house, the supreme court, and public policy events from washington dc and around the country so you can make up your own mind. created by cable in 1

mr. jimmy and man, did he look pretty ill we decided that we would have a soda my favorite flavor, cherry song to mr. jimmy yeah, and he said one word to me, and that was "dead" i said to him you can't always get what you want you can't always get what you want you can't always get what you want but if you try sometimes you just might find you get what you need you get what you need, yeah, oh baby whoo! ♪ vocalizing] >> ♪ you get what you need yeah, oh baby oh, yeah i saw her today at the reception in her glass was a bleeding man she was practiced at the art of deception well, i could tell by her blood-stained hands you can't always get what you want you can't ♪ campaign 2020. watch live coverage of the candidates on the campaign trail. c-span campaign 2020, you're on an interview of. your interview of politics. impeachmente house inquiry and the administration response on c-span, online. watch prime time on c-span prime time re-airs or anytime on c-span.org/impeachment. "newsmakers,"n senator patrick leahy, top democrat on the appropriations committee. and with us, we have andrew taylor

mrs. washington's grandson. he delivered these in this particular one was four hours long. and the sun was hot and the president was old and he went back to the white house famished and ate iced cherries. they lead to something and he developed phenomena and died very quickly. >> what did they do in the white house after his death? that's one of the things, one of the things your book is how much death has happened in the white house. and what they do with it. >> the 19th century, you know, death was very frequent with many family. it happened all the time. you know, you could go out and get your feet wet, i guess, get your feet wet and have them die in two days or a day. it happened all the time. people were very careful about that. he put in a receiving wall and later buried in kentucky. >> what kind of precedent was set up. what kind of thing almost happened around death in the white house? >> you mean the response? >> i mean, a lot of people have been embalmed. >>well, they all are. not all but in the old days they always were. just like people were embalmed at home. and a president harris who died in the white house was the first. and the officials surrounding him went to darius

mr. morrison, he said something damaging about the president. he, too, went to the lawyer and told his concerns. they're cherry picking the information that they believe helps them. they're want challenging the facts. we've now had five witnesses in public impeachment hearings and the republicans are not challenging the facts. the facts are being billed that everyone involved, whethe they're in ukraine or the state department or today inside the west wing of the white house thought this was outside the rails, thought it was illegal. the republicans aren't challenging that. what they're trying to do is hold the republicans in line about questions about judgment, about loyalty, about leaking. it's all a side show, but it's a side show to keep republicans from breaking. >> laura coates, your take on this time not the president but the white house itself attacking a witness -- that's my interpretation -- i should say criticizing, publicly airing critical testimony against one witness while that witness was testifying? >> what i really have a problem with is this idea in isolation not providing the full context of

for a little cherry on top, one william zelnick, taylor, the democrats' star witness, said it was better than the obama policy. >> dana: what do you want me to call delma talk about? >> mr. sondland called president trump and told him about his meetings be the member of my staff could hear president trump on the phone asking ambassadors sondland about the investigations. >> the president was speaking loud enough for your staff member to overhear this? >> he was. >> greg: this is third person remove now from the staff member who overheard it. >> dana: people only seized on it because taylor did not have this in his original deposition. a staffer of his said, i need to tell you about this because i didn't tell you beforehand so much like abbasid or sondland, he said i need to amend and make sure i have everything, i do not think it's fair to say that they are no name. they didn't want to do this. they weren't the whistle-blower. i think when ratliff asked them argue for impeachment click click we didn't want to be here in the first place. we were here as witnesses, they were asked are you against trump. says, i'm not a nonpartisan guy -- he said, no, sir, to the question